skip to main content
10.1145/3411763.3451839acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

SecondSight: A Framework for Cross-Device Augmented Reality Interfaces

Published:08 May 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper describes a modular framework developed to facilitate the design space exploration of cross-device Augmented Reality (AR) interfaces that combine an AR head-mounted display (HMD) with a smartphone. Currently, there is a growing interest in how AR HMDs can be used with smartphones to improve the user’s AR experience. In this work, we describe a framework that enables rapid prototyping and evaluation of an interface. Our system enables different modes of interaction, content placement, and simulated AR HMD field of view to assess which combination is best suited to inform future researchers on design recommendations. We provide examples of how the framework could be used to create sample applications, the types of the studies which could be supported, and example results from a simple pilot study.

References

  1. Dreamworld AR. 2021. Home. https://www.dreamworldvision.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Sunyoung Bang, Hyunjin Lee, and Woontack Woo. 2020. Effects of Augmented Content’s Placement and Size on User’s Search Experience in Extended Displays. In 2020 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct). IEEE, New York, USA, 184–188. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct51615.2020.00056Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Jonas Blattgerste, Patrick Renner, and Thies Pfeiffer. 2018. Advantages of Eye-Gaze over Head-Gaze-Based Selection in Virtual and Augmented Reality under Varying Field of Views. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Communication by Gaze Interaction (Warsaw, Poland) (COGAIN ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 1, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3206343.3206349Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Frederik Brudy, Christian Holz, Roman Rädle, Chi-Jui Wu, Steven Houben, Clemens Nylandsted Klokmose, and Nicolai Marquardt. 2019. Cross-Device Taxonomy: Survey, Opportunities and Challenges of Interactions Spanning Across Multiple Devices. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300792Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Rahul Budhiraja, Gun A Lee, and Mark Billinghurst. 2013. Using a HHD with a HMD for mobile AR interaction. In 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). IEEE, New Jersey, United States, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2013.6671837Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Ozan Cakmakci and Jannick Rolland. 2006. Head-worn displays: a review. Journal of Display Technology 2, 3 (2006), 199–216. https://doi.org/10.1109/JDT.2006.879846Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Nicko R Caluya, Alexander Plopski, Jayzon F Ty, Christian Sandor, Takafumi Taketomi, and Hirokazu Kato. 2018. Transferability of Spatial Maps: Augmented Versus Virtual Reality Training. In 2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE, New York, USA, 387–393.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Jens Grubert, Matthias Heinisch, Aaron Quigley, and Dieter Schmalstieg. 2015. MultiFi: Multi Fidelity Interaction with Displays On and Around the Body. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3933–3942. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702331Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Meta View Inc. 2021. Meta View. https://www.metavision.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Naohiro Kishishita, Kiyoshi Kiyokawa, Jason Orlosky, Tomohiro Mashita, Haruo Takemura, and Ernst Kruijff. 2014. Analysing the effects of a wide field of view augmented reality display on search performance in divided attention tasks. In 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). IEEE, New York, USA, 177–186.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Simon Moosburner, Christopher Remde, Peter Tang, Moritz Queisner, Nils Haep, Johann Pratschke, and Igor M. Sauer. 2019. Real world usability analysis of two augmented reality headsets in visceral surgery. Artificial Organs 43, 7 (2019), 694–698. https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.13396 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/aor.13396Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. [12] Mirror Networking.2021. https://mirror-networking.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Erwan Normand and Michael J. McGuffin. 2018. Enlarging a Smartphone with AR to Create a Handheld VESAD (Virtually Extended Screen-Aligned Display). In 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). IEEE, New York, USA, 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2018.00043Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. OptiTrack. 2021. OptiTrack – Motion Capture Systems. https://optitrack.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Patrick Reipschläger and Raimund Dachselt. 2019. DesignAR: Immersive 3D-Modeling Combining Augmented Reality with Interactive Displays. In Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Conference on Interactive Surfaces and Spaces(Daejeon, Republic of Korea) (ISS ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1145/3343055.3359718Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Donghao Ren, Tibor Goldschwendt, YunSuk Chang, and Tobias Höllerer. 2016. Evaluating wide-field-of-view augmented reality with mixed reality simulation. In 2016 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR). IEEE, New York, USA, 93–102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Jie Ren, Yueting Weng, Chengchi Zhou, Chun Yu, and Yuanchun Shi. 2020. Understanding Window Management Interactions in AR Headset + Smartphone Interface. In Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI EA ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/3334480.3382812Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Project North Star. 2021. Project North Star. https://project-north-star.gitbook.io/project-north-star/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Fengyuan Zhu and Tovi Grossman. 2020. BISHARE: Exploring Bidirectional Interactions Between Smartphones and Head-Mounted Augmented Reality. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376233Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. SecondSight: A Framework for Cross-Device Augmented Reality Interfaces
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI EA '21: Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2021
      2965 pages
      ISBN:9781450380959
      DOI:10.1145/3411763

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 May 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,164of23,696submissions,26%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format