skip to main content
10.1145/3517077.3517089acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicmipConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Frequency Domain Filtering Based Compressed Sensing Applied on Sparse-angle CT Image Reconstruction

Authors Info & Claims
Published:22 May 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

In the process of CT scanning, multi-angle projection data needs to be obtained from a large number of projection actions, which makes the scanned individual bear the risk of high radiation exposure. In order to solve such problems, the use of sparse projection data for CT image reconstruction is proposed as a new type of solution. The previous research can obtain good quality reconstructed images when the projection data is sparse by using the CT reconstruction technology based on the nonlinear sparsity transformation of compressed sensing. However, the heavy time loading of the image reconstruction is a practical problem that needs to be solved urgently. This study optimizes the non-linear filtering process of the regularization term of the original scheme, and proposes a novel method which replaces the original non-linear filter with a low-pass frequency domain filter. This strategy effectively utilizes the properties of low-pass frequency domain filtering in image processing. The excellent properties include high efficiency and low time complexity for image smoothing. The simulation experiment results show that in the process of CT image reconstruction using compressed sensing algorithm, the low-pass frequency domain filtering of the new scheme can greatly reduce the required time in the reconstruction of sparse projection data, and the image quality is feasibly guaranteed.

References

  1. GONZáLEZ A, DARBY S. 2004, Risk of cancer from diagnostic X-rays: estimates for the UK and 14 other countries [J]. Lancet, 363(9424): 345-51.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Cardis, E. 2005, Risk Of Cancer After Low Doses Of Ionising Radiation: Retrospective Cohort Study In 15 Countries [J]. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 331(7508): 77.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. GUJRAL D. 2013, Cancer risk in 680 000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians [J]. BMJ (online), 346.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. SODICKSON, A. 2013, CT radiation risks coming into clearer focus [J]. Bmj, 346(may21 1): f3102.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. A D M S P, A J A S, C M P L, 2012, Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study - ScienceDirect [J]. Lancet, 380(9840): 499-505.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. SODICKSON, AARON. Strategies for Reducing Radiation Exposure in Multi-Detector Row CT [J]. 2012, Radiologic Clinics of North America, 50(1): 1-14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. DONOHO D L. 2006, Compressed sensing [J]. IEEE Transactions on information theory, 52(4): 1289-306.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. GRAFF C G, SIDKY E Y. 2015, Compressive sensing in medical imaging [J]. Applied optics, 54(8): C23-C44.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. TANG J, NETT B E, CHEN G-H. 2009, Performance comparison between total variation (TV)-based compressed sensing and statistical iterative reconstruction algorithms [J]. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 54(19): 5781.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. RUDIN L I, OSHER S, FATEMI E. 1992, Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms [J]. Physica D: nonlinear phenomena, 60(1-4): 259-68.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. SIDKY E Y, PAN X. 2008, Image reconstruction in circular cone-beam computed tomography by constrained, total-variation minimization [J]. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 53(17): 4777.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Chen Q, Lu H, Yu G, 2016, A CT Local Reconstruction Algorithm Based on Prior Image and Compressed Sensing [J]. Journal of Computer-Aided Design & Computer Graphics, 28(4): 632-636.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. DONG J, KUDO H. 2016, Proposal of compressed sensing using nonlinear sparsifying transform for CT image reconstruction [J]. Med Imag Tech, 34: 235-244.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. DONG J, KUDO H. 2017, Accelerated algorithm for compressed sensing using nonlinear sparsifying transform in CT image reconstruction [J]. Med Imag Tech, 35: 63-73.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. MAKANDAR A, HALALLI B. 2015, Image enhancement techniques using highpass and lowpass filters [J]. International Journal of Computer Applications, 109(14): 12-5.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. SIDKY E Y, JøRGENSEN J H, PAN X. 2012, Convex optimization problem prototyping for image reconstruction in computed tomography with the Chambolle–Pock algorithm [J]. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 57(10): 3065.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. ELAD M. Sparse and redundant representations: from theory to applications in signal and image processing [M]. Springer Science & Business Media, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICMIP '22: Proceedings of the 2022 7th International Conference on Multimedia and Image Processing
    January 2022
    250 pages
    ISBN:9781450387408
    DOI:10.1145/3517077

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 22 May 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)11
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format