ABSTRACT
Prior work in IR has found that searchers under time constraints may adapt their search processes and perceive their task or their performance differently. In many of these prior studies, the task descriptions implicitly or explicitly conveyed an expectation of the amount of information needed to satisfy the task requirements in terms of number of pages (e.g., find N webpages on topic X) or the time to spend on the task (e.g., search until time is up) rather than allowing the participant to determine how much information was needed. In this lab-based study, we investigated the effects of time constraints on information search and decision-making. Participants completed a series of decision-making tasks with half of the participants receiving a 5-minute time constraint and half given no time guidance. They were asked to make good, specific recommendations for a friend, and they had considerable latitude in deciding how much information they needed. Results showed that participants in the time constraint condition made their decisions faster but there were few significant differences in measures of search behaviors between the time constraint conditions (RQ1). Qualitative analysis indicated that participants adapted their decision task by varying their recommendations in their specificity, justification strength, and contents in both time conditions (RQ2). Finally, we found evidence that the impact of the time constraint on time- and task-related perceptions was moderated by the extent to which participants adapted their decision task (RQ3).
- Denise E Agosto. 2002. Bounded rationality and satisficing in young people's Web-based decision making. Journal of the American society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 53, 1 (2002), 16--27.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dan Ariely and Dan Zakay. 2001. A timely account of the role of duration in decision making. Acta Psychologica, Vol. 108, 2 (2001), 187--207.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lehman Benson III and Lee Roy Beach. 1996. The effects of time constraints on the prechoice screening of decision options. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 67, 2 (1996), 222--228.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kathy Brennan, Diane Kelly, and Yinglong Zhang. 2016. Factor analysis of a Search Self-Efficacy Scale. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (CHIIR '16). 241--244.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Katriina Byström and Kalervo Järvelin. 1995. Task complexity affects information seeking and use. Information Processing & Management, Vol. 31, 2 (1995), 191--213.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shu-Yi Chen and Soo Young Rieh. 2009. Take your time first, time your search later: How college students perceive time in web searching. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 46, 1, 1--19.Google Scholar
- Pawitra Chiravirakul and Stephen J Payne. 2014. Choice overload in search engine use?. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1285--1294.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anita Crescenzi. 2016. Metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive regulation in time-constrained information search. In Search as Learning workshop at SIGIR '16, Vol. 1647. 5.Google Scholar
- Anita Crescenzi. 2019. Adaptation in information search and decision-making under time pressure. Ph.D. Dissertation.Google Scholar
- Anita Crescenzi, Robert Capra, and Jaime Arguello. 2013. Time pressure, user satisfaction and task difficulty. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 50, 1, 1--4.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anita Crescenzi, Robert Capra, and Jaime Arguello. 2017. Time limits, information search and the use of search assistance. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Conference Human Information Interaction and Retrieval. 349--352.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anita Crescenzi, Diane Kelly, and Leif Azzopardi. 2015. Time pressure and system delays in information search. In Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 767--770.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anita Crescenzi, Diane Kelly, and Leif Azzopardi. 2016. Impacts of time constraints and system delays on user experience. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval. 141--150.Google ScholarDigital Library
- J.Shane Culpepper, Fernando Diaz, and Mark D. Smucker. 2018. Research Frontiers in Information Retrieval: Report from the Third Strategic Workshop on Information Retrieval in Lorne (SWIRL 2018). SIGIR Forum, Vol. 52, 1 (2018), 34--90.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anne Edland and Ola Svenson. 1993. Judgment and decision making under time pressure: Studies and findings. In Time pressure and stress in human judgment and decision making. Plenum Press, New York, 27--40.Google Scholar
- Kathleen Eisenhardt. 1989. Making fast decisions in high-velocity environments. The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 32, 3 (1989), 543--576.Google Scholar
- Carlos Flavián, Raquel Gurrea, and Carlos Orús. 2012. An integrative perspective of online foraging behavior with search engines. Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 29, 11 (2012), 836--849.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Luanne Freund. 2013. A cross-domain analysis of task and genre effects on perceptions of usefulness. Information Processing & Management, Vol. 49, 5 (2013), 1108--1121.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stephen W Gilliland and Neal Schmitt. 1993. Information redundancy and decision behavior: A process tracing investigation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 54, 2 (1993), 157--180.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Andreas Glöckner and Tilmann Betsch. 2008. Multiple-reason decision making based on automatic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, memory, and cognition, Vol. 34, 5 (2008), 1055.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Minhi Hahn, Robert Lawson, and Young Gyu Lee. 1992. The effects of time pressure and information load on decision quality. Psychology & Marketing, Vol. 9, 5 (1992), 365--378.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anthony Jameson, Bettina Berendt, Silvia Gabrielli, Federica Cena, Cristina Gena, Fabiana Vernero, and Katharina Reinecke. 2013. Choice Architecture for Human-Computer Interaction. Vol. 7. Now Publishers Inc., 1--235.Google Scholar
- Jiwoon Jeon, W. Bruce Croft, Joon Ho Lee, and Soyeon Park. 2006. A Framework to Predict the Quality of Answers with Non-Textual Features. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR '06). 228--235.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Heidi Julien and David Michels. 2004. Intra-individual information behaviour in daily life. Information Processing & Management, Vol. 40, 3 (2004), 547--562.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Steven J Karau and Janice R Kelly. 1992. The effects of time scarcity and time abundance on group performance quality and interaction process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 28, 6 (1992), 542--571.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Diane Kelly. 2010. A preliminary investigation of Search Self-Efficacy. Technical Report TR-2010-01. https://sils.unc.edu/sites/default/files/news/kelly_sils_tech.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Soojung Kim and Sanghee Oh. 2009. Users' relevance criteria for evaluating answers in a social Q&A site. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 60, 4 (2009), 716--727.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Saskia Koldijk, Maya Sappelli, Suzan Verberne, Mark A Neerincx, and Wessel Kraaij. 2014. The swell knowledge work dataset for stress and user modeling research. (2014), 291--298.Google Scholar
- Arie W Kruglanski and Tallie Freund. 1983. The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 19, 5 (1983), 448--468.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chang Liu, Ying-Hsang Liu, Tom Gedeon, Yu Zhao, Yiming Wei, and Fan Yang. 2019. The effects of perceived chronic pressure and time constraint on information search behaviors and experience. Information Processing & Management, Vol. 56, 5 (2019), 1667--1679.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chang Liu and Yiming Wei. 2016. The impacts of time constraint on users' search strategy during search process. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 53, 1 (2016), 1--9.Google Scholar
- Chang Liu, Fan Yang, Yu Zhao, Qin Jiang, and Lu Zhang. 2014a. What does time constraint mean to information searchers? Proceedings of the 5th Information Interaction in Context Symposium (2014), 227--230.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chang Liu, Lu Zhang, Qin Jiang, Fan Yang, and Yu Zhao. 2014b. The influence of task type on search experience from the perspective of time constraint. In Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. Vol. 51. 1--4.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cheng Luo, Fan Zhang, Xue Li, Yiqun Liu, Min Zhang, Shaoping Ma, and Delin Yang. 2016. Manipulating time perception of web search users. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval. 293--296.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eddy Maddalena, Marco Basaldella, Dario De Nart, Dante Degl'Innocenti, Stefano Mizzaro, and Gianluca Demartini. 2016. Crowdsourcing relevance assessments: The unexpected benefits of limiting the time to judge. In Fourth AAAI conference on human computation and crowdsourcing. 129--138.Google Scholar
- Yazdan Mansourian and Nigel Ford. 2007. Search persistence and failure on the web: A "bounded rationality" and "satisficing" analysis. Journal of Documentation, Vol. 63, 5 (2007), 680--701.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gary Marchionini. 1995. Information seeking in electronic environments. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gary Marchionini. 2006. Exploratory search: From finding to understanding. Commun. ACM, Vol. 49, 4 (2006), 41--46.Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. John Maule, G. Robert J. Hockey, and L. Bdzola. 2000. Effects of time-pressure on decision-making under uncertainty: Changes in affective state and information processing strategy. Acta Psychologica, Vol. 104, 3 (2000), 283--301.Google ScholarCross Ref
- James G. Miller. 1960. Information input overload and psychopathology. American Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 116, 8 (1960), 695--704.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lisa D. Ordó n ez and Lehman Benson. 1997. Decisions under time pressure: How time constraint affects risky decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 71, 2 (1997), 121--140.Google ScholarCross Ref
- John W Payne, James R Bettman, and Eric J Johnson. 1988. Adaptive strategy selection in decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Vol. 14, 3 (1988), 534--552.Google ScholarCross Ref
- John W. Payne, James R. Bettman, and Eric J. Johnson. 1993. The Adaptive Decision Maker. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 330 pages.Google Scholar
- Chandra Prabha, Lynn Silipigni Connaway, Lawrence Olszewski, and Lillie R Jenkins. 2007. What is enough? Satisficing information needs. Journal of Documentation, Vol. 63, 1 (2007), 74--89.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jörg Rieskamp and Ulrich Hoffrage. 2008. Inferences under time pressure: How opportunity costs affect strategy selection. Acta Psychologica, Vol. 127, 2 (2008), 258--276.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Reijo Savolainen. 2006. Time as a context of information seeking. Library & Information Science Research, Vol. 28, 1 (2006), 110--127.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ola Svenson and Anne Edland. 1987. Change of preferences under time pressure: Choices and judgements. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, Vol. 28 (1987), 322--330.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ola Svenson, Anne Edland, and Paul Slovic. 1990. Choices and judgments of incompletely described decision alternatives under time pressure. Acta Psychologica, Vol. 75, 2 (1990), 153--169.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anastasios Tombros, Ian Ruthven, and Joemon M Jose. 2005. How users assess Web pages for information seeking. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 56, 4 (2005), 327--344.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Pertti Vakkari and Martti Kuokkanen. 1997. Theory growth in information science: Applications of the theory of science to a theory of information seeking. Journal of Documentation, Vol. 53, 5 (1997), 497--519.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Anton van der Vegt, Guido Zuccon, Bevan Koopman, and Anthony Deacon. 2020. How searching under time pressure impacts clinical decision making. Journal of the Medical Library Association, Vol. 108, 4 (Oct. 2020), 564--573.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Claire Warwick, Jon Rimmer, Ann Blandford, Jeremy Gow, and George Buchanan. 2009. Cognitive economy and satisficing in information seeking: A longitudinal study of undergraduate information behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 60, 12 (2009), 2402--2415.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mieneke W H Weenig and Marleen Maarleveld. 2002. The impact of time constraint on information search strategies in complex choice tasks. Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 23, 6 (dec 2002), 689--702.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Barbara M. Wildemuth, Luanne Freund, and Elaine G. Toms. 2014. Untangling search task complexity and difficulty in the context of interactive information retrieval studies. Journal of Documentation, Vol. 70, 6 (2014), 1118--1140.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Susan C Wilkinson, Will Reader, and Stephen J Payne. 2012. Adaptive browsing: Sensitivity to time pressure and task difficulty. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 70, 1 (2012), 14--25.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lilian Woudstra, Bart van den Hooff, and Alexander Schouten. 2015. The quality versus accessibility debate revisited: A contingency perspective on human information source selection. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 14, 4 (2015), 2060--2071.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Adaptation in Information Search and Decision-Making under Time Constraints
Recommendations
Impacts of Time Constraints and System Delays on User Experience
CHIIR '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM on Conference on Human Information Interaction and RetrievalDuring information search, people often experience time pressure. This might be a result of a deadline, the system's performance or some other event. In this paper, we report results of a study with forty-five participants which investigated how time ...
Supporting Information Search by Older Adults
ECCE '16: Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive ErgonomicsUsing cognitive models of web-navigation to generate support has long been a topic of research. In this paper, we address two limitations in this area. First, these models have so far been used to generate support for navigation within a website and not ...
How Time Pressure in Different Phases of Decision-Making Influences Human-AI Collaboration
CSCWHuman cognitive and decision-making abilities depreciate under pressure, motivating the emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) systems as decision support tools to assist people in performing tasks under stress. In this work, we study human decision-...
Comments