Changlong Sun
ABSTRACT
In the digital era, information retrieval, text/knowledge mining, and NLP techniques are playing increasingly vital roles in legal domain. While the open datasets and innovative deep learning methodologies provide critical potentials, in the legal-domain, efforts need to be made to transfer the theoretical/algorithmic models into the real applications to assist users, lawyers, judges and the legal professions to solve the real problems. The objective of this workshop is to aggregate studies/applications of text mining/retrieval and NLP automation in the context of classical/novel legal tasks, which address algorithmic, data and social challenges of legal intelligence. Keynote and invited presentations from industry and academic will be able to fill the gap between ambition and execution in the legal domain.
- Stefanie Brüninghaus and Kevin D Ashley. 2001. Improving the representation of legal case texts with information extraction methods. (2001), 42--51.Google Scholar
- Ilias Chalkidis, Ion Androutsopoulos, and Nikolaos Aletras. 2019. Neural Legal Judgment Prediction in English. (July 2019), 4317--4323.Google Scholar
- Emmanuel Chieze, Atefeh Farzindar, and Guy Lapalme. 2010. An automatic system for summarization and information extraction of legal information. In Semantic processing of legal texts. Springer, 216--234.Google Scholar
- Xinyu Duan, Yating Zhang, Lin Yuan, Xin Zhou, Xiaozhong Liu, Tianyi Wang, Ruocheng Wang, Qiong Zhang, Changlong Sun, and Fei Wu. 2019. Legal Summarization for Multi-role Debate Dialogue via Controversy Focus Mining and Multi-task Learning. (2019), 1361--1370.Google Scholar
- Xin Jiang, Hai Ye, Zhunchen Luo, WenHan Chao, and Wenjia Ma. 2018. Interpretable rationale augmented charge prediction system. (2018), 146--151.Google Scholar
- Bingfeng Luo, Yansong Feng, Jianbo Xu, Xiang Zhang, and Dongyan Zhao. 2017. Learning to Predict Charges for Criminal Cases with Legal Basis. (2017), 2727--2736.Google Scholar
- S Santhana Megala, A Kavitha, and A Marimuthu. 2014. Feature Extraction Based Legal Document Summarization. International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies, Vol. 2, 12 (2014), 346--352.Google Scholar
- Michael Mills. 2016. Artificial Intelligence in Law: The State of Play 2016. Thomson Reuters Legal executive Institute (2016).Google Scholar
- Marie-Francine Moens, Caroline Uyttendaele, and Jos Dumortier. 1999. Information extraction from legal texts: the potential of discourse analysis. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 51, 6 (1999), 1155--1171.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Douglas W Oard, Jason R Baron, Bruce Hedin, David D Lewis, and Stephen Tomlinson. 2010. Evaluation of information retrieval for E-discovery. Artificial Intelligence and Law, Vol. 18, 4 (2010), 347--386.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Douglas W Oard, William Webber, et al. 2013. Information retrieval for e-discovery. Foundations and Trends® in Information Retrieval, Vol. 7, 2--3 (2013), 99--237.Google ScholarCross Ref
- OECD. 2013. What makes civil justice effective? OECD Economics Department Policy Notes 18 (2013).Google Scholar
- Seth Polsley, Pooja Jhunjhunwala, and Ruihong Huang. 2016. CaseSummarizer: A System for Automated Summarization of Legal Texts. (2016), 258--262.Google Scholar
- Richard Susskind. 2000. Transforming the law: Essays on technology, justice and the legal marketplace .Oxford University Press, Inc.Google Scholar
- Richard E Susskind and Richard E Susskind. 1996. The future of law: facing the challenges of information technology. Number s 279. Clarendon Press Oxford.Google Scholar
- Chaojun Xiao, Haoxi Zhong, Zhipeng Guo, Cunchao Tu, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun, Yansong Feng, Xianpei Han, Zhen Hu, Heng Wang, et al. 2018. Cail2018: A large-scale legal dataset for judgment prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.02478 (2018).Google Scholar
- Zhou Xin, Zhang Yating, Liu Xiaozhong, Sun Changlong, and Si Luo. 2019. Legal Intelligence for E-commerce: Multi-task Learning by Leveraging Multiview Dispute Representation. (2019).Google Scholar
- Hai Ye, Xin Jiang, Zhunchen Luo, and Wenhan Chao. 2018. Interpretable Charge Predictions for Criminal Cases: Learning to Generate Court Views from Fact Descriptions. (2018), 1854--1864.Google Scholar
- Haoxi Zhong, Guo Zhipeng, Cunchao Tu, Chaojun Xiao, Zhiyuan Liu, and Maosong Sun. 2018. Legal Judgment Prediction via Topological Learning. (2018), 3540--3549.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Legal Intelligence: Algorithmic, Data, and Social Challenges
Recommendations
Legal Intelligence for E-commerce: Multi-task Learning by Leveraging Multiview Dispute Representation
SIGIR'19: Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information RetrievalVarious e-commerce platforms produce millions of transactions per day with many transaction disputes. This generates the demand for effective and efficient dispute resolutions for e-commerce transactions. This paper proposes a novel research task of ...
Legal Information Retrieval meets Artificial Intelligence (LIRAI)
HT '23: Proceedings of the 34th ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social MediaThe Legal Information Retrieval meets Artificial Intelligence (LIRAI) workshop series aims to provide a venue hosting discussion of novel ideas, evaluations, and success stories concerning the application of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Information ...
The Legal Roots of Social Intelligence and the Challenges of the Information Revolution
Revised Selected Papers of the AICOL 2013 International Workshops on AI Approaches to the Complexity of Legal Systems - Volume 8929The paper traces current research on social intelligence back to the everlasting debate on the sources of law and the formalization of social, as opposed to individual, intelligence as the binding force of social customs. After the crisis of the ...
Comments