skip to main content
10.1145/3474085.3475294acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

MS-GraphSIM: Inferring Point Cloud Quality via Multiscale Graph Similarity

Authors Info & Claims
Published:17 October 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

To address the point cloud quality assessment (PCQA) problem, GraphSIM was proposed via jointly considering geometrical and color features, which shows compelling performance in multiple distortion detection. However, GraphSIM does not take into account the mutiscale characteristics of human perception. In this paper, we propose a multiscale PCQA model, called Multiscale Graph Similarity (MS-GraphSIM), that can better predict human subjective perception. First, exploring the multiscale processing method used in image processing, we introduce a multiscale representation of point clouds based on graph signal processing. Second, we extend GraphSIM into multiscale version based on the proposed multiscale representation. Specifically, MS-GraphSIM constructs a multiscale representation for each local patch extracted from the reference point cloud or the distorted point cloud, and then fuses GraphSIM at different scales to obtain an overall quality score. Experiment results demonstrate that the proposed MS-GraphSIM outperforms the state-of-the-art PCQA metrics over two fairly large and independent databases. Ablation studies further prove the proposed MS-GraphSIM is robust to different model hyperparameter settings. The code is available at https://github.com/zyj1318053/MS_GraphSIM.

References

  1. Edward H Adelson, Charles H Anderson, James R Bergen, Peter J Burt, and Joan M Ogden. Pyramid methods in image processing. RCA engineer, 29(6):33--41, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. E. Alexiou and T. Ebrahimi. Point cloud quality assessment metric based on angular similarity. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME), pages 1--6, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Evangelos Alexiou and Touradj Ebrahimi. Exploiting user interactivity in quality assessment of point cloud imaging. In 2019 Eleventh International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), pages 1--6, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Evangelos Alexiou and Touradj Ebrahimi. Towards a point cloud structural similarity metric. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Expo Workshops (ICMEW), pages 1--6, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Evangelos Alexiou, Irene Viola, Tomás M. Borges, Tiago A. Fonseca, Ricardo L. de Queiroz, and Touradj Ebrahimi. A comprehensive study of the rate-distortion performance in mpeg point cloud compression. APSIPA Transactions on Signal and Information Processing, 8:e27, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. R. Q. Charles, H. Su, M. Kaichun, and L. J. Guibas. Pointnet: Deep learning on point sets for 3d classification and segmentation. In 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pages 77--85, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. S. Chen, D. Tian, C. Feng, A. Vetro, and J.. Fast resampling of three-dimensional point clouds via graphs. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 66(3):666--681, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Rafael Diniz, Pedro Garcia Freitas, and Mylène C. Q. Farias. Towards a point cloud quality assessment model using local binary patterns. In 2020 Twelfth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), pages 1--6, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Rafael Diniz, Pedro Garcia Freitas, and Mylène C.Q. Farias. Multi-distance point cloud quality assessment. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pages 3443--3447, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. D. Groux-Leclet, J. Lentremy, G. Caron, and E. Mouaddib. Efficient reproduction of heritage buildings: a new way to exploit 3d point cloud slicing : An example with the amiens gothic cathedral. In 2018 3rd Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHERITAGE) held jointly with 2018 24th International Conference on Virtual Systems Multimedia (VSMM 2018), pages 1--4, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. W. Hu, X. Gao, G. Cheung, and Z. Guo. Feature graph learning for 3d point cloud denoising. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 68:2841--2856, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Wei Hu, Jiahao Pang, Xianming Liu, Dong Tian, Chia-Wen Lin, and Anthony Vetro. Graph signal processing for geometric data and beyond: Theory and applications, arXiv prepeint arXiv: 2008.01918, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. G. Jang, Y. Shin, J. Park, and M. Baeg. Real-time point-cloud data transmission for teleoperation using h.264/avc. In 2014 IEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics (2014), pages 1--6, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Alireza Javaheri, Catarina Brites, Fernando Pereira, and João Ascenso. A generalized hausdorff distance based quality metric for point cloud geometry. In 2020 Twelfth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), pages 1--6, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Alireza Javaheri, Catarina Brites, Fernando Pereira, and João Ascenso. Mahalanobis based point to distribution metric for point cloud geometry quality evaluation. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 27:1350--1354, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Alireza Javaheri, Catarina Brites, Fernando Manuel Bernardo Pereira, and Joao M. Ascenso. Point cloud rendering after coding: Impacts on subjective and objective quality. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, pages 1--1, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Q. Liu, H. Yuan, J. Hou, R. Hamzaoui, and H. Su. Model-based joint bit allocation between geometry and color for video-based 3d point cloud compression. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, pages 1--1, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Yipeng Liu, Qi Yang, Yiling Xu, and Le Yang. Point cloud quality assessment: Large-scale dataset construction and learning-based no-reference approach, arXiv prepeint arXiv: 2012.11895, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. G. Meynet, J. Digne, and G. Lavoué. Pc-msdm: A quality metric for 3d point clouds. In 2019 Eleventh International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), pages 1--3, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. G. Meynet, Y. Nehmé, J. Digne, and G. Lavoué. Pcqm: A full-reference quality metric for colored 3d point clouds. In 2020 Twelfth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), pages 1--6, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Carsten Moenning and Neil A. Dodgson. Fast Marching farthest point sampling. Technical Report UCAM-CL-TR-562, University of Cambridge, Computer Laboratory, April 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Charles R. Qi, Li Yi, Hao Su, and Leonidas J. Guibas. Pointnet+: Deep hierarchical feature learning on point sets in a metric space, arXiv prepeint arXiv: 1706.02413, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. S. Schwarz, M. Preda, V. Baroncini, M. Budagavi, P. Cesar, P. A. Chou, R. A. Cohen, M. Krivoku?a, S. Lasserre, Z. Li, J. Llach, K. Mammou, R. Mekuria, O. Nakagami, E. Siahaan, A. Tabatabai, A. M. Tourapis, and V. Zakharchenko. Emerging mpeg standards for point cloud compression. IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems, 9(1):133--148, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. D. I. Shuman, S. K. Narang, P. Frossard, A. Ortega, and P. Vandergheynst. The emerging field of signal processing on graphs: Extending high-dimensional data analysis to networks and other irregular domains. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 30(3):83--98, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Aljoscha Smolic. An overview of 3d video and free viewpoint video. In Xiaoyi Jiang and Nicolai Petkov, editors, Computer Analysis of Images and Patterns, pages 1--8, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. K. Sugimoto, R. A. Cohen, D. Tian, and A. Vetro. Trends in efficient representation of 3d point clouds. In 2017 Asia-Pacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference (APSIPA ASC), pages 364--369, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Irene Viola and Pablo Cesar. A reduced reference metric for visual quality evaluation of point cloud contents. IEEE Signal Processing Letters, 27:1660--1664, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Irene Viola, Shishir Subramanyam, and Pablo Cesar. A color-based objective quality metric for point cloud contents. In 2020 Twelfth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX), pages 1--6, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Z. Wang, E. P. Simoncelli, and A. C. Bovik. Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment. In The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems Computers, 2003, volume 2, pages 1398--1402 Vol.2, 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Q. Yang, H. Chen, Z. Ma, Y. Xu, R. Tang, and J. Sun. Predicting the perceptual quality of point cloud: A 3d-to-2d projection-based exploration. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, pages 1--1, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Q. Yang, Z. Ma, Y. Xu, Z. Li, and J. Sun. Inferring point cloud quality via graph similarity. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, pages 1--1, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Qi Yang, Siheng Chen, Yiling Xu, Jun Sun, M. Salman Asif, and Zhan Ma. Point cloud distortion quantification based on potential energy for human and machine perception, arXiv prepeint arXiv: 2103.02850, 2021.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhou Wang, A. C. Bovik, H. R. Sheikh, and E. P. Simoncelli. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13(4):600--612, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. MS-GraphSIM: Inferring Point Cloud Quality via Multiscale Graph Similarity

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        MM '21: Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia
        October 2021
        5796 pages
        ISBN:9781450386517
        DOI:10.1145/3474085

        Copyright © 2021 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 17 October 2021

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate995of4,171submissions,24%

        Upcoming Conference

        MM '24
        MM '24: The 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia
        October 28 - November 1, 2024
        Melbourne , VIC , Australia

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader