skip to main content
10.1145/3505284.3532969acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesimxConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Work in Progress

Grasping Temperature: Thermal Feedback in VR Robot Teleoperation

Published:22 June 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a proof-of-concept of a robotic teleoperation system, that provides the human operator a thermal sense in addition to the visual sense. With a sensor suite comprising a stereo camera, 360° camera and long-wave infra-red camera, our demonstrator pushes the boundaries of virtual-reality situational awareness by bringing not only 3D visual content but also a 360° thermal experience to the operator. The visual channel of our robotic teleoperation system is represented through a head-mounted-display and the thermal channel is displayed through directional heaters in the operator cockpit and a thermal glove. Initial tests showed that an operator successfully experienced a 360° remote environment, correctly distinguished between and interacted with hot and cold objects, and could notice the presence of nearby people outside her direct field-of-view, based on their emitted heat.

References

  1. Jonathan Boisvert, Marc-Antoine Drouin, Guy Godin, and Michel Picard. 2020. Augmented reality, 3D measurement, and thermal imagery for computer-assisted manufacturing. In Emerging Digital Micromirror Device Based Systems and Applications XII, Vol. 11294. International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE Digital Library, United States, 112940L.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Carlos Coelho, JG Tichon, Trevor J Hine, GM Wallis, and Giuseppe Riva. 2006. Media presence and inner presence: the sense of presence in virtual reality technologies. In From communication to presence: Cognition, emotions and culture towards the ultimate communicative experience. IOS Press, Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 25–45.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. I. Comsa, R. Trestian, and G. Ghinea. 2018. 360° Mulsemedia experience over next generation wireless networks – A reinforcement learning approach. In 2018 Tenth International Conference on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX). IEEE, United States, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2018.8463409Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. I. Comşa, E. B. Saleme, A. Covaci, G. M. Assres, R. Trestian, C. A. S. Santos, and G. Ghinea. 2020. Do I Smell Coffee? The Tale of a 360° Mulsemedia Experience. IEEE MultiMedia 27, 1 (2020), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.1109/MMUL.2019.2954405Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Richard L. Daft and Robert H. Lengel. 1986. Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science 32, 5 (1986), 554–571. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Richard L Daft, Robert H Lengel, and Linda Klebe Trevino. 1987. Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS quarterly 11(1987), 355–366.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Leonor Fermoselle, Simon Gunkel, Frank ter ter Haar, Sylvie Dijkstra-Soudarissanane, Alexander Toet, Omar Niamut, and Nanda van van der Stap. 2020. Let’s Get in Touch! Adding Haptics to Social VR. In ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 174–179.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. FLIR. 2022. FLIR A655sc High-Resolution Science Grade LWIR Camera. https://www.flir.eu/products/a655sc/ Accessed: 2022-03-09.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Stereolabs Inc.2022. ZED 2i – Industrial AI Stereo Camera. https://www.stereolabs.com/zed-2i/ Accessed: 2022-03-09.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Seung-Won Kim, Sung Hee Kim, Choong Sun Kim, Kyoungsoo Yi, Jun-Sik Kim, Byung Jin Cho, and Youngsu Cha. 2020. Thermal display glove for interacting with virtual reality. Scientific Reports 10, 1 (2020), 1–12.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Ricoh Company Ltd.2022. Ricoh Theta Z1. https://theta360.com/en/about/theta/z1.html Accessed: 2022-03-09.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Honghao Lv, Geng Yang, Huiying Zhou, Xiaoyan Huang, Huayong Yang, and Zhibo Pang. 2020. Teleoperation of collaborative robot for remote dementia care in home environments. IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine 8 (2020), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1109/JTEHM.2020.3002384Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Günter Niemeyer, Carsten Preusche, Stefano Stramigioli, and Dongjun Lee. 2016. Telerobotics. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland, 1085–1108. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32552-1_43Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kaushik Parida, Hyunwoo Bark, and Pooi See Lee. 2021. Emerging thermal technology enabled augmented reality. Advanced Functional Materials 31, 39 (2021), 2007952.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Denis Peña and Fumihide Tanaka. 2020. Human perception of social robot’s emotional states via facial and thermal expressions. ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction 9, 4 (2020), Article 26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3388469Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Joseph Redmon and Ali Farhadi. 2018. YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvement.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Halodi Robotics. 2022. Eve Robot. https://www.halodi.com/ Accessed: 2022-03-09.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Sensiks. 2022. Sensiks Sensory Reality Pods & Platform. https://www.sensiks.com Accessed: 2022-03-09.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Kazuaki Tanaka, Hideyuki Nakanishi, and Hiroshi Ishiguro. 2015. Physical embodiment can produce robot operator’s pseudo presence. Frontiers in ICT 2, 8 (2015), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2015.00008Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Unity Technologies. 2022. Unity Real-time Development Platform. https://unity.com/ Accessed: 2022-03-09.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. TEGway. 2022. ThermoReal, TEGway. http://tegway.co/tegway/ Accessed: 2022-03-09.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. ©FLIR. 2018. Try the FLIR Virtual Reality Experience!https://www.flir.in/news-center/corporate-news/try-the-flir-virtual-reality-experience/ Accessed: 2021-08-03.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Alexander Toet, Irene A. Kuling, Bouke N. Krom, and Jan B. F. van Erp. 2020. Toward enhanced teleoperation through embodiment. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 7, 14 (2020), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2020.00014Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. ETH Zurich. 2022. ALMA – Robotic Systems Lab, ETH Zurich. https://rsl.ethz.ch/robots-media/alma.html Accessed: 2022-03-09.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Conferences
    IMX '22: Proceedings of the 2022 ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences
    June 2022
    390 pages
    ISBN:9781450392129
    DOI:10.1145/3505284

    Copyright © 2022 Owner/Author

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 22 June 2022

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Work in Progress
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate69of245submissions,28%

    Upcoming Conference

    IMX '24
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)67
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)5

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format