skip to main content
10.1145/3512676.3512685acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesiccmbConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Blockchain Technology in Post-Covid Agriculture

Published:28 March 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The Covid-19 pandemic poses great challenges to the resilience of global agriculture in response to disasters or crises. The pandemic mitigation measures prevent the spread of coronavirus but bring disruptions to the agriculture sector. Smallholder farmers and small agricultural producer particularly showed their vulnerability to these disruptions amid the pandemic. Technology innovations can be adopted to develop resilient, flexible and inclusive agriculture. Blockchain enables autonomous and decentralized coordination of trust in a distributed network without any trusted third-party intermediaries that can vastly reduce the transaction costs of exchange and trade. This paper examines the viable applications of blockchain technology in enhancing the resilience of agriculture and the food supply chain, facilitating trades and financing, and driving value allocation from a perspective of institutional economics.

References

  1. Maria Nicola, Zaid Alsafi, Catrin Sohrabi, Ahmed Kerwan, Ahmed Al-Jabir, Christos Iosifidis, Maliha Agha, and Riaz Agha. 2020. The socio-economic implications of the coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19): A review. Int. J. Surg 78 (June 2020), 185-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.04.018Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Emma C. Stephens, Guillaume Martin, Mark van Wijk, Jagadish Timsina, and Val Snow. 2020. Impacts of COVID-19 on agricultural and food systems worldwide and on progress to the sustainable development goals. Agric. Syst 183 (August 2020), 102873. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102873Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. OECD. 2020. COVID-19 and the Food and Agriculture Sector: Issues and Policy Responses. OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19). Retrieved January 18, 2021 from https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/covid-19-and-the-food-and-agriculture-sector-issues-and-policy-responses-a23f764b/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Sinclair Davidson, Primavera De Filippi, and Jason Potts. 2016. Disrupting governance: The new institutional economics of distributed ledger technology. SSRN (July 2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2811995Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Oliver E. Williamson. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. The Free Press. New York, USA; London, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Guoqing Zhao, Shaofeng Liu, Carmen Lopez, Haiyan Lu, Sebastian Elguet, Huilan Chen, Biljana M. Boshkoska. 2019. Blockchain technology in agri-food value chain management: A synthesis of applications, challenges and future research directions. Comput Ind 109 (August 2019), 83-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2019.04.002Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Juri Mattila, and Timo Seppälä. 2018. Distributed governance in multi-sided platforms: A conceptual framework from case: Bitcoin. Collaborative Value Co-creation in the Platform Economy. Translational Systems Sciences, vol 11. Springer, Singapore.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Girma Gebresenbet, and Techane Bosona. 2012. Logistics and supply chains in agriculture and food. Pathways to Supply Chain Excellence, Ales Groznik and Yu Xiong, IntechOpen, https://doi.org/10.5772/25907.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Richard J. Sexton, and Tian Xia. 2018. Increasing concentration in the agricultural supply chain: implications for market power and sector performance. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ 10 (October 2018), 229-251. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100517-023312Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Jill E. Hobbs. 2020. Food supply chains during the COVID-19 pandemic. Can. J. Agric. Econ 68 (April 2020), 171-176. https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12237Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. FAO. 2020. Urban food systems and COVID-19: The role of cities and local governments in responding to the emergency. Retrieved 18 January, 2021 from https://www.fao.org/3/ca8600en/CA8600EN.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Evagelos D. Liouta, and Chrysanthi Charatsari. 2021. Enhancing the ability of agriculture to cope with major crises or disasters: What the experience of COVID-19 teaches us. Agric. Syst 187 (Feburary 2021), 103023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.103023Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Christian Catalini, and Joshua S. Gans. 2020. Some simple economics of the blockchain. Commun. ACM 63, 7 (July 2020), 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359552Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Miguel P. Caro, Muhammad S. Ali, Massimo Vecchio, Raffaele Giaffreda. 2018. Blockchain-based traceability in agri-food supply chain management: a practical implementation. 2018 IoT Vertical and Topical Summit on Agriculture - Tuscany (IOT Tuscany), 2018, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1109/IOT-TUSCANY.2018.8373021Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Henry M. Kim, and Marek Laskowski. 2017 Agriculture on the blockchain: Sustainable solutions for food, farmers, and financing. SSRN Working Paper (December 2017). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3028164Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Darcy W. E. Allen, Alastair Berg, and Brendan Markey-Towler. 2019. Blockchain and supply chains: V-form organisations, value redistributions, de-commoditisation and quality proxies. Journal of the British Blockchain Association 2, 1 (Feburary 2019), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.31585/jbba-2-1-(3)2019Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Kenneth A. Dahlberg. 2008. Pursuing long-term food and agricultural security in the United States: Decentralization, diversification, and reduction of resource intensity. In: Food and the Mid-Level Farm: Renewing an Agriculture of the Middle. MIT Press. Massachusetts, USA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Duc-Hiep Nguyen, Nguyen Huynh Tuong, and Hoang-Anh Pham. 2020. Blockchain-based farming activities tracker for enhancing trust in the community supported agriculture model. 2020 International Conference on Information and Communication Technology Convergence (ICTC), 2020, 737-740, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTC49870.2020.9289297Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. FAO. 2020. COVID-19 and smallholder producers’ access to markets. Retrieved 18 January, 2021 from https://www.fao.org/3/ca8657en/CA8657EN.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Christopher B. Barrett. 2008. Smallholder market participation: concepts and evidence from eastern and southern Africa. Food Policy 33, 4 (August 2008), 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.10.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Lan Ge, Christopher Brewster, Jacco Spek, Anton Smeenk; Jan Top, Frans van Diepen, Bob Klaase, Conny Graumans, Marieke de Ruyter de Wildt. 2017. Blockchain for agriculture and food: findings from the pilot study. Wageningen Economic Research report No. 2017-112. Wageningen Economic Research, Wageningen.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Jun Lin, Zhiqi Shen, Anting Zhang, and Yueting Chai. 2018. Blockchain and IoT based Food Traceability for Smart Agriculture. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Crowd Science and Engineering (ICCSE'18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 3, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3265689.3265692Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Mischa Tripoli, and Josef Schmidhuber. 2018. Emerging opportunities for the application of blockchain in the agri-food industry. Retrieved 18 January, 2021 from https://www.fao.org/3/CA1335EN/ca1335en.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Nigel Poole. 2017. Smallholder Agriculture and Market Participation. Practical Action Publishing. Warwickshire, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Achim Walter, Robert Finger, Robert Huber, and Nina Buchmann. 2017. Smart farming is key to developing sustainable agriculture. PNAS 114, 24 (June 2017), 6148-6150. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1707462114Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. George A. Aherlof. 1970. The market for 'lemons': quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Q. J. Econ. 84, 3 (1970), 488-500. https://doi.org/10.2307/1879431Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Kyungmin Kim. 2012. Endogenous market segmentation for lemons. Rand J Econ 43, 3 (October 2012), 562-576. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2012.00186.xGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Blockchain Technology in Post-Covid Agriculture
      Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        ICCMB '22: Proceedings of the 2022 5th International Conference on Computers in Management and Business
        January 2022
        219 pages
        ISBN:9781450387422
        DOI:10.1145/3512676

        Copyright © 2022 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 28 March 2022

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format