skip to main content
10.1145/3473856.3474008acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmundcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Towards a Universal Human-Computer Interaction Model for Multimodal Interactions

Published:13 September 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

Models in HCI describe and provide insights into how humans use interactive technology. They are used by engineers, designers, and developers to understand and formalize the interaction process. At the same time, novel interaction paradigms arise constantly introducing new ways of how interactive technology can support humans. In this work, we look into how these paradigms can be described using the classical HCI model introduced by Schomaker in 1995. We extend this model by presenting new relations that would provide a better understanding of them. For this, we revisit the existing interaction paradigms and try to describe their interaction using this model. The goal of this work is to highlight the need to adapt the models to new interaction paradigms and spark discussion in the HCI community on this topic.

References

  1. Jonas Auda, Max Pascher, and Stefan Schneegass. 2019. Around the (Virtual) World: Infinite Walking in Virtual Reality Using Electrical Muscle Stimulation. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 431.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Durell Bishop. 1992. Marble answering machine. Royal College of Art, Interaction Design(1992).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. A.W. Cairns, R.R. Bond, D.D. Finlay, C. Breen, D. Guldenring, R. Gaffney, A.G. Gallagher, A.J. Peace, and P. Henn. 2016. A computer-human interaction model to improve the diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making during 12-lead electrocardiogram interpretation. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 64 (2016), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2016.09.016 cited By 13.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Lucas Colusso, Ridley Jones, Sean A. Munson, and Gary Hsieh. 2019. A Translational Science Model for HCI. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300231Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. C. Despont-Gros, H. Mueller, and C. Lovis. 2005. Evaluating user interactions with clinical information systems: A model based on human-computer interaction models. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 38, 3 (2005), 244–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2004.12.004 cited By 63.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Alan Dix, Alan John Dix, Janet Finlay, Gregory D Abowd, and Russell Beale. 2004. Human-computer interaction. Pearson Education.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ayaka Ebisu, Satoshi Hashizume, Kenta Suzuki, Akira Ishii, Mose Sakashita, and Yoichi Ochiai. 2017. Stimulated percussions: method to control human for learning music by using electrical muscle stimulation. In Proceedings of the 8th Augmented Human International Conference. 1–5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Sarah Faltaous and Stefan Schneegass. 2020. HCI Model: A Proposed Extension to Human-Actuation Technologies. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 306–308. https://doi.org/10.1145/3428361.3432081Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Sarah Faltaous, Chris Schönherr, Henrik Detjen, and Stefan Schneegass. 2019. Exploring Proprioceptive Take-over Requests for Highly Automated Vehicles. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (Pisa, Italy) (MUM ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 13, 6 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3365610.3365644Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. George W. Fitzmaurice, Hiroshi Ishii, and William A. S. Buxton. 1995. Bricks: Laying the Foundations for Graspable User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI ’95). ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., USA, 442–449. https://doi.org/10.1145/223904.223964Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Sean Follmer, Daniel Leithinger, Alex Olwal, Akimitsu Hogge, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2013. inFORM: dynamic physical affordances and constraints through shape and object actuation.. In Uist, Vol. 13. 2501988–2502032.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. John Hardy, Enrico Rukzio, and Nigel Davies. 2011. Real world responses to interactive gesture based public displays. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia. 33–39.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Albert Sydney Hornby. 1995. Oxford advanced learner’s dictionary of current English.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Hiroshi Ishii. 2015. TRANSFORM: Beyond Tangible Bits, Towards Radical Atoms. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction (Los Angeles, California, USA) (SUI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1. https://doi.org/10.1145/2788940.2788958Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Hiroshi Ishii, Daniel Leithinger, Sean Follmer, Amit Zoran, Philipp Schoessler, and Jared Counts. 2015. TRANSFORM: Embodiment of ”Radical Atoms” at Milano Design Week. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI EA ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 687–694. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702613.2702969Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Hiroshi Ishii and Brygg Ullmer. 1997. Tangible Bits: Towards Seamless Interfaces between People, Bits and Atoms. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (CHI ’97). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 234–241. https://doi.org/10.1145/258549.258715Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. AA Karpov and RM Yusupov. 2018. Multimodal interfaces of human–computer interaction. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences 88, 1 (2018), 67–74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. D. Lakatos and H. Ishii. 2012. Towards Radical Atoms — Form-giving to transformable materials. In 2012 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cognitive Infocommunications (CogInfoCom). 37–40. https://doi.org/10.1109/CogInfoCom.2012.6422023Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Mathieu Le Goc, Lawrence H. Kim, Ali Parsaei, Jean-Daniel Fekete, Pierre Dragicevic, and Sean Follmer. 2016. Zooids: Building Blocks for Swarm User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Tokyo, Japan) (UIST ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 97–109. https://doi.org/10.1145/2984511.2984547Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. T. Lei, L. Xiong, K. Chen, X. Liu, Y. Cao, Q. Zhang, D. Liu, and S. Guo. 2014. Gestures: The reformer of the user’s mental model in mobile HCI. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) 8518 LNCS, PART 2(2014), 586–597. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07626-3_55 cited By 0.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Bonanni Leonardo, Ishii Hiroshi, and Tangible Media Group. [n.d.]. Radical Atoms. https://tangible.media.mit.edu/project/radical-atoms/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. C. J. Lim, Younghwan Pan, and Jane Lee. 2008. Human Factors and Design Issues in Multimodal (Speech/Gesture) Interface. J. Digit. Content Technol. its Appl. 2 (2008), 67–77.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Hannah Limerick, David Coyle, and James W. Moore. 2014. The experience of agency in human-computer interactions: a review. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8 (2014), 643. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00643Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Pedro Lopes, Alexandra Ion, Willi Mueller, Daniel Hoffmann, Patrik Jonell, and Patrick Baudisch. 2015. Proprioceptive Interaction. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 939–948. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702461Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Pedro Lopes, Sijing You, Lung-Pan Cheng, Sebastian Marwecki, and Patrick Baudisch. 2017. Providing haptics to walls & heavy objects in virtual reality by means of electrical muscle stimulation. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 1471–1482.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Pedro Lopes, Sijing You, Alexandra Ion, and Patrick Baudisch. 2018. Adding force feedback to mixed reality experiences and games using electrical muscle stimulation. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 446.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Pedro Lopes, Doăa Yüksel, François Guimbretière, and Patrick Baudisch. 2016. Muscle-plotter: An interactive system based on electrical muscle stimulation that produces spatial output. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, 207–217.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Brad A. Myers. 1998. A Brief History of Human-Computer Interaction Technology. Interactions 5, 2 (March 1998), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1145/274430.274436Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Ken Nakagaki, Sean Follmer, and Hiroshi Ishii. 2015. LineFORM: Actuated Curve Interfaces for Display, Interaction, and Constraint. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology(Charlotte, NC, USA) (UIST ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1145/2807442.2807452Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Donald A Norman. 1986. Cognitive engineering. User centered system design 31 (1986), 61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Simon Olberding, Sergio Soto Ortega, Klaus Hildebrandt, and Jürgen Steimle. 2015. Foldio: Digital Fabrication of Interactive and Shape-Changing Objects With Foldable Printed Electronics. In Proceedings of the 28th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software & Technology (Charlotte, NC, USA) (UIST ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1145/2807442.2807494Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Antti Oulasvirta. 2019. It’s time to rediscover HCI models. Interactions 26, 4 (2019), 52–56.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Stefano Papetti. 2013. Design and Perceptual Investigations of Audio-Tactile Interactions. Proceedings of AIA DAGA(2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Max Pfeiffer, Tim D’unte, Stefan Schneegass, Florian Alt, and Michael Rohs. 2015. Cruise control for pedestrians: Controlling walking direction using electrical muscle stimulation. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2505–2514.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Lambert Schomaker. 1995. A taxonomy of Multimodal Interaction in the Human Information Processing System.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Eugénie Shinkle. 2008. Video games, emotion and the six senses. Media, culture & society 30, 6 (2008), 907–915.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Loretta Staples. 1993. Representation in Virtual Space: Visual Convention in the Graphical User Interface. In Proceedings of the INTERACT ’93 and CHI ’93 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) (CHI ’93). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 348–354. https://doi.org/10.1145/169059.169279Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Nicolas Stifani. 2014. Motor neurons and the generation of spinal motor neurons diversity. Frontiers in cellular neuroscience 8 (2014), 293.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Ivan E Sutherland. 1964. Sketchpad a man-machine graphical communication system. Simulation 2, 5 (1964), R–3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Faisal Taher, John Hardy, Abhijit Karnik, Christian Weichel, Yvonne Jansen, Kasper Hornbæk, and Jason Alexander. 2015. Exploring Interactions with Physically Dynamic Bar Charts. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3237–3246. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702604Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Emi Tamaki, Takashi Miyaki, and Jun Rekimoto. 2011. PossessedHand: techniques for controlling human hands using electrical muscles stimuli. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 543–552.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Wondimu W Teka, Khaldoun C Hamade, William H Barnett, Taegyo Kim, Sergey N Markin, Ilya A Rybak, and Yaroslav I Molkov. 2017. From the motor cortex to the movement and back again. PloS one 12, 6 (2017), e0179288.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. A.R. Várkonyi-Kóczy and B. Tusor. 2011. Human-Computer interaction for smart environment applications using fuzzy hand posture and gesture models. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement 60, 5(2011), 1505–1514. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2011.2108075 cited By 58.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Robert Walter, Gilles Bailly, Nina Valkanova, and Jörg Müller. 2014. Cuenesics: using mid-air gestures to select items on interactive public displays. In Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Human-computer interaction with mobile devices & services. 299–308.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. John Williamson, Roderick Murray-Smith, Benjamin Blankertz, Matthias Krauledat, and K-R Müller. 2009. Designing for uncertain, asymmetric control: Interaction design for brain–computer interfaces. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 67, 10 (2009), 827–841.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. M. Wrzesien, J.-M. Burkhardt, C. Botella, and M. Alcañiz. 2015. Towards a Virtual Reality- and Augmented Reality-Mediated Therapeutic Process model: a theoretical revision of clinical issues and HCI issues. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 16, 2 (2015), 124–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/1463922X.2014.903307 cited By 9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  1. Towards a Universal Human-Computer Interaction Model for Multimodal Interactions

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      MuC '21: Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2021
      September 2021
      613 pages
      ISBN:9781450386456
      DOI:10.1145/3473856

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 13 September 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper
      • Research
      • Refereed limited
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)51
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format