skip to main content
research-article

Generating Relevant and Informative Questions for Open-Domain Conversations

Authors Info & Claims
Published:09 January 2023Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Recent research has highlighted the importance of mixed-initiative interactions in conversational search. To enable mixed-initiative interactions, information retrieval systems should be able to ask diverse questions, such as information-seeking, clarification, and open-ended ones. question generation (QG) of open-domain conversational systems aims at enhancing the interactiveness and persistence of human-machine interactions. The task is challenging because of the sparsity of question generation (QG)-specific data in conversations. Current work is limited to single-turn interaction scenarios. We propose a context-enhanced neural question generation(CNQG) model that leverages the conversational context to predict question content and pattern, then perform question decoding. A hierarchical encoder framework is employed to obtain the discourse-level context representation. Based on this, we propose Review and Transit mechanisms to respectively select contextual keywords and predict new topic words to further construct the question content. Conversational context and the predicted question content are used to produce the question pattern, which in turn guides the question decoding process implemented by a recurrent decoder with a joint attention mechanism. To fully utilize the limited QG-specific data to train our question generator, we perform multi-task learning with three auxiliary training objectives, i.e., question pattern prediction, Review, and Transit mechanisms. The required additional labeled data is obtained in a self-supervised way. We also design a weight decaying strategy to adjust the influences of various auxiliary learning tasks. To the best of our acknowledge, we are the first to extend the application of QG to the multi-turn open-domain conversational scenario. Extensive experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposal and its main components on generating relevant and informative questions, with robust performance for contexts with various lengths.

REFERENCES

  1. [1] Aliannejadi Mohammad, Kiseleva Julia, Chuklin Aleksandr, Dalton Jeff, and Burtsev Mikhail S.. 2020. ConvAI3: Generating clarifying questions for open-domain dialogue systems (ClariQ). CoRR abs/2009.11352 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. [2] Aliannejadi Mohammad, Zamani Hamed, Crestani Fabio, and Croft W. Bruce. 2019. Asking clarifying questions in open-domain information-seeking conversations. In Proceedings of the 42nd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. Association for Computing Machinery, 475484.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. [3] Azzopardi Leif, Dubiel Mateusz, Halvey Martin, and Dalton Jeffery. 2018. Conceptualizing agent-human interactions during the conversational search process. In The 2nd Workshop on Conversational Approaches to Information Retrieval.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. [4] Belkin Nicholas J.. 1980. Anomalous states of knowledge as a basis for information retrieval. Can. J. Inf. Sci. 5, 1 (1980), 133143.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. [5] Bi Keping, Ai Qingyao, Zhang Yongfeng, and Croft W. Bruce. 2019. Conversational product search based on negative feedback. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management (CIKM’19). 359368.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. [6] Caruana Rich. 1997. Multitask learning. Mach. Learn. 28, 1 (1997), 4175. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. [7] Chen Hongshen, Liu Xiaorui, Yin Dawei, and Tang Jiliang. 2017. A survey on dialogue systems: Recent advances and new frontiers. SIGKDD Explor. 19, 2 (2017), 2535.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. [8] Chen Hongshen, Ren Zhaochun, Tang Jiliang, Zhao Yihong Eric, and Yin Dawei. 2018. Hierarchical variational memory network for dialogue generation. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference. 16531662.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. [9] Cho Kyunghyun, Merriënboer Bart van, Bahdanau Dzmitry, and Bengio Yoshua. 2014. On the properties of neural machine translation: Encoder–decoder approaches. In Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Syntax, Semantics and Structure in Statistical Translation. 103111.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. [10] Cho Kyunghyun, Merriënboer Bart van, Gulcehre Caglar, Bahdanau Dzmitry, Bougares Fethi, Schwenk Holger, and Bengio Yoshua. 2014. Learning phrase representations using RNN encoder–decoder for statistical machine translation. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 17241734.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. [11] Christakopoulou Konstantina, Radlinski Filip, and Hofmann Katja. 2016. Towards conversational recommender systems. In KDD 2016: 22nd ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM, 815824.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. [12] Church Kenneth Ward and Hanks Patrick. 1989. Word association norms, mutual information and lexicography. In 27th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistic. 7683.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. [13] Croft W. Bruce and Thompson R. H.. 1987. I3R: A new approach to the design of document retrieval systems. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 38, 6 (1987), 389404.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. [14] Dhole Kaustubh D. and Manning Christopher D.. 2020. Syn-QG: Syntactic and shallow semantic rules for question generation. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 752765.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. [15] Du Xinya, Shao Junru, and Cardie Claire. 2017. Learning to ask: Neural question generation for reading comprehension. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 13421352.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. [16] Duan Nan, Tang Duyu, Chen Peng, and Zhou Ming. 2017. Question generation for question answering. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 866874.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. [17] Gao Chongming, Lei Wenqiang, He Xiangnan, Rijke Maarten de, and Chua Tat-Seng. 2021. Advances and challenges in conversational recommender systems: A survey. AI Open 2 (July2021), 100126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. [18] Gao Yifan, Li Piji, King Irwin, and Lyu Michael R.. 2019. Interconnected question generation with coreference alignment and conversation flow modeling. In Proceedings of the 57th Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 48534862.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. [19] Hu Wenpeng, Liu Bing, Ma Jinwen, Zhao Dongyan, and Yan Rui. 2018. Aspect-based question generation. In 6th International Conference on Learning Representations.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. [20] Huang Minlie, Zhu Xiaoyan, and Gao Jianfeng. 2020. Challenges in building intelligent open-domain dialog systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. (TOIS) 38, 3 (2020), 132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. [21] Kendall Alex, Gal Yarin, and Cipolla Roberto. 2018. Multi-task learning using uncertainty to weigh losses for scene geometry and semantics. In 2018 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 74827491.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. [22] Kiesel Johannes, Bahrami Arefeh, Stein Benno, Anand Avishek, and Hagen Matthias. 2018. Toward voice query clarification. In The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval. Association for Computing Machinery, 12571260.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. [23] Krasakis Antonios Minas, Aliannejadi Mohammad, Voskarides Nikos, and Kanoulas Evangelos. 2020. Analysing the effect of clarifying questions on document ranking in conversational search. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM SIGIR on International Conference on Theory of Information Retrieval. 129132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. [24] Lan Tian, Mao Xianling, Wei Wei, Gao Xiaoyan, and Huang Heyan. 2020. PONE: A novel automatic evaluation metric for open-domain generative dialogue systems. CoRR abs/2004.02399 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. [25] Lei Wenqiang, He Xiangnan, Miao Yisong, Wu Qingyun, Hong Richang, Kan Min-Yen, and Chua Tat-Seng. 2020. Estimation-action-reflection: Towards deep interaction between conversational and recommender systems. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM’20). 304312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. [26] Li Jiwei, Galley Michel, Brockett Chris, Gao Jianfeng, and Dolan Bill. 2016. A diversity-promoting objective function for neural conversation models. In The 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 110119.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. [27] Li Jiwei, Miller Alexander H., Chopra Sumit, Ranzato Marc’Aurelio, and Weston Jason. 2017. Learning through dialogue interactions by asking questions. In 5th International Conference on Learning Representations.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. [28] Li Yanran, Su Hui, Shen Xiaoyu, Li Wenjie, Cao Ziqiang, and Niu Shuzi. 2017. DailyDialog: A manually labelled multi-turn dialogue dataset. In Proceedings of the E8th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing. 986995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. [29] Lin Chin-Yew and Hovy Eduard H.. 2003. Automatic evaluation of summaries using n-gram co-occurrence statistics. In Human Language Technology Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (HLT-NAACL’03).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. [30] Lin Tsung-Yi, Goyal Priya, Girshick Ross, He Kaiming, and Dollár Piotr. 2017. Focal loss for dense object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 29802988.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. [31] Ling Yanxiang, Cai Fei, Chen Honghui, and Rijke Maarten de. 2020. Leveraging context for neural question generation in open-domain dialogue systems. In WWW’20: The Web Conference 2020. 24862492.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. [32] Ling Yanxiang, Cai Fei, Hu Xuejun, Liu Jun, Chen Wanyu, and Chen Honghui. 2021. Context-controlled topic-aware neural response generation for open-domain dialog systems. Inf. Process. & Manage. 58, 1 (2021), 102392.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. [33] Liu Chia-Wei, Lowe Ryan, Serban Iulian Vlad, Noseworthy Mike, Charlin Laurent, and Pineau Joelle. 2016. How NOT to evaluate your dialogue system: An empirical study of unsupervised evaluation metrics for dialogue response generation. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 21222132.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. [34] Liu Xiaodong, He Pengcheng, Chen Weizhu, and Gao Jianfeng. 2019. Multi-task deep neural networks for natural language understanding. In Proceedings of the 57th Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Korhonen Anna, Traum David R., and Màrquez Lluís (Eds.). 44874496.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. [35] Lopez Luis Enrico, Cruz Diane Kathryn, Cruz Jan Christian Blaise, and Cheng Charibeth. 2020. Transformer-based end-to-end question generation. CoRR abs/2005.01107 (2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. [36] Mesgar Mohsen and Strube Michael. 2018. A neural local coherence model for text quality assessment. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 43284339.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. [37] Nakanishi Mao, Kobayashi Tetsunori, and Hayashi Yoshihiko. 2019. Towards answer-unaware conversational question generation. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Machine Reading for Question Answering (MRQA@EMNLP’19). 6371.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  38. [38] Pan Boyuan, Li Hao, Yao Ziyu, Cai Deng, and Sun Huan. 2019. Reinforced dynamic reasoning for conversational question generation. In Proceedings of the 57th Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 21142124.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. [39] Pan Liangming, Xie Yuxi, Feng Yansong, Chua Tat-Seng, and Kan Min-Yen. 2020. Semantic graphs for generating deep questions. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 14631475.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. [40] Papineni Kishore, Roukos Salim, Ward Todd, and Zhu Wei-Jing. 2002. BLEU: A method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 311318.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. [41] Radlinski Filip and Craswell Nick. 2017. A theoretical framework for conversational search. In Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Conference Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (CHIIR’17). 117126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. [42] Raffel Colin, Shazeer Noam, Roberts Adam, Lee Katherine, Narang Sharan, Matena Michael, Zhou Yanqi, Li Wei, and Liu Peter J.. 2019. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. CoRR abs/1910.10683 (2019).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. [43] Rashkin Hannah, Smith Eric Michael, Li Margaret, and Boureau Y-Lan. 2019. Towards empathetic open-domain conversation models: A new benchmark and dataset. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 53705381.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. [44] Ren Pengjie, Chen Zhumin, Ren Zhaochun, Kanoulas Evangelos, Monz Christof, and Rijke Maarten de. 2021. Conversations with search engines. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 30, 2 (2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. [45] Sepliarskaia Anna, Kiseleva Julia, Radlinski Filip, and Rijke Maarten de. 2018. Preference elicitation as an optimization problem. In RecSys 2018: The ACM Conference on Recommender Systems. ACM, 172180.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. [46] Serban Iulian Vlad, García-Durán Alberto, Gülçehre Çaglar, Ahn Sungjin, Chandar Sarath, Courville Aaron C., and Bengio Yoshua. 2016. Generating factoid questions with recurrent neural networks: The 30M factoid question-answer corpus. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  47. [47] Serban Iulian Vlad, Lowe Ryan, Henderson Peter, Charlin Laurent, and Pineau Joelle. 2018. A survey of available corpora for building data-driven dialogue systems: The journal version. Dialogue Discourse 9, 1 (2018), 149.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. [48] Serban Iulian V, Sordoni Alessandro, Bengio Yoshua, Courville Aaron, and Pineau Joelle. 2016. Building end-to-end dialogue systems using generative hierarchical neural network models. In Proceedings of the 30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 37763783.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. [49] Serban Iulian Vlad, Sordoni Alessandro, Lowe Ryan, Charlin Laurent, Pineau Joelle, Courville Aaron, and Bengio Yoshua. 2017. A hierarchical latent variable encoder-decoder model for generating dialogues. In Proceedings of the 31st AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 32953301.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. [50] Shang Lifeng, Lu Zhengdong, and Li Hang. 2015. Neural responding machine for short-text conversation. In Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing. 15771586.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  51. [51] Sordoni Alessandro, Galley Michel, Auli Michael, Brockett Chris, Ji Yangfeng, Mitchell Margaret, Nie Jian-Yun, Gao Jianfeng, and Dolan Bill. 2015. A neural network approach to context-sensitive generation of conversational responses. In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 196205.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  52. [52] Sun Xingwu, Liu Jing, Lyu Yajuan, He Wei, Ma Yanjun, and Wang Shi. 2018. Answer-focused and position-aware neural question generation. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 39303939.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. [53] Sutskever Ilya, Vinyals Oriol, and Le Quoc V.. 2014. Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks. In Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 31043112.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  54. [54] Tang Duyu, Duan Nan, Yan Zhao, Zhang Zhirui, Sun Yibo, Liu Shujie, Lv Yuanhua, and Zhou Ming. 2018. Learning to collaborate for question answering and asking. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Walker Marilyn A., Ji Heng, and Stent Amanda (Eds.). 15641574.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. [55] Thomas Paul, Czerwinski Mary, McDuff Daniel, Craswell Nick, and Mark Gloria. 2018. Style and alignment in information-seeking conversation. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval (CHIIR’18). 42—51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. [56] Trippas Johanne R., Spina Damiano, Cavedon Lawrence, Joho Hideo, and Sanderson Mark. 2018. Informing the design of spoken conversational search: Perspective paper. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Human Information Interaction & Retrieval (CHIIR’18). 3241.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. [57] Vakulenko Svitlana, Kanoulas Evangelos, and Rijke Maarten de. 2021. A large-scale analysis of mixed initiative in information-seeking dialogues for conversational search. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 39, 4 (August2021), Article 49.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. [58] Vakulenko Svitlana, Markov Ilya, and Rijke Maarten de. 2017. Conversational exploratory search via interactive storytelling. In 1st International Workshop on Search-Oriented Conversational AI.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. [59] Vakulenko Svitlana, Revoredo Kate, Ciccio Claudio Di, and Rijke Maarten de. 2019. QRFA: A data-driven model of information-seeking dialogues. In ECIR 2019: 41st European Conference on Information Retrieval. Springer, 541557.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  60. [60] Vakulenko Svitlana, Savenkov Vadim, and Rijke Maarten de. 2020. Conversational browsing. arXiv:2012.03704. https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.03704.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. [61] Wang Weichao, Feng Shi, Wang Daling, and Zhang Yifei. 2019. Answer-guided and semantic coherent question generation in open-domain conversation. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing. 50655075.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. [62] Wang Wenjie, Huang Minlie, Xu Xin-Shun, Shen Fumin, and Nie Liqiang. 2018. Chat more: Deepening and widening the chatting topic via a deep model. In The 41st International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval. 255264.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  63. [63] Wang Yansen, Liu Chenyi, Huang Minlie, and Nie Liqiang. 2018. Learning to ask questions in open-domain conversational systems with typed decoders. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 21932203.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. [64] Warrens Matthijs J.. 2021. Kappa coefficients for dichotomous-nominal classifications. Adv. Data Anal. Classif. 15, 1 (2021), 193208.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  65. [65] Wu Ho Chung, Luk Robert Wing Pong, Wong Kam Fai, and Kwok Kui Lam. 2008. Interpreting tf-idf term weights as making relevance decisions. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. (TOIS) 26, 3 (2008), 137.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  66. [66] Xing Chen, Wu Wei, Wu Yu, Liu Jie, Huang Yalou, Zhou Ming, and Ma Wei-Ying. 2017. Topic aware neural response generation. In Proceedings of the 31st AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 33513357.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. [67] Xing Chen, Wu Yu, Wu Wei, Huang Yalou, and Zhou Ming. 2018. Hierarchical recurrent attention network for response generation. In Proceedings of the 32nd AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 56105617.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. [68] Xu Jingjing, Wang Yuechen, Tang Duyu, Duan Nan, Yang Pengcheng, Zeng Qi, Zhou Ming, and Sun Xu. 2019. Asking clarification questions in knowledge-based question answering. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP’19). 16181629.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. [69] Xu Peng, Saghir Hamidreza, Kang Jin Sung, Long Teng, Bose Avishek Joey, Cao Yanshuai, and Cheung Jackie Chi Kit. 2019. A cross-domain transferable neural coherence model. In Proceedings of the 57th Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 678687.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  70. [70] Zamani Hamed, Dumais Susan, Craswell Nick, Bennett Paul, and Lueck Gord. 2020. Generating clarifying questions for information retrieval. In Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on World Wide Web(WWW’20).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  71. [71] Zhang Hainan, Lan Yanyan, Pang Liang, Guo Jiafeng, and Cheng Xueqi. 2019. ReCoSa: Detecting the relevant contexts with self-attention for multi-turn dialogue generation. In Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 37213730.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. [72] Zhang Houyu, Liu Zhenghao, Xiong Chenyan, and Liu Zhiyuan. 2020. Grounded conversation generation as guided traverses in commonsense knowledge graphs. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 20312043.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  73. [73] Zhang Saizheng, Dinan Emily, Urbanek Jack, Szlam Arthur, Kiela Douwe, and Weston Jason. 2018. Personalizing dialogue agents: I have a dog, do you have pets too?. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 22042213.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  74. [74] Zhang Tianyi, Kishore Varsha, Wu Felix, Weinberger Kilian Q., and Artzi Yoav. 2020. BERTScore: Evaluating text generation with BERT. In 8th International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR’20).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  75. [75] Zhang Yongfeng, Chen Xu, Ai Qingyao, Yang Liu, and Croft W. Bruce. 2018. Towards conversational search and recommendation: System ask, user respond. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management (CIKM’18). 177186.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  76. [76] Zhang Yizhe, Sun Siqi, Galley Michel, Chen Yen-Chun, Brockett Chris, Gao Xiang, Gao Jianfeng, Liu Jingjing, and Dolan Bill. 2020. DIALOGPT: Large-scale generative pre-training for conversational response generation. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations. 270278.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. [77] Zhao Tiancheng, Zhao Ran, and Eskenazi Maxine. 2017. Learning discourse-level diversity for neural dialog models using conditional variational autoencoders. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 654664.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  78. [78] Zhou Qingyu, Yang Nan, Wei Furu, Tan Chuanqi, Bao Hangbo, and Zhou Ming. 2017. Neural question generation from text: A preliminary study. In Natural Language Processing and Chinese Computing—6th CCF International Conference. 662671.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. [79] Zhou Wenjie, Zhang Minghua, and Wu Yunfang. 2019. Multi-task learning with language modeling for question generation. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, Inui Kentaro, Jiang Jing, Ng Vincent, and Wan Xiaojun (Eds.). 33923397.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  80. [80] Zhou Wenjie, Zhang Minghua, and Wu Yunfang. 2019. Question-type driven question generation. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing. 60316036.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Generating Relevant and Informative Questions for Open-Domain Conversations

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Information Systems
      ACM Transactions on Information Systems  Volume 41, Issue 1
      January 2023
      759 pages
      ISSN:1046-8188
      EISSN:1558-2868
      DOI:10.1145/3570137
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 9 January 2023
      • Online AM: 14 February 2022
      • Accepted: 6 January 2022
      • Revised: 2 October 2021
      • Received: 16 January 2021
      Published in tois Volume 41, Issue 1

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Full Text

    View this article in Full Text.

    View Full Text

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format .

    View HTML Format