ABSTRACT
Industry 4.0 involves enhancing industrial processes with high-fidelity and high-value information from machines, workers, and products. Industry 4.0 applications improve production efficiency, product quality, etc., by using Internet of Things (IoT) and Artificial Intelligence (AI). Existing industry 4.0 application development approaches are centered on commercial IoT platforms that provide siloed development and runtime environments (leading to vendor lockdown) and only support individual sensors and actuators instead of entire machines. Therefore, Industry 4.0 applications need to construct representations of complex machines from such basic elements, which is a costly, error-prone, inefficient hindering portability across machines and plants. This paper proposes Cyber Twins, a comprehensive solution for efficient Industry 4.0 application development, testing, and portability. The Cyber Twins solution includes a model for machine representation and services that facilitate Industry 4.0 application development. Finally, a prototype Cyber Twin implementation is presented, with its functionality described using a sample Industry 4.0 application.
- André Barthelmey, Eunseo Lee, Ramy Hana, and Jochen Deuse. 2019. Dynamic digital twin for predictive maintenance in flexible production systems. In IECON 2019 - 45th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Vol. 1. IEEE, Lisbon, Portugal, Portugal, 4209--4214.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yi Cai, Binil Starly, Paul Cohen, and Yuan-Shin Lee. 2017. Sensor Data and Information Fusion to Construct Digital-twins Virtual Machine Tools for Cyber-physical Manufacturing. Procedia Manufacturing 10 (2017), 1031--1042.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jean-Paul Calbimonte, Sofiane Sarni, Julien Eberle, and Karl Aberer. 2014. XGSN: An Open-source Semantic Sensing Middleware for the Web of Things. In TC/SSN@ISWC. CEUR, Garda, Trentino, Italy.Google Scholar
- Camunda. 2020. Process Automation reinvented for the Digital Enterprise. https://camunda.com/Google Scholar
- Michael Compton, Payam Barnaghi, Luis Bermudez, Raúl García-Castro, Oscar Corcho, Simon Cox, John Graybeal, Manfred Hauswirth, Cory Henson, Arthur Herzog, Vincent Huang, Krzysztof Janowicz, W. David Kelsey, Danh Le Phuoc, Laurent Lefort, Myriam Leggieri, Holger Neuhaus, Andriy Nikolov, Kevin Page, Alexandre Passant, Amit Sheth, and Kerry Taylor. 2012. The SSN ontology of the W3C semantic sensor network incubator group. Journal of Web Semantics 17 (2012), 25 -- 32. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Cumulocity. 2020. Introduction to Cumulocity IoT. https://cumulocity.com/guides/concepts/introduction/Google Scholar
- Inc Eclipse Foundation. 2020. Eclipse rdf4j. https://rdf4j.org/Google Scholar
- Rossmann Engineering. 2020. THE STANDARD LIBRARY FOR MODBUS COMMUNICATION. http://easymodbustcp.net/en/Google Scholar
- Abdur Rahim Mohammad Forkan, Montori Federico, Dimitrios Georgakopoulos, Prem Prakash Jayaraman, Ali Yavari, and Ahsan Morshed. 2019. An Industrial IoT Solution for Evaluating Workers' Performance Via Activity Recognition. In 2019 IEEE 39th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS). IEEE, Dallas, TX, USA, USA, 1393--1403.Google Scholar
- OPC Foundation. 2020. Collaborations: PackML, PRODML, MDIS, AutomationM. https://opcconnect.opcfoundation.org/2016/09/collaborations-packml-prodml-mdis-automationml/Google Scholar
- Dimitrios Georgakopoulos, Prem Prakash Jayaraman, Maria Fazia, Massimo Villari, and Rajiv Ranjan. 2016. Internet of Things and Edge Cloud Computing Roadmap for Manufacturing. IEEE Cloud Computing 3, 4 (2016), 66--73.Google ScholarCross Ref
- MTConnect Institute. 2020. MTConnect R Standard. https://www.mtconnect.org/standard-download20181Google Scholar
- Krzysztof Janowicz, Armin Haller, Simon J.D. Cox, Danh Le Phuoc, and Maxime Lefrançois. 2019. SOSA: A lightweight ontology for sensors, observations, samples, and actuators. Journal of Web Semantics 56 (2019), 1 -- 10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Apache JMeter. 2020. Apache Software Foundation. https://jmeter.apache.org/Google Scholar
- Aleksey Kychkin and Aleksadr Nikolaev. 2020. IoT-based Mine Ventilation Control System Architecture with Digital Twin. In 2020 International Conference on Industrial Engineering, Applications and Manufacturing (ICIEAM). IEEE, Sochi, Russia, Russia, 1--5.Google Scholar
- Stefan-Helmut Leitner and Wolfgang Mahnke. 2006. OPC UA - Service-oriented Architecture for Industrial Applications. Softwaretechnik-Trends 26, 6 (2006), 1--7.Google Scholar
- Inc Lightbend. 2020. Build powerful reactive, concurrent, and distributed applications more easily. https://akka.io/Google Scholar
- Microsoft. 2020. Understand and use device twins in IoT Hub. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/iot-hub/iot-hub-devguide-device-twinsGoogle Scholar
- Thiago Rodrigues Alves, Mario Buratto, Flavio Mauricio de Souza, and Thelma Virginia Rodrigues. 2014. OpenPLC: An open source alternative to automation. In IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference (GHTC 2014). IEEE, San Jose, CA, USA, 585--589.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Ali Salehi, Jose Jimenez-Berni, David Deery, Doug Palmer, Edward Holland, Pablo Rozas-Larraondo, Scott Chapman, Dimitrios Georgakopoulos, and Robert Furbank. 2015. SensorDB: a virtual laboratory for the integration, visualization and analysis of varied biological sensor data. Plant Methods 11 (2015), 108--111. http://search.proquest.com/docview/1779613409/Google ScholarCross Ref
- Greyce N Schroeder, Charles Steinmetz, Carlos E Pereira, and Danubia B Espindola. 2016. Digital Twin Data Modeling with AutomationML and a Communication Methodology for Data Exchange. IFAC PapersOnLine 49, 30 (2016), 12--17.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nicolas Seydoux, Khalil Drira, Nathalie Hernandez, and Thierry Monteil. 2016. IoT-O, a Core-Domain IoT Ontology to Represent Connected Devices Networks. In Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management: 20th International Conference, EKAW 2016, Bologna, Italy, November 19-23, 2016, Proceedings 20, Vol. 10024. Springer, Bologna, Italy, 561--576. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01467853 Google ScholarDigital Library
- Siemens. 2020. MindSphere - the Industrial Internet of Things solution. https://new.siemens.com/au/en/products/software/discover-mindsphere.htmlGoogle Scholar
- John Soldatos, Nikos Kefalakis, Manfred Hauswirth, Martin Serrano, Jean-Paul Calbimonte, Mehdi Riahi, Karl Aberer, Prem Prakash Jayaraman, Arkady Zaslavsky, Ivana Podnar Žarko, Lea Skorin-Kapov, and Reinhard Herzog. 2015. OpenIoT: Open Source Internet-of-Things in the Cloud. In Interoperability and Open-Source Solutions for the Internet of Things, Ivana Podnar Žarko, Krešimir Pripužić, and Martin Serrano (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 13--25.Google Scholar
- Matthias Thoma, Torsten Braun, Alexandru-Florian Antonescu, and Carsten Magerkurth. 2014. Managing Things and Services with Semantics: A Survey.Google Scholar
- Jan Vachalek, Lukas Bartalsky, Oliver Rovny, Dana Sismisova, Martin Morhac, and Milan Loksik. 2017. The digital twin of an industrial production line within the industry 4.0 concept. In 2017 21st International Conference on Process Control (PC). IEEE, Štrbské Pleso, Slovakia, 258--262.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Wikipedia. 2020. Actor Model. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Actor_modelGoogle Scholar
- Kamil Židek, Ján Pitel', Milan Adámek, Peter Lazorík, and Alexander Hošovský. 2020. Digital Twin of Experimental Smart Manufacturing Assembly System for Industry 4.0 Concept. Sustainability 12, 9 (2020), 3658. http://search.proquest.com/docview/2398421237/Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- Cyber twins supporting industry 4.0 application development
Recommendations
Enhancing and securing cyber‐physical systems and Industry 4.0 through digital twins: A critical review
AbstractDue to the fierce competitive global market, enterprises need to face and overcome new challenges and requirements to stay ahead of competition. Cyber‐physical systems, Internet of things, and digital twins are some of the contemporary ...
This study presents a critical review regarding the use of digital twins as a means to improve, reinforce and secure cyber‐physical systems and Industry 4.0. Therefore, it provides an overview of the related fields and technologies, goes over the results ...
Industry 4.0 tools in lean production: A systematic literature review
AbstractThe present article focuses its attention on the tools of the Industry 4.0 with the purpose to analyze how these tools can be useful for the companies to increase factors like efficiency and productivity. In the age of the fourth industrial ...
On the development and deployment of an IIoT Infrastructure for the Fish Canning Industry
AbstractThe introduction of IoT technologies in industrial settings is changing the way manufacturing companies perceive their production processes, allowing for more accurate monitoring of production-related parameters. Due to the introduction of IoT ...
Comments