Mark Colley
Pascal Jansen
Enrico Rukzio
Skip Abstract Section
Skip Supplemental Material SectionAbstract
Autonomous vehicles provide new input modalities to improve interaction with in-vehicle information systems. However, due to the road and driving conditions, the user input can be perturbed, resulting in reduced interaction quality. One challenge is assessing the vehicle motion effects on the interaction without an expensive high-fidelity simulator or a real vehicle. This work presents SwiVR-Car-Seat, a low-cost swivel seat to simulate vehicle motion using rotation. In an exploratory user study (N=18), participants sat in a virtual autonomous vehicle and performed interaction tasks using the input modalities touch, gesture, gaze, or speech. Results show that the simulation increased the perceived realism of vehicle motion in virtual reality and the feeling of presence. Task performance was not influenced uniformly across modalities; gesture and gaze were negatively affected while there was little impact on touch and speech. The findings can advise automotive user interface design to mitigate the adverse effects of vehicle motion on the interaction.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
zip
colley.zip (91.2 MB)
Supplemental movie, appendix, image and software files for, SwiVR-Car-Seat: Exploring Vehicle Motion Effects on Interaction Quality in Virtual Reality Automated Driving Using a Motorized Swivel Seat
- Bashar I. Ahmad, Patrick M. Langdon, Simon J. Godsill, Robert Hardy, Lee Skrypchuk, and Richard Donkor. 2015. Touchscreen usability and input performance in vehicles under different road conditions: an evaluative study. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 47--54. https://doi.org/10.1145/2799250.2799284Google Scholar
Digital Library
- The Great Alpaca. 2021. The Essential Leap-Motion Gesture Detection. https://assetstore.unity.com/packages/tools/input-management/the-essential-leap-motion-gesture-detection-111791. [Online; accessed: 24-APRIL-2021].Google Scholar
- April Ash, Stephen Palmisano, Deborah Apthorp, and Robert S Allison. 2013. Vection in Depth during Treadmill Walking. Perception 42, 5 (May 2013), 562--576. https://doi.org/10.1068/p7449 Publisher: SAGE Publications Ltd STM.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Aya Ataya, Won Kim, Ahmed Elsharkawy, and SeungJun Kim. 2021. How to Interact with a Fully Autonomous Vehicle: Naturalistic Ways for Drivers to Intervene in the Vehicle System While Performing Non-Driving Related Tasks. Sensors 21, 6 (Jan. 2021), 2206. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21062206 Number: 6 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sonia Baltodano, Srinath Sibi, Nikolas Martelaro, Nikhil Gowda, and Wendy Ju. 2015. The RRADS platform: a real road autonomous driving simulator. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 281--288. https://doi.org/10.1145/2799250.2799288Google ScholarDigital Library
- Klaus Bengler, Martin Kohlmann, and Christian Lange. 2012. Assessment of cognitive workload of in-vehicle systems using a visual peripheral and tactile detection task setting. Work 41, Supplement 1 (2012), 4919--4923.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Klaus Bengler, Michael Rettenmaier, Nicole Fritz, and Alexander Feierle. 2020. From HMI to HMIs: Towards an HMI Framework for Automated Driving. Information 11, 2 (Feb. 2020), 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11020061 Number: 2 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Doug A Bowman and Larry F Hodges. 2002. Formalizing the Design, Evaluation, and Application of Interaction Techniques for Immersive Virtual Environments. Journal of Visual Languages & Computing 10, 1 (2002), 17. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvlc.1998.0111Google ScholarCross Ref
- Géry Casiez, Nicolas Roussel, and Daniel Vogel. 2012. 1 € Filter: A Simple Speed-Based Low-Pass Filter for Noisy Input in Interactive Systems. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Austin, Texas, USA) (CHI '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2527--2530. https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208639Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fabien Danieau, Julien Fleureau, Philippe Guillotel, Nicolas Mollet, Anatole Lécuyer, and Marc Christie. 2012. HapSeat: producing motion sensation with multiple force-feedback devices embedded in a seat. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology - VRST '12. ACM Press, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 69. https://doi.org/10.1145/2407336.2407350Google ScholarDigital Library
- Henrik Detjen, Sarah Faltaous, Stefan Geisler, and Stefan Schneegass. 2019. User-Defined Voice and Mid-Air Gesture Commands for Maneuver-based Interventions in Automated Vehicles. In Proceedings of Mensch und Computer 2019 (MuC'19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 341--348. https://doi.org/10.1145/3340764.3340798Google ScholarDigital Library
- Henrik Detjen, Bastian Pfleging, and Stefan Schneegass. 2020. A Wizard of Oz Field Study to Understand Non-Driving-Related Activities, Trust, and Acceptance of Automated Vehicles. In 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Virtual Event, DC, USA) (AutomotiveUI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 19--29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3409120.3410662Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nicole Dillen, Marko Ilievski, Edith Law, Lennart E. Nacke, Krzysztof Czarnecki, and Oliver Schneider. 2020. Keep Calm and Ride Along: Passenger Comfort and Anxiety as Physiological Responses to Autonomous Driving Styles. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376247Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tanja Döring, Dagmar Kern, Paul Marshall, Max Pfeiffer, Johannes Schöning, Volker Gruhn, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2011. Gestural Interaction on the Steering Wheel: Reducing the Visual Demand. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vancouver, BC, Canada) (CHI '11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 483--492. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979010Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sarah D'Amour, Laurence R Harris, Stefan Berti, and Behrang Keshavarz. 2021. The role of cognitive factors and personality traits in the perception of illusory self-motion (vection). Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 83, 4 (2021), 1804--1817.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Paul M Fitts. 1954. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of experimental psychology 47, 6 (1954), 381.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Kikuo Fujimura, Lijie Xu, Cuong Tran, Rishabh Bhandari, and Victor Ng-Thow-Hing. 2013. Driver queries using wheel-constrained finger pointing and 3-D head-up display visual feedback. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 56--62. https://doi.org/10.1145/2516540.2516551Google ScholarDigital Library
- David Goedicke, Jamy Li, Vanessa Evers, and Wendy Ju. 2018. VR-OOM: Virtual Reality On-rOad driving siMulation. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--11. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173739Google ScholarDigital Library
- Amr Gomaa, Guillermo Reyes, Alexandra Alles, Lydia Rupp, and Michael Feld. 2020. Studying Person-Specific Pointing and Gaze Behavior for Multimodal Referencing of Outside Objects from a Moving Vehicle. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction. ACM, Virtual Event Netherlands, 501--509. https://doi.org/10.1145/3382507.3418817Google ScholarDigital Library
- Natassia Goode, Michael G Lenné, and Paul Salmon. 2012. The impact of on-road motion on BMS touch screen device operation. Ergonomics 55, 9 (2012), 12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2012.685496Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jan Gugenheimer, Dennis Wolf, Gabriel Haas, Sebastian Krebs, and Enrico Rukzio. 2016. SwiVRChair: A Motorized Swivel Chair to Nudge Users' Orientation for 360 Degree Storytelling in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, San Jose California USA, 1996--2000. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858040Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sandra G Hart and Lowell E Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In Advances in psychology. Vol. 52. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 139--183.Google Scholar
- Kenneth P. Herndon, Andries van Dam, and Michael Gleicher. 1994. The challenges of 3D interaction: a CHI '94 workshop. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 26, 4 (Oct. 1994), 36--43. https://doi.org/10.1145/191642.191652Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lawrence J. Hettinger, Kevin S. Berbaum, Robert S. Kennedy, William P. Dunlap, and Margaret D. Nolan. 1990. Vection and Simulator Sickness. Military Psychology 2, 3 (Sept. 1990), 171--181. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327876mp0203_4Google ScholarCross Ref
- Juan David Hincapié-Ramos, Xiang Guo, Paymahn Moghadasian, and Pourang Irani. 2014. Consumed Endurance: A Metric to Quantify Arm Fatigue of Mid-Air Interactions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) (CHI '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1063--1072. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557130Google ScholarDigital Library
- Xin Jin, Haibin Hou, Ming Shen, Hequan Wu, and King H Yang. 2018. Occupant kinematics and biomechanics with rotatable seat in autonomous vehicle collision: a preliminary concept and strategy., 12--14 pages.Google Scholar
- Digital Ruby (Jeff Johnson). 2021. Fingers - Touch Gestures for Unity. https://assetstore.unity.com/packages/tools/input-management/fingers-touch-gestures-for-unity-41076. [Online; accessed: 24-APRIL-2021].Google Scholar
- Sofia Jorlöv, Katarina Bohman, and Annika Larsson. 2017. Seating positions and activities in highly automated cars-a qualitative study of future automated driving scenarios., 10 pages.Google Scholar
- M. Kauer, M. Schreiber, and R. Bruder. 2010. How to conduct a car? A design example for maneuver based driver-vehicle interaction. In 2010 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium. IEEE, New York, NY, USA, 1214--1221. https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2010.5548099 ISSN: 1931--0587.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robert S Kennedy, Julie M Drexler, Daniel E Compton, Kay M Stanney, D Susan Lanham, and Deborah L Harm. 2003. Configural Scoring of Simulator Sickness, Cybersickness and Space Adaptation Syndrome: Similarities and Differences., 247 pages.Google Scholar
- Robert S Kennedy, Norman E Lane, Kevin S Berbaum, and Michael G Lilienthal. 1993. Simulator sickness questionnaire: An enhanced method for quantifying simulator sickness. The international journal of aviation psychology 3, 3 (1993), 203--220.Google Scholar
- Heejin Kim, Sunghyuk Kwon, Jiyoon Heo, Hojin Lee, and Min K Chung. 2014. The effect of touch-key size on the usability of In-Vehicle Information Systems and driving safety during simulated driving. Applied ergonomics 45, 3 (2014), 379--388.Google Scholar
- Huhn Kim and Haewon Song. 2014. Evaluation of the safety and usability of touch gestures in operating in-vehicle information systems with visual occlusion. Applied Ergonomics 45, 3 (2014), 789--798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2013.10.013Google ScholarCross Ref
- Myeongseop Kim, Eunjin Seong, Younkyung Jwa, Jieun Lee, and Seungjun Kim. 2020. A Cascaded Multimodal Natural User Interface to Reduce Driver Distraction. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 112969--112984. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3002775 Conference Name: IEEE Access.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Moritz Körber. 2019. Theoretical Considerations and Development of a Questionnaire to Measure Trust in Automation. In Proceedings of the 20th Congress of the International Ergonomics Association (IEA 2018), Sebastiano Bagnara, Riccardo Tartaglia, Sara Albolino, Thomas Alexander, and Yushi Fujita (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 13--30.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shunsuke Koyama, Yuta Sugiura, Masa Ogata, Anusha Withana, Yuji Uema, Makoto Honda, Sayaka Yoshizu, Chihiro Sannomiya, Kazunari Nawa, and Masahiko Inami. 2014. Multi-Touch Steering Wheel for in-Car Tertiary Applications Using Infrared Sensors. In Proceedings of the 5th Augmented Human International Conference (Kobe, Japan) (AH '14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 5, 4 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/2582051.2582056Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tuomo Kujala and Pertti Saariluoma. 2011. Effects of menu structure and touch screen scrolling style on the variability of glance durations during in-vehicle visual search tasks. Ergonomics 54, 8 (2011), 716--732.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yuriy Kurylyak, Francesco Lamonaca, and Giovanni Mirabelli. 2012. Detection of the eye blinks for human's fatigue monitoring. In 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications Proceedings. IEEE, New York, NY, USA, 1--4.Google ScholarCross Ref
- David R. Large, Gary Burnett, Andrew Morris, Arun Muthumani, and Rebecca Matthias. 2018. A Longitudinal Simulator Study to Explore Drivers' Behaviour During Highly-Automated Driving. In Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation (Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing), Neville A Stanton (Ed.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 583--594. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60441-1_57Google ScholarCross Ref
- David R. Large, Elizabeth Crundall, Gary Burnett, and Lee Skrypchuk. 2015. Predicting the Visual Demand of Finger-Touch Pointing Tasks in a Driving Context. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Nottingham, United Kingdom) (AutomotiveUI '15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 221--224. https://doi.org/10.1145/2799250.2799256Google ScholarDigital Library
- Joseph J. LaViola. 2000. A discussion of cybersickness in virtual environments. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 32, 1 (Jan. 2000), 47--56. https://doi.org/10.1145/333329.333344Google ScholarDigital Library
- Huy Viet Le, Thomas Kosch, Patrick Bader, Sven Mayer, and Niels Henze. 2018. PalmTouch: Using the Palm as an Additional Input Modality on Commodity Smartphones. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173934Google ScholarDigital Library
- Scott Le Vine, Alireza Zolfaghari, and John Polak. 2015. Autonomous cars: The tension between occupant experience and intersection capacity. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 52 (2015), 1--14.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Li Liu and Shen Huang. 2020. Dominate and Non-dominate Hand Prediction for Handheld Touchscreen Interaction. In 2020 13th International Conference on Human System Interaction (HSI). IEEE, New York, NY, USA, 56--62.Google Scholar
- Haiko Lüpsen. 2020. R-Funktionen zur Varianzanalyse. http://www.uni-koeln.de/~luepsen/R/. [Online; accessed 25-APRIL-2021].Google Scholar
- T. Maeda, H. Ando, and M. Sugimoto. 2005. Virtual acceleration with galvanic vestibular stimulation in a virtual reality environment. In IEEE Proceedings. VR 2005. Virtual Reality, 2005. IEEE, New York, NY, USA, 289--290. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2005.1492799 ISSN: 2375--5334.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Udara E. Manawadu, Mitsuhiro Kamezaki, Masaaki Ishikawa, Takahiro Kawano, and Shigeki Sugano. 2016. A hand gesture based driver-vehicle interface to control lateral and longitudinal motions of an autonomous vehicle. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC). IEEE, New York, NY, USA, 001785--001790. https://doi.org/10.1109/SMC.2016.7844497Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mark Mcgill, Aidan Kehoe, Euan Freeman, and Stephen Brewster. 2020. Expanding the Bounds of Seated Virtual Workspaces. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 27, 3 (June 2020), 1--40. https://doi.org/10.1145/3380959Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Mohan, W. B. Goh, C. Fu, and S. Yeung. 2018. DualGaze: Addressing the Midas Touch Problem in Gaze Mediated VR Interaction. In 2018 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct). IEEE, New York, NY, USA, 79--84. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct.2018.00039Google ScholarCross Ref
- Takahiko Murano, Takashi Yonekawa, Masami Aga, and Sueharu Nagiri. 2009. Development of High-Performance Driving Simulator. SAE International Journal of Passenger Cars - Mechanical Systems 2, 1 (April 2009), 661--669. https://doi.org/10.4271/2009-01-0450 Number: 2009--01-0450.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robert Neßelrath, Mohammad Mehdi Moniri, and Michael Feld. 2016. Combining Speech, Gaze, and Micro-gestures for the Multimodal Control of In-Car Functions. In 2016 12th International Conference on Intelligent Environments (IE). IEEE, New York, NY, USA, 190--193. https://doi.org/10.1109/IE.2016.42 ISSN: 2472--7571.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alexander Ng and Stephen A. Brewster. 2016. Investigating Pressure Input and Haptic Feedback for In-Car Touchscreens and Touch Surfaces. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Ann Arbor, MI, USA) (Automotive'UI 16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 121--128. https://doi.org/10.1145/3003715.3005420Google ScholarDigital Library
- University of Iowa. 2021. NADS-1 | National Advanced Driving Simulator. https://nads.uiowa.edu/nads-1-simulator. [Online; accessed: 28-APRIL-2021].Google Scholar
- Stephen Palmisano, Robert S. Allison, Mark M. Schira, and Robert J. Barry. 2015. Future challenges for vection research: definitions, functional significance, measures, and neural bases. Frontiers in Psychology 6 (2015), 15 pages. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00193 Publisher: Frontiers.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sanna M. Pampel, Gary Burnett, Chrisminder Hare, Harpreet Singh, Arber Shabani, Lee Skrypchuk, and Alex Mouzakitis. 2019. Fitts Goes Autobahn: Assessing the Visual Demand of Finger-Touch Pointing Tasks in an On-Road Study. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Utrecht, Netherlands) (AutomotiveUI '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 254--261. https://doi.org/10.1145/3342197.3344538Google ScholarDigital Library
- George D. Park, R. Wade Allen, Theodore J. Rosenthal, and Dary Fiorentino. 2005. Training Effectiveness: How Does Driving Simulator Fidelity Influence Driver Performance? Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 49, 25 (Sept. 2005), 2201--2205. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120504902518 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yiyun Peng, Linda Ng Boyle, and John D Lee. 2014. Reading, typing, and driving: How interactions with in-vehicle systems degrade driving performance. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour 27 (2014), 182--191.Google Scholar
- Abdul Moiz Penkar, Christof Lutteroth, and Gerald Weber. 2012. Designing for the Eye: Design Parameters for Dwell in Gaze Interaction. In Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference (Melbourne, Australia) (OzCHI '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 479--488. https://doi.org/10.1145/2414536.2414609Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ingrid Pettersson and IC MariAnne Karlsson. 2015. Setting the stage for autonomous cars: a pilot study of future autonomous driving experiences. IET intelligent transport systems 9, 7 (2015), 694--701.Google Scholar
- Max Pfeiffer, Dagmar Kern, Johannes Schöning, Tanja Döring, Antonio Krüger, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2010. A Multi-Touch Enabled Steering Wheel: Exploring the Design Space. In CHI '10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3355--3360. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753846.1753984Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bastian Pfleging, Maurice Rang, and Nora Broy. 2016. Investigating user needs for non-driving-related activities during automated driving. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (MUM '16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 91--99. https://doi.org/10.1145/3012709.3012735Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bastian Pfleging, Stefan Schneegass, and Albrecht Schmidt. 2012. Multimodal Interaction in the Car: Combining Speech and Gestures on the Steering Wheel. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Portsmouth, New Hampshire) (AutomotiveUI '12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 155--162. https://doi.org/10.1145/2390256.2390282Google ScholarDigital Library
- Matthew J Pitts, Gary Burnett, Lee Skrypchuk, Tom Wellings, Alex Attridge, and Mark A Williams. 2012. Visual-haptic feedback interaction in automotive touchscreens. Displays 33, 1 (2012), 7--16.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tony Poitschke, Florian Laquai, Stilyan Stamboliev, and Gerhard Rigoll. 2011. Gaze-based interaction on multiple displays in an automotive environment. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics. IEEE, New York, NY, USA, 543--548. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSMC.2011.6083740 ISSN: 1062--922X.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Sharif Razzaque, Zachariah Kohn, and Mary C. Whitton. 2001. Redirected Walking., 5 pages. https://doi.org/10.2312/egs.20011036 Accepted: 2015--11-11T18:52:51Z Publisher: Eurographics Association.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. T. Reason and J. J. Brand. 1975. Motion sickness. Academic Press, Oxford, England. Pages: vii, 310.Google Scholar
- Albert J Rehmann, Robert D Mitman, and Michael C Reynolds. 1995. A Handbook of Flight Simulation Fidelity Requirements for Human Factors Research. Technical Report. Crew System Ergonomics Information Analysis Center Wright-Patterson AFB OH.Google Scholar
- William B. Ribbens, Norman P. Mansour, Gerald Luecke, Charles W. Battle, Edward C. Jones, and Leslie E. Mansir. 2003. 8 - Vehicle Motion Control. In Understanding Automotive Electronics (Sixth Edition) (sixth ed.). Newnes, Burlington, 287--325. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-075067599-4/50008-0Google ScholarCross Ref
- Andreas Riegler, Bilal Aksoy, Andreas Riener, and Clemens Holzmann. 2020. Gaze-Based Interaction with Windshield Displays for Automated Driving: Impact of Dwell Time and Feedback Design on Task Performance and Subjective Workload. In 12th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Virtual Event, DC, USA) (AutomotiveUI '20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 151--160. https://doi.org/10.1145/3409120.3410654Google ScholarDigital Library
- Andreas Riener. 2010. Assessment of simulator fidelity and validity in simulator and on-the-road studies. International Journal on Advances in Systems and Measurements 3, 3 (2010), 110--124.Google Scholar
- Michael Rietzler, Teresa Hirzle, Jan Gugenheimer, Julian Frommel, Thomas Dreja, and Enrico Rukzio. 2018. VRSpinning: Exploring the Design Space of a 1D Rotation Platform to Increase the Perception of Self-Motion in VR. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM, Hong Kong China, 99--108. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196755Google ScholarDigital Library
- Florian Roider and Tom Gross. 2018. I See Your Point: Integrating Gaze to Enhance Pointing Gesture Accuracy While Driving. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 351--358. https://doi.org/10.1145/3239060.3239084Google ScholarDigital Library
- Florian Roider, Sonja Rümelin, Bastian Pfleging, and Tom Gross. 2017. The Effects of Situational Demands on Gaze, Speech and Gesture Input in the Vehicle. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications. ACM, Oldenburg Germany, 94--102. https://doi.org/10.1145/3122986.3122999Google ScholarDigital Library
- Robert Rosenthal, Harris Cooper, L Hedges, et al. 1994. Parametric measures of effect size. The handbook of research synthesis 621, 2 (1994), 231--244.Google Scholar
- Roto-VR. 2021. Virtual Reality | Roto VR Chair |. https://www.rotovr.com/. [Online; accessed: 19-APRIL-2021].Google Scholar
- Sonja Rümelin, Chadly Marouane, and Andreas Butz. 2013. Free-hand pointing for identification and interaction with distant objects. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI '13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 40--47. https://doi.org/10.1145/2516540.2516556Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paul M. Salmon, Michael G. Lenné, Tom Triggs, Natassia Goode, Miranda Cornelissen, and Victor Demczuk. 2011. The effects of motion on in-vehicle touch screen system operation: A battle management system case study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 14, 6 (Nov. 2011), 494--503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2011.08.002Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tevfik Metin Sezgin, Ian Davies, and Peter Robinson. 2009. Multimodal inference for driver-vehicle interaction. In Proceedings of the 2009 international conference on Multimodal interfaces (ICMI-MLMI '09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 193--198. https://doi.org/10.1145/1647314.1647348Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mel Slater, Martin Usoh, and Anthony Steed. 1994. Depth of presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 3, 2 (1994), 130--144.Google ScholarDigital Library
- David L Strayer, Jonna Turrill, Joel M Cooper, James R Coleman, Nathan Medeiros-Ward, and Francesco Biondi. 2015. Assessing cognitive distraction in the automobile. Human factors 57, 8 (2015), 1300--1324.Google Scholar
- Xu Sun, Shi Cao, and Pinyan Tang. 2021. Shaping driver-vehicle interaction in autonomous vehicles: How the new in-vehicle systems match the human needs. Applied Ergonomics 90 (Jan. 2021), 103238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103238Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marc Teyssier, Gilles Bailly, Catherine Pelachaud, Eric Lecolinet, Andrew Conn, and Anne Roudaut. 2019. Skin-On Interfaces: A Bio-Driven Approach for Artificial Skin Design to Cover Interactive Devices. In Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. ACM, New Orleans LA USA, 307--322. https://doi.org/10.1145/3332165.3347943Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tobii. 2021. Tobii G2OM. https://vr.tobii.com/sdk/solutions/tobii-g2om. [Online; accessed: 24-APRIL-2021].Google Scholar
- Tobii. 2021. VIVE Pro Eye with Tobii Eye Tracking. https://vr.tobii.com/integrations/htc-vive-pro-eye. [Online; accessed: 24-APRIL-2021].Google Scholar
- Ultraleap. 2021. Touchless Interfaces. https://docs.ultraleap.com/touchless-interfaces. [Online; accessed: 24-APRIL-2021].Google Scholar
- Unity. 2021. Unity Phrase Recognition System. https://docs.unity3d.com/ScriptReference/Windows.Speech.PhraseRecognitionSystem.html. [Online; accessed: 24-APRIL-2021].Google Scholar
- Claudia Voelcker-Rehage. 2008. Motor-skill learning in older adults---a review of studies on age-related differences. European Review of Aging and Physical Activity 5, 1 (2008), 5--16.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marcel Walch, Lorenz Jaksche, Philipp Hock, Martin Baumann, and Michael Weber. 2017. Touch Screen Maneuver Approval Mechanisms for Highly Automated Vehicles: A First Evaluation. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications Adjunct (AutomotiveUI '17). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 206--211. https://doi.org/10.1145/3131726.3131756Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marcel Walch, Tobias Sieber, Philipp Hock, Martin Baumann, and Michael Weber. 2016. Towards Cooperative Driving: Involving the Driver in an Autonomous Vehicle's Decision Making. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Automotive'UI 16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 261--268. https://doi.org/10.1145/3003715.3005458Google ScholarDigital Library
- Florian Weidner and Wolfgang Broll. 2019. Interact with Your Car: A User-Elicited Gesture Set to Inform Future in-Car User Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (Pisa, Italy) (MUM '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 11, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3365610.3365625Google ScholarDigital Library
- Garrett Weinberg and Bret Harsham. 2009. Developing a low-cost driving simulator for the evaluation of in-vehicle technologies. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications - AutomotiveUI '09. ACM Press, Essen, Germany, 51. https://doi.org/10.1145/1620509.1620519Google ScholarDigital Library
- Carlos Wilkes. 2021. LeanTouch+. https://assetstore.unity.com/packages/tools/input-management/lean-touch-72356. [Online; accessed: 24-APRIL-2021].Google Scholar
- W. G. Wright. 2009. Linear vection in virtual environments can be strengthened by discordant inertial input. In 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE, New York, NY, USA, 1157--1160. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5333425 ISSN: 1558--4615.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yaw-VR. 2021. Yaw VR - Motion Simulator. https://www.yawvr.com/. [Online; accessed: 19-APRIL-2021].Google Scholar
- Nidzamuddin Md. Yusof, Juffrizal Karjanto, Jacques Terken, Frank Delbressine, Muhammad Zahir Hassan, and Matthias Rauterberg. 2016. The Exploration of Autonomous Vehicle Driving Styles: Preferred Longitudinal, Lateral, and Vertical Accelerations. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (Ann Arbor, MI, USA) (Automotive'UI 16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 245--252. https://doi.org/10.1145/3003715.3005455Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- SwiVR-Car-Seat: Exploring Vehicle Motion Effects on Interaction Quality in Virtual Reality Automated Driving Using a Motorized Swivel Seat
Recommendations
Eyes on a Car: an Interface Design for Communication between an Autonomous Car and a Pedestrian
AutomotiveUI '17: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular ApplicationsSelf-driving technologies have been increasingly developed and tested in recent years (e.g., Volvo's and Google's self-driving cars). However, only a limited number of investigations have so far been conducted into communication between self-driving ...
Sensor-in-the-loop tractor stability control: Look-ahead attitude prediction and field tests
Rollover protective structures (ROPS) have been recognized as the most effective device to prevent tractor-related fatalities due to tractor rollover. However, ROPS provide only passive protection from rollover-caused fatalities. The most effective way ...
Can Eyes on a Car Reduce Traffic Accidents?
AutomotiveUI '22: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular ApplicationsVarious car manufacturers and researchers have explored the idea of adding eyes to a car as an additional communication modality. A previous study demonstrated that autonomous vehicles’ (AVs) eyes help pedestrians make faster street-crossing decisions. ...
Comments