skip to main content
10.1145/3517031.3531629acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesetraConference Proceedingsconference-collections
abstract

Saliency Methods Analysis for Paintings

Published:08 June 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

The topic of visual saliency is well-known and spreads across numerous disciplines. In this paper, we examine how saliency models perform on images with specific characteristics. We explore a saliency of 14 different digitized paintings, all representing a biblical scene of The Last Supper. We evaluate the performance of different saliency models. The models are using the traditional approach as well as the deep learning approach. For the evaluation, we use three different metrics, AUC, NSS and CC. As ground truth, we use eye-tracking data from 35 participants. Our analysis shows that deep-learning methods predict the most salient parts of the paintings very similar to real eye fixations. We also checked the consistency of gaze patterns among the participants.

References

  1. 2018. ARTstor. http://www.artstor.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2018. prometheus. https://prometheus-bildarchiv.deGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. A. Borji and L. Itti. 2012. State-of-the-art in visual attention modeling. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 35, 1(2012), 185–207.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. A. Borji, H. R Tavakoli, D. N. Sihite, and L. Itti. 2013. Analysis of scores, datasets, and models in visual saliency prediction. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision. 921–928.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. G. T. Buswell. 1935. How people look at pictures: a study of the psychology and perception in art. Univ. Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Z. Bylinskii, T. Judd, A. Oliva, A. Torralba, and F. Durand. 2018. What do different evaluation metrics tell us about saliency models?IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence 41, 3(2018), 740–757.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. M. Cacciola, G. Occhiuto, and F. C. Morabito. 2013. Artistic complexity and saliency: Two faces of the same coin?International Journal of Information Acquisition 9, 02(2013), 1350010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. M. Cornia, L. Baraldi, G. Serra, and R. Cucchiara. 2018. Predicting human eye fixations via an lstm-based saliency attentive model. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 27, 10 (2018), 5142–5154.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. I. Fuchs, U. Ansorge, Ch. Redies, and H. Leder. 2011. Salience in paintings: bottom-up influences on eye fixations. Cognitive Computation 3, 1 (2011), 25–36.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. L. Itti, C. Koch, and E. Niebur. 1998. A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 20, 11 (Nov 1998), 1254–1259.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. T. N. Vikram, M. Tscherepanow, and B. Wrede. 2011. A random center surround bottom up visual attention model useful for salient region detection. In 2011 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV). IEEE, 166–173.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format