skip to main content
research-article

Examining the Adoption of Onlineto- Offline (O2O): Facilitating and Impeding Factors

Published:22 January 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

The online-to-offline (O2O) business model is rapidly growing among organizations, yet current knowledge on O2O adoption is predominantly individual focused, with little research on organizational adoption and the factors driving adoption. To address this gap, underpinned by the diffusion of innovation (DOI) theory, this study collected qualitative data (24 semistructured interviews), which were analyzed using content analysis techniques. We found that offline service quality and social network prosperity are some of the factors driving O2O adoption. Surprisingly, inefficient offline marketing was also found to drive O2O adoption, which indicates new challenges posed by the growing online business environment. We found that not all factors can be categorically classified as facilitating or impeding adoption, as some factors (such as operational challenges and costs) could play dichotomous roles of facilitating or impeding in the context of peculiar circumstances. For example, we found cost to be an impeding factor, yet the results also indicated the benefits of cost reduction resulting from O2O adoption, thereby rendering cost a contentious issue. This study extends the application of DOI theory to the O2O adoption stage, and identifies a number of new factors associated with internal/external organizational characteristics, as postulated in the DOI. Managerial implications are discussed.

References

  1. Aboelmaged, M. G. (2014). Predicting e-readiness at firm-level: An analysis of technological, organizational and environmental (TOE) effects on e-maintenance readiness in manufacturing firms. International Journal of Information Management, 34(5), 639--651. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Ahmad, S. Z., Abu Bakar, A. R., Faziharudean, T. M., & Mohamad Zaki, K. A. (2015). An empirical study of factors affecting e-commerce adoption among small-and medium-sized enterprises in a developing country: Evidence from Malaysia. Information Technology for Development, 21(4), 555--572. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ahn, T., Ryu, S., & Han, I. (2004). The impact of the online and offline features on the user acceptance of internet shopping malls. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 3(4), 405--420.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77--101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Chau, N. T., & Deng, H. (2018). Critical determinants for mobile commerce adoption in Vietnamese SMEs: A conceptual framework. Procedia Computer Science, 138, 433--440.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Chatzoglou, P., & Chatzoudes, D. (2016). Factors affecting e-business adoption in SMEs: An empirical research. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 29(3), 327--358.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Chen, Y. J. (2014). The study of new opportunity and potential risks in the mode of O2O E-commerce. Retrieved from http://www.som.siu.ac.th/wpcontent/ uploads/2014/09/The-Study-of-New- Opportunity-and-Potential-Risks-in-the-Mode-of- 020-E-Commerce.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Chi, Y.-S., Kang, M.-Y., Han, K.-S., & Choi, J.-I. (2015). A study on consumers? discontinuance intentions towards O2O commerce: Focused on the mediating effects of perceived risk and user resistance. Advanced Science and Technology Letters, 11(4), 45--50.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Chiang, I.-P., Lin, C.-Y., & Huang, C.-H. (2018). Measuring the effects of online-to-offline marketing. Contemporary Management Research, 14(3), 167--189.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Cho, M., Bonn, M. A., & Li, J. J. (2019). Differences in perceptions about food delivery apps between single-person and multi-person households. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 77,108--116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Du, Y., Cui, M., & Su, J. (2018). Implementation processes of online and offline channel conflict management strategies in manufacturing enterprises: A resource orchestration perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 39, 136--145.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Du, Y. S., & Tang, Y. C. (2014). Study on the development of O2O e-commerce platform of China from the perspective of offline service quality. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 5(4), 308--312.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Gao, F., Rau, P. L. P., & Zhang, Y. (2017). Perceived mobile information security and adoption of mobile payment services in China. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction, 9(1), 45- 62. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Gorla, N., Chiravuri, A., & Chinta, R. (2017). Businessto- business e-commerce adoption: An empirical investigation of business factors. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(3), 645--667. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Grosse, E. H., & Glock, C. H. (2015). The effect of worker learning on manual order picking processes. International Journal of Production Economics, 170, 882--890.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. HKTDC Research. (2015). E-commerce: Recent developments and opportunities for Hong Kong businesses. Retrieved from http://economistspick- research.hktdc.com/businessnews/ article/Research-Articles/E-commerce- Recent-Developments-and-Opportunities-for- Hong-Kong- Businesses/rp/en/1/1X32LK39/1X0A2EJB.htm HKTDC Research. (2016). Glossary: O2O. Retrieved from http://economists-pickresearch. hktdc.com/businessnews/ article/Glossary/Glossary- O2O/glossary/en/1/1X000000/1X09WBEP.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Hsieh, J. K. (2017). The role of customers in cocreating m-services in the O2O model. Journal of Service Management, 28(5), 866--883.