skip to main content
10.1145/3503047.3503133acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaissConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Network Embedding Method Based on Semantic Information

Published:19 January 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Graph embedding is the resultful method to map the graph in the low-dimensional vector space. Now most existing embedding methods to learn nodes representations mainly focus on obtaining nodes adjacent and feature information, but they ignore the state that there is also semantic information between nodes. Therefore, it is proposed a graph embedding method, which introduces point mutual information to compute the semantic similarity between nodes, the basic idea is to count the probability of two nodes appearing simultaneously in a sentence. And it learns representations by modeling the sum of the squares of the difference between point-wise mutual information and the inner product of node vectors, and theoretically shows that using point mutual information can also obtain a log-linear relationship between graph topological by leveraging the invariance property of difference between nodes. Finally, the study selects 5 social networks datasets for node classifications, clustering tasks, and compares them with 6 graph embedding methods and 4 methods based on graph neural network, the result demonstrates that the direct method does not negatively impact accuracy on many downstream applications, and outperforms all the baseline methods. In addition, the computation complexity of our method is lower than the worst-case.

References

  1. Will H, Zhitao Ying, Jure L. Inductive representation learning on large graphs// In 31st Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), Long Beach, CA, USA, 2017:1025–1035.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Fenyu Hu, Yanqiao, ShuWu,Liang wang,Tieniu Tan.Hierarchical Graph Convolutional Networks for Semi-supervised Node Classification.arXiv:1902.06667v4. 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Kipf and Welling Thomas N Kipf and Max Welling. Variational graph auto-encoders. arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.07308, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Shirui Pan, Ruiqi Hu, Guodong Long, Jing Jiang, Lina Yao, and Chengqi Zhang. Adversarially regularized graph autoencoder for graph embedding. In International Joint Conference on Artifificial Intelligence, pages 2609–2615, 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Qiu J, Dong Y, Ma H, Netsmf: Large-scale network embedding as sparse matrix factorization//Proceedings of the 28th international conference on World Wide Web. San Francisco, USA, 2019: 1509-1520.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Zhang J, Dong Y, Wang Y, ProNE: fast and scalable network representation learning//Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Macao, China. 2019: 4278-4284.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Yang C, Liu Z, Zhao D, Network representation learning with rich text information//Twenty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2015: 2111-2117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. B. Perozzi, R. Al-Rfou, and S. Skiena, Deepwalk: Online learning of social representations, in Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 2014:701–710.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. A. Grover and J. Leskovec, node2vec: Scalable feature learning for networks,” in Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and datamining.ACM,2016:855-864.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Bryan Perozzi, Vivek Kulkarni, Haochen Chen, and Steven Skiena. Don't Walk, Skip! : online learning of multi-scale network embeddings. //In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEEACM International.Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining.2017: 258–265.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Benedek Rozemberczki and Rik Sarkar. Fast Sequence-Based Embedding with Diffusion Graphs. In International Workshop on Complex Networks. Springer, 2018:99–107.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. C. Yang, Z. Liu, D. Zhao, M. Sun, and E. Y. Chang, “Network representation learning with rich text information,” //in Twenty-Furth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), Buenos Aires, Argentina,2015:2111–2117.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. L. Tang and H. Liu, “Relational learning via latent social dimensions,” // Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 2009:817–826.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Jian Tang, Meng Qu, Mingzhe Wang, Ming Zhang, Jun Yan, and Qiaozhu Mei. Line: Large scale information network embedding. In Proceedings of the 24th international conference on world wide web, pages 1067–1077, Florence, Italy, May 2015. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Hamilton, W., Ying, Z., and Leskovec, J. Inductive representation learning on large graphs. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 1024–1034, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Petar Veliˇckovi´c, William Fedus, William L Hamilton, Pietro Li`o, Yoshua Bengio, and R Devon Hjelm. Deep graph infomax. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ribeiro, L., Saverese, P., and Figueiredo, D. Struc2vec: Learning node representations from structural identity. In International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp 385394, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. You, J., Ying, R., and Leskovec, J. Position-aware graph neural networks. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 7134–7143, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Chun Wang, Shirui Pan, Guodong Long, Xingquan Zhu, and Jing Jiang. Mgae: Marginalized graph autoencoder for graph clustering. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pages 889–898. ACM, 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Garcia Duran, A. and Niepert, M. Learning graph representations with embedding propagation. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 5119–5130. 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Park, J., Lee, M., Chang, H. J., Lee, K., and Choi, J. Y. Symmetric graph convolutional autoencoder for unsupervised graph representation learning. In International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 6519–6528, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Petar Veliˇckovi´c, William Fedus, William L Hamilton, Pietro Li`o, Yoshua Bengio, and R Devon Hjelm. Deep graph infomax. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Tian, Y., Krishnan, D., and Isola, P. Contrastive multiview coding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.05849, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Li, Y., Gu, C., Dullien, T., Vinyals, O., and Kohli, P. Graph matching networks for learning the similarity of graph structured objects. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 3835–3845, 2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Sun, F.-Y., Hoffman, J., Verma, V., and Tang, J. Infograph: Unsupervised and semi-supervised graph-level representation learning via mutual information maximization. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Hjelm, R. D., Fedorov, A., Lavoie-Marchildon, S., Grewal, K., Bachman, P., Trischler, A., and Bengio, Y. Learning deep representations by mutual information estimation and maximization.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Sun, F.-Y., Hoffman, J., Verma, V., and Tang, J. Infograph: Unsupervised and semi-supervised graph-level representation learning via mutual information maximization. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. O. Levy and Y. Goldberg, “Neural word embedding as implicit matrix factorization,” in Advances in neural information processing systems, 2014, pp. 2177–2185.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. J. Pennington, R. Socher, and C. Manning, “Glove: Global vectors for word representation,” in Proceedings of the 2014 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP), 2014, pp. 1532–1543.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Chenyi Zhuang,Qiang Ma.Dual Graph Convolutional Networks for Graph-Based Semi-Supervised Classification.//the 2018 World Wide Web Conference.2018:499-508.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Jure Leskovec and Andrej Krevl. SNAP Datasets: Stanford Large Network Dataset Collection. http://snap.stanford.edu/data.2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Benedek Rozemberczki, Carl Allen, and Rik Sarkar. Multi-scale Attributed Node Embedding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.1302.2019.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Benedek Rozemberczki, Oliver Kiss, and Rik Sarkar. Karate Club: An API Oriented Open-Source Python Framework for Unsupervised Learning on Graphs.arXiv:2003.04819v3 [cs.LG] 7 Aug 2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Network Embedding Method Based on Semantic Information
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        AISS '21: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Advanced Information Science and System
        November 2021
        526 pages
        ISBN:9781450385862
        DOI:10.1145/3503047

        Copyright © 2021 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 19 January 2022

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate41of95submissions,43%
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)16
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format