Abstract
This paper uses resource view theory to determine the means by which SAP technology could provide a sustainable competitive advantage to firms which have successfully implemented the SAP system. Resource view theory suggests that resources which are durable, not easily replicable, and imperfectly mobile can be effectively leveraged by the firm in order to achieve a sustainable competitive advantage over its competitors.The analysis which is presented in this paper suggests that the effective implementation of the SAP system by a firm requires not only an acquisition of a high level of technical expertise, but a change in organizational culture from one which rewards individual brilliance to one which encourages project teams. This will create an environment in which the success of any individual in his job is critically dependent on the skills possessed by the other team members. This will render the human component of the SAP resource imperfectly mobile and increase the capability of the firm to leverage this resource in order to achieve a sustainable competitive advantage.A second prescription which emerges from the analysis is that it is preferable to modify the business processes of the organization to fit the capabilities provided by the SAP system, rather than modify the SAP system to fit the reengineered business processes of the organization.
- Andreu, R., and Ciborra, C. (1996), "Organizational Learning and Core Capabilities Development: The Role of IT," Journal of Strategic Information Systems, Vol. 5, pp. 111-127.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bancroft, Nancy H. (1996). Implementing R/3: How to Introduce a Large System into a Large Organization, New York, NY: Manning/Prentice Hall. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Barney, J. (1986). "Organizational Culture: Can it be a Source of Sustained Competitive Advantage?," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 11, pp. 656-665.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Barney, J. (1991). "Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage," Journal of Management , Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 99-120.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Caves, R.E. (1984). "Economic Analysis and the Quest for Competitive Advantage," American Economic Review, Vol. 74, pp. 127-128.Google Scholar
- Dess, G., and Davis P. (1984). "Porter's (1980) Generic Strategies as Determinants of Strategic Group Membership and Organizational Performance," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 27, No. 3, September, pp. 467-488.Google Scholar
- Fiol, C. M. (1991). "Managing Culture as a Competitive Resource: An Identity-Based View of Sustainable Competitive Advantage," Journal of Management, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 191-211.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ghemawat, P. (1986). "Sustainable Advantage," Harvard Business Review, Vol. 65, No. 5, pp. 53-58.Google Scholar
- Grant, Robert M. (1991). "The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation," California Management Review, Spring, pp. 114-135.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Hambrick, D.C. (1980). "Operationalizing the Concept of Business-Level Strategy in Research," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 5, No. 3, July, pp. 567-576.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kettinger, W.J., Grover, V., Guha, S., and Segars, A.H. (1994). "Strategic Information Systems Revisited: A Study in Sustainability and Performance," MIS Quarterly, March, pp. 31- 55. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Neo, B.S. (1988). "Factors Facilitating the Use of Information Technology for Competitive Advantage : An Exploratory Study," Information & Management, Vol. 15, pp. 191-201. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nord, W.R. (1985). "Can Organizational Culture Be Managed? A Synthesis," in P.J. Frost & Associates (Eds.) Organizational Culture, Beverly Hills: Sage, pp. 187-196.Google Scholar
- Porter, M.E. (1985). Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Porter, M.E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York, NY: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Peteraf, M.A. (1993). "The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based View," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 14, pp. 179-191.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Prahalad, C.K., and Hamel, G. (1990). "The Core Competence of the Corporation," Harvard Business Review, May/June, pp. 79-91.Google Scholar
- Smircich, L. (1983). "Concepts of Culture in Organizational Analysis," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 28, pp. 339-358.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Resource view theory analysis of SAP as a source of competitive advantage for firms
Recommendations
Review: it-dependent strategic initiatives and sustained competitive advantage: a review and synthesis of the literature
The role of information systems in the creation and appropriation of economic value has a long tradition of research, within which falls the literature on the sustainability of IT-dependent competitive advantage. In this article, we formally define the ...
Innovation, Competitive Advantage and Rent: A Model and Test
<P>Four antecedents, it is argued, are necessary precursors for a firm to capture rents from innovation. The antecedents are causal understanding; innovation team proficiency; emergence and mobilization of new competences; and creation of competitive ...
A contingency perspective on internet adoption and competitive advantage
Firms adopt the Internet for different purposes, ranging from simple Internet presence to using the Internet to transform business operations. This paper examines the contingency factors that affect levels of Internet adoption and their impact on ...
Comments