skip to main content
10.1145/3512388.3512413acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicigpConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Anatomy-guided Multi-View Fusion Framework for Abdominal CT Multi-Organ Segmentation

Authors Info & Claims
Published:28 March 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Multi-organ segmentation from abdominal CT images plays a vital role in clinical practice. However, due to the low contrast of soft tissues in CT images and the significant differences in the shape and appearance of organs, this is a challenging task. In this paper, we propose a two-stage framework based on multi-view fusion to solve this challenge. Specifically, the first stage is to segment the organs in the original abdominal CT image quickly. Based on this, we introduce anatomical knowledge to robustly extract the image region of a single organ. Then, inspired by the clinician's image reading, the organ image blocks from three views are used as the input of the second stage network, and the features from different views are adaptively fused to output accurate segmentation results. We conduct extensive experiments on a public CT dataset, and the experimental results show that our method is accurate and robust to this challenging segmentation task.

References

  1. Van Ginneken B, Schaefer-Prokop C M, Prokop M. 2011. Computer-aided diagnosis: how to move from the laboratory to the clinic. Journal of Radiology, 261(3), 719-732. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11091710Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Wolz R, Chu C, Misawa K, 2013. Automated abdominal multi-organ segmentation with subject-specific atlas generation. Journal of IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 32(9), 1723-1730. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2013.2265805Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Yushkevich P A, Gao Y, Gerig G. 2016. ITK-SNAP: An interactive tool for semi-automatic segmentation of multi-modality biomedical images. 2016 38th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). IEEE, 3342-3345. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2016.7591443Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Wolz R, Chu C, Misawa K, 2012. Multi-organ abdominal CT segmentation using hierarchically weighted subject-specific atlases. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 10-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33415-3_2Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Cerrolaza J J, Reyes M, Summers R M, 2015. Automatic multi-resolution shape modeling of multi-organ structures. Journal of Medical image analysis, 25(1), 11-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2015.04.003Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Wang Y, Zhou Y, Shen W, 2019. Abdominal multi-organ segmentation with organ-attention networks and statistical fusion. Journal of Medical image analysis, 55: 88-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2019.04.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Gibson E, Giganti F, Hu Y, Bonmati E, Bandula S, Gurusamy K, Barratt D C, 2018. Automatic multi-organ segmentation on abdominal CT with dense V-networks. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 37(8), 1822-1834. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2018.2806309Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Liang X, Li N, Zhang Z, 2021. Incorporating the hybrid deformable model for improving the performance of abdominal CT segmentation via multi-scale feature fusion network. Journal of Medical Image Analysis, 73: 102156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2021.102156Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Shi G, Xiao L, Chen Y, 2021. Marginal loss and exclusion loss for partially supervised multi-organ segmentation. Journal of Medical Image Analysis, 70: 101979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2021.101979Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Fang X, Yan P. 2020. Multi-organ segmentation over partially labeled datasets with multi-scale feature abstraction. Journal of IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 39(11): 3619-3629. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2020.3001036Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Li X, Chen H, Qi X, 2018. H-DenseUNet: hybrid densely connected UNet for liver and tumor segmentation from CT volumes. Journal of IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 37(12): 2663-2674. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2018.2845918Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Lei Y, Fu Y, Wang T, 2020. Deep learning in multi-organ segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv: 2001.10619. https://arxiv.org/abs/2001.10619v1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. 2015. U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. International Conference on Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer, Cham, 234-241. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Landman B, Xu Z, Igelsias J, Styner M, Langerak T, Klein A. 2015. Miccai multi-atlas labeling beyond the cranial vault-workshop and challenge. In Proceedings of MICCAI Multi-Atlas Labeling Beyond Cranial Vault—Workshop Challenge. https://www.synapse.org/#!Synapse:syn3193805/wiki/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Zhang H, Goodfellow I, Metaxas D, 2019. Self-attention generative adversarial networks. International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 7354-7363. https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.08318v2Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Paszke A, Gross S, Chintala S, 2017. Automatic differentiation in pytorch. https://openreview.net/forum?id=BJJsrmfCZGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Çiçek Ö, Abdulkadir A, Lienkamp S S, 2016. 3D U-Net: learning dense volumetric segmentation from sparse annotation. International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer, Cham, 424-432. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46723-8_49Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Kumar H, DeSouza S V, Petrov M S. 2019. Automated pancreas segmentation from computed tomography and magnetic resonance images: a systematic review. Journal of Computer methods and programs in biomedicine, 178: 319-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.07.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Roth H R, Oda H, Hayashi Y, 2017. Hierarchical 3D fully convolutional networks for multi-organ segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.06382. https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.06382Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Zhou Y, Xie L, Shen W, 2017. A fixed-point model for pancreas segmentation in abdominal CT scans. International conference on medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention. Springer, Cham, 693-701. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66182-7_79Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICIGP '22: Proceedings of the 2022 5th International Conference on Image and Graphics Processing
    January 2022
    391 pages
    ISBN:9781450395465
    DOI:10.1145/3512388

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 28 March 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)43
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format