Abstract
Tracing the triumphs and challenges of two decades of Semantic Web research and applications.
- Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., and Lassila, O. The Semantic Web. Scientific American 284, 5 (May 2001), 34--43.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bernstein, A., Hendler, J., and Noy, N. A new look at the Semantic Web. Commun. ACM 59, 9 (Sept. 2016), 35--37.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bizer, C., Heath, T., and Berners-Lee, T. Linked Data---The story so far. Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst., 3 (2009), 1--22.Google Scholar
- d'Amato, C. 2020. Machine learning for the Semantic Web: Lessons learnt and next research directions. Semantic Web 11, 1 (2020), 195--203.Google Scholar
- Gruber, T. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 5, 2 (1993), 199--220.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Guha, R., Brickley, D., and Macbeth, S. 2016. Schema.org: evolution of structured data on the web. Commun. ACM 59, 2 (2016), 44--51. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Haller, A., Janowicz, K., Cox, S., Phuoc, D., Taylor, K., and Lefrancois, M (Eds.). 2017. Semantic Sensor Network Ontology. W3C Recommendation 19 October 2017. Available from http://www.w3.org/TR/vocabssn/.Google Scholar
- Halpin, H., Hayes, P., and Thompson, H. When owl: Same as isn't the same redux: A preliminary theory of identity and inference on the Semantic Web. In Proceedings of Workshop on Discovering Meaning on the Go in Large Heterogeneous Data. (Barcelona, Spain, July 16, 2011), 25--30.Google Scholar
- Hammar, K. et al. Collected research questions concerning ontology design patterns. Ontology Engineering with Ontology Design Patterns---Foundations and Applications. P. Hitzler, A. Gangemi, K. Janowicz, A. Krisnadhi, and V. Presutti (Eds.). Studies on the Semantic Web 25. IOS Press, 2016, 189--198.Google Scholar
- Hitzler, P., Bianchi, F., Ebrahimi, M., and Sarker, M. Neural-symbolic integration and the Semantic Web. Semantic Web 11, 1 (2020), 3--11.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hitzler, P., Krötzsch, M., Parsia, B., Patel-Schneider, P., and Rudolph, S. (Eds.). OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Primer (2nd Ed.). W3C Recommendation 11 (Dec. 2012); http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-primer/.Google Scholar
- Hitzler, P., Krötzsch, M., and Rudolph, S. Foundations of Semantic Web Technologies. Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2010.Google Scholar
- Höffner, K., Walter, S., Marx, E., Usbeck, R., Lehmann, J., and Ngomo, A. Survey on challenges of question answering in the Semantic Web. Semantic Web 8, 6 (2017), 895--920.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Horridge, M. and Bechhofer, S. The OWL API: A Java API for OWL ontologies. Semantic Web 2, 1 (2011), 11--21.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hyvönen, E. Using the Semantic Web in digital humanities: Shift from data publishing to data-analysis and serendipidous knowledge discovery. Semantic Web 11, 1 (2020), 187--193.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jain, P., Hitzler, P., Yeh, P., Verma, K., and Sheth, A. Linked Data Is Merely More Data. Papers from the 2010 AAAI Spring Symposium, Technical Report SS-10-07. Linked Data Meets Artificial Intelligence. (Stanford, CA, USA, Mar. 22-24, 2010). AAAI.Google Scholar
- Janowicz, K., van Harmelen, F., Hendler, J., and Hitzler, P. Why the data train needs semantic rails. AI Magazine 36, 1 (2015), 5--14.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kazakov, Y., Krötzsch, M., and Simancik, F. The incredible ELK---From polynomial procedures to efficient reasoning with EL ontologies. J. Autom. Reasoning 53, 1 (2014), 1--61.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Krisnadhi, A., Maier, F., and Hitzler, P. OWL and rules. In Proceedings of the 7th Intern. Summer School: Reasoning Web Semantic Technologies for the Web of Data. (Galway, Ireland, Aug. 23-27, 2011). A. Polleres, C. d'Amato, M. Arenas, S. Handschuh, P. Kroner, S. Ossowski, and P.F. Patel-Schneider (Eds.). LNCS 6848. Springer, 382--415.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lebo, T., Sahoo, S., and McGuinness, D. (Eds.). PROV-O: The PROV Ontology. W3C Recommendation (Apr. 30, 2013); http://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/.Google Scholar
- Lecue, F. On the role of knowlege graphs in explainable AI. Semantic Web 11, 1 (2020), 41--51.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lehmann, J. et al. DBpedia---A large-scale, multilingual knowledge base extracted from Wikipedia. Semantic Web 6, 2 (2015), 167--195.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Martinez-Rodriguez, J., Hogan, A., and Lopez-Arevalo, I. Information extraction meets the Semantic Web: A Survey. Semantic Web 11, 2 (2020), 255--335.Google Scholar
