skip to main content
10.1145/3426020.3426088acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessmaConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Deep Learning-Based Inpainting for Chest X-ray Image

Published:04 November 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

In recent years, chest X-ray images have been progressively applied in research studies. Inspired by the recent success of applying deep learning-based approaches to medical image processing, we first propose an architecture for inpainting on chest X-ray images. A system based on deep convolutional neural networks for completion of the missing or distorted areas using the chest X-ray image was designed and implemented in this paper. Our network was trained with chest X-ray images and shows promising results compared to other networks. Through qualitative and quantitative comparisons with other image inpainting methods, the experimental results have proven our method achieved very good performance when compared with other methods. The average PSNR and SSIM values on the test set for the proposed model were 39.51 dB and 0.79 respectively.

References

  1. Mashail Alsalamah and Saad Amin. 2016. Medical image inpainting with RBF interpolation technique. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 7, 8 (2016), 91–99.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Karim Armanious, Vijeth Kumar, Sherif Abdulatif, Tobias Hepp, Sergios Gatidis, and Bin Yang. 2019. ipA-MedGAN: Inpainting of Arbitrary Regions in Medical Imaging. arXiv (2019), arXiv–1910.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Karim Armanious, Youssef Mecky, Sergios Gatidis, and Bin Yang. 2019. Adversarial inpainting of medical image modalities. In ICASSP 2019-2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 3267–3271.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Mirko Arnold, Anarta Ghosh, Stefan Ameling, and Gerard Lacey. 2010. Automatic segmentation and inpainting of specular highlights for endoscopic imaging. EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing 2010 (2010), 1–12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Djork-Arné Clevert, Thomas Unterthiner, and Sepp Hochreiter. 2015. Fast and accurate deep network learning by exponential linear units (elus). arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.07289 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Zhilin Feng, Shuiming Chi, Jianwei Yin, Duanyang Zhao, and Xiaoming Liu. 2007. A variational approach to medical image inpainting based on mumfordshah model. In 2007 International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management. IEEE, 1–5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Ian Goodfellow, Jean Pouget-Abadie, Mehdi Mirza, Bing Xu, David Warde-Farley, Sherjil Ozair, Aaron Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. 2014. Generative adversarial nets. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 2672–2680. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Nicolas Guizard, Kunio Nakamura, Pierrick Coupé, Vladimir S Fonov, Douglas L Arnold, and D Louis Collins. 2015. Non-local means inpainting of MS lesions in longitudinal image processing. Frontiers in neuroscience 9 (2015), 456.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jia-Bin Huang, Sing Bing Kang, Narendra Ahuja, and Johannes Kopf. 2014. Image completion using planar structure guidance. ACM Transactions on graphics (TOG) 33, 4 (2014), 1–10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Olivier Le Meur, Josselin Gautier, and Christine Guillemot. 2011. Examplar-based inpainting based on local geometry. In 2011 18th IEEE international conference on image processing. IEEE, 3401–3404.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Deepak Pathak, Philipp Krahenbuhl, Jeff Donahue, Trevor Darrell, and Alexei A Efros. 2016. Context encoders: Feature learning by inpainting. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2536–2544.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Yael Pritch, Eitam Kav-Venaki, and Shmuel Peleg. 2009. Shift-map image editing. In 2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision. IEEE, 151–158.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Olaf Ronneberger, Philipp Fischer, and Thomas Brox. 2015. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer, 234–241.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Ecem Sogancioglu, Shi Hu, Davide Belli, and Bram van Ginneken. 2018. Chest X-ray Inpainting with Deep Generative Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.01471 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Minh-Trieu Tran and Guee-Sang Lee. 2019. Super-resolution in Music Score Images by Instance Normalization. Smart Media Journal 8, 4 (2019), 64–71.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Dmitry Ulyanov, Andrea Vedaldi, and Victor Lempitsky. 2016. Instance normalization: The missing ingredient for fast stylization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.08022 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Pavel Vlašánek. 2018. Fuzzy image inpainting aimed to medical images. (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Xiaosong Wang, Yifan Peng, Le Lu, Zhiyong Lu, Mohammadhadi Bagheri, and Ronald M Summers. 2017. Chestx-ray8: Hospital-scale chest x-ray database and benchmarks on weakly-supervised classification and localization of common thorax diseases. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2097–2106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Zhou Wang, Alan C Bovik, Hamid R Sheikh, and Eero P Simoncelli. 2004. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE transactions on image processing 13, 4 (2004), 600–612. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Chaohao Xie, Shaohui Liu, Chao Li, Ming-Ming Cheng, Wangmeng Zuo, Xiao Liu, Shilei Wen, and Errui Ding. 2019. Image inpainting with learnable bidirectional attention maps. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 8858–8867.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Zongben Xu and Jian Sun. 2010. Image inpainting by patch propagation using patch sparsity. IEEE transactions on image processing 19, 5 (2010), 1153–1165. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Zhaoyi Yan, Xiaoming Li, Mu Li, Wangmeng Zuo, and Shiguang Shan. 2018. Shift-net: Image inpainting via deep feature rearrangement. In Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV). 1–17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Kashan Zafar, Syed Omer Gilani, Asim Waris, Ali Ahmed, Mohsin Jamil, Muhammad Nasir Khan, and Amer Sohail Kashif. 2020. Skin Lesion Segmentation from Dermoscopic Images Using Convolutional Neural Network. Sensors 20, 6 (2020), 1601.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Deep Learning-Based Inpainting for Chest X-ray Image
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            SMA 2020: The 9th International Conference on Smart Media and Applications
            September 2020
            491 pages
            ISBN:9781450389259
            DOI:10.1145/3426020

            Copyright © 2020 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 4 November 2021

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format