skip to main content
10.1145/3437120.3437327acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagespciConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Efficient Method for Accelerating Training of Short-Term Traffic Prediction Models in Large-Scale Traffic Networks

Published:04 March 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The increasing availability of large volumes of traffic data has led to the development of several short-term traffic prediction models. Training these models is a computationally intensive process due to the volume of available traffic data. Therefore, having effective methods for accelerating this process is considered necessary. In this paper, we propose an efficient method for accelerating the training process of multiple short-term traffic prediction models in large-scale traffic networks. In particular, the traffic data is organized into separate files so that the training process for one model is independent of the others. These files are distributed in the cores of a shared-memory multicore processor so as to train multiple models simultaneously. Appropriate measures have been taken to limit the memory footprint of the proposed method, as well as to enhance its load balancing capabilities. The proposed method was applied to five short-term traffic prediction models, and evaluated using large-scale real-world traffic data. Preliminary experimental results indicate that the proposed method exhibits nearly linear speedup for the training process of all models, while maintaining their prediction performance.

References

  1. Sabyasachi Basu and Martin Meckesheimer. 2007. Automatic outlier detection for time series: an application to sensor data. Knowledge and Information Systems 11, 2 (01 Feb 2007), 137–154.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. K. Y. Chan, T. Dillon, E. Chang, and J. Singh. 2013. Prediction of Short-Term Traffic Variables Using Intelligent Swarm-Based Neural Networks. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 21, 1 (Jan 2013), 263–274.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. X. Y. Chen, H. K. Pao, and Y. J. Lee. 2014. Efficient traffic speed forecasting based on massive heterogeneous historical data. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data). 10–17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Liang Dai, Wen Qin, Hongke Xu, Ting Chen, and Chao Qian. 2014. Urban traffic flow prediction: A MapReduce based parallel multivariate linear regression approach. In 17th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2014). 2823–2827.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Themistoklis Diamantopoulos, Dionysios D. Kehagias, Felix Konig, and Dimitrios Tzovaras. 2013. Investigating the effect of global metrics in travel time prediction. In 16th International IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC 2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Filmon G. Habtemichael and Mecit Cetin. 2016. Short-term traffic flow rate forecasting based on identifying similar traffic patterns. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 66 (2016), 61 – 78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. S. Vasantha Kumar and Lelitha Vanajakshi. 2015. Short-term traffic flow prediction using seasonal ARIMA model with limited input data. European Transport Research Review 7, 3 (2015), 21.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Thomas Liebig, Marco Stolpe, and Katharina Morik. 2015. Distributed traffic flow prediction with label proportions: from in-network towards high performance computation with MPI. In 2nd International Conference on Mining Urban Data (MUD 2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Lei Lv, Meng Chen, Yang Liu, and Xiaohui Yu. 2015. A Plane Moving Average Algorithm for Short-Term Traffic Flow Prediction. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 357–369.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Tao Ma, Zhou Zhou, and Baher Abdulhai. 2015. Nonlinear multivariate time–space threshold vector error correction model for short term traffic state prediction. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological 76 (2015), 27 – 47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Wanli Min and Laura Wynter. 2011. Real-time road traffic prediction with spatio-temporal correlations. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 19, 4 (August 2011), pp. 606–616.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. PeMS. 2018. Caltrans Freeway Performance Measurement System. http://pems.dot.ca.gov/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. J. Petrlik and L. Sekanina. 2015. Towards Robust and Accurate Traffic Prediction Using Parallel Multiobjective Genetic Algorithms and Support Vector Regression. In 18th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2015). 2231–2236.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Athanasios Salamanis, Dionysios D. Kehagias, Christos K. Filelis-Papadopoulos, Dimitrios Tzovaras, and George A. Gravvanis. 2016. Managing Spatial Graph Dependencies in Large Volumes of Traffic Data for Travel-Time Prediction. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 17, 6 (June 2016), pp. 1678–1687.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Z Sun and H Ombao. 2015. Short-Term Traffic Flow Prediction with Mixture Autoregressive Model. In Proc. Transportation Research Board 94th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC, United States.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Hao Wang, Li Chen, Kai Chen, Ziyang Li, Yiming Zhang, Haibing Guan, Zhengwei Qi, Dongsheng Li, and Yanhui Geng. 2015. FLOWPROPHET: Generic and Accurate Traffic Prediction for Data-Parallel Cluster Computing. In 35th International IEEE Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS 2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Baozhen Yao, Chao Chen, Qingda Cao, Lu Jin, Mingheng Zhang, Hanbing Zhu, and Bin Yu. 2017. Short-Term Traffic Speed Prediction for an Urban Corridor. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 32, 2(2017), 154–169.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Yanru Zhang, Yunlong Zhang, and Ali Haghani. 2014. A hybrid short-term traffic flow forecasting method based on spectral analysis and statistical volatility model. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 43, Part 1 (2014), pp. 65 – 78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    PCI '20: Proceedings of the 24th Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics
    November 2020
    433 pages

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 4 March 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate190of390submissions,49%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format