Susanna Kouri
ABSTRACT
There is a strong societal pressure for the immigrants to learn the local language to be able to properly enter the work-life and social life in the new culture. The limit of resources in second language teaching and the challenges related to language practicing with native people, encourages us to search for alternative options for the second language learning. Robot-assisted language learning (RALL) provides one potential option. In this article, we focus on exploring the potentials of customized language robots for immigrants to support their professional development and adaptation to the local work contexts. We describe our qualitative and exploratory user study with 10 immigrants as participants, focusing on their user experience (UX) of the customized RALL solution for language learning at work settings. We collected data through 1) field observations of the authentic RALL sessions in a user pilot, and 2) user interviews in the end of the pilot. The research shows that customization of several aspects of RALL is needed to support immigrants? language learning at work. These include, e.g. the vocabulary and tasks, the level, the speed of language, and the timing of the RALL. The optimal customization can be achieved by co-designing the RALL within the multidisciplinary team including the workplace representatives, language trainer and programmer. The RALL provides a lot of potential for immigrants? language learning as it offers unique learning experiences and many possibilities to keep up the learner?s attention and motivation. However, there are also challenging aspects, which need further consideration.
- Ahtinen, A. & Kaipainen, K. (2020). Learning and Teaching Experiences with a Persuasive Social Robot in Primary School -- Findings and Implications from a 4-Month Field Study. Persuasive Technology 2020.Google Scholar
- Bartneck, C., Forlizzi, J.: A design-centred framework for social human-robot interaction. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication 2004, pp. 591--594. IEEE..Google ScholarCross Ref
- Belpaeme, T., Kennedy, J., Ramachandran, A. et al.: Social robots for education: A review. Science Robotics, 3(21), eaat5954 (2018).Google Scholar
- Belpaeme, T., Vogt, P., Van den Berghe, R., et al. (2018). Guidelines for designing social robots as second language tutors. International Journal of Social Robotics, 10(3), 325--341.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Broadbent, E., Tamagawa, R., Kerse, N. et al. (2009, September). Retirement home staff and residents' preferences for healthcare robots. In RO-MAN 2009-The 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (pp. 645--650). IEEE..Google Scholar
- Bruno, B., Chong, N. Y., Kamide, H., et al. (2017, August). Paving the way for culturally competent robots: A position paper. In 2017 26th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) (pp. 553--560). IEEE.Google Scholar
- Carolis, B. D., Palestra, G., Penna, C. D. et al. (2019). Social robots supporting the inclusion of unaccompanied migrant children: Teaching the meaning of culture-related gestures. Je-LKS : Journal of E-Learning and Knowledge Society, 15(2) doi:10.20368/1971-8829/1636..Google Scholar
- Engwall, O., Lopes, J., & Åhlund, A. (2020). Robot interaction styles for conversation practice in second language learning. International Journal of Social Robotics, 1--26.Google Scholar
- Kennedy, J., Lemaignan, S., Montassier, C. et al..: Child speech recognition in human-robot interaction: evaluations and recommendations. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 82--90 (2017).Google ScholarDigital Library
- Levy M. (1997) CALL: context and conceptualisation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Leyzberg, D., Spaulding, S., Toneva, M., & Scassellati, B. (2012). The physical presence of a robot tutor increases cognitive learning gains. In Proceedings of the annual meeting of the cognitive science society (Vol. 34, No. 34)...Google Scholar
- Lopes, J., Engwall, O., Skantze, G. (2017) A First Visit to the Robot Language Café. In: Engwall, Lopes (ed.), Proceedings of the ISCA workshop on Speech and Language Technology in Education Stockholm.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lopes, J., Robb, D. A., Ahmad, M., Liu, X., Lohan, K., & Hastie, H. (2019, March). Towards a conversational agent for remote robot-human teaming. In 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) (pp. 548--549). IEEE.Google Scholar
- Nielson, K. B. (2011). Self-study with language learning software in the workplace: What happens?. Language Learning & Technology, 15(3), 110--129.Google Scholar
- Randall, N. (2019). A Survey of Robot-Assisted Language Learning (RALL). ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction (THRI), 9(1), 1--36.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Šabanović, S. (2010, October). Emotion in robot cultures: Cultural models of affect in social robot design. In Proceedings of the Conference on Design & Emotion.Google Scholar
- Saukkonen, P. (2016). From fragmentation to integration. Dealing with migration flows in Finland, 18.Google Scholar
- Simo, H., Avelino, J., Duarte, N., & Figueiredo, R. (2018). GeeBot: A robotic platform for refugee integration. Paper presented at the 365--366. doi:10.1145/3173386.3177833.Google Scholar
- Tanaka, F., Isshiki, K., Takahashi, F. et al.: Pepper learns together with children: Development of an educational application. In IEEE-RAS 15th International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), pp. 270--275 (2015).Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tuna, A., & Tuna, G. (2019). The use of humanoid robots with multilingual interaction skills in teaching a foreign language: opportunities, research challenges and future research directions. CEPS Journal, 9(3), 95--115..Google ScholarCross Ref
- van den Berghe, R., Verhagen, J., Oudgenoeg-Paz, O. et al. (2019). Social robots for language learning: A review. Review of Educational Research, 89(2), 259--295.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vogt, P., van den Berghe, R., de Haas, M., Hoffman, L., Kanero, J., Mamus, E., Papadopoulos, F.: Second Language Tutoring Using Social Robots: A Large-Scale Study. In 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), pp. 497--505, IEEE (2019).Google Scholar
- Zaga, C., Lohse, M., Truong, K. P., Evers, V. The effect of a robot's social character on children's task engagement: Peer versus tutor. In International Conference on Social Robotics, pp. 704--713, Springer, Cham (2015)Google ScholarCross Ref
Recommendations
Design Implications for a Virtual Language Learning Companion Robot: Considering the Appearance, Interaction and Rewarding Behavior
HAI '21: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Human-Agent InteractionSecond language learning has become very important because of globalization and as a result, many online language learning platforms have gained popularity. Despite their popularity and convenience, they still lack the human factor and meaningful ...
Robot-Assisted Language Learning Increases Functional Connectivity in Children's Brain
HRI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot InteractionThe current study investigated how robot tutors influence brain activity during child-robot interaction (CRI) for learning of second language vocabulary. We gathered EEG signals from two groups of children; 1) Robot group (N=21) who listened to a ...
A Long-term Study of Robot-Assisted Therapy for Children with Severe Autism and ADHD
HRI '20: Companion of the 2020 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot InteractionSocial robots are increasingly being used as a mediator between therapists and children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). This paper describes an ongoing work that aims to target children with ...
Comments