skip to main content
10.1145/3447993.3483250acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmobicomConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Combating link dynamics for reliable lora connection in urban settings

Published:25 October 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

LoRa, as a representative Low-Power Wide-Area Network (LPWAN) technology, can provide long-range communication for battery-powered IoT devices with a 10-year lifetime. LoRa links in practice, however, experience high dynamics in various environments. When the SNR falls below the threshold (e.g., in the building), a LoRa device disconnects from the network. We propose Falcon, which addresses the link dynamics by enabling data transmission for very low SNR or even disconnected LoRa links. At the heart of Falcon, we reveal that low SNR LoRa links that cannot deliver packets can still introduce interference to other LoRa transmissions. Therefore, Falcon transmits data bits on the low SNR link by selectively interfering with other LoRa transmissions. We address practical challenges in Falcon design. We propose a low-power channel activity detection method to detect other LoRa transmissions for selective interference. To interfere with the so-called interference-resilient LoRa, we accurately estimate the time and frequency offsets on LoRa packets and propose an adaptive frequency adjusting strategy to maximize the interference. We implement Falcon, all using commercial off-the-shelf LoRa devices, and extensively evaluate its performance. The results show that Falcon can provide reliable communication links for disconnected LoRa devices and achieves the SNR boundary upto 7.5 dB lower than that of standard LoRa.

References

  1. Yiwei Ma and Jianliang Chen. Toward intelligent agriculture service platform with lora-based wireless sensor network. In Proceedings of IEEE ICASI, Tokyo, Japan, April 13--17, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Jithu G. Panicker, Mohamed Azman, and R. Kashyap. A lora wireless mesh network for wide-area animal tracking. In Proceedings of IEEE ICECCT, Tamil Nadu, India, February 20--22, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Lili Chen, Jie Xiong, Xiaojiang Chen, Sunghoon Ivan Lee, Kai Chen, Dianhe Han, Dingyi Fang, Zhanyong Tang, and Zheng Wang. Widesee: Towards wide-area contactless wireless sensing. In Proceedings of ACM SenSys, New York, NY, USA, November 10--13, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. R. Jedermann, M. Borysov, N. Hartgenbusch, S. Jaeger, M. Sellwig, and W. Lang. Testing lora for food applications - example application for airflow measurements inside cooled warehouses with apples. Procedia Manufacturing, 24(5):284--289, February 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. J. P. Shanmuga Sundaram, W. Du, and Z. Zhao. A survey on lora networking: Research problems, current solutions, and open issues. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 22(l):371--388, October 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ghena Branden, Adkins Joshua, Shangguan Longfei, Jamieson Kyle, Levis Phil, and Dutta Prabal. Challenge: Unlicensed lpwans are not yet the path to ubiquitous connectivity. In Proceedings of ACM Mobicom, Los Cabos, Mexico, October 21--25, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jansen C Liando, Amalinda Gamage, Agustinus W Tengourtius, and Mo Li. Known and unknown facts of lora: Experiences from a large-scale measurement study. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, 15(2):l-35, February 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Adwait Dongare, Revathy Narayanan, Akshay Gadre, Anh Luong, Artur Balanuta, Swarun Kumar, Bob Iannucci, and Anthony Rowe. Charm: exploiting geographical diversity through coherent combining in low-power wide-area networks. In Processings of ACM/IEEE IPSN, Porto, Portugal, April 11--13, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jun Liu, Weitao Xu, Sanjay Jha, and Wen Hu. Nephalai: Towards lpwan c-ran with physical layer compression. In Proceedings of ACM MobiCom, Online, September 21--25, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Artur Balanuta, Nuno Pereira, Swarun Kumar, and Anthony Rowe. A cloud-optimized link layer for low-power wide-area networks. In Proceedings of ACM MobiSys, Toronto, Canada, June 16--19, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Akshay Gadre, Revathy Narayanan, Anh Luong, Anthony Rowe, Bob Iannucci, and Swarun Kumar. Frequency configuration for low-power wide-area networks in a heartbeat. In Proceedings of USENTX NSDI, Online, Februray 25--27, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Rashad Eletreby, Diana Zhang, Swarun Kumar, and Osman Yağan. Empowering low-power wide area networks in urban settings. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM, Los Angeles, CA, USA, August 21--25, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Tallal Elshabrawy and Joerg Robert. Closed-form approximation of lora modulation ber performance. IEEE Communications Letters, 22(9):1778--1781, June 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Amalinda Gamage, Jansen Christian Liando, Chaojie Gu, Rui Tan, and Mo Li. Lmac: Efficient carrier-sense multiple access for lora. In Proceedings of ACM MobiCom, Online, September 21--25, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Semtch. Sx1278/77/78/79 datasheet. Available: https://www.semtech.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Bernat Carbonés Fargas and Martin Nordal Petersen. Gps-free geolocation using lora in low-power wans. In Proceedings of IEEE GIoTS, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Nico Podevijn, David Plets, Jens Trogh, Luc Martens, Pieter Suanet, Kim Hendríkse, and Wout Joseph. Tdoa-based outdoor positioning with tracking algorithm in a public lora network. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. USRP Ettus. N210 datasheet. Available: https://www.ettus.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Semtch. Sxl301 datasheet. Available: https://www.semtech.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Monsoon Solutions Inc. High voltage power monitor. Available: https://www.msoon.com/high-voltage-power-monitor.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Yuxiang Lin, Wei Dong, Yi Gao, and Tao Gu. Sateloc: A virtual fingerprinting approach to outdoor lora localization using satellite images. In Proceedings of ACM/IEEE IPSN, Online, April 21--24, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Yao Peng, Longfei Shangguan, Yue Hu, Yujie Qian, Xianshang Lin, Xiaojiang Chen, Dingyi Fang, and Kyle Jamieson. Plora: a passive long-range data network from ambient lora transmissions. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM, Budapest, Hungary, August 20--25, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Xiong Wang, Linghe Kong, Liang He, and Guihai Chen, mlora: A multi-packet reception protocol for lora communications. In Proceedings of IEEE ICNP, Chicago, Illinois, USA, October 7--10, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Zhe Wang, Linghe Kong, Kangjie Xu, Liang He, Kaishun Wu, and Guihai Chen. Online concurrent transmissions at lora gateway. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, Online, July 6--9, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Bin Hu, Zhimeng Yin, Shuai Wang, Zhuqing Xu, and Tian He. Sclora: Leveraging multi-dimensionality in decoding collided lora transmissions. In Proceedings of WEE ICNP, Online, October 13--16, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Zhenqiang Xu, Pengjin Xie, and Jiliang Wang. Pyramid: Real-time lora collision decoding with peak tracking. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, Online, May 10--13, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Xia Xianjin, Zheng Yuanqing, and Gu Tao. Ftrack: Parallel decoding for lora transmissions. In Proceedings of ACM SenSys, New York, NY, USA, November 10--13, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Shuai Tong, Jiliang Wang, and Yunhao Liu. Combating packet collisions using non-stationary signal scaling in lpwans. In Proceedings of ACM MobiSys, Toronto, Canada, June 16--19, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Shuai Tong, Zhenqiang Xu, and Jiliang Wang. Colora: Enabling multi-packet reception in lora. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, Online, July 6--9, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Yinghui Li, Jing Yang, and Jiliang Wang Wang. Dylora: Towards energy efficient dynamic lora transmission control. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, Online, July 6--9, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Weifeng Gao, Zhiwei Zhao, and Geyong Min. Adaplora: Resource adaptation for maximizing network lifetime in lora networks. In Proceedings of IEEE ICNP, Online, October 13--16, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Liu Li, Yao Yuguang, Cao Zhichao, and Zhang Mi. Deeplora: Learning accurate path loss model for long distance links in lpwan. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, Online, May 10--13, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Zhenqiang Xu, Shuai Tong, Pengjin Xie, and Jiliang Wang. Fliplora: Resolving collisions with up-down quasi-orthogonality. In Proceedings of IEEE SECON, Online, June 22--25, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Akshay Gadre, Fan Yi, Anthony Rowe, Bob Iannucci, and Swarun Kumar. Quick (and dirty) aggregate queries on low-power wans. In Proceedings of ACM/IEEE IPSN, Online, April 21--24, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Xianjin Xia, Yuanqing Zheng, and Tao Gu. Litenap: Downclocking lora reception. In Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, Online, July 6--9, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Ruofeng Liu, Zhimeng Yin, Wenchao Jiang, and Tian He. Xfi: Cross-technology iot data collection via commodity wifi. In Proceedings of IEEE ICNP, Online, October 13--16, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Junyang Shi, Di Mu, and Mo Sha. Lorabee: Cross-technology communication from lora to zigbee via payload encoding. In Proceedings of IEEE ICNP, Chicago, Illinois, USA, October 7--10, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. Ningning Hou and Yuanqing Zheng. Cloaklora: A covert channel over lora phy. In Proceedings of IEEE ICNP, Online, October 13--16, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhijun Li and Yongrui Chen. Achieving universal low-power wide-area networks on existing wireless devices. In Proceedings of IEEE ICNP, Chicago, Illinois, USA, October 7--10, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Justin Chan, Anran Wang, Arvind Krishnamurthy, and Shyamnath Gollakota. Deepsense: Enabling carrier sense in low-power wide area networks using deep learning. In ArXiv, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Xiong Wang, Linghe Kong, Zucheng Wu, Long Cheng, Chenren Xu, and Guihai Chen. Slora: towards secure lora communications with fine-grained physical layer features. In Proceedings of ACM SenSys, Online, November 16--19, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Silvia Demetri, Marco Zúñiga, Gian Pietro Picco, Fernando Kuipers, Lorenzo Bruzzone, and Thomas Telkamp. Automated estimation of link quality for lora: A remote sensing approach. In Proceedings of IEEE IPSN, Montreal, Canada, April 16--18, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Chaojie Gu, Linshan Jiang, Rui Tan, Mo Li, and Jun Huang. Attack-aware synchronization-free data timestamping in lorawan. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, In press, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Ezzeldin Hamed, Hariharan Rahul, Mohammed A. Abdelghany, and Dina Katabi. Real-time distributed mimo systems. In SIGCOMM, Florianopolis, Brazil, August 22--26, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Ezzeldin Hamed, Hariharan Rahul, and Bahar Partov. Chorus: truly distributed distributed-mimo. In SIGCOMM, Budapest, Hungary, August 20--25, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Se-Yeon Jeon, Min-Ho Ka, Seungha Shin, Munsung Kim, Seok Nyeon Kim, Sunwook Kim, Jeongbae Kim, Aulia Dewantari, Jaeheung Kim, and Hansup Chung. W-band mimo fmcw radar system with simultaneous transmission of orthogonal waveforms for high-resolution imaging. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 66(ll):5051--5064, September 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Arijit Roy, Debasish Deb, Harshal B. Nemade, and Ratnajit Bhattacharjee. Design of discrete frequency-coding waveforms using phase-coded linear chirp for multiuser and mimo radar systems. Karnataka, India, February 20--23, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Diep N Nguyen and Marwan Krunz. A cooperative mimo framework for wireless sensor networks. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, 10(3):l-28, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Philip Lundrigan, Neal Patwari, and Sneha K Kasera. On-off noise power communication. In Proceedings of ACM Mobicom, Los Cabos, Mexico, October 21--25, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  50. Vincent Liu, Aaron Parks, Vamsi Talla, Shyamnath Gollakota, David Wetherall, and Joshua R. Smith. Ambient backscatter: Wireless communication out of thin air. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM, Hong Kong, China, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Anran Wang, Vikram Iyer, Vamsi Talla, Joshua R. Smith, and Shyamnath Gollakota. FM backscatter: Enabling connected cities and smart fabrics. In Proceedings of USENIX NSDI, Boston, MA, USA, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Pengyu Zhang, Dinesh Bharadia, Kiran Joshi, and Sachin Katti. HitchHike: Practical backscatter using commodity WiFi. In Proceedings of ACM SenSys, Stanford, CA, USA, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Ali Abedi, Farzan Dehbashi, Mohammad Hossein Mazaheri, Omid Abari, and Tim Brecht. Witag: Seamless wifi backscatter communication. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM, Virtual Event, USA, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Mehrdad Hessar, Ali Najafì, and Shyamnath Gollakota. Netscatter: Enabling large-scale backscatter networks. In Proceedings of USENIX NSDI, Boston, MA, USA, February 26--28, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Vamsi Talla, Mehrdad Hessar, Bryce Kellogg, Ali Najafì, Joshua R Smith, and Shyamnath Gollakota. Lora backscatter: Enabling the vision of ubiquitous connectivity. In Proceedings of ACM Ubicomp, Hawaii, USA, September 11--15, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Szymon Chachulski, Michael Jennings, Sachin Katti, and Dina Katabi. Trading structure for randomness in wireless opportunistic routing. In Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM, ACM New York, NY, USA, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Omprakash Gnawali, Rodrigo Fonseca, Kyle Jamieson, David Moss, and Philip Levis. Collection tree protocol. In Proceedings of ACM SenSys, Berkeley, California, USA, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Michael Buettner, Gary V Yee, Eric Anderson, and Richard Han. X-mac: a short preamble mac protocol for duty-cycled wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of ACM SenSys, pages 307--320, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Gang Zhou, Tian He, Sudha Krishnamurthy, and John A. Stankovic. Models and solutions for radio irregularity in wireless sensor networks. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, 2(2):221--262, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. Chaojie Gu, Rui Tan, and Xin Lou. One-hop out-of-band control planes for multihop wireless sensor networks. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN), 15(4):1--29, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Combating link dynamics for reliable lora connection in urban settings

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MobiCom '21: Proceedings of the 27th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking
      October 2021
      887 pages
      ISBN:9781450383424
      DOI:10.1145/3447993

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 October 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate440of2,972submissions,15%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader