skip to main content
research-article

The Complementary Nature of Perceived and Actual Time Spent Online in Measuring Digital Well-being

Published:22 April 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

As online platforms become ubiquitous, there is growing concern that their use can potentially lead to negative outcomes in users' personal lives, such as disrupted sleep and impacted social relationships. A central question in the literature studying these problematic effects is whether they are associated with the amount of time users spend on online platforms. This is often addressed by either analyzing self-reported measures of time spent online, which are generally inaccurate, or using objective metrics derived from server logs or tracking software. Nonetheless, how the two types of time measures comparatively relate to problematic effects -- whether they complement or are redundant with each other in predicting problematicity -- remains unknown. Additionally, transparent research into this question is hindered by the literature's focus on closed platforms with inaccessible data, as well as selective analytical decisions that may lead to reproducibility issues.

In this work, we investigate how both self-reported and data-derived metrics of time spent relate to potentially problematic effects arising from the use of an open, non-profit online chess platform. These effects include disruptions to sleep, relationships, school and work performance, and self-control. To this end, we distributed a gamified survey to players and linked their responses with publicly-available game logs. We find problematic effects to be associated with both self-reported and data-derived usage measures to similar degrees. However, analytical models incorporating both self-reported and actual time explain problematic effects significantly more effectively than models with either type of measure alone. Furthermore, these results persist across thousands of possible analytical decisions when using a robust and transparent statistical framework. This suggests that the two methods of measuring time spent measure contain distinct, complementary information about problematic usage outcomes and should be used in conjunction with each other.

References

  1. 2019. Lichess.org Press Kit. Retrieved September 18, 2019 from https://lichess.cdn.prismic.io/lichess%2F758a8bb6-c1c5-4982-9c6b-6fcebeea424f_2018-03-04-lichess-press-kit.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Sami Abuhamdeh and Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. 2012. The importance of challenge for the enjoyment of intrinsically motivated, goal-directed activities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 38, 3 (2012), 317--330.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Hunt Allcott, Luca Braghieri, Sarah Eichmeyer, and Matthew Gentzkow. 2020. The welfare effects of social media. American Economic Review, Vol. 110, 3 (2020), 629--76.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. American Psychiatric Association and others. 2013. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. BMC Med, Vol. 17 (2013), 133--137.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashton Anderson and Etan A Green. 2018. Personal bests as reference points. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 115, 8 (2018), 1772--1776.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Cecilie Schou Andreassen, Torbjørn Torsheim, Geir Scott Brunborg, and Ståle Pallesen. 2012. Development of a Facebook addiction scale. Psychological reports, Vol. 110, 2 (2012), 501--517.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Julie H Aranda and Safia Baig. 2018. Toward JOMO: the joy of missing out and the freedom of disconnecting. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. ACM, 19.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Adriana Bianchi and James G Phillips. 2005. Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. CyberPsychology & Behavior, Vol. 8, 1 (2005), 39--51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Jeffrey Boase and Rich Ling. 2013. Measuring mobile phone use: Self-report versus log data. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 18, 4 (2013), 508--519.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Moira Burke, Cameron Marlow, and Thomas Lento. 2010. Social network activity and social well-being. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 1909--1912.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Neralie Cain and Michael Gradisar. 2010. Electronic media use and sleep in school-aged children and adolescents: A review. Sleep medicine, Vol. 11, 8 (2010), 735--742.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Scott Caplan, Dmitri Williams, and Nick Yee. 2009. Problematic Internet use and psychosocial well-being among MMO players. Computers in human behavior, Vol. 25, 6 (2009), 1312--1319.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hilarie Cash, Cosette D Rae, Ann H Steel, and Alexander Winkler. 2012. Internet addiction: A brief summary of research and practice. Current psychiatry reviews, Vol. 8, 4 (2012), 292--298.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Justin Cheng, Moira Burke, and Elena Goetz Davis. 2019. Understanding Perceptions of Problematic Facebook Use: When People Experience Negative Life Impact and a Lack of Control. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Robert S Davidson and Page B Walley. 1985. Computer fear and addiction: Analysis, prevention and possible modification. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, Vol. 6, 3--4 (1985), 37--52.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Amandeep Dhir, Puneet Kaur, Sufen Chen, and Kirsti Lonka. 2016. Understanding online regret experience in Facebook use--Effects of brand participation, accessibility & problematic use. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 59 (2016), 420--430.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Tony Durkee, Michael Kaess, Vladimir Carli, Peter Parzer, Camilla Wasserman, Birgitta Floderus, Alan Apter, Judit Balazs, Shira Barzilay, Julio Bobes, et almbox. 2012. Prevalence of pathological internet use among adolescents in Europe: demographic and social factors. Addiction, Vol. 107, 12 (2012), 2210--2222.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Sindhu Kiranmai Ernala, Moira Burke, Alex Leavitt, and Nicole B Ellison. 2020. How well do people report time spent on Facebook? An evaluation of established survey questions with recommendations. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Isabela Granic, Adam Lobel, and Rutger CME Engels. 2014. The benefits of playing video games. American psychologist, Vol. 69, 1 (2014), 66.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Colin M Gray, Yubo Kou, Bryan Battles, Joseph Hoggatt, and Austin L Toombs. 2018. The dark (patterns) side of UX design. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 534.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Mark D Griffiths. 1991. Amusement machine playing in childhood and adolescence: A comparative analysis of video games and fruit machines. Journal of adolescence, Vol. 14, 1 (1991), 53--73.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Mark D Griffiths. 2000. Does Internet and computer" addiction" exist? Some case study evidence. CyberPsychology and Behavior, Vol. 3, 2 (2000), 211--218.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Melissa G Hunt, Rachel Marx, Courtney Lipson, and Jordyn Young. 2018. No more FOMO: Limiting social media decreases loneliness and depression. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, Vol. 37, 10 (2018), 751--768.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Reynol Junco. 2013. Comparing actual and self-reported measures of Facebook use. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 29, 3 (2013), 626--631.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Adam S Kahn, Rabindra Ratan, and Dmitri Williams. 2014. Why we distort in self-report: Predictors of self-report errors in video game play. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Vol. 19, 4 (2014), 1010--1023.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Ronald C Kessler, Irving Hwang, Richard LaBrie, Maria Petukhova, Nancy A Sampson, Ken C Winters, and Howard J Shaffer. 2008. DSM-IV pathological gambling in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Psychological medicine, Vol. 38, 9 (2008), 1351--1360.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Dongil Kim, Yunhee Lee, Juyoung Lee, JeeEun Karin Nam, and Yeoju Chung. 2014. Development of Korean smartphone addiction proneness scale for youth. PloS one, Vol. 9, 5 (2014), e97920.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Daniel L King, Maria C Haagsma, Paul H Delfabbro, Michael Gradisar, and Mark D Griffiths. 2013. Toward a consensus definition of pathological video-gaming: A systematic review of psychometric assessment tools. Clinical psychology review, Vol. 33, 3 (2013), 331--342.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Aniket Kittur, Ed H Chi, and Bongwon Suh. 2008. Crowdsourcing user studies with Mechanical Turk. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, 453--456.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Geza Kovacs, Zhengxuan Wu, and Michael S Bernstein. 2018. Rotating Online Behavior Change Interventions Increases Effectiveness But Also Increases Attrition. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Vol. 2, CSCW (2018), 95.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Daria J Kuss and Mark D Griffiths. 2011. Online social networking and addiction -- a review of the psychological literature. International journal of environmental research and public health, Vol. 8, 9 (2011), 3528--3552.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Daria J Kuss and Mark D Griffiths. 2012. Internet gaming addiction: A systematic review of empirical research. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, Vol. 10, 2 (2012), 278--296.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Daria J Kuss, Mark D Griffiths, Laurent Karila, and Jöel Billieux. 2014. Internet addiction: A systematic review of epidemiological research for the last decade. Current pharmaceutical design, Vol. 20, 25 (2014), 4026--4052.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Min Kwon, Dai-Jin Kim, Hyun Cho, and Soo Yang. 2013a. The smartphone addiction scale: development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PloS one, Vol. 8, 12 (2013), e83558.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Min Kwon, Joon-Yeop Lee, Wang-Youn Won, Jae-Woo Park, Jung-Ah Min, Changtae Hahn, Xinyu Gu, Ji-Hye Choi, and Dai-Jin Kim. 2013b. Development and validation of a smartphone addiction scale (SAS). PloS one, Vol. 8, 2 (2013), e56936.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Robert LaRose, Carolyn A Lin, and Matthew S Eastin. 2003. Unregulated Internet usage: Addiction, habit, or deficient self-regulation? Media Psychology, Vol. 5, 3 (2003), 225--253.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Uichin Lee, Joonwon Lee, Minsam Ko, Changhun Lee, Yuhwan Kim, Subin Yang, Koji Yatani, Gahgene Gweon, Kyong-Mee Chung, and Junehwa Song. 2014. Hooked on smartphones: an exploratory study on smartphone overuse among college students. In Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 2327--2336.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Jeroen S Lemmens, Patti M Valkenburg, and Jochen Peter. 2009. Development and validation of a game addiction scale for adolescents. Media psychology, Vol. 12, 1 (2009), 77--95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Shao-Kang Lo, Chih-Chien Wang, and Wenchang Fang. 2005. Physical interpersonal relationships and social anxiety among online game players. Cyberpsychology & behavior, Vol. 8, 1 (2005), 15--20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Ulrik Lyngs, Kai Lukoff, Petr Slovak, Reuben Binns, Adam Slack, Michael Inzlicht, Max Van Kleek, and Nigel Shadbolt. 2019. Self-Control in Cyberspace: Applying Dual Systems Theory to a Review of Digital Self-Control Tools. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.00157 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Robert McIlwraith, Robin Smith Jacobvitz, Robert Kubey, and Alison Alexander. 1991. Television addiction: Theories and data behind the ubiquitous metaphor. American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 35, 2 (1991), 104--121.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. G-J Meerkerk, Regina JJM Van Den Eijnden, Ad A Vermulst, and Henk FL Garretsen. 2009. The compulsive internet use scale (CIUS): some psychometric properties. Cyberpsychology & behavior, Vol. 12, 1 (2009), 1--6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Monty Newborn. 2012. Kasparov versus Deep Blue: Computer chess comes of age. Springer Science & Business Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Amy Orben, Tobias Dienlin, and Andrew K Przybylski. 2019. Social media's enduring effect on adolescent life satisfaction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 116, 21 (2019), 10226--10228.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Amy Orben and Andrew K Przybylski. 2019. The association between adolescent well-being and digital technology use. Nature Human Behaviour, Vol. 3, 2 (2019), 173.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Andrew K Przybylski and Netta Weinstein. 2017. A large-scale test of the Goldilocks Hypothesis: Quantifying the relations between digital-screen use and the mental well-being of adolescents. Psychological Science, Vol. 28, 2 (2017), 204--215.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. John Rooksby, Parvin Asadzadeh, Mattias Rost, Alistair Morrison, and Matthew Chalmers. 2016. Personal tracking of screen time on digital devices. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 284--296.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Tracii Ryan, Andrea Chester, John Reece, and Sophia Xenos. 2014. The uses and abuses of Facebook: A review of Facebook addiction.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Matthew J Salganik. 2017. Bit by bit: social research in the digital age. Princeton University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Michael Scharkow. 2016. The accuracy of self-reported internet use-A validation study using client log data. Communication Methods and Measures, Vol. 10, 1 (2016), 13--27.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. A Fleming Seay and Robert E Kraut. 2007. Project massive: Self-regulation and problematic use of online gaming. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 829--838.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Choonsung Shin and Anind K Dey. 2013. Automatically detecting problematic use of smartphones. In Proceedings of the 2013 ACM international joint conference on Pervasive and ubiquitous computing. ACM, 335--344.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Uri Simonsohn, Joseph P Simmons, and Leif D Nelson. 2015. Specification curve: Descriptive and inferential statistics on all reasonable specifications. Available at SSRN 2694998 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. Ricardo A Tejeiro Salguero and Rosa M Bersabé Morán. 2002. Measuring problem video game playing in adolescents. Addiction, Vol. 97, 12 (2002), 1601--1606.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Naomi J Thomas and Frances Heritage Martin. 2010. Video-arcade game, computer game and Internet activities of Australian students: Participation habits and prevalence of addiction. Australian Journal of Psychology, Vol. 62, 2 (2010), 59--66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  56. Jean M Twenge, Thomas E Joiner, Megan L Rogers, and Gabrielle N Martin. 2018. Increases in depressive symptoms, suicide-related outcomes, and suicide rates among US adolescents after 2010 and links to increased new media screen time. Clinical Psychological Science, Vol. 6, 1 (2018), 3--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Antonius J Van Rooij, Tim M Schoenmakers, Ad A Vermulst, Regina JJM Van Den Eijnden, and Dike Van De Mheen. 2011. Online video game addiction: identification of addicted adolescent gamers. addiction, Vol. 106, 1 (2011), 205--212.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. Steve Whittaker, Vaiva Kalnikaite, Victoria Hollis, and Andrew Guydish. 2016. 'Don't Waste My Time': Use of Time Information Improves Focus. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1729--1738.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  59. Dmitri Williams, Mia Consalvo, Scott Caplan, and Nick Yee. 2009. Looking for gender: Gender roles and behaviors among online gamers. Journal of communication, Vol. 59, 4 (2009), 700--725.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  60. Peter M Yellowlees and Shayna Marks. 2007. Problematic Internet use or Internet addiction? Computers in human behavior, Vol. 23, 3 (2007), 1447--1453.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Kimberly S Young. 1996. Psychology of computer use: XL. Addictive use of the Internet: a case that breaks the stereotype. Psychological reports, Vol. 79, 3 (1996), 899--902.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  62. Kimberly S Young. 1998. Internet addiction: The emergence of a new clinical disorder. Cyberpsychology & behavior, Vol. 1, 3 (1998), 237--244.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Kimberly S Young and Carl J Case. 2004. Internet abuse in the workplace: new trends in risk management. CyberPsychology & Behavior, Vol. 7, 1 (2004), 105--111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. David Zendle and Paul Cairns. 2018. Video game loot boxes are linked to problem gambling: Results of a large-scale survey. PloS one, Vol. 13, 11 (2018), e0206767.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. The Complementary Nature of Perceived and Actual Time Spent Online in Measuring Digital Well-being

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
          Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 5, Issue CSCW1
          CSCW
          April 2021
          5016 pages
          EISSN:2573-0142
          DOI:10.1145/3460939
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 2021 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 22 April 2021
          Published in pacmhci Volume 5, Issue CSCW1

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader