skip to main content
10.1145/3478432.3499112acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
poster

Reading Between the Lines: Student Experiences of Resubmission in an Introductory CS Course

Published:03 March 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Motivated by the need to develop equitable and just computer science education, we implemented a resubmission policy. We ran a large-scale, end-of-term survey of all students across two large introductory CS courses asking about their reasons for resubmission. Though some students were motivated primarily by grades, many responses suggested intrinsic motivation. We interviewed 9 students and found that in our competitive program, resubmissions take the pressure off the need to submit work that earns a perfect grade the first time. However, our findings suggest that resubmissions alone can't create space for equity and belonging.

References

  1. Angela Calabrese Barton and Edna Tan. 2020. Beyond Equity as Inclusion: A Framework of "Rightful Presence" for Guiding Justice-Oriented Studies in Teaching and Learning. Educational Researcher 49, 6 (Aug. 2020), 433--440. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20927363Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Kelsey Chamberlin, Maï Yasué, and I-Chant Andrea Chiang. 2018. The Impact of Grades on Student Motivation. Active Learning in Higher Education (Dec. 2018), 1469787418819728. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787418819728Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Amanda M. Holland-Minkley and Thomas Lombardi. 2016. Improving Engagement in Introductory Courses with Homework Resubmission. In Proceedings of the 47th ACM Technical Symposium on Computing Science Education (Memphis, Tennessee, USA) (SIGCSE '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 534--539. https://doi.org/10.1145/2839509.2844576Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Asao B. Inoue. 2015. AntiracistWriting Assessment Ecologies: Teaching and Assessing Writing for a Socially Just Future. The WAC Clearinghouse; Parlor Press. https://doi.org/10.37514/PER-B.2015.0698Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Robert Talbert. 2017. Specifications Grading: We May Have a Winner. http://rtalbert.org/specs-grading-iteration-winner/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Reading Between the Lines: Student Experiences of Resubmission in an Introductory CS Course

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGCSE 2022: Proceedings of the 53rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 2
      March 2022
      254 pages
      ISBN:9781450390712
      DOI:10.1145/3478432

      Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 3 March 2022

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • poster

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

      Upcoming Conference

      SIGCSE Virtual 2024
      SIGCSE Virtual 2024: ACM Virtual Global Computing Education Conference
      November 30 - December 1, 2024
      Virtual Event , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader