skip to main content
10.1145/3446132.3446176acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesacaiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Research on bank fraud transaction detection based on LSTM-Focalloss

Published:09 March 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Bank fraud transaction has brought huge losses to consumers and banks, and the original rule-based fraud detection method is not suitable for various new fraud way. According to the fact that bank fraud transaction is a typical unbalanced data classification problem, two neural network models of DNN and LSTM are established, with a new type loss function, Focalloss is used to train and test on the Kaggle's TESTIMON Dataset. As the test results, LSTM-Focalloss's network was able to detect fraud transactions significantly higher than other methods, indicating that this network model is very effective in detecting bank fraud transactions.

References

  1. R Brause, T Langsdorf, M Hepp. 1999. Neural data mining for credit card fraud detection. IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, Chicago, IL. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAI.1999.809773Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Shao H, zhao H, Chang G R. 2002. Applying data mining to detect fraud behavior in customs declaration, Machine Learning and Cybernetics, proceeding International Conference on. IEEE 2002, 3: 1241-1244, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLC.2002.1167400Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Y. Sahin, E. Duman. 2011. Detecting Credit Card Fraud by Decision Trees and Support Vector Machines, Proceeding of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, IMECS 2011: 442-447.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Robinson W N. Aria A. 2018. Sequential fraud detection for prepaid cards using hidden Markov model divergence. Expert Systems with Applications, 2018,91:235-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.08.043Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Jurgovsky J, Granitzer M, Ziegler K, 2018. Sequence classification for credit-card fraud detection. Expert Systems with Applications, 2018,100:234-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.01.037Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. S. Benson Edwin Raj, A. Annie Portia. 2011. Analysis on credit card fraud detection methods. 2011 International Conference on Computer, Communication and Electrical Technology (ICCCET). Tamilnadu, India. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCET.2011.5762457Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Donglin L. Credit card fraud identification based on unbalanced data set based on fusion model[C]. 2019 IEEE 1st International Conference on Civil Aviation Safety and Information Technology (ICCASIT). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCASIT48058.2019.8973167Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Tsung Y L, Priya G, Ross G, Kaiming H, 2017. Focal Loss for Dense Object Detection[C]. Conference: 2017 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). Venice, Italy. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2017.324Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ACAI '20: Proceedings of the 2020 3rd International Conference on Algorithms, Computing and Artificial Intelligence
    December 2020
    576 pages
    ISBN:9781450388115
    DOI:10.1145/3446132

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 9 March 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate173of395submissions,44%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format