skip to main content
10.1145/3426020.3426081acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessmaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Determinants of Social Media-Based Online Store Adoption.

Published:04 November 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

This study aims to examine the key influential factors responsible for social media-based online store adoption in Bangladesh. The research model combines constructs from the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology model. We use structural equation modeling to analyze the data collected through an online survey of 273 participants who are social media-based online store users in Bangladesh. The results indicate that social influence is the most influential factor of use intention, and performance expectancy and effort expectancy have an almost similar impact on use intention. The findings also reveal that facilitating conditions and use intention have significant positive impacts on the actual use behavior of these platforms.

References

  1. [1] Muneer Mahmood Abbad, David Morris and Carmel de Nahlik. 2009. Looking under the Bonnet: Factors Affecting Student Adoption of E-Learning Systems in Jordan. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 10(2). https://doi.org/ 10.19173/Ir rodl.v10i2.596Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [2] Said S. Al-Gahtani. 2016. Empirical investigation of e-learning acceptance and assimilation: A structural equation model. Applied Computing and Informatics, 12(1), 27–50. https://doi.org/10.101 6/j.aci.2014.09.001Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. [3] Thamer A. Alrawashdeh, Mohammad I. Muhairat and Sokyna M. Alqatawnah. 2012. Factors Affecting Acceptance of Web-Based Training System: Using Extended Utaut and Structural Equation Modeling. International Journal of Computer Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 2(2), 45–54. https://doi.org/10. 5121/ ijcseit.20 12.2205Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. [4] Seyedeh Marjan Mahdavi Anari, Aryati Bakri and Roliana Ibrahim. 2014. Understanding factors on the customer intention behavior through Facebook commerce: a conceptual model. Paper presented at the 2014 International Symposium on Technology Management and Emerging TechnologiesGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. [5] Youcef Baghdadi.2016.A framework for social commerce design. Information Systems, 60, 95–113 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. [6] Richard P. Bagozzi and Youjae Yi. 1989.On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science,16(1): p. 74-94Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. [7] Hakan Celik. 2016. Customer online shopping anxiety within the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use Technology (UTAUT) framework. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 28(2), 278–307. https:// doi. Org/10.1108/apjml-05-2015-0077Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. [8] Fred D. Davis. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319–340 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. [9] Export.gov 2018.Bangladesh- eCommerce. [Retrieved June 30 2020 from] https://www.export.gov/article ?id = Bangladesh-EcommerceGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. [10] Joseph F. Hair Jr, William C. Black, Barry J. Babin, and Rolph E. Anderson. 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis; a global perspective (ed.): Pearson Education Inc. New Jersey, USA, 5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. [11] Joe F. Hair, Marko Sarstedt, Christian M. Ringle and Jeannette A. Mena. 2012. An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 40(3), 414-433.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. [12] Joseph F. Hair, Ronald L. Tatham, Rolph E. Anderson, William Black. 1995. Multivariate Data Analysis, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. [13] John Hulland. 1999. Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic management journal, 20(2): p. 195-204.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. [14] Simon Kemp. 2018. Digital in 2018: world’s internet users pass the 4 billion mark. [Retrieved June 20 2020 from]https://wearesocial.com/blog /2018/ 01/ global-digital-report-2018Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. [15] Rex B. Kline. 2015. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publicationGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. [16] F. Liebana-Cabanillasa and M. Alonso-Dos-Santosb. 2017. Factors that determine the adoption of Facebook commerce: The moderating effect of age. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 44, 1–18. https://doi. org/ 1 0.1016/j.jengtecman.2017.03.001Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. [17] Anny Mardjo. 2018. Exploring Facebook users’ willingness to accept f-commerce using the integrated unified theory of acceptance and use of technology 2 (UTAUT2), trust and risk under the moderating role of age and gender. UTCC International Journal of Business and Economics 10(2): p. 139-166Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. [18] Vaggelis Saprikis. 2018. Examining Behavioral Intention Towards Social Commerce: An Empirical Investigation in University Students. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the32nd IBIMA Conference, NovemberGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. [19] Saeideh Sharifi fard,Ezhar Tamam, Md Salleh Hj Hassan, Moniza Waheed and Zeinab Zaremohzzabieh. 2016. Factors affecting Malaysian university students’ purchase intention in social networking sites. Cogent Business & Management, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2016.1182612Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. [20] Lai-Ying Leong, Noor Ismawati Jaafar and Ainin Sulaiman Related information. 2018. What triggers impulse purchase in Facebook commerce? International Journal of Mobile Communications, 16(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijmc.2018.10008843 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. [21] Viswanath Venkatesh, Michael G. Morris, Gordon B. Davis and Fred D. Davis. 2003. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 425-478. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. [22] Viswanath Venkatesh, James Y. L. Thong and Xin Xu. 2012. Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157. https://doi.org /10.23 07/41410412 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. [23] Ken Kwong-Kay Wong. 2013. Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) techniques using SmartPLS. Marketing Bulletin, 24(1): p. 1-32Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. [24] Mashruha Zabeen, Husna Ara and Nafish Sarwar. 2013. F-Commerce in Bangladesh: “Venit, Vidit, Vicit.” IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 17(5), 01–08. https://doi.org / 10.9790/0837-1750108Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. [25] Amoghsiddhi Urne and Artee Aggrawal. 2018. Social Media: A Determinant Factor of Consumer Life Quality from E-Commerce Perspective. Asian Journal of Management, 9(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.59 58/2321-5763.2018.00003.3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. [26] Nick Hajli.2019. The impact of positive valence and negative valence on social commerce purchase intention. Information Technology & People, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 774-791. https://do i. org / 10.1108/itp-02-2018-0099Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. [27] Sfenrianto, Ika Romadoni Yunita, and Wang Gunawan. 2018. The influence of social media to loyalty in an e-commerce. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 420, 012102. https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1757-899x/420/1/012102Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. [28] Shantanu Prasad, Ishwar C. Gupta, Navindra K. Totala. 2017. Social media usage, electronic word of mouth and purchase-decision involvement. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 9(2), 134–145. https://doi.org/10.1108/apjba-06-2016-0063Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. [29] Abdullah Al Mamun, Noorshella Binti Che Nawi, Noorul Azwin Binti Md Nasir and Syed Ali Fazal. 2020. Social Media and Consumer Engagement: The Case of Malaysian Student Entrepreneurs. Journal of Asia-Pacific Business,1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 10599 23 1.2020.1783972Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. [30] Noorlisa Maria bt A. Hamid Shokery, Noorshella Binti Che Nawi, Noorul Azwin Binti Md Nasir, and Abdullah Al Mamun. 2016. Factors Contributing to the Acceptance of Social Media as a Platform among Student Entrepreneurs: A Review. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences,7(2),42-51. https://doi.org /1 0.5901/mjss.2016.v7n2p42Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. [31] Marcos Komodromos, Tap Papaioannou, and Mohammed Alhaji Adamu. 2018. Influence of online retailers’ social media marketing strategies on students’ perceptions towards e-shopping: a qualitative study. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 10(3), 218. https://doi. org/ 10.1504/ijtel.2018.10010201 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. [32] Boying Li, Zhengzhi Guan, Fangfang Hou, and Alain Yee-Loong Chong. 2019. How Social Experience Encourages Donation Intention to Charitable Crowdfunding Projects on Social Media: Empathy and Personal Impulsiveness. Paper presented at the Twenty-Third Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, ChinaGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. [33] David Gefen, Detmar Straub, and Marie-Claude Boudreau. 2000. Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the association for information systems, 4(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.00407Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Determinants of Social Media-Based Online Store Adoption.
        Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          SMA 2020: The 9th International Conference on Smart Media and Applications
          September 2020
          491 pages
          ISBN:9781450389259
          DOI:10.1145/3426020

          Copyright © 2020 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 4 November 2021

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article
          • Research
          • Refereed limited
        • Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

          Other Metrics

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader

        HTML Format

        View this article in HTML Format .

        View HTML Format