skip to main content
10.1145/3510450.3517273acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesmhvConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Sustainable OTT video distribution powered by 5G-multicast/unicast delivery and versatile video coding

Published:17 March 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Video over the internet has drastically grown these past years, currently representing more than 80% of the internet bandwidth [3]. The massive usage of unicast delivery leads to network congestion that can result in poor quality of experience for the viewer, high delivery cost for operators and increased energy consumption. The current methods for adaptive video streaming rely more on maximizing the video quality for a given bandwidth rather than minimizing the end-to-end (from video server to end-user display) energy consumption for a given level of quality. This paper aims at leveraging recently standardized delivery and coding technologies to maintain the video quality while monitoring and reducing video energy footprint and delivery costs.

The Versatile Video Coding (VVC) [2] recently issued by ISO/IEC and ITU-T is used to further reduce video services bandwidth over previous video coding solutions, in particular its predecessor HEVC [10]. Compared to HEVC, VVC enables around 50% of bandwidth saving, at an equivalent video quality [12]. This performance is achieved by extending existing HEVC coding tools and by introducing new ones. VVC also brings new high-level features to better address new use-cases and applications (e.g variable resolution, scalability, 360° and screen-content coding). This paper uses ATEME Titan encoder while the decoding is performed by a real time software decoder OpenVVC. This latter is a cross-platform library that provides consumers with real time decoding capability under different OS including MAC OS, Windows, Linux and Android on Intel x86 and ARM platforms.

A dynamic video format selection is proposed to limit the distribution bandwidth and energy cost based on quality/complexity tradeoffs sent to the player. The carriage of such metadata is achieved by using the Green-MPEG [6] and DASH standard. A content mapping and video artefacts masking is implemented to counterbalance video degradation with post-processing. These are based on SEI messages such as CTI and Grain Synthesis recently standardized in the VSEI specification [5]. An energy reporting solution is proposed in order for the end-viewer to be informed of the energy impact and enabling manual adjustment the energy/quality tradeoff.

The Common Media Application Format (CMAF) is used to deliver the video segments over the network [5]. The carriage of video, audio and green metadata is based on the ISO/IEC Base Media File Format [7] (ISOBMFF). To save network traffic, the video segments can be either sent in unicast for low-audience services or in multicast for highly popular ones. The DASH/FLUTE stack is implemented as multicast protocol. The OTT services are delivered in the context of 3GPP Release 17 [1] and DVB-MABR Phase 2 network [4], including delivery over managed networks (IPTV) and mobile (4G-Lte and 5G).

The estimated energy saving for the proposed delivery infrastructure is the following. First, the bitrate saving brought by improved compression is estimated to be .05-0.1 Wh/bit for 1 bit of transmitted video [11], representing 37.5-75kWh saving for a 5Mbps HEVC HD service. Usage of SL-HDR is estimated to save 15-20% of display energy [9], and even more for a receiver fully leveraging Green metadata. For an average TV set [8], it represents a 21kWh saving. Finally, radio saving is more complex to estimate, but preliminary results show that saving from multicast starts from 1-8 User-Equipment (UE) in a cell.

This paper proposes an OTT delivery solution enabling operators and end-users to monitor and control their energy impact. At the headend side, metadata are generated by a pre-processing block and embedded in SEI messages. The encoder is leveraging VVC and CMAF to encapsulate video services together with the metadata. The delivery network is optimized by using DASH/FLUTE profile of DVB-MABR to save bandwidth when OTT content are delivered over IPTV or mobile networks. On end-user side, a real-time software VVC decoding and post-decoding processing are demonstrated. An end-to-end demonstrator is provided and evaluated to assess the relevance of the proposed method in a real environment.

References

  1. 3GPP TR 23.757. 2020. Study on architectural enhancements for 5G multicast-broadcast services.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Benjamin Bross, Ye-Kui Wang, Yan Ye, Shan Liu, Jianle Chen, Gary J Sullivan, and Jens-Rainer Ohm. 2021. Overview of the versatile video coding (VVC) standard and its applications. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 31, 10 (2021), 3736--3764.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Cisco. 2020. Global - 2021 Forecast Highlights. https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/m/en_us/solutions/service-provider/vni-forecast-highlights/pdf/Global_2021_Forecast_Highlights.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. DVB. 2020. Next steps confirmed for DVB work on Multicast ABR and Native IP. https://dvb.org/news/next-steps-confirmed-for-dvb-work-on-multicast-abr-and-native-ip/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. ITU-T Rec. H.274 (ex H.SEI) | ISO/IEC 23002-7:2020. 2020. Versatile supplemental enhancement information messages for coded video bitstreams.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Felix C Fernandes, Xavier Ducloux, Zhan Ma, Esmaeil Faramarzi, Patrick Gendron, and Jiangtao Wen. 2015. The green metadata standard for energy-efficient video consumption. IEEE MultiMedia 22, 1 (2015), 80--87.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. ISO/IEC. 2020. 23000-19:2020 Information technology - Multimedia application format (MPEG-A) - Part 19: Common Media Application Format (CMAF) for segmented media.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Eco Cost Savings. 2021. TV Wattage - 2022's Most Efficient TVs Revealed [With Data]. https://ecocostsavings.com/tv-wattage/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Michael Scholand, Robert Harrison, and Marie Baton. 2017. Measurement of automatic brightness control in televisions - critical for effective policy-making. In eceee Summer Study Proceedings. European Council for an Energy Efficient Economoy (ECEEE).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Gary J Sullivan, Jens-Rainer Ohm, Woo-Jin Han, and Thomas Wiegand. 2012. Overview of the high efficiency video coding (HEVC) standard. IEEE Transactions on circuits and systems for video technology 22, 12 (2012), 1649--1668.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Carbon Trust. 2021. Carbon impact of video streaming. https://www.carbontrust.com/resources/carbon-impact-of-video-streamingGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Mathias Wien and Vittorio Baroncini. 2021. VVC Verification Test Report for High Definition (HD) and 360 Standard Dynamic Range (SDR) Video Content. In doc. JVET-V2020 of ITU-T/ISO/IEC Joint Video Experts Team (JVET), 22st JVET meeting: April.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Sustainable OTT video distribution powered by 5G-multicast/unicast delivery and versatile video coding

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      MHV '22: Proceedings of the 1st Mile-High Video Conference
      March 2022
      150 pages
      ISBN:9781450392228
      DOI:10.1145/3510450

      Copyright © 2022 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 17 March 2022

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader