skip to main content
10.1145/3411764.3445100acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Self-E: Smartphone-Supported Guidance for Customizable Self-Experimentation

Published:07 May 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The ubiquity of self-tracking devices and smartphone apps has empowered people to collect data about themselves and try to self-improve. However, people with little to no personal analytics experience may not be able to analyze data or run experiments on their own (self-experiments). To lower the barrier to intervention-based self-experimentation, we developed an app called Self-E, which guides users through the experiment. We conducted a 2-week diary study with 16 participants from the local population and a second study with a more advanced group of users to investigate how they perceive and carry out self-experiments with the help of Self-E, and what challenges they face. We find that users are influenced by their preconceived notions of how healthy a given behavior is, making it difficult to follow Self-E’s directions and trusting its results. We present suggestions to overcome this challenge, such as by incorporating empathy and scaffolding in the system.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Amid Ayobi, Paul Marshall, and Anna L Cox. 2020. Trackly: A Customisable and Pictorial Self-Tracking App to Support Agency in Multiple Sclerosis Self-Care. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1–15.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Amid Ayobi, Paul Marshall, Anna L Cox, and Yunan Chen. 2017. Quantifying the body and caring for the mind: self-tracking in multiple sclerosis. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 6889–6901.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Amid Ayobi, Tobias Sonne, Paul Marshall, and Anna L Cox. 2018. Flexible and Mindful Self-Tracking: Design Implications from Paper Bullet Journals. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Colin Barr, Maria Marois, Ida Sim, Christopher H Schmid, Barth Wilsey, Deborah Ward, Naihua Duan, Ron D Hays, Joshua Selsky, Joseph Servadio, 2015. The PREEMPT study-evaluating smartphone-assisted n-of-1 trials in patients with chronic pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 16, 1 (2015), 67.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Colleen E Carney, Daniel J Buysse, Sonia Ancoli-Israel, Jack D Edinger, Andrew D Krystal, Kenneth L Lichstein, and Charles M Morin. 2012. The consensus sleep diary: standardizing prospective sleep self-monitoring. Sleep 35, 2 (2012), 287–302.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Ting-Ray Chang, Eija Kaasinen, and Kirsikka Kaipainen. 2012. What influences users’ decisions to take apps into use?: A framework for evaluating persuasive and engaging design in mobile Apps for well-being. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Connie Chen, David Haddad, Joshua Selsky, Julia E Hoffman, Richard L Kravitz, Deborah E Estrin, and Ida Sim. 2012. Making sense of mobile health data: an open architecture to improve individual-and population-level health. Journal of medical Internet research 14, 4 (2012), e112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Eun Kyoung Choe, Bongshin Lee, Haining Zhu, Nathalie Henry Riche, and Dominikus Baur. 2017. Understanding self-reflection: how people reflect on personal data through visual data exploration. In Proceedings of the 11th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare. ACM, 173–182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Eun Kyoung Choe, Nicole B Lee, Bongshin Lee, Wanda Pratt, and Julie A Kientz. 2014. Understanding quantified-selfers’ practices in collecting and exploring personal data. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1143–1152.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Chia-Fang Chung, Elena Agapie, Jessica Schroeder, Sonali Mishra, James Fogarty, and Sean A Munson. 2017. When personal tracking becomes social: Examining the use of Instagram for healthy eating. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1674–1687.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. John Concato, Nirav Shah, and Ralph I Horwitz. 2000. Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. New England journal of medicine 342, 25 (2000), 1887–1892.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Felicia Cordeiro, Elizabeth Bales, Erin Cherry, and James Fogarty. 2015. Rethinking the mobile food journal: Exploring opportunities for lightweight photo-based capture. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3207–3216.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Felicia Cordeiro, Daniel A Epstein, Edison Thomaz, Elizabeth Bales, Arvind K Jagannathan, Gregory D Abowd, and James Fogarty. 2015. Barriers and negative nudges: Exploring challenges in food journaling. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1159–1162.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Mary Czerwinski, Eric Horvitz, and Susan Wilhite. 2004. A diary study of task switching and interruptions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 175–182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Nediyana Daskalova, Karthik Desingh, Alexandra Papoutsaki, Diane Schulze, Han Sha, and Jeff Huang. 2017. Lessons learned from two cohorts of personal informatics self-experiments. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 3 (2017), 46.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Nediyana Daskalova, Danaë Metaxa-Kakavouli, Adrienne Tran, Nicole Nugent, Julie Boergers, John McGeary, and Jeff Huang. 2016. SleepCoacher: A personalized automated self-experimentation system for sleep recommendations. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, 347–358.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Nediyana Daskalova, Jina Yoon, Yibing Wang, Cintia Araujo, Guillermo Beltran Jr, Nicole Nugent, John McGeary, Joseph Jay Williams, and Jeff Huang. 2020. SleepBandits: Guided Flexible Self-Experiments for Sleep. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1–13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Orianna DeMasi, Sidney Feygin, Aluma Dembo, Adrian Aguilera, and Benjamin Recht. 2017. Well-being tracking via smartphone-measured activity and sleep: cohort study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 5, 10 (2017), e137.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Markéta Dolejšová and Denisa Kera. 2017. Soylent Diet Self-Experimentation: Design Challenges in Extreme Citizen Science Projects. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. ACM, 2112–2123.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Daniel A Epstein, Nicole B Lee, Jennifer H Kang, Elena Agapie, Jessica Schroeder, Laura R Pina, James Fogarty, Julie A Kientz, and Sean Munson. 2017. Examining menstrual tracking to inform the design of personal informatics tools. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 6876–6888.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Daniel A Epstein, An Ping, James Fogarty, and Sean A Munson. 2015. A lived informatics model of personal informatics. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. 731–742.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Bob Evans. 2019. PACO: The Personal Analytics Companion. https://pacoapp.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Miguel Farias and Catherine Wikholm. 2016. Has the science of mindfulness lost its mind?BJPsych bulletin 40, 6 (2016), 329–332.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Brian J Fogg. 2002. Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. Ubiquity 2002, December (2002), 5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Brian J Fogg. 2019. Tiny Habits: The Small Changes That Change Everything. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Susannah Fox and Maeve Duggan. 2013. Tracking for Health. https://www.pewinternet.org/2013/01/28/tracking-for-health/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Daniel Harrison, Paul Marshall, Nadia Bianchi-Berthouze, and Jon Bird. 2015. Activity tracking: barriers, workarounds and customisation. In Proceedings of the 2015 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing. ACM, 617–621.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Eiji Hayashi and Jason Hong. 2011. A diary study of password usage in daily life. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2627–2630.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Steven C Hayes. 1981. Single case experimental design and empirical clinical practice.Journal of consulting and clinical psychology 49, 2(1981), 193.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Reetta Heinonen, Riitta Luoto, Pirjo Lindfors, and Clas-Håkan Nygård. 2012. Usability and feasibility of mobile phone diaries in an experimental physical exercise study. Telemedicine and e-Health 18, 2 (2012), 115–119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Miguel A Hernán and Sonia Hernández-Díaz. 2012. Beyond the intention-to-treat in comparative effectiveness research. Clinical Trials 9, 1 (2012), 48–55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Mieke Heyvaert and Patrick Onghena. 2014. Randomization tests for single-case experiments: State of the art, state of the science, and state of the application. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science 3, 1 (2014), 51–64.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Alexis Hiniker, Sungsoo Ray Hong, Tadayoshi Kohno, and Julie A Kientz. 2016. Mytime: Designing and evaluating an intervention for smartphone non-use. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 4746–4757.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Tero Jokela, Jarno Ojala, and Thomas Olsson. 2015. A diary study on combining multiple information devices in everyday activities and tasks. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3903–3912.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Ravi Karkar, Jessica Schroeder, Daniel A Epstein, Laura R Pina, Jeffrey Scofield, James Fogarty, Julie A Kientz, Sean A Munson, Roger Vilardaga, and Jasmine Zia. 2017. Tummytrials: a feasibility study of using self-experimentation to detect individualized food triggers. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 6850–6863.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Ravi Karkar, Jasmine Zia, Roger Vilardaga, Sonali R Mishra, James Fogarty, Sean A Munson, and Julie A Kientz. 2015. A framework for self-experimentation in personalized health. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 23, 3(2015), 440–448.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Joseph Jofish Kaye, Mary McCuistion, Rebecca Gulotta, and David A Shamma. 2014. Money talks: tracking personal finances. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 521–530.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Christina Kelley, Bongshin Lee, and Lauren Wilcox. 2017. Self-tracking for mental wellness: understanding expert perspectives and student experiences. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 629–641.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. John M Kelley and Ted J Kaptchuk. 2010. Group analysis versus individual response: the inferential limits of randomized controlled trials. Contemporary clinical trials 31, 5 (2010), 423–428.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Ian Kerridge. 2003. Altruism or reckless curiosity? A brief history of self experimentation in medicine. Internal medicine journal 33, 4 (2003), 203–207.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Elisabeth T Kersten-van Dijk, Joyce HDM Westerink, Femke Beute, and Wijnand A IJsselsteijn. 2017. Personal informatics, self-insight, and behavior change: A critical review of current literature. Human–Computer Interaction 32, 5-6 (2017), 268–296.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Julie A Kientz. 2019. In Praise of Small Data: When You Might Consider N-of-1 Studies. GetMobile: Mobile Computing and Communications 22, 4(2019), 5–8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Young-Ho Kim, Eun Kyoung Choe, Bongshin Lee, and Jinwook Seo. 2019. Understanding Personal Productivity: How Knowledge Workers Define, Evaluate, and Reflect on Their Productivity. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 615.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Young-Ho Kim, Jae Ho Jeon, Eun Kyoung Choe, Bongshin Lee, KwonHyun Kim, and Jinwook Seo. 2016. TimeAware: Leveraging framing effects to enhance personal productivity. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 272–283.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Young-Ho Kim, Jae Ho Jeon, Bongshin Lee, Eun Kyoung Choe, and Jinwook Seo. 2017. OmniTrack: A Flexible Self-Tracking Approach Leveraging Semi-Automated Tracking. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 1, 3 (2017), 67.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. Judy Kopp. 1988. Self-monitoring: A literature review of research and practice. In Social Work Research and Abstracts, Vol. 24. Oxford University Press, 8–20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Thomas R Kratochwill, John H Hitchcock, Robert H Horner, Joel R Levin, Samuel L Odom, David M Rindskopf, and William R Shadish. 2013. Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education 34, 1 (2013), 26–38.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Reed Larson and Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 2014. The experience sampling method. In Flow and the foundations of positive psychology. Springer, 21–34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Gary P Latham. 2003. Goal setting: A five-step approach to behavior change.Organizational Dynamics(2003), 309–318.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Jisoo Lee, Erin Walker, Winslow Burleson, Matthew Kay, Matthew Buman, and Eric B Hekler. 2017. Self-experimentation for behavior change: Design and formative evaluation of two approaches. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 6837–6849.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Ian Li, Anind Dey, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2010. A stage-based model of personal informatics systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 557–566.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Elizabeth O Lillie, Bradley Patay, Joel Diamant, Brian Issell, Eric J Topol, and Nicholas J Schork. 2011. The n-of-1 clinical trial: the ultimate strategy for individualizing medicine?Personalized medicine 8, 2 (2011), 161–173.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. David Mant. 1999. Can randomised trials inform clinical decisions about individual patients?The Lancet 353, 9154 (1999), 743–746.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Sean A Munson, Jessica Schroeder, Ravi Karkar, Julie A Kientz, Chia-Fang Chung, and James Fogarty. 2020. The Importance of Starting With Goals in N-of-1 Studies. Frontiers in Digital Health 2 (2020), 3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Gina Neff and Dawn Nafus. 2016. Self-tracking. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Rosemery O Nelson and Steven C Hayes. 1981. Theoretical explanations for reactivity in self-monitoring. Behavior Modification 5, 1 (1981), 3–14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Doug Oman, Shauna L Shapiro, Carl E Thoresen, Thomas G Plante, and Tim Flinders. 2008. Meditation lowers stress and supports forgiveness among college students: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of American College Health 56, 5 (2008), 569–578.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Leysia Palen and Marilyn Salzman. 2002. Voice-mail diary studies for naturalistic data capture under mobile conditions. In Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 87–95.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Vineet Pandey. 2018. Creating Scientific Theories with Online Communities using Gut Instinct. In Companion of the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. 109–112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. Vineet Pandey, Tushar Koul, Chen Yang, Daniel McDonald, Mad Price Ball, Bastian Greshake Tzovaras, and Scott Klemmer. 2021. Galileo: Citizen-led Experimentation using a Social Computing System. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Sun Young Park and Yunan Chen. 2015. Individual and social recognition: challenges and opportunities in migraine management. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing. ACM, 1540–1551.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. James O Prochaska and Wayne F Velicer. 1997. The transtheoretical model of health behavior change. American journal of health promotion 12, 1 (1997), 38–48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Seth Roberts and Allen Neuringer. 1998. Self-experimentation. In Handbook of research methods in human operant behavior. Springer, 619–655.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. John Rooksby, Parvin Asadzadeh, Mattias Rost, Alistair Morrison, and Matthew Chalmers. 2016. Personal tracking of screen time on digital devices. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 284–296.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. John Rooksby, Mattias Rost, Alistair Morrison, and Matthew Chalmers. 2014. Personal tracking as lived informatics. In Proceedings of the 2014 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1163–1172.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Daniel J Russo, Benjamin Van Roy, Abbas Kazerouni, Ian Osband, Zheng Wen, 2018. A tutorial on Thompson sampling. Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning 11, 1(2018), 1–96.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Johnny Saldaña. 2015. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. Akane Sano, Sara Taylor, Craig Ferguson, Akshay Mohan, and Rosalind W Picard. 2017. QuantifyMe: An Automated Single-Case Experimental Design Platform. In International Conference on Wireless Mobile Communication and Healthcare. Springer, 199–206.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. Jessica Schroeder, Chia-Fang Chung, Daniel A Epstein, Ravi Karkar, Adele Parsons, Natalia Murinova, James Fogarty, and Sean A Munson. 2018. Examining self-tracking by people with migraine: goals, needs, and opportunities in a chronic health condition. In Proceedings of the 2018 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2018. ACM, 135–148.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Jessica Schroeder, Ravi Karkar, James Fogarty, Julie A Kientz, Sean A Munson, and Matthew Kay. 2019. A Patient-Centered Proposal for Bayesian Analysis of Self-Experiments for Health. Journal of healthcare informatics research 3, 1 (2019), 124–155.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Timothy Sohn, Kevin A Li, William G Griswold, and James D Hollan. 2008. A diary study of mobile information needs. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 433–442.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  73. Katarzyna Stawarz, Anna L Cox, and Ann Blandford. 2015. Beyond self-tracking and reminders: designing smartphone apps that support habit formation. In Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2653–2662.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  74. Anselm Strauss and Juliet Corbin. 1998. Basics of qualitative research techniques. Sage publications Thousand Oaks, CA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. Melanie Swan. 2013. The quantified self: Fundamental disruption in big data science and biological discovery. Big data 1, 2 (2013), 85–99.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Jakob Tholander and Maria Normark. 2020. Crafting Personal Information-Resistance, Imperfection, and Self-Creation in Bullet Journaling. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  77. Eric Topol. 2019. The A.I. Diet. The New York Times (Mar 2019). https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/02/opinion/sunday/diet-artificial-intelligence-diabetes.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Niels van Berkel, Jorge Goncalves, Peter Koval, Simo Hosio, Tilman Dingler, Denzil Ferreira, and Vassilis Kostakos. 2019. Context-Informed Scheduling and Analysis: Improving Accuracy of Mobile Self-Reports. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1–12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  79. Heather P Whitley and Wesley Lindsey. 2009. Sex-based differences in drug activity. American family physician 80, 11 (2009), 1254–1258.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Steve Whittaker, Vaiva Kalnikaite, Victoria Hollis, and Andrew Guydish. 2016. ‘Don’t Waste My Time’: Use of Time Information Improves Focus. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1729–1738.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Hanlu Ye, Meethu Malu, Uran Oh, and Leah Findlater. 2014. Current and future mobile and wearable device use by people with visual impairments. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 3123–3132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Self-E: Smartphone-Supported Guidance for Customizable Self-Experimentation
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 2021
      10862 pages
      ISBN:9781450380966
      DOI:10.1145/3411764

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 May 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format