ABSTRACT
In the process of CT scanning, multi-angle projection data needs to be obtained from a large number of projection actions, which makes the scanned individual bear the risk of high radiation exposure. In order to solve such problems, the use of sparse projection data for CT image reconstruction is proposed as a new type of solution. The previous research can obtain good quality reconstructed images when the projection data is sparse by using the CT reconstruction technology based on the nonlinear sparsity transformation of compressed sensing. However, the heavy time loading of the image reconstruction is a practical problem that needs to be solved urgently. This study optimizes the non-linear filtering process of the regularization term of the original scheme, and proposes a novel method which replaces the original non-linear filter with a low-pass frequency domain filter. This strategy effectively utilizes the properties of low-pass frequency domain filtering in image processing. The excellent properties include high efficiency and low time complexity for image smoothing. The simulation experiment results show that in the process of CT image reconstruction using compressed sensing algorithm, the low-pass frequency domain filtering of the new scheme can greatly reduce the required time in the reconstruction of sparse projection data, and the image quality is feasibly guaranteed.
- GONZáLEZ A, DARBY S. 2004, Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries [J]. Lancet, 363(9424): 345-51.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cardis, E. 2005, Risk Of Cancer After Low Doses Of Ionising Radiation: Retrospective Cohort Study In 15 Countries [J]. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 331(7508): 77.Google ScholarCross Ref
- GUJRAL D. 2013, Cancer risk in 680 000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians [J]. BMJ (online), 346.Google Scholar
- SODICKSON, A. 2013, CT radiation risks coming into clearer focus [J]. Bmj, 346(may21 1): f3102.Google Scholar
- A D M S P, A J A S, C M P L, 2012, Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study - ScienceDirect [J]. Lancet, 380(9840): 499-505.Google ScholarCross Ref
- SODICKSON, AARON. Strategies for Reducing Radiation Exposure in Multi-Detector Row CT [J]. 2012, Radiologic Clinics of North America, 50(1): 1-14.Google ScholarCross Ref
- DONOHO D L. 2006, Compressed sensing [J]. IEEE Transactions on information theory, 52(4): 1289-306.Google ScholarDigital Library
- GRAFF C G, SIDKY E Y. 2015, Compressive sensing in medical imaging [J]. Applied optics, 54(8): C23-C44.Google Scholar
- TANG J, NETT B E, CHEN G-H. 2009, Performance comparison between total variation (TV)-based compressed sensing and statistical iterative reconstruction algorithms [J]. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 54(19): 5781.Google ScholarCross Ref
- RUDIN L I, OSHER S, FATEMI E. 1992, Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms [J]. Physica D: nonlinear phenomena, 60(1-4): 259-68.Google Scholar
- SIDKY E Y, PAN X. 2008, Image reconstruction in circular cone-beam computed tomography by constrained, total-variation minimization [J]. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 53(17): 4777.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chen Q, Lu H, Yu G, 2016, A CT Local Reconstruction Algorithm Based on Prior Image and Compressed Sensing [J]. Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics, 28(4): 632-636.Google Scholar
- DONG J, KUDO H. 2016, Proposal of compressed sensing using nonlinear sparsifying transform for CT image reconstruction [J]. Med Imag Tech, 34: 235-244.Google Scholar
- DONG J, KUDO H. 2017, Accelerated algorithm for compressed sensing using nonlinear sparsifying transform in CT image reconstruction [J]. Med Imag Tech, 35: 63-73.Google Scholar
- MAKANDAR A, HALALLI B. 2015, Image enhancement techniques using highpass and lowpass filters [J]. International Journal of Computer Applications, 109(14): 12-5.Google ScholarCross Ref
- SIDKY E Y, JøRGENSEN J H, PAN X. 2012, Convex optimization problem prototyping for image reconstruction in computed tomography with the Chambolle–Pock algorithm [J]. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 57(10): 3065.Google ScholarCross Ref
- ELAD M. Sparse and redundant representations: from theory to applications in signal and image processing [M]. Springer Science & Business Media, 2010.Google ScholarCross Ref
Recommendations
A fast-iterative reconstruction algorithm for sparse angle CT based on compressed sensing
AbstractWhen conducting computed tomography (CT) image reconstruction, the existing algorithms do not analyze the physical and mathematical bases of CT image reconstruction, which leads to the lack of detailed information of reconstructed ...
Highlights- Compressed sensing theory is applied for fast-iterative CT reconstruction.
- The ...
A generalized l1 greedy algorithm for image reconstruction in CT
The sparse vector solutions for an underdetermined system of linear equations Ax=b have many applications in signal recovery and image reconstruction in tomography. Under certain conditions, the sparsest solution can be found by solving a constrained l"...
Image reconstruction based on compressed sensing for sparse-data endoscopic photoacoustic tomography
AbstractEndoscopic photoacoustic tomography (EPAT) is an interventional application of photoacoustic tomography (PAT) to visualize anatomical features and functional components of biological cavity structures such as nasal cavity, digestive ...
Comments