- Miles, A. and Bechhofer, S. (Eds.). SKOS Simple Knowledge Organization System. W3C Recommendation (Aug. 18, 2009); http://www.w3.org/TR/skos-reference/.Google Scholar
- Morgenstern, L., Welty, C., Boley, H., and Hallmark, G. (Eds.). RIF Primer (2nd Ed.). W3C Working Group Note 5 (Feb. 2013); http://www.w3.org/TR/rif-primer/.Google Scholar
- Musen, M. The Protégé project: a look back and a look forward. AI Matters 1, 4 (2015), 4--12.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Noy, N., Gao, Y., Jain, A., Narayanan, A., Patterson, A., and Taylor, J. Industry-scale knowledge graphs: lessons and challenges. Commun. ACM 62, 8 (Aug. 2019), 36--43.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Patel-Schneider, P. and Horrocks, I. Position paper: A comparison of two modelling paradigms in the Semantic Web. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM Intern. Conf. World Wide Web, (Edinburgh, Scotland, May 23-26, 2006). L. Carr, D. De Roure, A. Iyengar, C.A. Goble, and M. Dahlin (Eds.), 3--12.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rietveld, L., Beek, W., and Schlobach, S. LOD lab: Experiments at LOD scale. In Proceedings of the 14th Intern. Semantic Web Conf. (Bethlehem, PA, USA, Oct. 11-15, 2015), M. Arenas et al. (Eds). LNCS 9367. Springer, 339--355.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sabou, M., Biffl, S., Einfalt, A., Krammer, L., Kastner W., and Ekaputra, F. Semantics for cyber-physical systems: A cross-domain perspective. Semantic Web 11, 1 (2020), 115--124.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sandhaus, E. Abstract: Semantic technology at the New York Times: Lessons learned and future directions. In Proceedings of the 9th Intern. Semantic Web Conf. (Shanghai, China, Nov. 7-11, 2010). P.F. Patel-Schneider et al. (Eds.), LNCS 6497. Springer, 355.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Schreiber, G and Raimond, Y (Eds.). RDF 1.1 Primer. W3C Working Group Note (June 24, 2014); http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf11-primer/.Google Scholar
- Schulz, S., Suntisrivaraporn, B., Baader, F., and Boeker, M. SNOMED reaching its adolescence: Ontologists' and logicians' health check. I. J. Medical Informatics 78, Supp. 1 (2009), S86--S94.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sporny, M., Longley, D., Kellogg, G., Lanthaler, M., and Lindström, N. JSON-LD 1.0. A JSON-based Serialization for Linked Data. W3C Recommendation (Jan. 16, 2014); http://www.w3.org/TR/jsonld/.Google Scholar
- The Gene Ontology Consortium. The Gene Ontology Project in 2008. Nucleic Acids Research 36 (Database issue) (2008), D440--D444.Google Scholar
- The W3C SPARQL Working Group (Ed.). SPARQL 1.1 Overview. W3C Recommendation (Mar. 21, 2013); http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-overview.Google Scholar
- Thieblin, E., Haemmerle, O., Hernandez, N., and Santos, C. Survey on complex ontology matching. Semantic Web (2020), 689--727.Google Scholar
- Tudorache, T., Nyulas, C., Noy, N., and Musen, M. Using Semantic Web in ICD-11: Three years down the road. In Proceedings of the 12th Intern. Semantic Web Conf., (Sydney, NSW, Australia, Oct. 21-25, 2013). H. Alani et al. (Eds). LNCS 8219. Springer, 195--211.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vrandecic, D. and Krötzsch, M. Wikidata: A free collaborative knowledgebase. Commun. ACM 57, 10 (Oct. 2014), 78--85.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Weaver, J. and Tarjan, P. Facebook linked data via the graph API. Semantic Web 4, 3 (2013), 245--250.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
A review of the semantic web field
Recommendations
Semantic Web Mining
Semantic Web Mining aims at combining the two fast-developing research areas Semantic Web and Web Mining. This survey analyzes the convergence of trends from both areas: More and more researchers are working on improving the results of Web Mining by ...
Semantic Web and Semantic Web Services: Father and Son or Indivisible Twins?
The Semantic Web is, without a doubt, gaining momentum in both industry and academia. Unfortunately, Semantic Web services -- annotating computational functionality rather than data -- are underrepresented. Most Semantic Web researchers dedicate their ...
Semantic web reasoners and languages
Semantic web reasoners and languages enable the semantic web to function. Some of the latest reasoning models developed in the last few years are: DLP, FaCT, RACER, Pellet, MSPASS, CEL, Cerebra Engine, QuOnto, KAON2, HermiT and others. Some software ...
Comments