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Huang, J. S., Pan, S. L., & Liu, J. (2017). Boundary permeability and online-offline hybrid organization: A case study of Suning, China. Information & Management, 54(3), 304--316. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Huang, J., Zhou, J., Liao, G., Mo, F., & Wang, H. (2017). Investigation of Chinese students? O2O shopping through multiple devices. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 58--69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Hwang, S., & Kim, S. (2018). Does mIM experience affect satisfaction with and loyalty toward O2O services? Computers in Human Behavior, 82, 70- 80.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. IResearch. (2016). 2015 China's e-commerce & O2O summary report. Retrieved from http://www.iresearchchina.com/content/details8_1 9531.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. IResearch. (2017). China's local life O2O GMV is expected to attain 590.7 Bn Yuan in 2019. Retrieved from http://www.iresearchchina.com/content/details7_2 9895.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Kang, J. W., & Namkung, Y. (2019). The information quality and source credibility matter in customers? evaluation toward food O2O commerce. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 78,189--198.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Koetse, M. (2017). China's growing e-commerce graveyard: These companies already failed in 2017. Retrieved from https://www.whatsonweibo.com/chinas-growinge- commerce-graveyard-companies-alreadyfailed- 2017/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Köseoglu, M. A., Chan, E. S., Okumus, F., & Altin, M. (2018), How do hotels operationalize their competitive intelligence efforts into their management processes? Proposing a holistic model. International Journal of Hospitality Management.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Kurnia, S., Choudrie, J., Mahbubur, R. M., & Alzougool, B. (2015). E-commerce technology adoption: A Malaysian grocery SME retail sector study. Journal of Business Research, 68(9), 1906--1918.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Kwon, T.H., & Zmud, R. W. (1987). Unifying the fragmented models of information systems implementation. In Critical issues in information systems research (pp. 227--251). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Lee, J., Kim, H. J., & Ahn, M. J. (2011). The willingness of e-government service adoption by business users: The role of offline service quality and trust in technology. Government Information Quarterly, 28(2), 222--230.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Lendle, A., Olarreaga, M., Schropp, S., & Vézina, P. L. (2016). There goes gravity: eBay and the death of distance. The Economic Journal, 126(591), 406- 441.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Leung, P. P. L., Wu, C. H., Ip, W. H., Ho, G. T. S., Cho, V. W. S., & Kwong, K. K. Y. (2016). Customer loyalty enhancement of online-to-offline marketing in beauty industry. IEEE 4th International Conference on Enterprise Systems (pp. 51--59).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Li, H-L., & Wang, D-C. (2016). The influential factors analysis of China's e-commerce development by applying double-layered grey correlation analysis model. Joint International Conference on Service Science, Management and Engineering.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Li, J., & Wei, J. M. (2015). The O2O mode in electronic commerce. International Conference on Education, Management, Commerce and Society (EMCS 2015) (pp. 246--249).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Liébana-Cabanillas, F., & Alonso-Dos-Santos, M. (2017). Factors that determine the adoption of Facebook commerce: The moderating effect of age. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 44, 1--18.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Mao, A. Y., Song, Y. Y., & Yu, J. X. (2015). The realization of the O2O model in mobile ecommerce based on the technology of the WeChat platform. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 743, 641--645.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Maramwidze-Merrison, E. (2016). Innovative methodologies in qualitative research: Social media window for accessing organisational elites for interviews. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 14(2), 157--167.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13--22.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Pan, Y., & Desheng, W. (2018). User activity measurement in rating-based online-to-offline (O2O) service recommendation. Information Sciences, 1--3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Peng, H., & Wu, L. (2014). O2O ecommerce: Power, patterns and prospects. Journal of South China University of Technology (Social Science Edition), 16(6), 10--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Phang, C. W., Tan, C. H., Sutanto, J., Magagna, F., & Lu, X. (2014). Leveraging O2O commerce for product promotion: An empirical investigation in Mainland China. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 61(4), 623--632. Poon, P. L., & Yu, Y. T. (2012). Degree of Internet corporate reporting: A research framework. Information Research, 17(1), 509.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. PWC. (2015). Delivering on O2O: How Chinese retailers can respond to blurring of online and offline. Retrieved from https://www.pwchk.com/en/consulting/consultingdelivering- o2o-jun2015.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Rahayu, R., & Day, J. (2015). Determinant factors of e-commerce adoption by SMEs in developing country: Evidence from Indonesia. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 142--150.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Ren, M., Zhou, G., Gu, G., & Wang, H. (2013). Statistical analysis of user check-in behavior and its application in O2O. Pakistan Journal of Statistics, 29(6), 973--988.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Robinson, O. C. (2014). Sampling in interview-based qualitative research: A theoretical and practical guide. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 11(1), 25--41.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Roh, M., & Park, K. (2018). Adoption of O2O food delivery services in South Korea: The moderating role of moral obligation in meal preparation. International Journal of Information Management.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Shang, S. S. C., & Yang, A. S. T. (2015). The types of online to offline business model. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication and Information Technology? CCIT.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Shen, C. W., Chen, M., & Wang, C. C. (2018). Analyzing the trend of O2O commerce by bilingual text mining on social media. Computers in Human Behavior.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Statista. (2019). Gross merchandise value of the online-to-offline catering market in China from 2010 to 2018 (in billion Yuan). Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/810638/chinao2o- catering-market-gmv/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Stockdale, R., & Standing, C. (2006). A classification model to support SME e-commerce adoption initiatives. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 13(3), 381--394.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Sun, S., Cegielski, C. G., Jia, L., & Hall, D. J. (2018). Understanding the factors affecting the organizational adoption of big data. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 58(3), 193--203.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. Tang, J. S., & Shao, J. X. (2015). Consumers? perceptions to traditional enterprises, under the O2O mode. Journal of Shenyang University of Technology (Social Science Edition), 8(1), 57--63.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Tornatzky, L.G., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Tsai, T. M., Yang, P. C., & Wang, W. N. (2013). Pilot study toward realizing social effect in O2O commerce services. Social Informatics, LNCS 8238, 268--273. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. van de Weerd, I., Mangula, I. S., & Brinkkemper, S. (2016). Adoption of software as a service in Indonesia: Examining the influence of organizational factors. Information & Management, 53(7), 915--928. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Walker, J. H., Saffu, K., & Mazurek, M. (2016). An empirical study of factors influencing e-commerce adoption/non-adoption in Slovakian SMEs. Journal of Internet Commerce, 15(3), 189--213.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Wan, X., & Chen, J. (2017). The relationship between platform choice and supplier's efficiency? Evidence from China's online to offline (O2O) ecommerce platforms. Electronic Markets, 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Wang, Y. (2016). O2O leads Chinese startups? boom and bust cycle. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/ywang/2016/04/21/o 2o-leads-chinese-startups-boom-and-bustcycle/# 60af8f127858Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Wang, Y. L. (2012). The opportunities of new current e-commerce: O2O. Journal of Anhui University of Science and Technology (Social Science), 16(5), 38--41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. White, G. R., Afolayan, A., & Plant, E. (2014). Challenges to the adoption of e-commerce technology for supply chain management in a developing economy: A focus on Nigerian SMEs. In Lacka E., Chan H., Yip N. (eds.), E-commerce Platform Acceptance, Springer, Cham.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Wimmer, R. (2018). How to Successfully Start a Startup in China, http://startupradar.asia/how-tosuccessfully- start-a-startup-in-china/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Xue, W.X., & Li, D.D. (2016). Innovative research on O2O marketing mode based on social networks. Software Engineering and Information Technology: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Software Engineering and Information Technology, (pp. 113--117).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Yang, S., & Wang, K. (2009). The influence of information sensitivity compensation on privacy concern and behavioral intention. ACM SIGMIS Database: The DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems, 40(1), 38--51. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Yang, Y., Gong, Y., Yu, B., Zhang, J., & He, T. (2016). What drives online-to-offline commerce: From a perspective of consumer. WHICEB 2016 Proceedings, 26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Yin, R.K. (2015). Qualitative research from start to finish. Guilford Publications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhang, C., & Wan, L. (2015). Online to offline convergent ecosystem: A case study of dianping. com. Journal of Digital Convergence, 13(6), 105- 111. Zhang, J. (2014). Customer loyalty forming mechanism of O2O e-commerce. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 5(5).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. Zhou, T. (2014). An empirical examination of initial trust in mobile payment. Wireless Personal Communications, 77(2), 1519--1531. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Zhou, T. (2015). An empirical examination of users' switch from online payment to mobile payment. International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction, 11(1), 55--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Examining the Adoption of Onlineto- Offline (O2O): Facilitating and Impeding Factors
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems
        ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems  Volume 52, Issue 1
        February 2021
        115 pages
        ISSN:0095-0033
        EISSN:1532-0936
        DOI:10.1145/3447934
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2021 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 22 January 2021

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader