skip to main content
10.1145/3487075.3487086acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescsaeConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Investigation of Octane Number Loss Based on Particle Swarm Optimization

Published:07 December 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Particle swarm optimization (PSO) is a swarm intelligence algorithm that simulates the predatory behavior of birds. It is inspired by the social behavior of bird flocking. It is widely used in many fields because of its easy implementation, high accuracy, and fast convergence. In this article, we propose a method to improve the performance of the PSO algorithm by combining it with a gradient boosting regression (GBR) model. We apply our algorithm for the optimization of octane number (express in RON) loss in the gasoline industry. RON is the most significant indicator that reflects the combustion petrol performance and it is the commercial brand name of petrol (e.g., 89#, 92#, 95#). Our simulation results demonstrate that RON average loss rate was greater than 30%, under the product's sulfur content was no greater than 5μg/g (Euro VI standard is no greater than 10μg/g).

References

  1. W Zhang (2020). State-of-the-art review of soft computing applications in underground excavations. Geoscience Frontiers, vol.11, pp. 1095-1106.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. S Isam and W Zhang (2021). Use of the Soft Computing techniques for TBM tunnelling optimization. Underground Space, 6(3): 233-239.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. J Kennedy and R Eberhart (1995). Particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of ICNN'95 - International Conference on Neural Networks, vol.4, pp. 1942-1948, DOI: 10.1109/ICNN.1995.488968.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. M Pluhacek (2013). On the behavior and performance of chaos driven PSO algorithm with inertia weight[J]. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, vol. 66, pp. 122-134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Z Gui, X Gao (2012). Theory and applications of swarm intelligence. Neural Computing and Applications, vol.21, pp. 205-206.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Y D Zhang, S H Wang and G L Ji (2015). A Comprehensive Survey on Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm and Its Applications. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol.2015, pp.1-38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. C Huang (2021). Particle swarm optimization in image processing of power flow learning distribution. Discover Internet of Things, vol. 1, pp. 1-12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. X C Zhong, J Y Chen and Z Y Fan (2019). A Particle Swarm Optimization-Based Method for Numerically Solving Ordinary Differential Equations, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, vol. 2019, pp. 1-11, December, DOI: 10.1155/2019/9071236.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. G C Chen and J S Yu (2007). Two sub-swarms particle swarm optimization algorithm and its application.Control Theory & Applications, vol. 24, pp. 294-298.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Z Yu, W Wu and L Wu (2012). An Improved Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm Based on Two Sub-swarms. Advances in Computer Science and Information Engineering, vol. 2, pp. 443-448.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. C F Wang and Liu K (2018). An improved particle swarm optimization algorithm based on comparative judgment. Natural Computing, vol. 17, pp. 641-661.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. D Wang,D Tan and L Liu (2018). Particle swarm optimization algorithm: an overview. Soft Computing, vol. 22, pp. 387-408.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. W B Langdon and R Poli (2005). Evolving problems to learn about particle swarm and other optimizers. Evolutionary Computation, vol. 1, pp. 81-88.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. M Jiang, Y Luo and S Yang (2007). Stagnation Analysis in Particle Swarm Optimization. IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium, pp. 92-99, DOI: 10.1109/SIS.2007.368031.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Y Shi and R Eberhart (1998). A modified particle swarm optimizer. IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation Proceedings, pp. 69-73, DOI: 10.1109/ICEC.1998.699146.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. M Clerc and J Kennedy (2002). The particle swarm - explosion, stability, and convergence in a multidimensional complex space. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 6(1): 58-73.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Y Shi and R Eberhart (2001). Fuzzy adaptive particle swarm optimization. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Evolutionary Computation, ICEC, vol. 1, pp. 101-106.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. W Li (2021). Characteristic Selection and Prediction of Octane Number Loss in Gasoline Refinement Process. E3S Web of Conferences, 245(8):01040, DOI:10.1051/e3sconf/202124501040.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. T Mitchell (1990). Machine Learning. Annual Review of Computer Science, vol. 4, pp. 417-433.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Investigation of Octane Number Loss Based on Particle Swarm Optimization
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Other conferences
            CSAE '21: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computer Science and Application Engineering
            October 2021
            660 pages
            ISBN:9781450389853
            DOI:10.1145/3487075

            Copyright © 2021 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 7 December 2021

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate368of770submissions,48%
          • Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)5
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

            Other Metrics

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format .

          View HTML Format