skip to main content
10.1145/3466933.3466937acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessbsiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An indicator of inefficient visualizations: the challenge of transparency during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil: An indicator of inefficient visualizations: the challenge of transparency during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil

Published:08 July 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 epidemic requires clear and reliable information to guide the population. Visualization is a powerful tool to contribute to the understanding of this data. However, just divulging this resource is not enough to guarantee this understanding. It is important to support users in analyzing this data, making this process easier and more transparent, especially for users with little (or no) literacy. In this work, we define an inefficient graphics indicator, that is, with the potential to be misinterpreted or difficult to understand, according to the basic guidelines of the data visualization area. These guidelines were selected through a literature review, forming a repository of practices that guide good visualization design and provide the indicator assessment items. This proposal can be applied inis necessary because we do not perceive the existence of standards, norms or quality indicators for data visualization that assist in the creation of this artifact efficiently or evaluate the existing ones for improvement, both manually and automatically. This approach can be applied in the most diverse scenarios, being initially in Brazil during the dissemination of COVID-19, analyzing the official visualizations and highlighting the failures of several epidemiological perspectives on the pandemic. Through a study with users where volunteers analyzed the official data and our recommendations, we demonstrated that the indicator is effective in detecting and helping to understand the visualization. We highlight the alert for the need for greater care in the creation of graphics by the government so as not to compromise the understanding of the citizens who use them.

References

  1. Malecki, K., Keating, J. A., & Safdar, N. Crisis Communication and Public Perception of COVID-19 Risk in the Era of Social Media. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Tangcharoensathien, V., Calleja, N., Nguyen, T., Purnat, T., D'Agostino, M., Garcia-Saiso, S., ... & Ghiga, I. (2020). Framework for Managing the COVID-Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Munzner, Tamara. Visualization analysis and design. CRC press, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Unwin, A. Good graphics?. In Handbook of data visualization (pp. 57-78). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Tufte, E.R., 2001. The visual display of quantitative information (Vol. 2). Cheshire, CT: Graphics press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Shneiderman, B. (1996, September). The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In Proceedings 1996 IEEE symposium on visual languages (pp. 336-343). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Few, Stephen; Edge, Perceptual. Data Visualization: Past, Present and Future. IBM Cognos Innovation Center, 2007. Disponível em: ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/data/sw- library/cognos/pdfs/whitepapers/wp_data_visualization_past_present_future.pdf. Acesso em 20 de agosto de 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Saket, B., Moritz, D., Lin, H., Dibia, V., Demiralp, C., & Heer, J. (2018). Beyond heuristics: Learning visualization design. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.06641.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Mooney, P., & Juhász, L. (2020). Mapping COVID-19: How web-based maps contribute to the infodemic. Dialogues in Human Geography, 2043820620934926.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Manovich, L. (2011). What is visualisation?. Visual Studies, 26(1), 36-49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Dix, A. (2012, January). Introduction to information visualisation. In PROMISE Winter School (pp. 1-27). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Alhamadi, M. (2020, July). Challenges, Strategies and Adaptations on Interactive Dashboards. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (pp. 368-371).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Miller, G.A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81-97Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning. Cognitive Science, 12, 257-285.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Vessey, Iris, Galletta, Dennis (1991). Cognitive Fit: An Empirical Study of Information Acquisition. Information Systems Research, 2(1), 63-84.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Teets, J. M., Tegarden, D. P., & Russell, R. S. (2010). Using cognitive fit theory to evaluate the effectiveness of information visualizations: An example using quality assurance data. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 16(5), 841-853.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Engelke, U., Abdul-Rahman, A., & Chen, M. (2018, October). VISupply: A Supply-Chain Process Model for Visualization Guidelines. In 2018 International Symposium on Big Data Visual and Immersive Analytics (BDVA) (pp. 1-9). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Park, S., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2017, June). Understanding transparency and accountability in open government ecosystems: The case of health data visualizations in a state government. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (pp. 39-47).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Santos, V., Camara, P., Bernardini, F., Viterbo, J., & Jorge, D. A framework for constructing open data map visualizations. In Proceedings of the XIV Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems (pp. 1-7), 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Chen, M., Grinstein, G., Johnson, C. R., Kennedy, J., & Tory, M. (2017). Pathways for theoretical advances in visualization. IEEE computer graphics and applications, 37(4), 103-112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Cappelli, C. Uma Abordagem para Transparência em Processos Organizacionais Utilizando Aspectos. Tese de Doutorado, PUC-Rio, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Boscarioli, C.; Araujo, R. M.; Maciel, R. S. P., 2017. I GranDSI-BR – Grand Research Challenges in Information Systems in Brazil 2016-2026. Special Committee on Information Systems (CE-SI). Brazilian Computer Society (SBC).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Meireles, A. I., dos Santos, R. P., & Cappelli, C. Construindo um Questionário para Avaliar Transparência em Portais de Ecossistemas de Software. In Anais do VIII Workshop sobre Aspectos da Interação Humano-Computador para a Web Social (pp. 25-35). SBC, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Amorim, R. P. C., & de Menezes, C. S. (2016, May). Metodologia de Avaliação de Portais da Transparência Municipais. In Anais do XII Simpósio Brasileiro de Sistemas de Informação (pp. 017-024). SBC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Dresch, A. (2013). Design science e design science research como artefatos metodológicos para engenharia de produção.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007). “A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research”, J. Manag. Inf. Syst., vol. 24, no 8, p. 45–78.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele, UK, Keele University, 33(2004), 1-26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee, N., & Rojas, E. M. (2009). Developing effective visual representations to monitor project performance. In Construction Research Congress 2009: Building a Sustainable Future (pp. 826-835).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Isett, K. R., & Hicks, D. M. (2018). Providing public servants what they need: Revealing the “unseen” through data visualization. Public Administration Review, 78(3), 479-485.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Senay, H., & Ignatius, E. (1990). Rules and principles of scientific data visualization. Institute for Information Science and Technology, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, School of Engineering and Applied Science, George Washington University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Kelleher, C., & Wagener, T. (2011). Ten guidelines for effective data visualization in scientific publications. Environmental Modelling & Software, 26(6), 822-827.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Rheingans, P. L. (2000, May). Task-based color scale design. In 28th AIPR Workshop: 3D Visualization for Data Exploration and Decision Making (Vol. 3905, pp. 35-43). International Society for Optics and Photonics.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Siirtola, H. (2019, July). The cost of pie charts. In 2019 23rd International Conference Information Visualisation (IV) (pp. 151-156). IEEE.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Grainger, S., Mao, F., & Buytaert, W. (2016). Environmental data visualisation for non-scientific contexts: Literature review and design framework. Environmental Modelling & Software, 85, 299-318.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Kopp, T., Riekert, M., & Utz, S. (2018). When cognitive fit outweighs cognitive load: Redundant data labels in charts increase accuracy and speed of information extraction. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 367-376.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Gramazio, C. C., Schloss, K. B., & Laidlaw, D. H. (2014). The relation between visualization size, grouping, and user performance. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 20(12), 1953-1962.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Wilke, C. O. (2019). Fundamentals of data visualization: a primer on making informative and compelling figures. O'Reilly Media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Knaflic, C. N. (2015). Storytelling with data: A data visualization guide for business professionals. John Wiley & Sons.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Rees, D., & Laramee, R. S. (2019, February). A survey of information visualization books. In Computer Graphics Forum (Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 610- 646).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Segel, E., & Heer, J. (2010). Narrative visualization: Telling stories with data. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 16(6), 1139-1148.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Barcellos, R. Avaliação da Qualidade e Interpretabilidade de Visualizações de Dados. (Masters dissertation, Universidade Federal Fluminense - UFF) Niterói, 2017. 87 p. In portuguese.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhu, Y. Measuring effective data visualization. In International Symposium on Visual Computing (pp. 652-661). Springer. Berlin, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. An indicator of inefficient visualizations: the challenge of transparency during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil: An indicator of inefficient visualizations: the challenge of transparency during the COVID-19 pandemic in Brazil
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      SBSI '21: Proceedings of the XVII Brazilian Symposium on Information Systems
      June 2021
      453 pages
      ISBN:9781450384919
      DOI:10.1145/3466933

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 July 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate181of557submissions,32%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format