skip to main content
10.1145/3410531.3414298acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesubicompConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Eslucent: an eyelid interface for detecting eye blinking

Published:04 September 2020Publication History

ABSTRACT

Eyelid stickers are thin strips that temporarily create a crease when attached to the eyelid. The direct contact with the crease that increases and decreases the pressure on the eyelid sticker provides a novel opportunity for sensing blinking. We present Eslucent, an on-skin wearable capacitive sensing device that affords blink detection, building on the form factor of eyelid stickers. It consists of an art layer, conductive thread, fiber eyelid stickers, coated with conductive liquid, and applied the device onto the eyelid crease with adhesive temporary tattoo paper. Eslucent detects blinks during intentional blinking and four involuntary activities by a falling edge detection algorithm in a user study of 14 participants. The average precision was 82% and recall was 70% while achieving the precision and recall of more than 90% in intentional blinking. By embedding interactive technology into a daily beauty product, Eslucent explores a novel wearable form factor for blink detection.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Andreas Bulling, Jamie A Ward, Hans Gellersen, and Gerhard Troster. 2010. Eye movement analysis for activity recognition using electrooculography. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 33, 4 (2010), 741--753.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Fabio Lo Castro. 2008. Class I infrared eye blinking detector. Sensors and actuators A: Physical 148, 2 (2008), 388--394.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Michael Chau and Margrit Betke. 2005. Real time eye tracking and blink detection with usb cameras. Technical Report. Boston University Computer Science Department.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Jordan Crook. 2013. The Google Glass Wink Feature Is Real. https://techcrunch.com/2013/05/09/the-google-glass-wink-feature-is-real/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Artem Dementyev and Christian Holz. 2017. DualBlink: A Wearable Device to Continuously Detect, Track, and Actuate Blinking For Alleviating Dry Eyes and Computer Vision Syndrome. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 1 (2017), 1.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Meirav Devash. 2018. Eyelid Lifting Strips promise a more wide-awake look. https://www.allure.com/story/magicstripes-eyelid-lifting-strips-reviewGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Christine Dierk, Sarah Sterman, Molly Jane Pearce Nicholas, and Eric Paulos. 2018. Häiriö: Human hair as interactive material. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction. ACM, 148--157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Christine Dierk, Tomás Vega Gálvez, and Eric Paulos. 2017. AlterNail: Ambient, batteryless, stateful, dynamic displays at your fingertips. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 6754--6759.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Matjaz Divjak and Horst Bischof. 2009. Eye Blink Based Fatigue Detection for Prevention of Computer Vision Syndrome.. In MVA. 350--353.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Patricia J Flanagan, Katia Vega, and Hugo Fuks. 2012. Blinklifier: The power of feedback loops for amplifying expressions through bodily worn objects. In Proceedings of APCHI. 641--642.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Kyosuke Fukuda. 2001. Eye blinks: new indices for the detection of deception. International Journal of Psychophysiology 40, 3 (2001), 239--245.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Nur Al-huda Hamdan, Adrian Wagner, Simon Voelker, Jürgen Steimle, and Jan Borchers. 2019. Springlets: Expressive, flexible and silent on-skin tactile interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Shoya Ishimaru, Kai Kunze, Koichi Kise, Jens Weppner, Andreas Dengel, Paul Lukowicz, and Andreas Bulling. 2014. In the blink of an eye: combining head motion and eye blink frequency for activity recognition with Google Glass. In Proceedings of the 5th augmented human international conference. ACM, 15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Hsin-Liu Cindy Kao, Miren Bamforth, David Kim, and Chris Schmandt. 2018. Skinmorph: texture-tunable on-skin interface through thin, programmable gel. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. ACM, 196--203.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Hsin-Liu Cindy Kao, Abdelkareem Bedri, and Kent Lyons. 2018. SkinWire: Fabricating a Self-Contained On-Skin PCB for the Hand. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 2, 3 (2018), 116.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Hsin-Liu Cindy Kao, Artem Dementyev, Joseph A Paradiso, and Chris Schmandt. 2015. NailO: fingernails as an input surface. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3015--3018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Hsin-Liu Cindy Kao, Christian Holz, Asta Roseway, Andres Calvo, and Chris Schmandt. 2016. DuoSkin: Rapidly prototyping on-skin user interfaces using skin-friendly materials. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. ACM, 16--23.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Hsin-Liu Cindy Kao, Manisha Mohan, Chris Schmandt, Joseph A Paradiso, and Katia Vega. 2016. Chromoskin: Towards interactive cosmetics using thermochromic pigments. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3703--3706.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Aleksandra Królak and Paweł Strumiłło. 2012. Eye-blink detection system for human-computer interaction. Universal Access in the Information Society 11, 4 (2012), 409--419.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Juyoung Lee, Hui-Shyong Yeo, Murtaza Dhuliawala, Jedidiah Akano, Junichi Shimizu, Thad Starner, Aaron Quigley, Woontack Woo, and Kai Kunze. 2017. Itchy nose: discreet gesture interaction using EOG sensors in smart eyewear. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers. 94--97.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Xin Liu, Katia Vega, Pattie Maes, and Joe A Paradiso. 2016. Wearability factors for skin interfaces. In Proceedings of the 7th Augmented Human International Conference 2016. 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Joanne Lo, Doris Jung Lin Lee, Nathan Wong, David Bui, and Eric Paulos. 2016. Skintillates: Designing and creating epidermal interactions. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, 853--864.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Eric Markvicka, Guanyun Wang, Yi-Chin Lee, Gierad Laput, Carmel Majidi, and Lining Yao. 2019. ElectroDermis: Fully Untethered, Stretchable, and Highly-Customizable Electronic Bandages. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 632.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Aditya Shekhar Nittala, Anusha Withana, Narjes Pourjafarian, and Jürgen Steimle. 2018. Multi-touch skin: A thin and flexible multi-touch sensor for on-skin input. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Monalisa Pal, Anwesha Banerjee, Shreyasi Datta, Amit Konar, DN Tibarewala, and R Janarthanan. 2014. Electrooculography based blink detection to prevent computer vision syndrome. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Computing and Communication Technologies (CONECCT). IEEE, 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. SciPy.org. 2015. Scipy Signal Savgol Filter. https://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy-0.15.1/reference/generated/scipy.signal.savgol_filter.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Marcos Serrano, Barrett M Ens, and Pourang P Irani. 2014. Exploring the use of hand-to-face input for interacting with head-worn displays. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3181--3190.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. TinyCircuits. 2020. TinyDuino Overview. https://tinycircuits.com/pages/tinyduino-overviewGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Katia Vega, Abel Arrieta, Felipe Esteves, and Hugo Fuks. 2014. FX e-makeup for muscle based interaction. In International Conference of Design, User Experience, and Usability. Springer, 643--652.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Katia Vega, Marcio Cunha, and Hugo Fuks. 2015. Hairware: the conscious use of unconscious auto-contact behaviors. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 78--86.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Katia Vega and Hugo Fuks. 2014. Beauty tech nails: interactive technology at your fingertips. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction. 61--64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Katia Vega and Hugo Fuks. 2014. Beauty technology: body surface computing. Computer 47, 4 (2014), 71--75.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Katia Vega and Hugo Fuks. 2016. Beauty Technology: Designing Seamless Interfaces for Wearable Computing. Springer.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Yanan Wang, Shijian Luo, Yujia Lu, Hebo Gong, Yexing Zhou, Shuai Liu, and Preben Hansen. 2017. AnimSkin: fabricating epidermis with interactive, functional and aesthetic color animation. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM, 397--401.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Yanfang Wang, Sonia S Toor, Ramesh Gautam, and David B Henson. 2011. Blink frequency and duration during perimetry and their relationship to test-retest threshold variability. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 52, 7 (2011), 4546--4550.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Martin Weigel, Tong Lu, Gilles Bailly, Antti Oulasvirta, Carmel Majidi, and Jürgen Steimle. 2015. Iskin: flexible, stretchable and visually customizable on-body touch sensors for mobile computing. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2991--3000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Martin Weigel, Aditya Shekhar Nittala, Alex Olwal, and Jürgen Steimle. 2017. Skinmarks: Enabling interactions on body landmarks using conformal skin electronics. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3095--3105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Anusha Withana, Daniel Groeger, and Jürgen Steimle. 2018. Tacttoo: A thin and feel-through tattoo for on-skin tactile output. In The 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, 365--378.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Koki Yamashita, Takashi Kikuchi, Katsutoshi Masai, Maki Sugimoto, Bruce H Thomas, and Yuta Sugiura. 2017. CheekInput: turning your cheek into an input surface by embedded optical sensors on a head-mounted display. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology. 1--8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Eslucent: an eyelid interface for detecting eye blinking

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      ISWC '20: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers
      September 2020
      107 pages
      ISBN:9781450380775
      DOI:10.1145/3410531

      Copyright © 2020 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 September 2020

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate38of196submissions,19%

      Upcoming Conference

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader