Philip Engelbutzeder
ABSTRACT
Research on food practices has become more common among scholars of HCI in recent years. Human-Food-Interaction (HFI) looks into the interplay of humans, food and technology. HFI, even so, has paid relatively little attention to the more collective elements of food practice, including social bonding [1]. The modest project we describe below aimed to say something about the use of digital artifacts to support community engagement for sustainable food practices. We participated, as action researchers (see [2]) in a grassroots movement that instigated a project around learning about food growing, using digital means to bring interested people together during times of physical distancing: In the project Vegetables seek a home, people from various backgrounds ‘adopted’ a chili-plant, they are invited to share what they like in a Telegram-Group, and to get learning-modules via a mailing-list. Through an analysis of the communal effort to actualize the project (video-calls, Telegram, wechange.de) and the content of the Telegram-Group for the chili-plant adopting parents and experts, we suggest some design implications for grassroots communities and sustainable food practice. In future research we intend an iterative design to support the community and its project, utilizing Holmgren's 12 principles of permaculture design.
- F. Altarriba Bertran, S. Jhaveri, R. Lutz, K. Isbister, and D. Wilde, “Making Sense of Human-Food Interaction,” in Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Glasgow, Scotland Uk, May 2019, pp. 1–13, doi: 10.1145/3290605.3300908.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- S. A. Small, “Action-Oriented Research: Models and Methods,” J. Marriage Fam. Couns., vol. 57, no. 4, pp. 941–955, 1995, doi: 10.2307/353414.Google ScholarCross Ref
- R. Ferguson and S. Lovell, “Grassroots engagement with transition to sustainability: diversity and modes of participation in the international permaculture movement,” Ecol. Soc., vol. 20, no. 4, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.5751/ES-08048-200439.Google Scholar
- J. Casas, E. Mugellini, and O. A. Khaled, “Food Diary Coaching Chatbot,” in Proceedings of the 2018 ACM International Joint Conference and 2018 International Symposium on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and Wearable Computers, Singapore, Singapore, Oct. 2018, pp. 1676–1680, doi: 10.1145/3267305.3274191.Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. S. Ferdous, “Technology at Mealtime: Beyond the ‘Ordinary,’” in Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seoul, Republic of Korea, Apr. 2015, pp. 195–198, doi: 10.1145/2702613.2702620.Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Prost, C. Crivellaro, A. Haddon, and R. Comber, “Food Democracy in the Making: Designing with Local Food Networks,” in Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal QC, Canada, Apr. 2018, pp. 1–14, doi: 10.1145/3173574.3173907.Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Dourish, “HCI and environmental sustainability: the politics of design and the design of politics,” in Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, Aarhus, Denmark, Aug. 2010, pp. 1–10, doi: 10.1145/1858171.1858173.Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Pierce, Y. Strengers, P. Sengers, and S. Bødker, “Introduction to the special issue on practice-oriented approaches to sustainable HCI,” ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 1–8, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1145/2494260.Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Ganglbauer, G. Fitzpatrick, and R. Comber, “Negotiating food waste: Using a practice lens to inform design,” ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1–25, May 2013, doi: 10.1145/2463579.2463582.Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Ganglbauer, G. Fitzpatrick, Ö. Subasi, and F. Güldenpfennig, “Think globally, act locally: a case study of a free food sharing community and social networking,” in Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, Feb. 2014, pp. 911–921, doi: 10.1145/2531602.2531664.Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Knowles, O. Bates, and M. Håkansson, “This Changes Sustainable HCI,” in Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal QC, Canada, Apr. 2018, pp. 1–12, doi: 10.1145/3173574.3174045.Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Hirsch, P. Sengers, E. Blevis, R. Beckwith, and T. Parikh, “Making food, producing sustainability,” in CHI ’10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, Apr. 2010, pp. 3147–3150, doi: 10.1145/1753846.1753939.Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Heitlinger, N. Bryan-Kinns, and J. Jefferies, “Sustainable HCI for grassroots urban food-growing communities,” in Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, Collaboration, Adelaide, Australia, Nov. 2013, pp. 255–264, doi: 10.1145/2541016.2541023.Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Lyle, J. H.-J. Choi, and M. Foth, “Designing for grassroots food production: an event-based urban agriculture community,” in Proceedings of the 26th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference on Designing Futures: the Future of Design, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, Dec. 2014, pp. 362–365, doi: 10.1145/2686612.2686666.Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Balestrini, Y. Rogers, and P. Marshall, “Civically engaged HCI: tensions between novelty and social impact,” in Proceedings of the 2015 British HCI Conference, Lincoln, Lincolnshire, United Kingdom, Jul. 2015, pp. 35–36, doi: 10.1145/2783446.2783590.Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. Fischer, “Beyond binary choices: Understanding and exploiting trade-offs to enhance creativity,” First Monday, vol. 11, no. 4), Apr. 2006, doi: 10.5210/fm.v11i4.1323.Google Scholar
- J. Lave, “Situating learning in communities of practice,” in Perspectives on socially shared cognition, vol. 2, L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, and S. D. Teasley, Eds. Washington, DC US: American Psychological Association, 1991, pp. 63–82.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. Seyfang and A. Smith, “Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda,” Env. Polit., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 584–603, Aug. 2007, doi: 10.1080/09644010701419121.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Pansera and R. Owen, “Eco-Innovation at the ‘Bottom of the Pyramid,’” in Collaboration for Sustainability and Innovation: A Role For Sustainability Driven by the Global South? A Cross-Border, Multi-Stakeholder Perspective, D. A. Vazquez-Brust, J. Sarkis, and J. J. Cordeiro, Eds. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2014, pp. 293–313.Google ScholarCross Ref
- N. Pantidi, J. Ferreira, M. Balestrini, M. Perry, P. Marshall, and J. McCarthy, “Connected sustainability: connecting sustainability-driven, grass-roots communities through technology,” in Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Communities and Technologies, Limerick, Ireland, Jun. 2015, pp. 161–163, doi: 10.1145/2768545.2768563.Google ScholarDigital Library
- G. R. Hayes, “The relationship of action research to human-computer interaction,” ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 1–20, Aug. 2011, doi: 10.1145/1993060.1993065.Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. Ley, C. Ogonowski, M. Mu, J. Heß, and V. Wulf, “At Home with Users: A Comparative View of Living Labs,” Interacting with Computers, vol. 27, no. 1), pp. 21–35, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.1093/iwc/iwu025.Google ScholarCross Ref
- G. Simmel, “Sociology of the Meal,” SAGE Publications Ltd, 1997, pp. 130–136.Google Scholar
- H. Thalbauer, “How COVID-19 Exposed Weaknesses In The Global Supply Chain,” Forbes Magazine, Forbes, Apr. 02, 2020.Google Scholar
- IPES, “COVID-19 and the crisis in food systems: Symptoms, causes, and potential solutions,” 2020. [Online]. Available: http://www.ipes-food.org/_img/upload/files/COVID-19_CommuniqueEN.pdf.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Investigating the use of digital artifacts in a community project of sustainable food practices: ‘My chili blossoms’
Recommendations
This Changes Sustainable HCI
CHI '18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsMore than a decade into Sustainable HCI (SHCI) research, the community is still struggling to converge on a shared understanding of sustainability and HCI's role in addressing it. We think this is largely a positive sign, reflective of maturity; yet, ...
From Surplus and Scarcity toward Abundance: Understanding the Use of ICT in Food Resource Sharing Practices
Food practices have become an important context for questions around sustainability. Within HCI, sustainable HCI and human-food-interaction have developed as a response. We argue, nevertheless, that food practices as a social activity remain relatively ...
Sustainable HCI for grassroots urban food-growing communities
OzCHI '13: Proceedings of the 25th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference: Augmentation, Application, Innovation, CollaborationMainstream food growing practices around the world call in to question our future food security, and in particular the sustainability of food consumption in urban centres. At the same time there has been a dramatic recent increase in grassroots urban ...
Comments