skip to main content
10.1145/3442520.3442525acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccnsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Slow Scan Attack Detection Based on Communication Behavior

Authors Info & Claims
Published:13 March 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

We present a novel method for detecting slow scan attacks. Attackers collect information about vulnerabilities in hosts by scan attacks and then penetrate the systems based on the collected information. Detection of scan attacks is therefore useful to avoid the following attacks. The intrusion detection system (IDS) has been proposed for detecting scan attacks. However, it cannot detect slow scan attacks that are executed slowly over a long period. In this paper, we introduce novel features that are useful to distinguish the difference in the communication behavior between the scanning hosts and the benign hosts. Then, we propose the detection method using the features. Furthermore, through the experiments, we confirm the effectiveness of our method for detecting a slow scan attack.

References

  1. [n.d.]. MITRE ATT&CK Enterprise Matrix. https://attack.mitre.org/matrices/enterprise/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [n.d.]. MITRE PRE-ATT&CK Matrix. https://attack.mitre.org/matrices/pre/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. [n.d.]. Nmap. https://nmap.org/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. [n.d.]. redis. https://redis.io/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. [n.d.]. Yet another flowmeter. https://linux.die.net/man/1/yaf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Mohammad Almseidin, Mouhammd Al-Kasassbeh, and Szilveszter Kovács. 2019. Detecting Slow Port Scan Using Fuzzy Rule Interpolation. 2019 2nd International Conference on new Trends in Computing Sciences (ICTCS) (2019), 1–6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jari Arkko, Michelle Cotton, and Leo Vegoda. 2010. IPv4 Address Blocks Reserved for Documentation. RFC 5737. https://doi.org/10.17487/RFC5737Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Mehiar Dabbagh, Ali J Ghandour, Kassem Fawaz, Wassim El Hajj, and Hazem Hajj. 2011. Slow port scanning detection. In 2011 7th International Conference on Information Assurance and Security (IAS). IEEE, 228–233.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Carrie Gates, Joshua J McNutt, Joseph B Kadane, and Marc I Kellner. 2006. Scan detection on very large networks using logistic regression modeling. In 11th IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications (ISCC’06). IEEE, 402–408.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. John Green, David J Marchette, Stephen Northcutt, and Bill Ralph. 1999. Analysis Techniques for Detecting Coordinated Attacks and Probes.. In Workshop on Intrusion Detection and Network Monitoring. 1–9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jaekwang Kim and Jee-Hyong Lee. 2008. A slow port scan attack detection mechanism based on fuzzy logic and a stepwise p1olicy. 1 – 5. https://doi.org/10.1049/cp:20081126Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Susmit Panjwani, Stephanie Tan, Keith M Jarrin, and Michel Cukier. 2005. An experimental evaluation to determine if port scans are precursors to an attack. In 2005 International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN’05). IEEE, 602–611.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Dan Pelleg, Andrew W Moore, 2000. X-means: Extending k-means with efficient estimation of the number of clusters.. In Icml, Vol. 1. 727–734.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Ichiro Shimada, Yu Tsuda, Masashi Eto, Daisuke Inoue, 2014. A Slow-Scan Detection Method for Live Network Environments. Computer Security Symposium 2014 2014, 2 (2014), 458–465.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Stuart Staniford, James A Hoagland, and Joseph M McAlerney. 2002. Practical automated detection of stealthy portscans. Journal of Computer Security 10, 1-2 (2002), 105–136.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Stuart Staniford-Chen, Steven Cheung, Richard Crawford, Mark Dilger, Jeremy Frank, James Hoagland, Karl Levitt, Christopher Wee, Raymond Yip, and Dan Zerkle. 1996. GrIDS-a graph based intrusion detection system for large networks. In Proceedings of the 19th national information systems security conference, Vol. 1. Baltimore, 361–370.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ehsan Moeen Taghavi, Bahman Abolhassani, 2011. A two step secure spectrum sensing algorithm using fuzzy logic for cognitive radio networks. Int’l J. of Communications, Network and System Sciences 4, 08(2011), 507.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Masahiko Takenaka, Satoru Torii, Satoru Shimizu, 2012. Study on Detection for Randomly Slow Port Scanning. Computer Security Symposium 2012 2012, 3 (2012), 736–741.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. J Udhayan, M Muruga Prabu, V Aravinda Krishnan, and R Anitha. 2009. Reconnaissance scan detection heuristics to disrupt the pre-attack information gathering. In 2009 International Conference on Network and Service Security. IEEE, 1–5.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Vinod Yegneswaran, Paul Barford, and Johannes Ullrich. 2003. Internet intrusions: Global characteristics and prevalence. ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review 31, 1 (2003), 138–147.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICCNS '20: Proceedings of the 2020 10th International Conference on Communication and Network Security
    November 2020
    145 pages
    ISBN:9781450389037
    DOI:10.1145/3442520

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 13 March 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format