Ira Anjali Anwar
Skip Abstract Section
Abstract
Women gig workers face unique challenges in on-demand platforms as gendered aspects of class, caste, and labor participation intersect with moments of control experienced on the job. Through in-depth interviews with 19 beauty workers on on-demand home service platforms, we explore how the platformization of informal beauty work in India has ruptured dominant socio-cultural structures of control that have traditionally shaped women's mobility and access to work. This paper maps the ways in which women beauty gig workers experience and are impacted by algorithmic and bureaucratic management practices prevalent in the gig economy, in the context of home service platforms in Bangalore. We find that platform control impacts lives in myriad ways, beyond the conditions of work. Women workers negotiate their identities and sense of agency through the visibility afforded by platform control mechanisms. Yet, despite these subversions, being on a platform does not fundamentally change the socio-cultural logic that restricts women's lives in India. These mechanisms work to entrench power asymmetries between customers and workers, as well as maintain them between the platform and the worker.
- 2019. World Development Report: The Changing Nature of Work.Google Scholar
- Deepak Adhana. 2016. Start-UP India, Stand-UP India: India turning into a Start-UP HUB by prospering entrepreneurial culture. International Journal in Management and Social Science, Vol. 4 (2016).Google Scholar
- Anders Albrechtslund and Louise Nørgaard Glud. 2010. Empowering residents: A theoretical framework for negotiating surveillance technologies. Surveillance & Society, Vol. 8, 2 (2010), 235--250.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Antonio Aloisi. 2015. Commoditized workers: Case study research on labor law issues arising from a set of on-demand/gig economy platforms. Comp. Lab. L. & Pol'y J., Vol. 37 (2015), 653.Google Scholar
- Urvashi Aneja, Vikram Mathur, and Ira Anjali Anwar. 2018. Emerging technologies and the future of work in India. (2018).Google Scholar
- Urvashi Aneja and Aishwarya Shridhar. 2018. Worker Wellbeing on Digital Work Platforms in India: A Study of Ola Cabs & UrbanClap in New Delhi.Google Scholar
- Michel Anteby and Curtis K Chan. 2018. A self-fulfilling cycle of coercive surveillance: Workers? invisibility practices and managerial justification. Organization Science, Vol. 29, 2 (2018), 247--263.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Callum Cant. 2019. Riding for Deliveroo: resistance in the new economy. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Julien Cayla and Kushagra Bhatnagar. 2017. Language and power in India's 'new services'. Journal of Business Research, Vol. 72 (2017), 189--198.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brendan Churchill and Lyn Craig. 2019. Gender in the gig economy: Men and women using digital platforms to secure work in Australia. Journal of Sociology, Vol. 55, 4 (2019), 741--761.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Emanuele Dagnino. 2016. Labour and Labour Law in the time of the on-demand economy. Labour and labour law in the time of the on-demand economy (2016), 43--65.Google Scholar
- Alex Davies. 2019. The World's Most Traffic-Choked Cities, Ranked. https://www.wired.com/story/worlds-most-traffic-choked-cities-ranked/Google Scholar
- Valerio De Stefano. 2015. The rise of the just-in-time workforce: On-demand work, crowdwork, and labor protection in the gig-economy. Comp. Lab. L. & Pol'y J., Vol. 37 (2015), 471.Google Scholar
- Sara Dickey and Kathleen M Adams. 2000. Introduction: Negotiating homes, hegemonies, identities, and politics. Home and hegemony: Domestic service and identity politics in South and Southeast Asia (2000), 1--29.Google Scholar
- Paul Dourish and Ken Anderson. 2006. Collective information practice: Exploring privacy and security as social and cultural phenomena. Human-computer interaction, Vol. 21, 3 (2006), 319--342.Google Scholar
- James Duggan, Ultan Sherman, Ronan Carbery, and Anthony McDonnell. 2019. Algorithmic management and app-work in the gig economy: A research agenda for employment relations and HRM. Human Resource Management Journal (2019).Google Scholar
- Richard Edwards. 1982. Contested terrain: The transformation of the workplace in the twentieth century. (1982).Google Scholar
- Gaëlle Ferrant, Luca Maria Pesando, and Keiko Nowacka. 2014. Unpaid Care Work: The missing link in the analysis of gender gaps in labour outcomes. Boulogne Billancourt: OECD Development Center (2014).Google Scholar
- Valérie Fournier. 1999. The appeal to 'professionalism'as a disciplinary mechanism. The sociological review, Vol. 47, 2 (1999), 280--307.Google Scholar
- Kathinka Frøystad. 2003. Master-servant relations and the domestic reproduction of caste in Northern India. Ethnos, Vol. 68, 1 (2003), 73--94.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Vijay Govindarajan. 1988. A contingency approach to strategy implementation at the business-unit level: integrating administrative mechanisms with strategy. Academy of management Journal, Vol. 31, 4 (1988), 828--853.Google Scholar
- Mark Graham, Jamie Woodcock, Richard Heeks, Paul Mungai, Jean-Paul Van Belle, Darcy du Toit, Sandra Fredman, Abigal Osiki, Anri van der Spuy, and Six M Silberman. 2020. The Fairwork Foundation: Strategies for improving platform work in a global context. Geoforum (2020).Google Scholar
- Kathleen Griesbach, Adam Reich, Luke Elliott-Negri, and Ruth Milkman. 2019. Algorithmic Control in Platform Food Delivery Work. Socius, Vol. 5 (2019), 2378023119870041.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shalini Grover, Thomas Chambers, and Patricia Jeffery. 2018. Portraits of Women's Paid Domestic-Care Labour: Ethnographic Studies from Globalizing India. Journal of South Asian Development, Vol. 13, 2 (2018), 123--140.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Debra Howcroft and Birgitta Bergvall-Kåreborn. 2019. A typology of crowdwork platforms. Work, Employment and Society, Vol. 33, 1 (2019), 21--38.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Julie Hui, Kentaro Toyama, Joyojeet Pal, and Tawanna Dillahunt. 2018. Making a Living My Way: Necessity-driven Entrepreneurship in Resource-Constrained Communities. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 2, CSCW (2018), 1--24.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Abigail Hunt and Emma Samman. 2019. Gender and the Gig Economy: Critical Steps for Evidence-based Policy?. London: Overseas Development Institute. https://www. odi. org/publications/11272-gender-and-gig-economycritical-steps-evidence-based-policy (2019).Google Scholar
- Lilly Irani. 2015. Difference and dependence among digital workers: The case of Amazon Mechanical Turk. South Atlantic Quarterly, Vol. 114, 1 (2015), 225--234.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Paula Kantor. 2002. Female mobility in India: the influence of seclusion norms on economic outcomes. International Development Planning Review, Vol. 24, 2 (2002), 145--159.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Katherine C Kellogg, Melissa A Valentine, and Angele Christin. 2020. Algorithms at work: The new contested terrain of control. Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 14, 1 (2020), 366--410.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eliscia Kinder, Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi, and Will Sutherland. 2019. Gig Platforms, Tensions, Alliances and Ecosystems: An Actor-Network Perspective. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (2019), 1--26.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anja Kovacs. [n.d.]. Reading Surveillance through a Gendered Lens: Some Theory.Google Scholar
- Kavita Krishnan. 2018. gendered discipline in globalising India. Feminist Review, Vol. 119, 1 (2018), 72--88.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kristine M Kuhn. 2016. The rise of the 'gig economy' and implications for understanding work and workers. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 9, 1 (2016), 157--162.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Neha Kumar, Nassim Jafarinaimi, and Mehrab Bin Morshed. 2018. Uber in Bangladesh: The Tangled Web of mobility and justice. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 2, CSCW (2018), 1--21.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Deborah Lupton. 2016. The diverse domains of quantified selves: self-tracking modes and dataveillance. Economy and Society, Vol. 45, 1 (2016), 101--122.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Saikat Maitra and Srabani Maitra. 2018. Producing the Aesthetic Self: An Analysis of Aesthetic Skill and Labour in the Organized Retail Industries in India. Journal of South Asian Development, Vol. 13, 3 (2018), 337--357.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alexandra Mateescu and Aiha Ngyuen. 2019. Algorithmic Management in the Workplace.Google Scholar
- Santosh Mehrotra and Sharmistha Sinha. 2019. Towards higher female work participation in India: what can be done? (2019).Google Scholar
- Torin Monahan. 2009. Dreams of control at a distance: Gender, surveillance, and social control. Cultural Studies? Critical Methodologies, Vol. 9, 2 (2009), 286--305.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sirisha C Naidu. 2016. Domestic labour and female labour force participation. Education, Vol. 6, 7.6 (2016), 7--2.Google Scholar
- Martin Oelz, Uma Rani, et almbox. 2015. Domestic work, wages, and gender equality: Lessons from developing countries. ILO.Google Scholar
- Parvati Raghuram. 2001. Caste and gender in the organisation of paid domestic work in India. Work, Employment and Society, Vol. 15, 3 (2001), 607--617.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Uma Rani and Marianne Furrer. 2020. Digital labour platforms and new forms of flexible work in developing countries: Algorithmic management of work and workers. Competition & Change (2020), 1024529420905187.Google Scholar
- Aayush Rathi, Ambika Tandon, and Pallavi Bedi. 2019. Comments to the United Nations Human Rights Commission Report on Gender and Privacy.Google Scholar
- Noopur Raval and Joyojeet Pal. 2019. Making a" Pro": 'Professionalism' after Platforms in Beauty-work. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 3, CSCW (2019), 1--17.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alex Rosenblat. 2018. Uberland: How algorithms are rewriting the rules of work. Univ of California Press.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alex Rosenblat and Luke Stark. 2016. Algorithmic labor and information asymmetries: A case study of Uber's drivers. International Journal of Communication, Vol. 10 (2016), 27.Google Scholar
- Srila Roy. 2016. Breaking the cage. Dissent, Vol. 63, 4 (2016), 74--83.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Johnny Saldaña. 2015. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.Google Scholar
- Shruti Sannon and Dan Cosley. 2019. Privacy, Power, and Invisible Labor on Amazon Mechanical Turk. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--12.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jacob Silverman. 2017. Privacy under surveillance capitalism. Social Research: An International Quarterly, Vol. 84, 1 (2017), 147--164.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lekha Subaiya and Reeve Vanneman. 2016. The Multi-dimensionality of Development and Gender Empowerment: Women's Decision-Making and Mobility in India.Google Scholar
- Sharifa Sultana, Francc ois Guimbretière, Phoebe Sengers, and Nicola Dell. 2018. Design within a patriarchal society: Opportunities and challenges in designing for rural women in bangladesh. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--13.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Aditi Surie and Jyothi Koduganti. 2016. The emerging nature of work in platform economy companies in Bengaluru, India: The case of Uber and Ola Cab drivers. E-Journal of International and Comparative Labour Studies, Vol. 5, 3 (2016).Google Scholar
- Will Sutherland and Mohammad Hossein Jarrahi. 2017. The gig economy and information infrastructure: The case of the digital nomad community. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 1, CSCW (2017), 1--24.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Frederick Winslow Taylor. 1911. The principles of scientific management. Harper & brothers.Google Scholar
- Julia Ticona. 2015. Strategies of control: workers? use of ICTs to shape knowledge and service work. Information, Communication & Society, Vol. 18, 5 (2015), 509--523.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Julia Ticona and Alexandra Mateescu. 2018. Trusted strangers: Carework platforms? cultural entrepreneurship in the on-demand economy. New Media & Society, Vol. 20, 11 (2018), 4384--4404.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Richard F Vancil. 1982. Implementing strategy: The role of top management. Division of Research, Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
- Jennifer K Wesely and Emily Gaarder. 2004. The gendered 'nature' of the urban outdoors: Women negotiating fear of violence. Gender & Society, Vol. 18, 5 (2004), 645--663.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alex J Wood, Mark Graham, Vili Lehdonvirta, and Isis Hjorth. 2019. Good gig, bad gig: autonomy and algorithmic control in the global gig economy. Work, Employment and Society, Vol. 33, 1 (2019), 56--75.Google ScholarCross Ref
- David Murakami Wood and Torin Monahan. 2019. Platform surveillance. Surveillance & Society, Vol. 17, 1/2 (2019), 1--6.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Suraj Yengde. [n.d.]. Apartheid in Fancy Dress.Google Scholar
- Shoshana Zuboff. 2019. The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Profile Books.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Watched, but Moving: Platformization of Beauty Work and Its Gendered Mechanisms of Control
Recommendations
Delivery Work and the Experience of Social Isolation
CSCWThe isolating nature of platform-based work, particularly gig work involving deliveries, has created unintended consequences over how workers engage with peers, friends, family, and society in general. We performed a qualitative study involving ...
Gig Platforms as Faux Infrastructure: A Case Study of Women Beauty Workers in India
CSCWIn order to sustain everyday life in India during pandemic induced lockdowns, home service gig platforms materialized to provide essential services for urban society. As unemployment worsened, these gig platforms also emerged as key sources of paid work ...
“Brush it Off”: How Women Workers Manage and Cope with Bias and Harassment in Gender-agnostic Gig Platforms
CHI '22: Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsWomen make up approximately half of the workforce in ride-hailing, food delivery, and home service platforms in North America. While studies have reported that gig workers face bias, harassment, and a gender pay gap, we have limited understanding of ...
Comments