skip to main content
10.1145/3440840.3440852acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesciisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Improved Rehabilitation Robot Trajectory Regeneration by Learning from the Healthy Ankle Demonstration

Authors Info & Claims
Published:15 February 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The prevalence of ankle injuries in daily life has prompted the widespread application of rehabilitation robots. One of the important factors affecting robot-assisted ankle rehabilitation is the training trajectory which is usually regenerated from ankle movements. The traditional trajectory regeneration method is not suitable for the clinically recommended periodic ankle movements. In this paper, an improved robot trajectory regeneration method based on the individual characteristics is proposed to provide training reference trajectory for rehabilitation robots. This method extracts sample characteristics from the demonstration of the healthy ankle and reconstructs the sample space. Based on Learning from Demonstration (LfD) technology, the reference trajectory is regenerated for the rehabilitation of the injured ankle. The analysis of statistics and the regeneration of spatial features are performed to prove that this proposed method can regenerate the rehabilitation reference trajectory by learning from the healthy ankle demonstration.

References

  1. M. Zhang, T. C. Davies and S. Xie, “Effectiveness of robot-assisted therapy on ankle rehabilitation–a systematic review,” Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 10, (1), pp. 30-30, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. X. Zeng , “Reviewing Clinical Effectiveness of Active Training Strategies of Platform-Based Ankle Rehabilitation Robots,” Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Jin, Zhixiang , “The Factor Analysis and Preventive Measures of Ankle Injury in Basket-ball Players' Movement,” Open Cybernetics & Systemics Journal 9, pp.1790-1795,2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. J. Hertel, “Functional anatomy, pathomechanics, and pathophysiology of lateral ankle instability,” Journal of Athletic Training, vol. 37, (4), pp. 364-375, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. D. T. Fong , “A Systematic Review on Ankle Injury and Ankle Sprain in Sports,” Sports Medicine, vol. 37, (1), pp. 73-94, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Y. Khalid, D. Gouwanda and S. Parasuraman, “A review on the mechanical design elements of ankle rehabilitation robot,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part h-Journal of Engineering in Medicine, vol. 229, (6), pp. 452-463, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. P. K. Jamwal , “An Adaptive Wearable Parallel Robot for the Treatment of Ankle Injuries,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 19, (1), pp. 64-75, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. A. B. Farjadian , “Vi-RABT: A Platform-Based Robot for Ankle and Balance Assessment and Training,” Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, vol. 38, (4), pp. 556-572, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. C. Mattacola and M. Dwyer, “Rehabilitation of the ankle after acute sprain or chronic instability,” Journal of Athletic Training, vol. 37, (4), pp. 413-429, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. H. I. Krebs , “Rehabilitation Robotics: Performance-Based Progressive Robot-Assisted Therapy,” Autonomous Robots, vol. 15, (1), pp. 7-20, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. H. Krebs , “Increasing productivity and quality of care: Robot-aided neuro-rehabilitation,” Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, vol. 37, (6), pp. 639-652, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. W. Meng, S. Xie, Q. Liu, C. Lu, and Q. Ai, “Robust iterative feedback tuning control of a compliant rehabilitation robot for repetitive ankle training,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 2017, 22(1): 173-184.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. W. Meng, Q. Liu, Z. Zhou, Q. Ai, B. Sheng, and S. Q. Xie, “Recent development of mechanisms and control strategies for robot-assisted lower limb rehabilitation,” Mechatronics, vol. 31, pp. 132–145, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. C. P. Latimer, J. Keeling, B. Lin, M. Henderson, and L. A. Hale, “Theimpact of bilateral therapy on upper limb function after chronic stroke: a systematic review,” Disability & Rehabilitation, vol. 32, no. 15, pp.1221–1231, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Lum, Peter S., , “MIME robotic device for upper-limb neurorehabilitation in subacute stroke subjects: A follow-up study,” Journal of rehabilitation research and development, pp.631, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. J. Chang, W. L. Tung, W. L. Wu, M. H. Huang, and F. C. Su, “Effects of robot -aided bilateral force -induced isokinetic arm training combined with conventional rehabilitation on arm motor function in patients with chronic stroke,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 88, no. 10, pp. 1332-1338, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Macedo, Luciana Gazzi, BPT, MSc and Magee, David J., BPT, PhD, “Differences in Range of Motion Between Dominant and Nondominant Sides of Upper and Lower Extremities,” Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, vol. 31, (8), pp. 577-582, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. B. D. Argall , “A survey of robot learning from demonstration,” Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 57, (5), pp. 469-483, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. A. G. Billard , “Learning from humans,” in Springer Handbook of Robotics". New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2016, pp. 1995–2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Sonia Chernova; Andrea L. Thomaz, “Robot Learning from Human Teachers,” Robot Learning from Human Teachers ,1, Morgan & Claypool, 2014, pp.121-.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. J. Fong and M. Tavakoli, “Kinesthetic teaching of a therapist's behavior to a rehabilitation robot,” in 2018, DOI: 10.1109/ISMR.2018.8333285.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. J. Fong and H. Rouhani, “A Therapist-Taught Robotic System for Assistance During Gait Therapy Targeting Foot Drop,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 4, (2), pp. 407-413, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. S. F. Atashzar , “A Computational-Model-Based Study of Supervised Haptics-Enabled Therapist-in-the-Loop Training for Upper-Limb Poststroke Robotic Rehabilitation,” IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 23, (2), pp. 563-574, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. M. Najafi, M. Sharifi, K. Adams, and M.Tavakoli, “Robotic assistance for children with cerebral palsy based on learning from tele-cooperative demonstration,” International Journal of Intelligent Robotics and Applications, pp. 1-12, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. M. Najafi, K. Adams and M. Tavakoli, “Robotic learning from demonstration of therapist's time-varying assistance to a patient in trajectory-following tasks,” in 2017, DOI: 10.1109/ICORR.2017.8009361.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Z. Jiang, D. Zhang and G. Lu, “Radial artery pulse waveform analysis based on curve fitting using discrete Fourier series,” Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, vol. 174, pp. 25-31, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Improved Rehabilitation Robot Trajectory Regeneration by Learning from the Healthy Ankle Demonstration
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            CIIS '20: Proceedings of the 2020 3rd International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Systems
            November 2020
            135 pages
            ISBN:9781450388085
            DOI:10.1145/3440840

            Copyright © 2020 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 15 February 2021

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format