skip to main content
10.1145/3411763.3443425acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Designing to Support and Extend the Competencies of People with Visual Impairments

Authors Info & Claims
Published:08 May 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

This work sits in the fields of Human Computer Interaction and accessibility research dedicated to the study and development of technology used by people who are blind or visually impaired. Increasingly, researchers have stated the need to get away from technological solutions that intend to ‘normalize’ disabled individuals, towards providing alternative ways that accommodate diverse bodies and minds. To achieve this, scholars and activists call for a shift in the design paradigm in which both the designers’ orientation and the design processes centre not only the needs of people with disabilities but also their lived experience and tacit knowledge. Moreover, more mainstream technologies must be built to accommodate them to the best extent possible, instead of leaving the responsibility to specialised assistive technologies. My PhD has been focused on uncovering and highlighting the competencies that people with visual impairments employ in their technology practices and how these are showcased, by closely examining a corpus of ethnographic data, including a comprehensive set of video demonstrations. Furthermore, my research aims to explore how these findings can be used for practical design within and beyond the accessibility and assistive technology fields, resulting in the production of resources that aid the design for supporting and extending such competencies.

References

  1. Ali Abdolrahmani, Kevin M. Storer, Antony Rishin Mukkath Roy, Ravi Kuber, and Stacy M. Branham. 2020. Blind Leading the Sighted: Drawing Design Insights from Blind Users towards More Productivity-Oriented Voice Interfaces. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 12, 4, Article 18 (Jan. 2020), 35 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3368426Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Shiri Azenkot and Nicole B. Lee. 2013. Exploring the Use of Speech Input by Blind People on Mobile Devices. In Proceedings of the 15th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility(Bellevue, Washington) (ASSETS ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 11, 8 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2513383.2513440Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Mark S Baldwin, Sen H Hirano, Jennifer Mankoff, and Gillian R Hayes. 2019. Design in the Public Square: Supporting Assistive Technology Design Through Public Mixed-Ability Cooperation. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW(2019), 1–22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Cynthia L. Bennett, Erin Brady, and Stacy M. Branham. 2018. Interdependence as a Frame for Assistive Technology Research and Design. In Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility(Galway, Ireland) (ASSETS ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1145/3234695.3236348Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Cynthia L. Bennett, Burren Peil, and Daniela K. Rosner. 2019. Biographical Prototypes: Reimagining Recognition and Disability in Design. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (San Diego, CA, USA) (DIS ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 35–47. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322376Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Cynthia L. Bennett and Daniela K. Rosner. 2019. The Promise of Empathy: Design, Disability, and Knowing the ”Other”. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300528Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Cynthia L. Bennett, Kristen Shinohara, Brianna Blaser, Andrew Davidson, and Kat M. Steele. 2016. Using a Design Workshop To Explore Accessible Ideation. In Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Reno, Nevada, USA) (ASSETS ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 303–304. https://doi.org/10.1145/2982142.2982209Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Cynthia L. Bennett, Abigale Stangl, Alexa F. Siu, and Joshua A. Miele. 2019. Making Nonvisually: Lessons from the Field. In The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Pittsburgh, PA, USA) (ASSETS ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 279–285. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308561.3355619Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jeffrey P. Bigham, Craig M. Prince, and Richard E. Ladner. 2008. Webanywhere: Enabling a Screen Reading Interface for the Web on Any Computer. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web (Beijing, China) (WWW ’08). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1159–1160. https://doi.org/10.1145/1367497.1367705Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Erin Brady, Meredith Ringel Morris, Yu Zhong, Samuel White, and Jeffrey P. Bigham. 2013. Visual Challenges in the Everyday Lives of Blind People. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2117–2126. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2481291Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Stacy M. Branham and Shaun K. Kane. 2015. The Invisible Work of Accessibility: How Blind Employees Manage Accessibility in Mixed-Ability Workplaces. In Proceedings of the 17th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers & Accessibility (Lisbon, Portugal) (ASSETS ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1145/2700648.2809864Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Michele A. Burton, Erin Brady, Robin Brewer, Callie Neylan, Jeffrey P. Bigham, and Amy Hurst. 2012. Crowdsourcing Subjective Fashion Advice Using VizWiz: Challenges and Opportunities. In Proceedings of the 14th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Boulder, Colorado, USA) (ASSETS ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 135–142. https://doi.org/10.1145/2384916.2384941Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Andrew Crabtree, Mark Rouncefield, and Peter Tolmie. 2012. Doing design ethnography. Springer-Verlag London, London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Guy Dewsbury, Karen Clarke, Dave Randall, Mark Rouncefield, and Ian Sommerville. 2004. The anti‐social model of disability. Disability & Society 19, 2 (2004), 145–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/0968759042000181776Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Heather A Faucett, Kate E Ringland, Amanda LL Cullen, and Gillian R Hayes. 2017. (In) visibility in disability and assistive technology. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS) 10, 4 (2017), 1–17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Christopher Frauenberger, Judith Good, and Alyssa Alcorn. 2012. Challenges, Opportunities and Future Perspectives in Including Children with Disabilities in the Design of Interactive Technology. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Bremen, Germany) (IDC ’12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 367–370. https://doi.org/10.1145/2307096.2307171Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Harold Garfinkel. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Cole Gleason, Amy Pavel, Emma McCamey, Christina Low, Patrick Carrington, Kris M. Kitani, and Jeffrey P. Bigham. 2020. Twitter A11y: A Browser Extension to Make Twitter Images Accessible. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376728Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Martin Grayson, Anja Thieme, Rita Marques, Daniela Massiceti, Ed Cutrell, and Cecily Morrison. 2020. A Dynamic AI System for Extending the Capabilities of Blind People. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI EA ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3383142Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Dhruv Jain, Audrey Desjardins, Leah Findlater, and Jon E. Froehlich. 2019. Autoethnography of a Hard of Hearing Traveler. In The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Pittsburgh, PA, USA) (ASSETS ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 236–248. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308561.3353800Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Ravi Kuber, Amanda Hastings, Matthew Tretter, and Dónal Fitzpatrick. 2012. Determining the accessibility of mobile screen readers for blind users. In Proceedings of IASTED Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. ACTA Press, Calgary, AB, Canada, 182–189.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Richard E. Ladner. 2016. Accessibility is Becoming Mainstream. In Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Reno, Nevada, USA) (ASSETS ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1. https://doi.org/10.1145/2982142.2982180Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Megan Lawrence and Mary Bellard. 2017. Teach Access: Preparing Computing Students for Industry (Abstract Only). In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (Seattle, Washington, USA) (SIGCSE ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 700. https://doi.org/10.1145/3017680.3022392Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Amanda Lazar, Jonathan Lazar, and Alisha Pradhan. 2019. Using Modules to Teach Accessibility in a User-Centered Design Course. In The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility(Pittsburgh, PA, USA) (ASSETS ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 554–556. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308561.3354632Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. The Disabled List. 2019. CriticalAxis: A Community Driven Project from the Disabled List. Retrieved October 13, 2020 from http://www.criticalaxis.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Jennifer Mankoff, Holly Fait, and Tu Tran. 2005. Is Your Web Page Accessible? A Comparative Study of Methods for Assessing Web Page Accessibility for the Blind. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Portland, Oregon, USA) (CHI ’05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 41–50. https://doi.org/10.1145/1054972.1054979Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Janis Lena Meissner, John Vines, Janice McLaughlin, Thomas Nappey, Jekaterina Maksimova, and Peter Wright. 2017. Do-It-Yourself Empowerment as Experienced by Novice Makers with Disabilities. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (Edinburgh, United Kingdom) (DIS ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1053–1065. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064663.3064674Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Oussama Metatla, Sandra Bardot, Clare Cullen, Marcos Serrano, and Christophe Jouffrais. 2020. Robots for Inclusive Play: Co-Designing an Educational Game With Visually Impaired and Sighted Children. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376270Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Oussama Metatla, Nick Bryan-Kinns, Tony Stockman, and Fiore Martin. 2015. Designing with and for people living with visual impairments: audio-tactile mock-ups, audio diaries and participatory prototyping. CoDesign 11, 1 (2015), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1007877 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2015.1007877Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Oussama Metatla, Alison Oldfield, Taimur Ahmed, Antonis Vafeas, and Sunny Miglani. 2019. Voice User Interfaces in Schools: Co-Designing for Inclusion with Visually-Impaired and Sighted Pupils. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300608Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Cecily Morrison, Edward Cutrell, Anupama Dhareshwar, Kevin Doherty, Anja Thieme, and Alex Taylor. 2017. Imagining Artificial Intelligence Applications with People with Visual Disabilities Using Tactile Ideation. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Baltimore, Maryland, USA) (ASSETS ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132525.3132530Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Alan F Newell and Peter Gregor. 1999. Extra-ordinary human–machine interaction: what can be learned from people with disabilities?Cognition, Technology & Work 1, 2 (1999), 78–85.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Rohan Patel, Pedro Breton, Catherine M. Baker, Yasmine N. El-Glaly, and Kristen Shinohara. 2020. Why Software is Not Accessible: Technology Professionals’ Perspectives and Challenges. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI EA ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3383103Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Alisha Pradhan, Kanika Mehta, and Leah Findlater. 2018. ”Accessibility Came by Accident”: Use of Voice-Controlled Intelligent Personal Assistants by People with Disabilities. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174033Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Gisela Reyes-Cruz, Joel E. Fischer, and Stuart Reeves. 2020. Reframing Disability as Competency: Unpacking Everyday Technology Practices of People with Visual Impairments. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376767Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Harvey Sacks. 1992. Lectures on Conversation. Vol. 1, 2. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Nuzhah Gooda Sahib, Tony Stockman, Anastasios Tombros, and Oussama Metatla. 2013. Participatory Design with Blind Users: A Scenario-Based Approach. In Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2013, Paula Kotzé, Gary Marsden, Gitte Lindgaard, Janet Wesson, and Marco Winckler (Eds.). Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 685–701.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Kristen Shinohara, Cynthia L Bennett, Wanda Pratt, and Jacob O Wobbrock. 2018. Tenets for social accessibility: Towards humanizing disabled people in design. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS) 11, 1 (2018), 1–31.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Kristen Shinohara, Nayeri Jacobo, Wanda Pratt, and Jacob O Wobbrock. 2020. Design for Social Accessibility Method Cards: Engaging Users and Reflecting on Social Scenarios for Accessible Design. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS) 12, 4 (2020), 1–33.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Kristen Shinohara and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2011. In the Shadow of Misperception: Assistive Technology Use and Social Interactions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CHI ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 705–714. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979044Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Kristen Shinohara and Jacob O. Wobbrock. 2016. Self-Conscious or Self-Confident? A Diary Study Conceptualizing the Social Accessibility of Assistive Technology. ACM Trans. Access. Comput. 8, 2, Article 5 (Jan. 2016), 31 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2827857Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Kristen Shinohara, Jacob O. Wobbrock, and Wanda Pratt. 2018. Incorporating Social Factors in Accessible Design. In Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Galway, Ireland) (ASSETS ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 149–160. https://doi.org/10.1145/3234695.3236346Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Lee Stearns, Ruofei Du, Uran Oh, Catherine Jou, Leah Findlater, David A Ross, and Jon E Froehlich. 2016. Evaluating haptic and auditory directional guidance to assist blind people in reading printed text using finger-mounted cameras. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS) 9, 1 (2016), 1–38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Kevin M. Storer and Stacy M. Branham. 2019. “That’s the Way Sighted People Do It”: What Blind Parents Can Teach Technology Designers About Co-Reading with Children. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference (San Diego, CA, USA) (DIS ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 385–398. https://doi.org/10.1145/3322276.3322374Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Alexandra Vtyurina, Adam Fourney, Meredith Ringel Morris, Leah Findlater, and Ryen W. White. 2019. VERSE: Bridging Screen Readers and Voice Assistants for Enhanced Eyes-Free Web Search. In The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility(Pittsburgh, PA, USA) (ASSETS ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 414–426. https://doi.org/10.1145/3308561.3353773Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. W3C Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI). 2020. Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) Overview. Retrieved October 13, 2020 from https://www.w3.org/WAI/standards-guidelines/wcag/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Web Accessibility In Mind WebAIM. 2020. The WebAIM MillionAn annual accessibility analysis of the top 1,000,000 home pages. Retrieved October 13, 2020 from https://webaim.org/projects/million/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Rua M Williams and Juan E Gilbert. 2019. ’Nothing about us without us’: Transforming participatory research and ethics in human systems engineering. In Advancing Diversity, Inclusion, and Social Justice Through Human Systems Engineering. CRC Press, Boca Raton, 9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Jacob O Wobbrock, Shaun K Kane, Krzysztof Z Gajos, Susumu Harada, and Jon Froehlich. 2011. Ability-based design: Concept, principles and examples. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS) 3, 3 (2011), 1–27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Zeynep Yıldız and Ozge Subasi. 2020. Disabled and Design Researcher: An Unexpected Relationship?. In Companion Publication of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Eindhoven, Netherlands) (DIS’ 20 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 61–66. https://doi.org/10.1145/3393914.3395861Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Anon Ymous, Katta Spiel, Os Keyes, Rua M. Williams, Judith Good, Eva Hornecker, and Cynthia L. Bennett. 2020. ”I Am Just Terrified of My Future” — Epistemic Violence in Disability Related Technology Research. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI EA ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3381828Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Yu Zhong, T. V. Raman, Casey Burkhardt, Fadi Biadsy, and Jeffrey P. Bigham. 2014. JustSpeak: Enabling Universal Voice Control on Android. In Proceedings of the 11th Web for All Conference (Seoul, Korea) (W4A ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 36, 4 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2596695.2596720Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Annuska Zolyomi, Anushree Shukla, and Jaime Snyder. 2017. Technology-Mediated Sight: A Case Study of Early Adopters of a Low Vision Assistive Technology. In Proceedings of the 19th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Baltimore, Maryland, USA) (ASSETS ’17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 220–229. https://doi.org/10.1145/3132525.3132552Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Designing to Support and Extend the Competencies of People with Visual Impairments
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CHI EA '21: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
            May 2021
            2965 pages
            ISBN:9781450380959
            DOI:10.1145/3411763

            Copyright © 2021 Owner/Author

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 8 May 2021

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • extended-abstract
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

            Upcoming Conference

            CHI '24
            CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
            May 11 - 16, 2024
            Honolulu , HI , USA

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format