skip to main content
10.1145/3474085.3475543acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Augmenting TV Shows via Uncalibrated Camera Small Motion Tracking in Dynamic Scene

Published:17 October 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

To augment the TV show in post-production, we propose a novel solution to uncalibrated camera small motion tracking in a dynamic scene that simultaneously reconstructs the sparse 3D scene and computes camera poses and focal lengths of each frame. The critical elements of our approach are a robust image feature tracking strategy in dynamic scenes followed by automatic local-window frames slicing, local and global bundle adjustment optimization initialized by a homography-based uncalibrated relative rotation solver. The proposed method allows us to add the virtual objects (elements) into the reconstructed 3D scene, then composite them back into the original shot while perfectly matched perspective and appear seamless.

The evaluation of a large variety of real TV show sequences demonstrates the merits of our method against state-of-the-art works and commercial software products.

References

  1. [n.d.]. Vicon Boujou, howpublished = http://www.vicon/,.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Alastair Barber, Darren Cosker, Oliver James, Ted Waine, and Radhika Patel. 2016. Camera tracking in visual effects an industry perspective of structure from motion. In Symposium on Digital Production. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Matthew Brown, David G Lowe, et al. 2003. Recognising panoramas.. In ICCV. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Liang-Chieh Chen, Yukun Zhu, George Papandreou, Florian Schroff, and Hartwig Adam. 2018. Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation. In ECCV.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Mark Christiansen. 2013. Adobe After Effects CC Visual Effects and Compositing Studio Techniques. Adobe Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Daniel DeTone, Tomasz Malisiewicz, and Andrew Rabinovich. 2018. Superpoint: Self-supervised interest point detection and description. In CVPR workshops.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Tim Dobbert. 2006. Matchmoving: the invisible art of camera tracking. John Wiley & Sons. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Hyowon Ha, Sunghoon Im, Jaesik Park, Hae-Gon Jeon, and In So Kweon. 2016. High-quality depth from uncalibrated small motion clip. In CVPR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Jungong Han, Dirk Farin, and Peter HN de With. 2007. A real-time augmentedreality system for sports broadcast video enhancement. In ACM MM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Christopher G Harris, Mike Stephens, et al. 1988. A combined corner and edge detector.. In Alvey vision conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Juan David Hincapié-Ramos, Kasim Ozacar, Pourang P Irani, and Yoshifumi Kitamura. [n.d.]. GyroWand: IMU-based raycasting for augmented reality headmounted displays. In ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Sunghoon Im, Hyowon Ha, Gyeongmin Choe, Hae-Gon Jeon, Kyungdon Joo, and In So Kweon. 2015. High quality structure from small motion for rolling shutter cameras. In ICCV. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Zuzana Kukelova, Martin Bujnak, and Tomas Pajdla. 2008. Automatic generator of minimal problem solvers. In ECCV. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Kiriakos N Kutulakos and James R Vallino. 1998. Calibration-free augmented reality. TVCG (1998). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Viktor Larsson, Kalle Astrom, and Magnus Oskarsson. 2017. Efficient solvers for minimal problems by syzygy-based reduction. In CVPR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Zahid Mahmood, Tauseef Ali, Nazeer Muhammad, Nargis Bibi, Imran Shahzad, and Shoaib Azmat. 2017. EAR: Enhanced Augmented Reality System for Sports Entertainment Applications. KSII Transactions on Internet & Information Systems (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Pierre Moulon, Pascal Monasse, Romuald Perrot, and Renaud Marlet. 2016. Openmvg: Open multiple view geometry. In International Workshop on Reproducible Research in Pattern Recognition. Springer, 60--74.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Raul Mur-Artal, Jose Maria Martinez Montiel, and Juan D Tardos. 2015. ORBSLAM: a versatile and accurate monocular SLAM system. IEEE transactions on robotics (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. David Nistér. 2004. An efficient solution to the five-point relative pose problem. TPAMI (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Rahul Raguram, Ondrej Chum, Marc Pollefeys, Jiri Matas, and Jan-Michael Frahm. 2012. USAC: a universal framework for random sample consensus. TPAMI (2012). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Joseph Redmon and Ali Farhadi. 2018. Yolov3: An incremental improvement. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.02767 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Johannes L Schonberger and Jan-Michael Frahm. 2016. Structure-from-motion revisited. In CVPR.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Gerald Schweighofer, Sinisa Segvic, and Axel Pinz. 2008. Online/realtime structure and motion for general camera models. In 2008 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Yongduek Seo and Ki Sang Hong. 2000. Calibration-free augmented reality in perspective. TVCG (2000). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Dave Shreiner, Graham Sellers, John Kessenich, and Bill Licea-Kane. 2013. OpenGL programming guide: The Official guide to learning OpenGL, version 4.3. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. RA Smith, Andrew W Fitzgibbon, and Andrew Zisserman. 1999. Improving Augmented Reality using Image and Scene Constraints.. In BMVC.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Takafumi Taketomi, Hideaki Uchiyama, and Sei Ikeda. 2017. Visual SLAM algorithms: a survey from 2010 to 2016. IPSJ Transactions on Computer Vision and Applications (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Graham Thomas. 2006. Mixed reality techniques for TV and their application for on-set/pre-visualisation in film production. In International Workshop on Mixed Reality Technology for Filmmaking.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Carlo Tomasi and T Kanade Detection. 1991. Tracking of point features. IJCV (1991).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Bill Triggs, Philip F McLauchlan, Richard I Hartley, and Andrew W Fitzgibbon. 1999. Bundle adjustment-a modern synthesis. In International workshop on vision algorithms. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Changchang Wu et al. 2011. VisualSFM: A visual structure from motion system. (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Ruichao Xiao, Wenxiu Sun, Jiahao Pang, Qiong Yan, and Jimmy Ren. 2018. Dsr: Direct self-rectification for uncalibrated dual-lens cameras. In 3DV.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Fisher Yu and David Gallup. 2014. 3d reconstruction from accidental motion. In CVPR. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Jung-Jae Yu and Jae-Hean Kim. 2010. Camera motion tracking in a dynamic scene. In 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Guofeng Zhang, Jiaya Jia, Tien-Tsin Wong, and Hujun Bao. 2009. Consistent depth maps recovery from a video sequence. TPAMI (2009). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Richard Hartley Andrew Zisserman. 2004. Multiple view geometry in computer vision. (2004). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Stefanie Zollmann, Tobias Langlotz, Moritz Loos, Wei Hong Lo, and Lewis Baker. 2019. Arspectator: Exploring augmented reality for sport events. In SIGGRAPH Asia. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Augmenting TV Shows via Uncalibrated Camera Small Motion Tracking in Dynamic Scene

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        MM '21: Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia
        October 2021
        5796 pages
        ISBN:9781450386517
        DOI:10.1145/3474085

        Copyright © 2021 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 17 October 2021

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate995of4,171submissions,24%

        Upcoming Conference

        MM '24
        MM '24: The 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia
        October 28 - November 1, 2024
        Melbourne , VIC , Australia
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)20
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader