skip to main content
10.1145/3469595.3469619acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

What’s in a name and does CUI matter?

Published:27 July 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, I provide some thoughts on the moniker that adorns our conference and technology: CUI. The name has proven to be problematic, as evidenced through many provocation papers in prior CUI conferences. The name presents a mismatch or a promise that is not necessarily fulfilled by the technology. But what of this? The name serves us well as a provocation itself, to think and reflect. However, we must still be cautious: to learn from the past, pre-occupying ourselves with metaphor risks a poor user experience.

References

  1. Shashank Ahire and Michael Rohs. 2020. Tired of Wake Words? Moving Towards Seamless Conversations with Intelligent Personal Assistants. In Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (Bilbao, Spain) (CUI ’20). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 20, 3 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3405755.3406141Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Fermin Chavez-Sanchez, Gloria Adriana Mendoza Franco, Gloria Angelica Martínez de la Peña, and Erick Iroel Heredia Carrillo. 2020. Beyond What is Said: Looking for Foundational Principles in VUI Design. In Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (Bilbao, Spain) (CUI ’20). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 28, 3 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3405755.3406145Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Brian X. Chen and Cade Metz. 2019. Google’s Duplex Uses A.I. to Mimic Humans (Sometimes). https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/22/technology/personaltech/ai-google-duplex.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Leigh Clark, Philip Doyle, Diego Garaialde, Emer Gilmartin, Stephan Schlögl, Jens Edlund, Matthew Aylett, João Cabral, Cosmin Munteanu, Justin Edwards, and Benjamin R Cowan. 2019. The State of Speech in HCI: Trends, Themes and Challenges. Interacting with Computers 31, 4 (09 2019), 349–371. https://doi.org/10.1093/iwc/iwz016 arXiv:https://academic.oup.com/iwc/article-pdf/31/4/349/33525046/iwz016.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Jens Edlund. 2019. Shoehorning in the Name of Science. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (Dublin, Ireland) (CUI ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 8, 3 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342775.3342794Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Luciano Floridi. 2020. AI and Its New Winter: from Myths to Realities. Philosophy & Technology 33, 1 (2020), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-020-00396-6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Mary Ellen Foster. 2019. Face-to-Face Conversation: Why Embodiment Matters for Conversational User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces(Dublin, Ireland) (CUI ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 13, 3 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342775.3342810Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Elisa Giaccardi and Johan Redström. 2020. Technology and More-Than-Human Design. Design Issues 36, 4 (09 2020), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1162/desi_a_00612Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Chandra Khatri, Anu Venkatesh, Behnam Hedayatnia, Raefer Gabriel, Ashwin Ram, and Rohit Prasad. 2018. Alexa Prize—State of the Art in Conversational AI. AI Magazine 39, 3 (2018), 40–55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Don Norman and Jakob Nielsen. [n.d.]. The Definition of User Experience (UX). https://www.nngroup.com/articles/definition-user-experience/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Martin Porcheron, Joel E Fischer, Stuart Reeves, and Sarah Sharples. 2018. Voice Interfaces in Everyday Life. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems(CHI ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 640, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174214Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Stuart Reeves. 2019. Conversation Considered Harmful?. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (Dublin, Ireland) (CUI ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 10, 3 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342775.3342796Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Gisela Reyes-Cruz, Joel E. Fischer, and Stuart Reeves. 2020. Reframing Disability as Competency: Unpacking Everyday Technology Practices of People with Visual Impairments. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376767Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Supraja Sankaran, Chao Zhang, Mathias Funk, Henk Aarts, and Panos Markopoulos. 2020. Do I Have a Say? Using Conversational Agents to Re-Imagine Human-Machine Autonomy. In Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (Bilbao, Spain) (CUI ’20). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 18, 3 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3405755.3406135Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Stefan Schaffer and Norbert Reithinger. 2019. Conversation is Multimodal: Thus Conversational User Interfaces Should Be as Well. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Conversational User Interfaces(Dublin, Ireland) (CUI ’19). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 12, 3 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342775.3342801Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. John S. Seberger. 2021. Reconsidering the user in IoT: the subjectivity of things. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing(2021), 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-020-01513-0Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. James Simpson. 2020. Are CUIs Just GUIs with Speech Bubbles?. In Proceedings of the 2nd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces (Bilbao, Spain) (CUI ’20). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 23, 3 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3405755.3406143Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Lucy A Suchman. 1985. Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human Machine Communication (1 ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 220 pages.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Jane Wakefield. 2021. AI: Ghost workers demand to be seen and heard. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-56414491Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    CUI '21: Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Conversational User Interfaces
    July 2021
    262 pages
    ISBN:9781450389983
    DOI:10.1145/3469595

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 27 July 2021

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • short-paper
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate34of100submissions,34%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format