skip to main content
10.1145/3408066.3408070acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccmsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Civilian Characteristics and Casualties Of Terrorist Attacks in Public Places

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 August 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

The crowds in public gathering places are densely populated. Once a violent terrorist attack occurs, it may cause a large number of civilian casualties. There are few researches on the dynamics of crowd in terrorist attacks, and the relationship between civilian characteristics and the consequences of attacks is unclear. We built an agent-based model of terrorist attacks in public gathering places, and explore the impact of the microscopic characteristics of civilians on the consequences of events. Firstly, we proposed a conceptual framework of terrorist attacks event occurred in public places. Then we constructed the agent models of two main groups: civilians and terrorists. We developed a multi-agent simulation system to investigate the dynamic of crowd under attacks in public space. Finally, we simulated the terrorist attacks in a city square to explore the relationship between civilian characteristics and the consequences of the event. The simulation results show that the observation range, risk sensitivity and emergency movement speed of civilians have a significant impact on the number of casualties.

References

  1. National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism. 2018. Global Terrorism Database. http://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Usmani, Z.U.H. and Kirk, D. 2009. Modeling and Simulation of Explosion Effectiveness as a Function of Blast and Crowd Characteristics. The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulation, 6 (4), 79--95.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Hayes, R. and Hayes, R. Agent-Based Simulation of Mass Shootings: Determining How to Limit the Scale of a Tragedy. 2014. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 17(2), 5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Song, Y., Gong, J., Li, Y., Cui, T., Fang, L. and Cao, W. Crowd evacuation simulation for bioterrorism in micro-spatial environments based on virtual geographic environments. 2013. Safety Science, 53 (3), 105--113. DOI=10.1016/j.ssci.2012.08.011Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ma, L., Chen, B., Qiu, S., Li, Z. and Qiu, X. 2017. Agent-based modeling of emergency evacuation in a railway station square under sarin terrorist attack. International Journal of Modeling, Simulation, and Scientific Computing, 8(4).1750022(14 pages) DOI=10.1142/s1793962317500222Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Liu, Q. A social force model for the crowd evacuation in a terrorist attack. 2018. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 502, 315--330. DOI=10.1016/j.physa.2018.02.136Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen, C.K. and Tong, Y.H. 2019. Evacuation simulation considering action of guard in artificial attack. Chinese Physics B, 28, 010503. DOI: 10.1088/1674-1056/28/1/010503Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Kouskoulis, G. and Antoniou, C. 2017. Systematic Review of Pedestrian Simulation Models with a Focus on Emergency Situations. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2604 (1), 111--119. DOI= 10.3141/2604-14Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Kuligowski, E. 2011. Terror defeated: occupant sensemaking, decision-making and protective action in the 2001 World Trade Center disaster. University of Colorado at Boulde, Boulder,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kuligowski, E. 2013. Predicting Human Behavior During Fires. Fire Technology, 49(1), 101--120. DOI=10.1007/s10694-011-0245-6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Reneke, P. 2013. Evacuation Decision Model. NIST IR 7914, National Institute of Standards and Technology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Lovreglio, R., Ronchi, E. and Nilsson, D. 2016. An evacuation decision model based on perceived risk, social influence and behavioural uncertainty. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 66 (8), 226--242. DOI=10.1016/j.simpat.2016.03.006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Kinateder, M. T., Kuligowski, E. D., Reneke, P. A. and Peacock, R. 2015. Risk perception in fire evacuation behavior revisited: definitions, related concepts, and empirical evidence, Fire Sci Rev 4(1), DOI=10.1186/s40038-014-0005-z.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Richards, C. 2004. Certain to Win: The Strategy of John Boyd, Applied to Business. Xlibris, Corp.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Duives, D. C., Daamen, W. and Hoogendoorn, S. P. 2013. State-of-the-art crowd motion simulation models. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 37 (12), 193--209. DOI=10.1016/j.trc.2013.02.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Helbing, D. and Johansson, A. 2010. Pedestrian, Crowd, and Evacuation Dynamics. In Encyclopedia of Complexity & Systems Science 697--716.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Civilian Characteristics and Casualties Of Terrorist Attacks in Public Places

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ICCMS '20: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Modeling and Simulation
      June 2020
      219 pages
      ISBN:9781450377034
      DOI:10.1145/3408066

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 11 August 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)10
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader