skip to main content
10.1145/3434780.3436642acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesteemConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A Study to Analyze the Digital Competence of Pre-service Teachers and In-service Teachers in China

Published:22 January 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The development of information technology in education, the digitization of educators and pre-educators have received world attention, as well as in China for nearly a decade. Taking China as a case study, this paper identifies efforts and challenges on Chinese teachers’ digital competence. This doctoral thesis's main objectives are to investigate the actual status about digital competence of pre-service teachers and in-service teachers in China, especially in Anhui province, and create their digital competence profile. This research carried out a systematic literature review and identified the digital competence frameworks applied in other regions. From these evidences, the research will focus on the quantitative approach study in six universities of Anhui province and its capital Hefei, which carries out data collection and analysis to answer the research questions. Lastly, we would like to provide information for new teaching strategies and recommendations for improving digital competence.

References

  1. Antonio Latorre Beltrán, Delio del Rincón Igea, and Justo Arnal Agustín. 2005. Bases metodológicas de la investigación educativa (reimpresa ed.). Ediciones Experiencia, S.L.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Stephanie Carretero, Riina Vuorikari, and Yves Punie. 2017. DigComp 2.1: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens with eight proficiency levels and examples of use. Publications Office of the European Union (2017). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2760/38842 (online)Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Anusca Ferrari. 2013. DIGCOMP: A Framework for Developing and Understanding Digital Competence in Europe. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union (2013). DOI:https://doi.org/10.2788/52966Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Anusca Ferrari, Yves Punie, Barbara Neža Brečko, Katarzyna Urban, Marek Miłosz, Komisja Europejska, Joint Research Centre, and Fundacja ECCC. 2013. DIGCOMP: A Framework for Developing and Understanding Digital Competence in Europe. Fundacja ECCC, Lublin.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Francisco José García Peñalvo. 2013. Education in knowledge society | Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technological Ecosystem for Enhancing Multiculturality. In ACM, New York, NY, USA, Salamanca, Spain, 575–577. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1145/2536536.2536624Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Francisco J García-Peñalvo. 2015. Engineering Contributions to a Multicultural Perspective of the Knowledge Society. (2015), 3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Francisco José García-Peñalvo, María José Rodríguez-Conde, Roberto Therón, Alicia García-Holgado, Martínez-Abad Fernando, and Alejandro Benito-Santos. 2019. Grupo GRIAL. IE Comunicaciones. Revista Iberoamericana de Informática Educativa 30, 33-48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Sepehr Ghazinoory, Mansoureh Abdi, and Mandana Azadegan-Mehr. 2011. SWOT METHODOLOGY: A STATE-OF-THE-ART REVIEW FOR THE PAST, A FRAMEWORK FOR THE FUTURE / SSGG METODOLOGIJA: PRAEITIES IR ATEITIES ANALIZĖ. Journal of Business Economics and Management 12, 1 (April 2011), 24–48. DOI:https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2011.555358Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Charles R. Graham. 2011. Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education 57, 3 (November 2011), 1953–1960. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.010Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Emet Gürel. 2017. SWOT ANALYSIS: A THEORETICAL REVIEW. Journal of International Social Research 10, 51 (August 2017), 994–1006. DOI:https://doi.org/10.17719/jisr.2017.1832Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Terry Hill and Roy Westbrook. 1997. SWOT analysis: It's time for a product recall. Long Range Planning 30, 1 (1997), 46–52. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-6301(96)00095-7Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Li Wen, Du Juan, and Wang Yining. 2018. Analysis of Influencing Factors of Information Technology Application Ability of Key Teachers in Primary and Middle Schools in Less Developed Areas of Education Informatization. 中国电化教育 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. LIANG Xi. 2020. Influencing Factors and Promotion of Teachers'ICT Application: Evidences from Shanghai's TALIS 2018 Data. Open Education ༲esearch 26Analysis of Influencing Factors of Information Technology Application Ability of Key Teachers in Primary and Middle Schools in Less Developed Areas of Education Informatization., (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Marijana Kelentrić, Karianne Helland, and Ann-Thérèse Arstorp. 2017. Professional Digital Competence Framework for Teachers (Comparative Analysis of the National Curriculum Frameworks of Five Countries ed.). The Norwegian Centre for ICT in Education.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Vittorio Midoro. 2013. Guidelines on adaptation of the UNESCO ICT competency framework for teachers: methodological approach on localization of the UNESCO ICT-CFT. UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education Professional Digital Competence Framework for Teachers8 Kedrova St., Bldg. 3, Moscow, 117292 Russian Federation. Retrieved September 10, 2020 from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000224188Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ministry of Education of People´s Republic of China. 2014. 教育部办公厅关于印发《中小学教师信息技术应用能力标准)试行(》的通知. Ministry of Education of People´s Republic of China. Retrieved September 29, 2020 from http://old.moe.gov.cn/publicfiles/business/htmlfiles/moe/s6991/201406/170123.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ministry of Education of People´s Republic of China. 2018. 教育部关于印发《教育信息化2.0行动计划》的通知. Retrieved September 13, 2020 from http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A16/s3342/201804/t20180425_334188.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Ministry of Education of People´s Republic of China. 2018. 《教师教育振兴行动计划)2018—2022年(》的通知. Ministry of Education of People´s Republic of China. Retrieved April 19, 2020 from http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A10/s7034/201803/t20180323_331063.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Wu Pengze and Yang Lin. 2016. Research on Hierarchical Performance Evaluation of Teachers’ Ability to Apply Information Technology. 中国电化教育 348, (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Christine Redecker and Yves Punie. 2017. European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators. Joint Research Centre (JRC), European Commission's science and knowledge service, Edificio Expo, C/ Inca Garcilaso 3, E-41092 Seville (Spain).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Renato Opertti, Hyekyung Kang, and Giorgia Magni. 2018. Comparative Analysis of the National Curriculum Frameworks of Five Countries: Brazil, Cambodia, Finland, Kenya and Peru.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Roberto Hernández Sampieri, Carlos Fernández Collado, and Pilar Baptista Lucio. 2014. Metodología de la investigación (McGRAW-HILL / INTERAMERICANA EDITORES, S.A. DE C.V. ed.). McGraw-Hill Education, México, D.F.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. UNESCO. 2011. UNESCO ICT Competency Framework for Teachers. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 PARIS 07 SP.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. UNESCO. 2018. A Global Framework of Reference on Digital Literacy Skills for Indicator 4.4.2. Retrieved September 24, 2020 from http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/ip51-global-framework-reference-digital-literacy-skills-2018-en.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Riina Vuorikari, Yves Punie, Stephanie Carretero, and Lieve Van Brande. 2016. DigComp 2.0: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. Update Phase 1: The Conceptual Reference Model. Luxembourg Publication Office of the European Union EUR 27948, (2016), 44. DOI:https://doi.org/10.2791/11517Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. YAN Hanbing, LI Xiaoying, and REN Youqun. 2018. Development and Validation of Self-measurement Tools for Pre-service Teachers’ ICT Competency. 电化教育研究 1, (2018). DOI:https://doi.org/10.13811/j.cnki.eer.2018.01.014Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Yuan Lei, Li Binyu, and Wang Zhuoyu. 2016. A Research on the New Mode of Teacher's Information Technology Ability Training. 中国电化教育 355, (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. 中华人民共和国教育部. 2019. 教育部发布《关于实施全国中小学教师信息技术应用能力提升工程2.0的意见》. Retrieved April 20, 2020 from http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A10/s7034/201904/t20190402_376493.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. 张 秀梅, 张 悦, 李 佳文, and 田 甜. 2019. 用技术学技术: 教师信息技术 能力提升的实证研究. 中国远程教育 5, (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. 段建彬, 王建军, and 李华. 2016. 教师远程培训有效实施的策略研究. 现在远距离教育 163, (2016). DOI:https://doi.org/10.13927/j.cnki.yuan.2016.0003Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. ISTE Standards | ISTE. Retrieved August 5, 2020 from https://www.iste.org/standardsGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    TEEM'20: Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality
    October 2020
    1084 pages
    ISBN:9781450388504
    DOI:10.1145/3434780

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 22 January 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate496of705submissions,70%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format