skip to main content
10.1145/3405962.3405984acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageswimsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Splitting the Web Analytics Atom: From Page Metrics and KPIs to Sub-Page Metrics and KPIs

Authors Info & Claims
Published:24 August 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Web analytics Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are important metrics used to evaluate websites and web pages against objectives. The power of KPIs is in their simplicity. Every web page can be assessed by numeric KPI values, which can be easily calculated, compared, and tracked over time. KPIs highlight the strengths and weaknesses of individual web pages and significantly help in maintaining, improving, and optimizing websites. Current web analytics metrics and KPIs, in academic studies as well as in commercial tools, relate to entire websites and web pages. This paper advocates extending KPIs use to sub-page elements, such as paragraphs, as an effective way to refine knowledge and leverage web analytics capabilities. We discuss the potential and challenges of sub-page web analytics and define a framework for calculating sub-page metrics from accumulated in-page user activity data, such as mouse and keyboard events. Then we propose potential KPIs that may be effective in highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of individual page parts, such as paragraphs. We use web usage data from a sample website to demonstrate these ideas. This study is the first step towards sub-page web analytics metrics and KPIs. Further work is required in order to gain more knowledge about potential KPIs that are introduced in this work, as well as to explore new methods, metrics, and KPIs.

References

  1. Feras Alhlou, Shiraz Asif, and Eric Fettman. 2016. Google Analytics Breakthrough: From Zero to Business Impact. John Wiley & Sons, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Ralf Biedert, Jörn Hees, Andreas Dengel, and Georg Buscher. 2012. A Robust Realtime Reading-Skimming Classifier. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Eye Tracking Research and Applications (ETRA '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 123--130. https://doi.org/10.1145/2168556.2168575Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Dave Chaffey and Mark Patron. 2012. From web analytics to digital marketing optimization: Increasing the commercial value of digital analytics. Journal of Direct, Data and Digital Marketing Practice 14 (07 2012), 30--45. https://doi.org/10.1057/dddmp.2012.20Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Mark Claypool, Phong Le, Makoto Wased, and David Brown. 2001. Implicit Interest Indicators. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '01). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 33--40. https://doi.org/10.1145/359784.359836Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Matthew Conlen, Alex Kale, and Jeffrey Heer. 2019. Capture & Analysis of Active Reading Behaviors for Interactive Articles on the Web. Computer Graphics Forum 38, 3 (2019), 687--698. https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.13720arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/cgf.13720Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Datanyze. 2020. Web Analytics Market Share Report. Datanyze. https://www.datanyze.com/market-share/web-analytics--1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Brent Dykes. 2014. Web Analytics Kick Start Guide: A Primer on the Fundamentals of Digital Analytics. Peachpit, Pearson Education, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. first20hours. 2020. 20k.txt, most common English words in order of frequency, as determined by n-gram frequency analysis of the Google's Trillion Word Corpus. GitHub. https://github.com/first20hours/google-10000- englishGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Max Grusky, Jeiran Jahani, Josh Schwartz, Dan Valente, Yoav Artzi, and Mor Naaman. 2017. Modeling Sub-Document Attention Using Viewport Time. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 6475--6480. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025916Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Qi Guo and Eugene Agichtein. 2008. Exploring Mouse Movements for Inferring Query Intent. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR '08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 707--708. https://doi.org/10.1145/1390334.1390462Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Qi Guo and Eugene Agichtein. 2012. Beyond Dwell Time: Estimating Document Relevance from Cursor Movements and Other Post-Click Searcher Behavior. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 569--578. https://doi.org/10.1145/2187836.2187914Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Layla Hasan, Anne Morris, and Steve Probets. 2009. Using Google Analytics to Evaluate the Usability of E-Commerce Sites. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Human Centered Design. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 697--706. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-02806-9_81Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. David Hauger, Alexandros Paramythis, and Stephan Weibelzahl. 2011. Using Browser Interaction Data to Determine Page Reading Behavior. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on User Modeling, Adaption, and Personalization (UMAP'11). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 147--158.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Jeff Huang, Ryen White, and Georg Buscher. 2012. User See, User Point: Gaze and Cursor Alignment in Web Search. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1341--1350. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208591Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Shamsi Iqbal and Brian Bailey. 2004. Using Eye Gaze Patterns to Identify User Tasks. The Grace Hopper Celebration of Women in Computing 04 (01 2004), 6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Edson C. Tandoc Jr. 2015. Why Web Analytics Click. Journalism Studies 16, 6 (2015), 782--799. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2014.946309arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2014.946309Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Joel Järvinen and Heikki Karjaluoto. 2015. The use of Web analytics for digital marketing performance measurement. Industrial Marketing Management 50 (2015), 117 - 127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.04.009Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Avinash Kaushik. 2007. Web Analytics: An Hour a Day. SYBEX Inc., USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Avinash Kaushik. 2010. Web Analytics 2.0. SYBEX Inc., USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Ilan Kirsh. 2020. Directions and Speeds of Mouse Movements on a Website and Reading Patterns: A Web Usage Mining Case Study. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics (WIMS 2020), Biarritz, France. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3405962.3405982Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Ilan Kirsh and Mike Joy. 2020. A Different Web Analytics Perspective Through Copy to Clipboard Heatmaps. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Web Engineering (ICWE 2020), Helsinki, Finland. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 543--546. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50578-3_41Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Ilan Kirsh and Mike Joy. 2020. Horizontal Mouse Movements (HMMs) on Web Pages as Indicators of User Interest. In Proceedings of the 22st HCI International Conference (HCII 2020), Copenhagen, Denmark (forthcoming). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Dmitry Lagun and Mounia Lalmas. 2016. Understanding User Attention and Engagement in Online News Reading. In Proceedings of the Ninth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 113--122. https://doi.org/10.1145/2835776.2835833Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Fabrizio Lamberti and Gianluca Paravati. 2015. VDHM: Viewport-DOM Based Heat Maps as a Tool for Visually Aggregating Web Users' Interaction Data from Mobile and Heterogeneous Devices. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Mobile Services (MS '15). IEEE Computer Society, USA, 33--40. https://doi.org/10.1109/MobServ.2015.15Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. F. Lamberti, Gianluca Paravati, Valentina Gatteschi, and Alberto Cannavò. 2017. Supporting Web Analytics by Aggregating User Interaction Data From Heterogeneous Devices Using Viewport-DOM-Based Heat Maps. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics 13 (08 2017), 1989 - 1999. Issue 4. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2017.2658663Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. JooWon Lee and Jae-Hyeon Ahn. 2012. Attention to Banner Ads and Their Effectiveness: An Eye-Tracking Approach. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 17, 1 (2012), 119--137. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415170105arXiv:https://doi.org/10.2753/JEC1086-4415170105Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Yixuan Li, Pingmei Xu, Dmitry Lagun, and Vidhya Navalpakkam. 2017. Towards Measuring and Inferring User Interest from Gaze. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion (WWW '17 Companion). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, CHE, 525--533. https://doi.org/10.1145/3041021.3054182Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Heng Luo, Stevie Rocco, and Carl Schaad. 2015. Using Google Analytics to Understand Online Learning: A Case Study of a Graduate-Level Online Course. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference of Educational Innovation through Technology (EITT '15). IEEE Computer Society, USA, 264--268. https://doi.org/10.1109/EITT.2015.62Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Alexandre Milisavljevic, Kevin Hamard, Coralie Petermann, Bernard Gosselin, Karine Doré-Mazars, and Matei Mancas. 2018. Eye and Mouse Coordination DuringTask:FromBehaviourtoPrediction.InInternationalConferenceonHuman Computer Interaction Theory and Applications. SciTePress, Setúbal, Portugal, 86--93. https://doi.org/10.5220/0006618800860093Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Vidhya Navalpakkam, LaDawn Jentzsch, Rory Sayres, Sujith Ravi, Amr Ahmed, and Alex Smola. 2013. Measurement and Modeling of Eye-Mouse Behavior in the Presence of Nonlinear Page Layouts. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 953--964. https://doi.org/10.1145/2488388.2488471Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Kerry Rodden and Xin Fu. 2007. Exploring How Mouse Movements Relate to Eye Movements on Web Search Results Pages. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR 2007 Workshop on Web Information Seeking and Interaction. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 29--32. http://research.microsoft.com/~ryenw/proceedings/WISI2007.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Uzi Smadja, Max Grusky, Yoav Artzi, and Mor Naaman. 2019. Understanding Reader Backtracking Behavior in Online News Articles. In The World Wide Web Conference (WWW '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3237--3243. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308558.3313571Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Songhua Xu, Hao Jiang, and Francis C.M. Lau. 2009. User-Oriented Document Summarization through Vision-Based Eye-Tracking. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI '09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 7--16. https://doi.org/10.1145/1502650.1502656Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Splitting the Web Analytics Atom: From Page Metrics and KPIs to Sub-Page Metrics and KPIs

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        WIMS 2020: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Web Intelligence, Mining and Semantics
        June 2020
        279 pages
        ISBN:9781450375429
        DOI:10.1145/3405962

        Copyright © 2020 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 24 August 2020

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        WIMS 2020 Paper Acceptance Rate35of63submissions,56%Overall Acceptance Rate140of278submissions,50%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader