skip to main content
research-article

Dialogue History Matters! Personalized Response Selection in Multi-Turn Retrieval-Based Chatbots

Authors Info & Claims
Published:17 August 2021Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Existing multi-turn context-response matching methods mainly concentrate on obtaining multi-level and multi-dimension representations and better interactions between context utterances and response. However, in real-place conversation scenarios, whether a response candidate is suitable not only counts on the given dialogue context but also other backgrounds, e.g., wording habits, user-specific dialogue history content. To fill the gap between these up-to-date methods and the real-world applications, we incorporate user-specific dialogue history into the response selection and propose a personalized hybrid matching network (PHMN). Our contributions are two-fold: (1) our model extracts personalized wording behaviors from user-specific dialogue history as extra matching information; (2) we perform hybrid representation learning on context-response utterances and explicitly incorporate a customized attention mechanism to extract vital information from context-response interactions so as to improve the accuracy of matching. We evaluate our model on two large datasets with user identification, i.e., personalized Ubuntu dialogue Corpus (P-Ubuntu) and personalized Weibo dataset (P-Weibo). Experimental results confirm that our method significantly outperforms several strong models by combining personalized attention, wording behaviors, and hybrid representation learning.

References

  1. Mohammad Aliannejadi, Hamed Zamani, Fabio Crestani, and W. Bruce Croft. 2019. Asking clarifying questions in open-domain information-seeking conversations. In Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 475–484. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Dzmitry Bahdanau, Kyunghyun Cho, and Yoshua Bengio. 2015. Neural machine translation by jointly learning to align and translate. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR 2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Basma El Amel Boussaha, Nicolas Hernandez, Christine Jacquin, and Emmanuel Morin. 2019. Deep retrieval-based dialogue systems: A short review. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.12878 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Zhangming Chan, Juntao Li, Xiaopeng Yang, Xiuying Chen, Wenpeng Hu, Dongyan Zhao, and Rui Yan. 2019. Modeling personalization in continuous space for response generation via augmented wasserstein autoencoders. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMLNP-IJCNLP). 1931–1940.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Haolan Chen, Fred X. Han, Di Niu, Dong Liu, Kunfeng Lai, Chenglin Wu, and Yu Xu. 2018. MIX: Multi-channel information crossing for text matching. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. ACM, 110–119. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Zhuyun Dai, Chenyan Xiong, Jamie Callan, and Zhiyuan Liu. 2018. Convolutional neural networks for soft-matching n-grams in ad-hoc search. In Proceedings of the 11th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. ACM, 126–134. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2018. BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. George Ferguson, James F. Allen, and Bradford W. Miller. 1996. TRAINS-95: Towards a mixed-initiative planning assistant. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Planning Systems. 70–77. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Shen Gao, Xiuying Chen, Chang Liu, Li Liu, Dongyan Zhao, and Rui Yan. 2020. Learning to respond with stickers: A framework of unifying multi-modality in multi-turn dialog. In Proceedings of the Web Conference 2020. 1138–1148. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Jia-Chen Gu, Tianda Li, Quan Liu, Zhen-Hua Ling, Zhiming Su, Si Wei, and Xiaodan Zhu. 2020. Speaker-aware BERT for multi-turn response selection in retrieval-based chatbots. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. 2041–2044. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jiafeng Guo, Yixing Fan, Qingyao Ai, and W. Bruce Croft. 2016. A deep relevance matching model for ad-hoc retrieval. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. ACM, 55–64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Helia Hashemi, Hamed Zamani, and W. Croft. 2020. Guided transformer: Leveraging multiple external sources for representation learning in conversational search. In Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (2020). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Baotian Hu, Zhengdong Lu, Hang Li, and Qingcai Chen. 2014. Convolutional neural network architectures for matching natural language sentences. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2042–2050. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Minlie Huang, Xiaoyan Zhu, and Jianfeng Gao. 2020. Challenges in building intelligent open-domain dialog systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 38, 3 (2020), 1–32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Po-Sen Huang, Xiaodong He, Jianfeng Gao, Li Deng, Alex Acero, and Larry Heck. 2013. Learning deep structured semantic models for web search using clickthrough data. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. ACM, 2333–2338. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Ozan Irsoy and Claire Cardie. 2014. Deep recursive neural networks for compositionality in language. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2096–2104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Zongcheng Ji, Zhengdong Lu, and Hang Li. 2014. An information retrieval approach to short text conversation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1408.6988 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Nal Kalchbrenner, Edward Grefenstette, and Phil Blunsom. 2014. A convolutional neural network for modelling sentences. arXiv preprint arXiv:1404.2188 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Yoon Kim. 2014. Convolutional neural networks for sentence classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1408.5882 (2014).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Diederik P. Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2015. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In Proceedings of the ICLR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Wenqiang Lei, Xisen Jin, Min-Yen Kan, Zhaochun Ren, Xiangnan He, and Dawei Yin. 2018. Sequicity: Simplifying task-oriented dialogue systems with single sequence-to-sequence architectures. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), Vol. 1. 1437–1447.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Feng-Lin Li, Minghui Qiu, Haiqing Chen, Xiongwei Wang, Xing Gao, Jun Huang, Juwei Ren, Zhongzhou Zhao, Weipeng Zhao, Lei Wang, and Guwei Jin, Wei Chu. 2017. AliMe assist: An intelligent assistant for creating an innovative e-commerce experience. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 2495–2498. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Jiwei Li, Michel Galley, Chris Brockett, Jianfeng Gao, and Bill Dolan. 2016. A diversity-promoting objective function for neural conversation models. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 110–119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Jiwei Li, Michel Galley, Chris Brockett, Georgios Spithourakis, Jianfeng Gao, and Bill Dolan. 2016. A persona-based neural conversation model. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 994–1003. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P16-1094Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Jiwei Li, Minh-Thang Luong, Dan Jurafsky, and Eudard Hovy. 2015. When are tree structures necessary for deep learning of representations?arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.00185 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Jiwei Li, Will Monroe, Alan Ritter, Dan Jurafsky, Michel Galley, and Jianfeng Gao. 2016. Deep reinforcement learning for dialogue generation. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 1192–1202. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D16-1127Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Jiwei Li, Will Monroe, Tianlin Shi, Sėbastien Jean, Alan Ritter, and Dan Jurafsky. 2017. Adversarial learning for neural dialogue generation. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2157–2169. http://aclweb.org/anthology/D17-1230.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Juntao Li, Lisong Qiu, Bo Tang, Dongmin Chen, Dongyan Zhao, and Rui Yan. 2019. Insufficient data can also rock! Learning to converse using smaller data with augmentation. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 33. 6698–6705.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Juntao Li and Rui Yan. 2018. Overview of the NLPCC 2018 shared task: Multi-turn human-computer conversations. In Proceedings of the CCF International Conference on Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing. Springer, 446–451.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Lu Li, Chenliang Li, and Donghong Ji. [n.d.]. Deep context modeling for multi-turn response selection in dialogue systems. Information Processing & Management 58, 1 ([n. d.]), 102415.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Pengfei Liu, Xipeng Qiu, and Xuanjing Huang. 2016. Recurrent neural network for text classification with multi-task learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.05101 (2016). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Ryan Lowe, Nissan Pow, Iulian Serban, and Joelle Pineau. 2015. The ubuntu dialogue corpus: A large dataset for research in unstructured multi-turn dialogue systems. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue. 285–294. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W15-4640Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Junyu Lu, Xiancong Ren, Yazhou Ren, Ao Liu, and Zenglin Xu. 2020. Improving contextual language models for response retrieval in multi-turn conversation. In Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 1805–1808. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Zhengdong Lu and Hang Li. 2013. A deep architecture for matching short texts. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 1367–1375. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Gábor Melis, Tomáš Kočiskỳ, and Phil Blunsom. 2019. Mogrifier LSTM. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.01792 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Lili Mou, Yiping Song, Rui Yan, Ge Li, Lu Zhang, and Zhi Jin. 2016. Sequence to backward and forward sequences: A content-introducing approach to generative short-text conversation. In Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers. 3349–3358. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/C16-1316.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Liang Pang, Yanyan Lan, Jiafeng Guo, Jun Xu, Shengxian Wan, and Xueqi Cheng. 2016. Text matching as image recognition. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 2793–2799. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Lisong Qiu, Juntao Li, Wei Bi, Dongyan Zhao, and Rui Yan. 2019. Are training samples correlated? Learning to generate dialogue responses with multiple references. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 3826–3835.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Lisong Qiu, Yingwai Shiu, Pingping Lin, Ruihua Song, Yue Liu, Dongyan Zhao, and Rui Yan. 2020. What if bots feel moods? In Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 1161–1170. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  40. Alan Ritter, Colin Cherry, and William B. Dolan. 2011. Data-driven response generation in social media. In Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 583–593. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Iulian Vlad Serban, Tim Klinger, Gerald Tesauro, Kartik Talamadupula, Bowen Zhou, Yoshua Bengio, and Aaron Courville. 2017. Multiresolution recurrent neural networks: An application to dialogue response generation. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 3288–3294. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Iulian Vlad Serban, Alessandro Sordoni, Yoshua Bengio, Aaron C. Courville, and Joelle Pineau. 2016. End-to-end dialogue systems using generative hierarchical neural network models. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 3776–3784. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Iulian Vlad Serban, Alessandro Sordoni, Yoshua Bengio, Aaron C. Courville, and Joelle Pineau. 2016. Building end-to-end dialogue systems using generative hierarchical neural network models. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 16. 3776–3784. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Iulian Vlad Serban, Alessandro Sordoni, Ryan Lowe, Laurent Charlin, Joelle Pineau, Aaron C. Courville, and Yoshua Bengio. 2017. A hierarchical latent variable encoder-decoder model for generating dialogues. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 3295–3301. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Lifeng Shang, Zhengdong Lu, and Hang Li. 2015. Neural responding machine for short-text conversation. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing. 1577–1586. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/P15-1152Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  46. Heung-Yeung Shum, Xiaodong He, and Di Li. 2018. From ELIZA to XIAOICE: Challenges and opportunities with social chatbots. Frontiers of IT & EE 19, 1 (2018), 10–26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Richard Socher, Cliff C. Lin, Chris Manning, and Andrew Y. Ng. 2011. Parsing natural scenes and natural language with recursive neural networks. In Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-11). 129–136. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Yiping Song, Cheng-Te Li, Jian-Yun Nie, Ming Zhang, Dongyan Zhao, and Rui Yan. 2018. An ensemble of retrieval-based and generation-based human-computer conversation systems. In Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 4382–4388. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Alessandro Sordoni, Michel Galley, Michael Auli, Chris Brockett, Yangfeng Ji, Margaret Mitchell, Jian-Yun Nie, Jianfeng Gao, and Bill Dolan. 2015. A neural network approach to context-sensitive generation of conversational responses. In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 196–205. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/N15-1020Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Chongyang Tao, Wei Wu, Can Xu, Wenpeng Hu, Dongyan Zhao, and Rui Yan. 2019. Multi-representation fusion network for multi-turn response selection in retrieval-based chatbots. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 267–275. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  51. Chongyang Tao, Wei Wu, Can Xu, Wenpeng Hu, Dongyan Zhao, and Rui Yan. 2019. One time of interaction may not be enough: Go deep with an interaction-over-interaction network for response selection in dialogues. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 1–11.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. Zhaopeng Tu, Yang Liu, Shuming Shi, and Tong Zhang. 2018. Learning to remember translation history with a continuous cache. Transactions of the Association of Computational Linguistics 6 (2018), 407–420.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N. Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 5998–6008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. Oriol Vinyals and Quoc Le. 2015. A neural conversational model. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.05869 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Hao Wang, Zhengdong Lu, Hang Li, and Enhong Chen. 2013. A dataset for research on short-text conversations. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 935–945. http://aclweb.org/anthology/D13-1096.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Mingxuan Wang, Zhengdong Lu, Hang Li, and Qun Liu. 2015. Syntax-based deep matching of short texts. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1354–1361. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Weishi Wang, Steven C. H. Hoi, and Shafiq Joty. 2020. Response selection for multi-party conversations with dynamic topic tracking. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 6581–6591.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Taesun Whang, Dongyub Lee, Chanhee Lee, Kisu Yang, Dongsuk Oh, and H. Lim. 2020. An effective domain adaptive post-training method for BERT in response selection. In Proc. Interspeech, Vol. 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Taesun Whang, Dongyub Lee, Dongsuk Oh, Chanhee Lee, Kijong Han, Dong-hun Lee, and Saebyeok Lee. 2020. Do response selection models really know what’s next? Utterance manipulation strategies for multi-turn response selection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.04703 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Yu Wu, Wei Wu, Zhoujun Li, and Ming Zhou. 2018. Learning matching models with weak supervision for response selection in retrieval-based chatbots. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.02333 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Yu Wu, Wei Wu, Chen Xing, Ming Zhou, and Zhoujun Li. 2017. Sequential matching network: A new architecture for multi-turn response selection in retrieval-based chatbots. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), Vol. 1. 496–505. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P17-1046Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Chen Xing, Wei Wu, Yu Wu, Jie Liu, Yalou Huang, Ming Zhou, and Wei-Ying Ma. 2017. Topic aware neural response generation. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 3351–3357. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. Chen Xing, Yu Wu, Wei Wu, Yalou Huang, and Ming Zhou. 2018. Hierarchical recurrent attention network for response generation. In Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. Chenyan Xiong, Zhuyun Dai, Jamie Callan, Zhiyuan Liu, and Russell Power. 2017. End-to-end neural ad-hoc ranking with kernel pooling. In Proceedings of the 40th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. ACM, 55–64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. Zhen Xu, Bingquan Liu, Baoxun Wang, Chengjie Sun, and Xiaolong Wang. 2016. Incorporating loose-structured knowledge into LSTM with recall gate for conversation modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.05110 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Rui Yan, Yiping Song, and Hua Wu. 2016. Learning to respond with deep neural networks for retrieval-based human-computer conversation system. In Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 55–64. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Liu Yang, Junjie Hu, Minghui Qiu, Chen Qu, Jianfeng Gao, W. Bruce Croft, Xiaodong Liu, Yelong Shen, and Jingjing Liu. 2019. A hybrid retrieval-generation neural conversation model. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 1341–1350. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  68. Liu Yang, Minghui Qiu, Chen Qu, Jiafeng Guo, Yongfeng Zhang, W. Bruce Croft, Jun Huang, and Haiqing Chen. 2018. Response ranking with deep matching networks and external knowledge in information-seeking conversation systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.00188 (2018). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  69. Chunyuan Yuan, Wei Zhou, Mingming Li, Shangwen Lv, Fuqing Zhu, Jizhong Han, and Songlin Hu. 2019. Multi-hop selector network for multi-turn response selection in retrieval-based chatbots. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 111–120.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. Jiayi Zhang, Chongyang Tao, Zhenjing Xu, Qiaojing Xie, Wei Chen, and Rui Yan. 2019. EnsembleGAN: Adversarial learning for retrieval-generation ensemble model on short-text conversation. In Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 435–444. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. Zhuosheng Zhang, Jiangtong Li, Pengfei Zhu, Hai Zhao, and Gongshen Liu. 2018. Modeling multi-turn conversation with deep utterance aggregation. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics. Association for Computational Linguistics, 3740–3752. http://aclweb.org/anthology/C18-1317.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. Hao Zhou, Minlie Huang, Tianyang Zhang, Xiaoyan Zhu, and Bing Liu. 2018. Emotional chatting machine: Emotional conversation generation with internal and external memory. In Proceedings of the 32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. Xiangyang Zhou, Daxiang Dong, Hua Wu, Shiqi Zhao, Dianhai Yu, Hao Tian, Xuan Liu, and Rui Yan. 2016. Multi-view response selection for human-computer conversation. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 372–381. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D16-1036Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. Xiangyang Zhou, Lu Li, Daxiang Dong, Yi Liu, Ying Chen, Wayne Xin Zhao, Dianhai Yu, and Hua Wu. 2018. Multi-turn response selection for chatbots with deep attention matching network. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), Vol. 1. 1118–1127. http://aclweb.org/anthology/P18-1103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Dialogue History Matters! Personalized Response Selection in Multi-Turn Retrieval-Based Chatbots

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Information Systems
      ACM Transactions on Information Systems  Volume 39, Issue 4
      October 2021
      482 pages
      ISSN:1046-8188
      EISSN:1558-2868
      DOI:10.1145/3477247
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2021 Association for Computing Machinery.

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 17 August 2021
      • Accepted: 1 February 2021
      • Revised: 1 January 2021
      • Received: 1 May 2020
      Published in tois Volume 39, Issue 4

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format