skip to main content
10.1145/3494322.3494355acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiotConference Proceedingsconference-collections
demonstration

Demo: Web of Things in Building Automation

Published:08 March 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Automation of equipment in a building is essential to achieve reliable and energy-efficient operation. The devices used in Building Automation (BA) systems have different functional and non-functional requirements, and this leads to a heterogeneous system with vertical silos where multiple standards are at play along with vendor-specific information models and implementations. In such a situation establishing technical and semantic interoperability is challenging. Also, the absence of a method to uniformly represent entities across verticals and functional layers in BA, makes it difficult to link them to knowledge graphs that describe the building and its physical processes. The W3C Web of Things (WoT) aims to address this (and related) issues in cyber-physical systems (CPS). Based on our experience with a real-life implementation in the industry, we demonstrate how the challenge of creating uniform interface descriptions for the vast and heterogeneous BA standards landscape can be be overcome using WoT Thing Descriptions (TDs), and further, we show how such TDs can be linked to knowledge graphs by facilitating their integration in the engineering workflow. As a concrete use case, our demo shows how an automated fault detection system which we developed for room automation controls uses the TDs to reason about the physical process and its control programs and then retrieves process data for its analysis.

References

  1. 2004. Standard ISO 16484-5, 2004 – Building automation and control systems (BACS) – Part 2:Hardware.Technical Report.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Victor Charpenay, Sebastian Käbisch, and Harald Kosch. 2018. Semantic data integration on the web of things. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Internet of Things. 1–8.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Andrei Ciortea, Simon Mayer, Olivier Boissier, and Fabien Gandon. 2019. Exploiting Interaction Affordances: On Engineering Autonomous Systems for the Web of Things. In Second W3C Workshop on the Web of Things The Open Web to Challenge IoT Fragmentation. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02196903Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Matthias Kovatsch, Yassin N Hassan, and Simon Mayer. 2015. Practical semantics for the Internet of Things: Physical states, device mashups, and open questions. In 2015 5th International Conference on the Internet of Things (IOT). IEEE, 54–61.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. W3C. 2020. Web of Things (WoT) Architecture. Technical Report. W3C. https://www.w3.org/TR/2020/REC-wot-architecture-20200409/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Demo: Web of Things in Building Automation
              Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Other conferences
                IoT '21: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on the Internet of Things
                November 2021
                233 pages
                ISBN:9781450385664
                DOI:10.1145/3494322

                Copyright © 2021 Owner/Author

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 8 March 2022

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • demonstration
                • Research
                • Refereed limited

                Acceptance Rates

                Overall Acceptance Rate28of84submissions,33%
              • Article Metrics

                • Downloads (Last 12 months)15
                • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

                Other Metrics

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader

              HTML Format

              View this article in HTML Format .

              View HTML Format