skip to main content
research-article

Fine-Grained Air Pollution Inference with Mobile Sensing Systems: A Weather-Related Deep Autoencoder Model

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 June 2020Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Air pollution is a global health threat. Except static official air quality stations, mobile sensing systems are deployed for urban air pollution monitoring to achieve larger sensing coverage and greater sampling granularity. However, the data sparsity and irregularity also bring great challenges for pollution map recovery. To address these problems, we propose a deep autoencoder framework based inference algorithm. Under the framework, a partially observed pollution map formed by the irregular samples are input into the model, then an encoder and a decoder work together to recover the entire pollution map. Inside the decoder, we adopt a convolutional long short-term memory (ConvLSTM) model by revealing its physical interpretation with an atmospheric dispersion model, and further present a weather-related ConvLSTM to enable quasi real-time applications.

To evaluate our algorithm, a half-year data collection was deployed with a real-world system on a coastal area including the Sino-Singapore Tianjin Eco-city in north China. With the resolution of 500 m x 500 m x 1 h, our offline method is proved to have high robustness against low sampling coverage and accidental sensor errors, obtaining 14.9% performance improvement over existing methods. Our quasi real-time model better captures the spatiotemporal dependencies in the pollution map with unevenly distributed samples than other real-time approaches, obtaining 4.2% error reduction.

References

  1. Karl Aberer, Saket Sathe, Dipanjan Chakraborty, Alcherio Martinoli, Guillermo Barrenetxea, Boi Faltings, and Lothar Thiele. 2010. OpenSense: open community driven sensing of environment. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on GeoStreaming. ACM, 39--42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. S Pal Arya et al. 1999. Air pollution meteorology and dispersion. Vol. 310. Oxford University Press New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Daewon Byun and Kenneth L Schere. 2006. Review of the governing equations, computational algorithms, and other components of the Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system. Applied mechanics reviews 59, 2 (2006), 51--77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Yun Cheng, Xiucheng Li, Zhijun Li, Shouxu Jiang, Yilong Li, Ji Jia, and Xiaofan Jiang. 2014. AirCloud: a cloud-based air-quality monitoring system for everyone. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems. ACM, 251--265.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Chelsea Finn, Ian Goodfellow, and Sergey Levine. 2016. Unsupervised learning for physical interaction through video prediction. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 64--72.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Georg A Grell, Steven E Peckham, Rainer Schmitz, Stuart A McKeen, Gregory Frost, William C Skamarock, and Brian Eder. 2005. Fully coupled "online" chemistry within the WRF model. Atmospheric Environment 39, 37 (2005), 6957--6975.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Hongjie Guo, Guojun Dai, Jin Fan, Yifan Wu, Fangyao Shen, and Yidan Hu. 2016. A Mobile Sensing System for Urban Monitoring with Adaptive Resolution. Journal of Sensors 2016 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Gerard Hoek, Rob Beelen, Kees De Hoogh, Danielle Vienneau, John Gulliver, Paul Fischer, and David Briggs. 2008. A review of land-use regression models to assess spatial variation of outdoor air pollution. Atmospheric environment 42, 33 (2008), 7561--7578.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Nicholas S Holmes and Lidia Morawska. 2006. A review of dispersion modelling and its application to the dispersion of particles: an overview of different dispersion models available. Atmospheric environment 40, 30 (2006), 5902--5928.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Yidan Hu, Guojun Dai, Jin Fan, Yifan Wu, and Hua Zhang. 2016. BlueAer: A fine-grained urban PM2. 5 3D monitoring system using mobile sensing. In INFOCOM 2016-The 35th Annual IEEE International Conference on Computer Communications, IEEE. IEEE, 1--9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Yidan Hu, Jin Fan, Hua Zhang, Xinxin Chen, and Guojun Dai. 2016. An estimated method of urban PM2. 5 concentration distribution for a mobile sensing system. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 25 (2016), 88--103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Michael Jerrett, Richard T Burnett, Bernardo S Beckerman, Michelle C Turner, Daniel Krewski, George Thurston, Randall V Martin, Aaron van Donkelaar, Edward Hughes, Yuanli Shi, et al. 2013. Spatial analysis of air pollution and mortality in California. American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine 188, 5 (2013), 593--599.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Mikhail Kanevski. 2013. Advanced mapping of environmental data. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Prashant Kumar, Lidia Morawska, Claudio Martani, George Biskos, Marina Neophytou, Silvana Di Sabatino, Margaret Bell, Leslie Norford, and Rex Britter. 2015. The rise of low-cost sensing for managing air pollution in cities. Environment international 75 (2015), 199--205.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Jason Jingshi Li, Boi Fallings, Olga Saukh, David Hasenfratz, and Jan Beutel. 2012. Sensing the air we breathe---the OpenSense Zurich dataset. In Twenty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ning Liu, Yue Wang, Jiayi Huang, Rui Ma, and Lin Zhang. 2019. Enhanced air quality inference with mobile sensing attention mechanism. In Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. 418--419.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kin Gwn Lore, Adedotun Akintayo, and Soumik Sarkar. 2017. LLNet: A deep autoencoder approach to natural low-light image enhancement. Pattern Recognition 61 (2017), 650--662.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Xugang Lu, Yu Tsao, Shigeki Matsuda, and Chiori Hori. 2013. Speech enhancement based on deep denoising autoencoder. In Interspeech. 436--440.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Rui Ma, Ning Liu, Xiangxiang Xu, Yue Wang, Hae Young Noh, Pei Zhang, and Lin Zhang. 2019. A deep autoencoder model for pollution map recovery with mobile sensing networks. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. ACM, 577--583.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Rui Ma, Xiangxiang Xu, Yue Wang, Hae Young Noh, Pei Zhang, and Lin Zhang. 2018. Guiding the Data Learning Process with Physical Model in Air Pollution Inference. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data). IEEE, 4475--4483.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Pablo E Saide, Gregory R Carmichael, Scott N Spak, Laura Gallardo, Axel E Osses, Marcelo A Mena-Carrasco, and Mariusz Pagowski. 2011. Forecasting urban PM10 and PM2. 5 pollution episodes in very stable nocturnal conditions and complex terrain using WRF-Chem CO tracer model. Atmospheric Environment 45, 16 (2011), 2769--2780.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Michael Sherman. 2011. Spatial statistics and spatio-temporal data: covariance functions and directional properties. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. John M Stockie. 2011. The mathematics of atmospheric dispersion modeling. Siam Review 53, 2 (2011), 349--372.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Pascal Vincent, Hugo Larochelle, Isabelle Lajoie, Yoshua Bengio, and Pierre-Antoine Manzagol. 2010. Stacked denoising autoencoders: Learning useful representations in a deep network with a local denoising criterion. Journal of machine learning research 11, Dec (2010), 3371--3408.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Z Wang, T Maeda, M Hayashi, L-F Hsiao, and K-Y Liu. 2001. A nested air quality prediction modeling system for urban and regional scales: Application for high-ozone episode in Taiwan. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 130, 1-4 (2001), 391--396.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. WHO. 2018. Ambient (outdoor) air quality and health. http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ambient-(outdoor)-air-quality-and-health. Accessed: 2018-07-26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Min Wu, Jiayi Huang, Ning Liu, Rui Ma, Yue Wang, and Lin Zhang. 2018. A Hybrid Air Pollution Reconstruction by Adaptive Interpolation Method. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. ACM, 408--409.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. SHI Xingjian, Zhourong Chen, Hao Wang, Dit-Yan Yeung, Wai-Kin Wong, and Wang-chun Woo. 2015. Convolutional LSTM network: A machine learning approach for precipitation nowcasting. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 802--810.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Xiangxiang Xu, Xinlei Chen, Xinyu Liu, Hae Young Noh, Pei Zhang, and Lin Zhang. 2016. Gotcha II: Deployment of a Vehicle-based Environmental Sensing System. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems CD-ROM. ACM, 376--377.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Xiangxiang Xu, Pei Zhang, and Lin Zhang. 2014. Gotcha: a mobile urban sensing system. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM Conference on Embedded Network Sensor Systems. ACM, 316--317.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Paolo Zannetti. 2013. Air pollution modeling: theories, computational methods and available software. Springer Science & Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Hongliang Zhang, Gang Chen, Jianlin Hu, Shu-Hua Chen, Christine Wiedinmyer, Michael Kleeman, and Qi Ying. 2014. Evaluation of a seven-year air quality simulation using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF)/Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) models in the eastern United States. Science of the Total Environment 473 (2014), 275--285.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Yu Zhang, William Chan, and Navdeep Jaitly. 2017. Very deep convolutional networks for end-to-end speech recognition. In 2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 4845--4849.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Yu Zheng, Furui Liu, and Hsun-Ping Hsieh. 2013. U-Air: When urban air quality inference meets big data. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 1436--1444.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Yu Zheng, Xiuwen Yi, Ming Li, Ruiyuan Li, Zhangqing Shan, Eric Chang, and Tianrui Li. 2015. Forecasting fine-grained air quality based on big data. In Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 2267--2276.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Zahari Zlatev and Ivan Dimov. 2006. Computational and numerical challenges in environmental modelling. Vol. 13. Elsevier.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Fine-Grained Air Pollution Inference with Mobile Sensing Systems: A Weather-Related Deep Autoencoder Model

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies
          Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies  Volume 4, Issue 2
          June 2020
          771 pages
          EISSN:2474-9567
          DOI:10.1145/3406789
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2020 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 15 June 2020
          Published in imwut Volume 4, Issue 2

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader