skip to main content
10.1145/3447450.3447480acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicvipConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

A String Prediction-Based Algorithm to AVS3 Screen Content Coding

Authors Info & Claims
Published:09 April 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

String Prediction (SP) is a special intra prediction mode for screen content coding, which can provide better coding efficiency while keeping lower coding complexity. In this paper, we present a string prediction-based improved algorithm to third-generation of the Audio Video Coding Standard (AVS3) screen content coding (SCC). The main content is to use the string vector (SV) of history-based block vector prediction (HBVP) as string vector prediction (SVP), and obtain the best SV by comparing the rate-distortion (RD) cost, which comes from CU-level estimation search and pixel-level motion estimation search. SV is equal to the sum of SVP and string vector difference (SVD). While the encoder only needs to signal the SVD and the HBVP index to the decoder. The experiments show that with little coding complexity increases, the algorithm presented in this paper achieves an average Y BD-rate of -5.02% (TGM)/ -3.06% (MC), U BD-rate of -5.10% (TGM)/ -3.39% (MC), V BD-rate of -5.08% (TGM)/ -3.66% (MC) from AVS SCC common test condition (CTC) test suite in all intra configuration.

References

  1. Xu, Jizheng, Rajan Joshi, and Robert A. Cohen. 2015. Overview of the emerging HEVC screen content coding extension. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 26, 1, 50-62.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Peng, W. H., Walls, F. G., Cohen, R. A., Xu, J., Ostermann, J., and Macinnis, A. 2016. Overview of screen content video coding: technologies, standards, and beyond. IEEE Journal on Emerging & Selected Topics in Circuits & Systems, 6, 4, 393-408.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Xu, X., Liu, S., Chuang, T. D., Huang, Y. W., Lei, S. M., and Rapaka, K. 2016. Intra block copy in hevc screen content coding extensions. IEEE Journal on Emerging & Selected Topics in Circuits & Systems, 6, 4, 409-418.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Chen, C. C., and Peng, W. H. 2016. Intra line copy for hevc screen content coding. IEEE Transactions on Circuits & Systems for Video Technology, 99, 1-12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Zhu, W., Ding, W., Xu, J., Shi, Y., and Yin, B. 2014. Screen content coding based on HEVC framework. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 16, 5, 1316-1326.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Lin, T., CAI, W., CHEN, X., ZHOU, K., and WANG, S. 2017. Lossless compression algorithm based on string matching with high performance and low complexity for screen content coding. J. Electron. Inf. Technol, 39, 2, 351-359.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Zhao, L., Zhou, K., Guo, J., Wang, S., and Lin, T., 2018. A universal string matching approach to screen content coding. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 20, 4, 796-809.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. X. Chen, L. Zhao, T. Lin. 2015. A New HEVC Intra Mode for Screen Content Coding. Journal of Electronics & Information Technology, 37, 11, 2685-2690.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Zhao, L., Zhou, K., Lin, T., and Guo, J. 2019. A universal string prediction approach and its application in AVS2 mixed content coding. Chinese Journal of Computers, 42, 41, 1-15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Zhao, L., Lin, T., Zhou, K., Wang, S., and Chen, X. 2016. Pseudo 2d string matching technique for high efficiency screen content coding. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 18, 3, 339-350.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Zhou, Q. Y., Zhao, L. P., Wang, H. H., Zhou, K. L., Jiao, M. C., Wang, S. H., and Lin, T. Simple string prediction algorithm can significantly improve the efficiency of SCC coding, and has the advantages of low coding complexity and low chip cost, in document AVS-M5226. China, Mar. 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. AVS3 reference software version 8.0 (HPM-8.0), http://gitlab.com/AVS3_Software/hpm/-/tags/HPM-8.0.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. X. Xu, AVS3-P2 screen content coding common test condition, in document AVS-N2730, Haikou, China, Sept. 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. G. Bjontegaard, Calculation of average psnr differences between rd-curves, in document VCEG-M33, Proc. of 13th VCEG Meeting, Austin, TX, USA, Apr. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICVIP '20: Proceedings of the 2020 4th International Conference on Video and Image Processing
    December 2020
    255 pages
    ISBN:9781450389075
    DOI:10.1145/3447450

    Copyright © 2020 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 9 April 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)4
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format