skip to main content
10.1145/3497623.3497624acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccprConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Younger face recognition by learning perceptual flows

Published:04 February 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

In spite of the extensive research that has been performed on age detection with a single face image, little attention has been paid to younger face recognition given an image pair. Our paper addresses the problem by proposing a perceptual flow extraction algorithm, followed by a CNN based transfer learning for the recognition purpose. In particular, our algorithm first employs just noticeable difference scheme for filtering face images, so that the noise that cannot be perceived by the human visual system is reduced. Then, by fusing Laplacian stacks into our flow approximation framework, the estimated perceptual flow is able to capture features at multiple scales. Due to the lack of data and the difficulty of collecting and annotating face image pairs, we have also introduced a dataset based on the UTKFace dataset for the purpose. Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Aaron F. Bobick and James W. Davis. 2001. The recognition of human movement using temporal templates. IEEE Transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 23, 3(2001), 257–267.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Alexey Dosovitskiy, Philipp Fischer, Eddy Ilg, Philip Hausser, Caner Hazirbas, Vladimir Golkov, Patrick Van Der Smagt, Daniel Cremers, and Thomas Brox. 2015. Flownet: Learning optical flow with convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision. 2758–2766.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Berthold KP Horn and Brian G Schunck. 1981. Determining optical flow. Artificial intelligence 17, 1-3 (1981), 185–203.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Eddy Ilg, Nikolaus Mayer, Tonmoy Saikia, Margret Keuper, Alexey Dosovitskiy, and Thomas Brox. 2017. Flownet 2.0: Evolution of optical flow estimation with deep networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 2462–2470.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Ranjan Jana and Abhishek Basu. 2017. Automatic age estimation from face image. In 2017 International Conference on Innovative Mechanisms for Industry Applications (ICIMIA). IEEE, 87–90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Gil Levi and Tal Hassner. 2015. Age and gender classification using convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops. 34–42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Anmin Liu, Weisi Lin, Manoranjan Paul, Chenwei Deng, and Fan Zhang. 2010. Just noticeable difference for images with decomposition model for separating edge and textured regions. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 20, 11(2010), 1648–1652.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Ce Liu, Jenny Yuen, and Antonio Torralba. 2010. Sift flow: Dense correspondence across scenes and its applications. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 33, 5(2010), 978–994.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. David G Lowe. 2004. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International journal of computer vision 60, 2 (2004), 91–110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Jiayi Ma, Chen Chen, Chang Li, and Jun Huang. 2016. Infrared and visible image fusion via gradient transfer and total variation minimization. Information Fusion 31(2016), 100–109.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Jerome Revaud, Philippe Weinzaepfel, Zaid Harchaoui, and Cordelia Schmid. 2015. Epicflow: Edge-preserving interpolation of correspondences for optical flow. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 1164–1172.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Rasmus Rothe, Radu Timofte, and Luc Van Gool. 2018. Deep expectation of real and apparent age from a single image without facial landmarks. International Journal of Computer Vision 126, 2 (2018), 144–157.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Christian Szegedy, Wei Liu, Yangqing Jia, Pierre Sermanet, Scott Reed, Dragomir Anguelov, Dumitru Erhan, Vincent Vanhoucke, and Andrew Rabinovich. 2015. Going deeper with convolutions. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 1–9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Oliver Van Kaick, Hao Zhang, Ghassan Hamarneh, and Daniel Cohen-Or. 2011. A survey on shape correspondence. In Computer graphics forum, Vol. 30. Wiley Online Library, 1681–1707.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Liangliang Wang, Ruifeng Li, and Yajun Fang. 2016. Energy flow: image correspondence approximation for motion analysis. Optical Engineering 55, 4 (2016), 043109.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Philippe Weinzaepfel, Jerome Revaud, Zaid Harchaoui, and Cordelia Schmid. 2013. DeepFlow: Large displacement optical flow with deep matching. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision. 1385–1392.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Zhifei Zhang, Yang Song, and Hairong Qi. 2017. Age progression/regression by conditional adversarial autoencoder. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 5810–5818.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICCPR '21: Proceedings of the 2021 10th International Conference on Computing and Pattern Recognition
    October 2021
    393 pages
    ISBN:9781450390439
    DOI:10.1145/3497623

    Copyright © 2021 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 4 February 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format