skip to main content
10.1145/3434074.3447151acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageshriConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Teleoperation Interface Usage in Robot-Assisted Childhood ASD Therapy

Published:08 March 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Therapist-operated robots can play a uniquely impactful role in helping children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) practice and acquire social skills. While extensive research within Human Robot Interaction has focused on teleoperation interfaces for robots in general, little work has been done on teleoperation interface design for robots in the context of ASD therapy. Moreover, while clinical research has shown the positive impact robots can have on children with Autism, much of that research has been performed in a controlled environment, with little understanding of the way these robots are used "in the wild". We analyze archival data of therapists teleoperating robots as part of their regular therapy sessions, to (1) determine common themes and difficulties in therapists' use of teleoperation interfaces, and (2) provide design recommendations to improve therapists' overall experience. We believe that following these recommendations will help maximize the effectiveness of ASD therapy with Socially Assistive Robots and the scale at which it can be deployed.

References

  1. Jordan Allspaw and Jonathan Roche. 2018. Remotely teleoperating a humanoid robot to perform fine motor tasks with virtual reality--. In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Reality for Human-Robot Interaction (VAM-HRI).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Laura Boccanfuso, Sarah Scarborough, Ruth K Abramson, Alicia V Hall, Harry H Wright, and Jason M O'Kane. 2017. A low-cost socially assistive robot and robot-assisted intervention for children with autism spectrum disorder: field trials and lessons learned. Autonomous Robots, Vol. 41, 3 (2017), 637--655.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Josep Bosch, Pere Ridao, Rafael Garcia, and Nuno Gracias. 2016. Towards omnidirectional immersion for ROV teleoperation. Proceedings of Jornadas de Automática, Madrid, Spain (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. John-John Cabibihan, Hifza Javed, Marcelo Ang, and Sharifah Mariam Aljunied. 2013. Why robots? A survey on the roles and benefits of social robots in the therapy of children with autism. International journal of social robotics, Vol. 5, 4 (2013), 593--618.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Thierry Chaminade, David Da Fonseca, Delphine Rosset, Ewald Lutcher, Gordon Cheng, and Christine Deruelle. 2012. FMRI study of young adults with autism interacting with a humanoid robot. In 2012 IEEE RO-MAN: The 21st IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. IEEE, 380--385.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Eva Yin-han Chung. 2019. Robotic intervention program for enhancement of social engagement among children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, Vol. 31, 4 (2019), 419--434.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Eva Yin-han Chung. 2020. Robot-Mediated Social Skill Intervention Programme for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: An ABA Time-Series Study. International Journal of Social Robotics (2020), 1--13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Caitlyn Elise Clabaugh, Kartik Mahajan, Shomik Jain, Roxanna Pakkar, David Becerra, Zhonghao Shi, Eric Deng, Rhianna Lee, Gisele Ragusa, and Maja Mataric. 2019. Long-term personalization of an in-home socially assistive robot for children with autism spectrum disorders. Frontiers in Robotics and AI, Vol. 6 (2019), 110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Oliver Damm, Karoline Malchus, Petra Jaecks, Soeren Krach, Frieder Paulus, Marnix Naber, Andreas Jansen, Inge Kamp-Becker, Wolfgang Einhaeuser-Treyer, Prisca Stenneken, et al. 2013. Different gaze behavior in human-robot interaction in Asperger's syndrome: An eye-tracking study. In 2013 IEEE RO-MAN. IEEE, 368--369.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Kerstin Dautenhahn. 1999. Robots as social actors: Aurora and the case of autism. In Proc. CT99, The Third International Cognitive Technology Conference, August, San Francisco, Vol. 359. Citeseer, 374.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Julia Dawe, Craig Sutherland, Alex Barco, and Elizabeth Broadbent. 2019. Can social robots help children in healthcare contexts? A scoping review. BMJ paediatrics open, Vol. 3, 1 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. David Feil-Seifer and Maja J Matarić. 2009. Towards the integration of socially assistive robots into the lives of children with ASD. In International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction Workshop on Societal Impact: How Socially Accepted Robots Can be Integrated in our Society, Vol. 21.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Irini Giannopulu. 2013. Multimodal cognitive nonverbal and verbal interactions: the neurorehabilitation of autistic children via mobile toy robots. IARIA International Journal of Advances in Life Sciences, Vol. 5 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Phillip M Grice and Charles C Kemp. 2016. Assistive mobile manipulation: Designing for operators with motor impairments. In RSS 2016 Workshop on Socially and Physically Assistive Robotics for Humanity.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Fine Art Miracles Inc. 2021. Fine Art Miracles. https://fineartmiracles.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Luthffi Idzhar Ismail, Thibault Verhoeven, Joni Dambre, and Francis Wyffels. 2019. Leveraging robotics research for children with autism: a review. International Journal of Social Robotics, Vol. 11, 3 (2019), 389--410.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Katarzyna Kabaci'nska, Tony J Prescott, and Julie M Robillard. 2020. Socially Assistive Robots as Mental Health Interventions for Children: A Scoping Review. International Journal of Social Robotics (2020), 1--17.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Elizabeth S Kim, Lauren D Berkovits, Emily P Bernier, Dan Leyzberg, Frederick Shic, Rhea Paul, and Brian Scassellati. 2013. Social robots as embedded reinforcers of social behavior in children with autism. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, Vol. 43, 5 (2013), 1038--1049.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Tomávs Kot and Petr Novák. 2014. Utilization of the Oculus Rift HMD in mobile robot teleoperation. In Applied Mechanics and Materials, Vol. 555. Trans Tech Publ, 199--208.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Mathieu Le Goc, Lawrence H Kim, Ali Parsaei, Jean-Daniel Fekete, Pierre Dragicevic, and Sean Follmer. 2016. Zooids: Building blocks for swarm user interfaces. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. 97--109.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Michael Lichtenstern, Michael Angermann, Martin Frassl, Gunther Berthold, Brian J Julian, and Daniela Rus. 2013. Pose and paste-An intuitive interface for remote navigation of a multi-robot system. In 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems. IEEE, 1632--1639.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Jeffrey I Lipton, Aidan J Fay, and Daniela Rus. 2017. Baxter's homunculus: Virtual reality spaces for teleoperation in manufacturing. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, Vol. 3, 1 (2017), 179--186.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Maja J Matarić and Brian Scassellati. 2016. Socially assistive robotics. In Springer handbook of robotics. Springer, 1973--1994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Francc ois Michaud, Tamie Salter, Audrey Duquette, Henri Mercier, Michel Lauria, Helene Larouche, and Francois Larose. 2007. Assistive technologies and child-robot interaction. In AAAI spring symposium on multidisciplinary collaboration for socially assistive robotics.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. PEERbots. 2021. PEERbots. https://peerbots.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Paola Pennisi, Alessandro Tonacci, Gennaro Tartarisco, Lucia Billeci, Liliana Ruta, Sebastiano Gangemi, and Giovanni Pioggia. 2016. Autism and social robotics: A systematic review. Autism Research, Vol. 9, 2 (2016), 165--183.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Giovanni Pioggia, ML Sica, Marcello Ferro, Roberta Igliozzi, Filippo Muratori, Arti Ahluwalia, and Danilo De Rossi. 2007. Human-robot interaction in autism: FACE, an android-based social therapy. In RO-MAN 2007-the 16th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication. IEEE, 605--612.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Sarah M Rabbitt, Alan E Kazdin, and Brian Scassellati. 2015. Integrating socially assistive robotics into mental healthcare interventions: Applications and recommendations for expanded use. Clinical psychology review, Vol. 35 (2015), 35--46.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Ben Robins, Kerstin Dautenhahn, Rene Te Boekhorst, and Aude Billard. 2004. Effects of repeated exposure to a humanoid robot on children with autism. In Designing a more inclusive world. Springer, 225--236.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Brian Scassellati, Henny Admoni, and Maja Matarić. 2012. Robots for use in autism research. Annual review of biomedical engineering, Vol. 14 (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Brian Scassellati, Laura Boccanfuso, Chien-Ming Huang, Marilena Mademtzi, Meiying Qin, Nicole Salomons, Pamela Ventola, and Frederick Shic. 2018. Improving social skills in children with ASD using a long-term, in-home social robot. Science Robotics, Vol. 3, 21 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Syamimi Shamsuddin, Hanafiah Yussof, Salina Mohamed, Fazah Akhtar Hanapiah, and Luthffi Idzhar Ismail. 2013. Stereotyped behavior of autistic children with lower IQ level in HRI with a humanoid robot. In 2013 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts. IEEE, 175--180.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Aaron Steinfeld. 2004. Interface lessons for fully and semi-autonomous mobile robots. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA'04. 2004, Vol. 3. IEEE, 2752--2757.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Katherine M Tsui, James M Dalphond, Daniel J Brooks, Mikhail S Medvedev, Eric McCann, Jordan Allspaw, David Kontak, and Holly A Yanco. 2015. Accessible human-robot interaction for telepresence robots: A case study. Paladyn, Journal of Behavioral Robotics, Vol. 1, open-issue (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Joshua Wainer, Ester Ferrari, Kerstin Dautenhahn, and Ben Robins. 2010. The effectiveness of using a robotics class to foster collaboration among groups of children with autism in an exploratory study. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Vol. 14, 5 (2010), 445--455.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Joshua Wainer, Ben Robins, Farshid Amirabdollahian, and Kerstin Dautenhahn. 2014. Using the humanoid robot KASPAR to autonomously play triadic games and facilitate collaborative play among children with autism. IEEE Transactions on Autonomous Mental Development, Vol. 6, 3 (2014), 183--199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Teleoperation Interface Usage in Robot-Assisted Childhood ASD Therapy

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              HRI '21 Companion: Companion of the 2021 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction
              March 2021
              756 pages
              ISBN:9781450382908
              DOI:10.1145/3434074
              • General Chairs:
              • Cindy Bethel,
              • Ana Paiva,
              • Program Chairs:
              • Elizabeth Broadbent,
              • David Feil-Seifer,
              • Daniel Szafir

              Copyright © 2021 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 8 March 2021

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • short-paper

              Acceptance Rates

              Overall Acceptance Rate192of519submissions,37%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader