skip to main content
10.1145/3500931.3500969acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesisaimsConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Development and Effectiveness of a Novel Augmented Reality Self-training Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Environment During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Protocol of Randomized Controlled Trail

Authors Info & Claims
Published:22 December 2021Publication History

ABSTRACT

General cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training rate in China is less than 1%. AR may represent a powerful instrument for CPR training especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. A two-arms, prospective, parallel, 1:1 randomized clinical trial was designed. Participants will recruit via social media advertisements from August to October 2021 in Beijing and randomized into AR self-training CPR group and instructor-led training group. With the guide of immersive multi-sensory AR self-training CPR environment in Hololens step by step, participants in AR group should try their best to perform 10 minutes hands-only CPR to simulate an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and 15 minutes self-training of CPR and AED by Hololens after rest. Instructor-led group will perform continuous 10 minutes CPR with the similar simulation environment with the oral guide of certified instructor. And a 15 minutes face-to-face instructor-led training CPR and AED training are performed after rest. 2-min CPR skill assessment are conducted both in two groups after intervention immediately, 3 months and 6 months.

Meanwhile, CPR quality, include mean, per minute and per cycle (chest compression 30 times) chest compression depth (cm) and rate (minute-1), real-time CPR performance score and compression accuracy will be measured. 2-sample t-test or Mann-Whitney U tests and c2 or Fisher exact tests will be used to analyze the data. When the crowd can't gather, the study may have important implications for improving CPR training rate in China with a large population. This trial has registered in https://www.chictr.org.cn/ on 28 July, 2021with unique identifier: ChiCTR2100049254.

References

  1. Monsieurs, K. G., Nolan, J. P., Bossaert, L. L., et al. (2015). European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015 Section 1. Executive summary. Resuscitation, 95, 1--80. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.038Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. People.cn. (2016). National cardiopulmonary resuscitation popularization and billions of precision health projects launched in Beijing. Retrieved from http://health.people.com.cn/n1/2016/1121/c404177-28884287.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Woollard, M., Whitfield, R., Smith, A., et al. (2004). Skill acquisition and retention in automated external defibrillator (AED) use and CPR by lay responders: a prospective study. Resuscitation, 60(1), 17--28. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2003.09.006Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Woollard, M., Whitfield, R., Newcombe, R. G., et al. (2006). Optimal refresher training intervals for AED and CPR skills: A randomised controlled trial. Resuscitation, 71(2), 237--247. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.04.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Smith, K. K., Gilcreast, D., & Pierce, K. (2008). Evaluation of staff's retention of ACLS and BLS skills. Resuscitation, 78(1), 59--65. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2008.02.007Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Roppolo, L. P., Pepe, P. E., Campbell, L., et al. (2007). Prospective, randomized trial of the effectiveness and retention of 30-min layperson training for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external defibrillators: The American Airlines Study. Resuscitation, 74(2), 276--285. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2006.12.017Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Andresen, D., Arntz, H. R., Gräfling, W., et al. (2007). Public access resuscitation program including defibrillator training for laypersons: A randomized trial to evaluate the impact of training course duration. Resuscitation, 76(3), 419--424. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2007.08.019Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Greif, R., Lockey, A. S., Conaghan, P., et al. (2015). European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015. Section 10. Education and implementation of resuscitation. Resuscitation, 95, 288--301. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.032Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Balian, S., McGovern, S. K., Abella, B. S., et al. (2019). Feasibility of an augmented reality cardiopulmonary resuscitation training system for health care providers. Heliyon, 5(8), e02205-e02205. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02205Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Siebert, J. N., Ehrler, F., Gervaix, A., et al. (2017). Adherence to AHA guidelines when adapted for augmented reality glasses for assisted pediatric cardiopulmonary resuscitation: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of medical Internet research, 19(5), e183-e183. doi:10.2196/JMIR.7379Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Javaheri, H., Gruenerbl, A., Monger, E., et al. (2018). Stayin' Alive: An Interactive Augmented: Reality CPR Tutorial. 2018 ACM International Joint Conference.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Cruz Rivera, S., Liu, X., Chan, A.-W., et al. (2020). Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI extension. Nature medicine, 26(9), 1351 -1363. doi:10.1038/s41591-020-1037-7Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Wang, X. (2017). Pre-hospital dispatcher assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidance process and verification based on phone and mobile app. Second Military Medical University (Dissertation/Thesis).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kramer-Johansen, J., Edelson, D. P., Losert, H., et al. (2007). Uniform reporting of measured quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Resuscitation, 74(3), 406--417. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2007.01.024Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Considine, J., Gazmuri, R. J., Perkins, G. D., et al. (2020). Chest compression components (rate, depth, chest wall recoil and leaning): A scoping review. Resuscitation, 146, 188--202. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.08.042Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Nas, J., Thannhauser, J., Vart, P., et al. (2020). Effect of Face-to-Face vs Virtual Reality Training on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Quality: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA cardiology, 5(3), 328--335. doi:10.1001/jamacardio.2019.4992Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Soar, J., Maconochie, I., Wyckoff, M. H., et al. (2019). 2019 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Resuscitation, 145, 95--150. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.10.016Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Soar, J., Berg, K. M., Andersen, L. W., et al. (2020). Adult Advanced Life Support: 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. Resuscitation, 156, A80-A119. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.09.012Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Riggs, M., Franklin, R., & Saylany, L. (2019). Associations between cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) knowledge, self-efficacy, training history and willingness to perform CPR and CPR psychomotor skills: A systematic review. Resuscitation, 138, 259--272. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.03.019Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Bylow, H., Karlsson, T., Claesson, A., et al. (2019). Self-learning training versus instructor-led training for basic life support: A cluster randomised trial. Resuscitation, 139, 122--132. doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.03.026Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Stiell, I. G., Brown, S. P., Nichol, G., et al. (2014). What Is the Optimal Chest Compression Depth During Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Resuscitation of Adult Patients? Circulation (New York, N.Y.), 130(22), 1962--1970. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.008671Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Development and Effectiveness of a Novel Augmented Reality Self-training Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Environment During COVID-19 Pandemic: A Protocol of Randomized Controlled Trail

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ISAIMS '21: Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence for Medicine Sciences
      October 2021
      593 pages
      ISBN:9781450395588
      DOI:10.1145/3500931

      Copyright © 2021 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 22 December 2021

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate53of112submissions,47%
    • Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

      Other Metrics

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader