tutorial

Evolution of neural networks

Author:
Risto Miikkulainen

The University of Texas at Austin and Cognizant Al Labs

The University of Texas at Austin and Cognizant Al Labs
View Profile

GECCO '22: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference CompanionJuly 2022Pages 1020–1037https://doi.org/10.1145/3520304.3533656

Published:19 July 2022Publication History

GECCO '22: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion

Pages 1020–1037

References

A. Agogino, K. Tumer, and R. Miikkulainen, Efficient credit assignment through evaluation function decomposition, in: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (2005).Google ScholarDigital Library
A. Agrawal, J. Lu, S. Antol, M. Mitchell, C. L. Zitnick, D. Parikh, and D. Batra, Vqa: Visual question answering, International Journal of Computer Vision, 123(1):4--31 (2017).Google ScholarDigital Library
P. J. Angeline, G. M. Saunders, and J. B. Pollack, An evolutionary algorithm that constructs recurrent neural networks, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 5:54--65 (1994).Google ScholarDigital Library
R. K. Belew, Evolution, learning and culture: Computational metaphors for adaptive algorithms, Complex Systems, 4:11--49 (1990).Google Scholar
G. Bingham, W. Macke, and R. Miikkulainen, Evolutionary optimization of deep learning activation functions, in: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (2020).Google ScholarDigital Library
B. D. Bryant and R. Miikkulainen, Acquiring visibly intelligent behavior with example-guided neuroevolution, in: Proceedings of the Twenty-Second National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA (2007).Google ScholarDigital Library
D. J. Chalmers, The evolution of learning: An experiment in genetic connectionism, in: Touretzky et al.⁸⁸, 81--90.Google Scholar
D. B. D'Ambrosio and K. O. Stanley, A novel generative encoding for exploiting neural network sensor and output geometry, in: Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation (GECCO '07), 974--981, ACM, New York, NY, USA (2007).Google ScholarDigital Library
D. B. D'Ambrosio and K. O. Stanley, Generative encoding for multiagent learning, in: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (2008).Google ScholarDigital Library
K. Deb and C. Myburgh, A population-based fast algorithm for a billion-dimensional resource allocation problem with integer variablesbreaking the billion-variable barrier in real-world, European Journal of Operational Research, 261:460--474 (2017).Google ScholarCross Ref
X. Dong and Y. Yang, Nas-bench-201: Extending the scope of reproducible neural architecture search, in: 8th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2020, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, April 26--30, 2020, OpenReview.net (2020).Google Scholar
D. Floreano, P. Dürr, and C. Mattiussi, Neuroevolution: From architectures to learning, Evolutionary Intelligence, 1:47--62 (2008).Google ScholarCross Ref
D. Floreano and J. Urzelai, Evolutionary robots with on-line self-organization and behavioral fitness, Neural Networks, 13:431--4434 (2000).Google ScholarDigital Library
M. Fontaine and S. Nikolaidis, Differentiable quality diversity, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, M. Ranzato, A. Beygelzimer, Y. Dauphin, P. Liang, and J. W. Vaughan, eds., volume 34, 10040--10052, Curran Associates, Inc. (2021).Google Scholar
O. Francon, S. Gonzalez, B. Hodjat, E. Meyerson, R. Miikkulainen, X. Qiu, and H. Shahrzad, Effective reinforcement learning through evolutionary surrogate-assisted prescription, in: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2020), 814--822 (2020).Google ScholarDigital Library
B. Fullmer and R. Miikkulainen, Using marker-based genetic encoding of neural networks to evolve finite-state behaviour, in: Toward a Practice of Autonomous Systems: Proceedings of the First European Conference on Artificial Life, F. J. Varela and P. Bourgine, eds., 255--262, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1992).Google Scholar
J. J. Gauci and K. O. Stanley, A case study on the critical role of geometric regularity in machine learning, in: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA (2008).Google ScholarDigital Library
F. Gomez, Robust Non-Linear Control Through Neuroevolution, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin (2003).Google ScholarDigital Library
F. Gomez and R. Miikkulainen, Incremental evolution of complex general behavior, Adaptive Behavior, 5:317--342 (1997).Google ScholarDigital Library
F. Gomez, J. Schmidhuber, and R. Miikkulainen, Accelerated neural evolution through cooperatively coevolved synapses, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9:937--965 (2008).Google ScholarDigital Library
S. Gonzalez and R. Miikkulainen, Improved training speed, accuracy, and data utilization through loss function optimization, in: Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC) (2020).Google ScholarDigital Library
S. Gonzalez and R. Miikkulainen, Optimizing loss functions through multivariate taylor polynomial parameterization, in: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (2021).Google ScholarDigital Library
F. Gruau and D. Whitley, Adding learning to the cellular development of neural networks: Evolution and the Baldwin effect, Evolutionary Computation, 1:213--233 (1993).Google ScholarDigital Library
T. Hale, S. Webster, A. Petherick, T. Phillips, and B. Kira, Oxford COVID-19 government response tracker, Blavatnik School of Government (2020). https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/research/research-projects/coronavirus-government-response-tracker, accessed 5/26/2020.Google Scholar
H. Hoos, Programming by optimization, Communications of the ACM, 55:70--80 (2012).Google ScholarDigital Library
C. Igel, Neuroevolution for reinforcement learning using evolution strategies, in: Proceedings of the 2003 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, R. Sarker, R. Reynolds, H. Abbass, K. C. Tan, B. McKay, D. Essam, and T. Gedeon, eds., 2588--2595, IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ (2003).Google ScholarCross Ref
M. Jaderberg, V. Dalibard, S. Osindero, W. M. Czarnecki, J. Donahue, A. Razavi, O. Vinyals, T. Green, I. Dunning, K. Simonyan, C. Fernando, and K. Kavukcuoglu, Population based training of neural networks, arXiv:1711.09846 (2017).Google Scholar
A. Jain, A. Subramoney, and R. Miikkulainen, Task decomposition with neuroevolution in extended predator-prey domain, in: Proceedings of Thirteenth International Conference on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems, East Lansing, MI, USA (2012).Google ScholarCross Ref
B. M. Lake, R. Salakhutdinov, and J. B. Tenenbaum, Human-level concept learning through probabilistic program induction, Science, 350(6266):1332--1338 (2015).Google ScholarCross Ref
J. Lehman, J. Chen, J. Clune, and K. O. Stanley, ES is more than just a traditional finite-difference approximator, arXiv:1712.06568 (2017).Google Scholar
J. Lehman and K. O. Stanley, Abandoning objectives: Evolution through the search for novelty alone, Evolutionary Computation, 19:189--223 (2010).Google ScholarDigital Library
D. Lessin, D. Fussell, and R. Miikkulainen, Open-ended behavioral complexity for evolved virtual creatures, in: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (2013).Google ScholarDigital Library
D. Lessin, D. Fussell, and R. Miikkulainen, Trading control intelligence for physical intelligence: Muscle drives in evolved virtual creatures, in: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2014), Vancouver, BC, Canada (July 2014).Google ScholarDigital Library
X. Li and R. Miikkulainen, Evolving adaptive poker players for effective opponent exploitation, in: AAAI-17 Workshop on Computer Poker and Imperfect Information Games, San Francisco, CA, USA (2017).Google Scholar
J. Liang, S. Gonzalez, H. Shahrzad, and R. Miikkulainen, Regularized evolutionary population-based training, in: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (2021).Google ScholarDigital Library
J. Liang, E. Meyerson, B. Hodjat, D. Fink, K. Mutch, and R. Miikkulainen, Evolutionary neural AutoML for deep learning, in: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2019) (2019).Google ScholarDigital Library
J. Liang, E. Meyerson, and R. Miikkulainen, Evolutionary architecture search for deep multitask networks, in: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (2018).Google ScholarDigital Library
J. Z. Liang and R. Miikkulainen, Evolutionary bilevel optimization for complex control tasks, in: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2015), Madrid, Spain (July 2015).Google ScholarDigital Library
H. Liu, A. Brock, K. Simonyan, and Q. V. Le, Evolving normalization-activation layers, arXiv:2004.02967 (2020).Google Scholar
Y. Liu, X. Yao, and T. Higuchi, Evolutionary ensembles with negative correlation learning, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 4:380--387 (2000).Google ScholarDigital Library
A. Lockett and R. Miikkulainen, Neuroannealing: Martingale-driven learning for neural network, in: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (2013).Google ScholarDigital Library
P. McQuesten, Cultural Enhancement of Neuroevolution, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX (2002). Technical Report AI-02-295.Google Scholar
E. Meyerson, J. Lehman, and R. Miikkulainen, Learning behavior characterizations for novelty search, in: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2016), ACM, New York, NY (2016).Google ScholarDigital Library
E. Meyerson and R. Miikkulainen, Discovering evolutionary stepping stones through behavior domination, in: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2017), 139--146, Berlin, Germany (2017).Google ScholarDigital Library
E. Meyerson and R. Miikkulainen, Pseudo-task augmentation: From deep multitask learning to intratask sharing---and back, in: Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning (2018).Google Scholar
E. Meyerson and R. Miikkulainen, Modular universal reparameterization: Deep multi-task learning across diverse domains, in: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32, H. Wallach, H. Larochelle, A. Beygelzimer, F. d Alche-Buc, E. Fox, and R. Garnett, eds., Curran Associates, Inc. (2019).Google Scholar
E. Meyerson and R. Miikkulainen, The traveling observer model: Multi-task learning through spatial variable embeddings, in: International Conference on Learning Representations (2021).Google Scholar
E. Meyerson, X. Qiu, and R. Miikkulainen, Simple genetic operators are universal approximators of probability distributions (and other advantages of expressive encodings), in: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (2022).Google ScholarDigital Library
R. Miikkulainen, Creative AI through evolutionary computation, in: Evolution in Action: Past, Present and Future, W. Banzhaf, B. Cheng, K. Deb, K. Holekamp, R. E. Lenski, C. Ofria, R. Pennock, B. Punch, and D. Whittaker, eds., Springer, New York (2020).Google ScholarCross Ref
R. Miikkulainen, Neuroevolution, in: Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Science, 3rd Edition, D. Phung, C. Sammut, and G. I. Webb, eds., Springer, New York (in press).Google Scholar
R. Miikkulainen and S. Forrest, A biological perspective on evolutionary computation, Nature Machine Intelligence, 3:9--15 (2021).Google ScholarCross Ref
R. Miikkulainen, O. Francon, E. Meyerson, X. Qiu, D. Sargent, E. Canzani, and B. Hodjat, From prediction to prescription: Evolutionary optimization of non-pharmaceutical interventions in the COVID-19 pandemic, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 25:386--401 (2021).Google ScholarCross Ref
R. Miikkulainen, J. Liang, E. Meyerson, A. Rawal, D. Fink, O. Francon, B. Raju, H. Shahrzad, A. Navruzyan, N. Duffy, and B. Hodjat, Evolving deep neural networks, in: Artificial Intelligence in the Age of Neural Networks and Brain Computing, C. F. Morabito, C. Alippi, Y. Choe, and R. Kozma, eds., Elsevier, New York (2020).Google Scholar
R. Miikkulainen, E. Meyerson, X. Qiu, U. Sinha, R. Kumar, K. Hofmann, Y. M. Yan, M. Ye, J. Yang, D. Caiazza, and S. M. Brown, Evaluating medical aesthetics treatments through evolved age-estimation models, in: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (2021).Google ScholarDigital Library
E. Mjolsness, D. H. Sharp, and B. K. Alpert, Scaling, machine learning, and genetic neural nets, Advances in Applied Mathematics, 10:137--163 (1989).Google ScholarDigital Library
D. J. Montana and L. Davis, Training feedforward neural networks using genetic algorithms, in: Proceedings of the 11th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 762--767, San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann (1989).Google ScholarDigital Library
D. E. Moriarty and R. Miikkulainen, Forming neural networks through efficient and adaptive co-evolution, Evolutionary Computation, 5:373--399 (1997).Google ScholarDigital Library
S. Nolfi and D. Parisi, Good teaching inputs do not correspond to desired responses in ecological neural networks, Neural Processing Letters, 1(2):1--4 (1994).Google ScholarDigital Library
D. Pardoe, M. Ryoo, and R. Miikkulainen, Evolving neural network ensembles for control problems, in: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (2005).Google ScholarDigital Library
M. A. Potter and K. A. D. Jong, Cooperative coevolution: An architecture for evolving coadapted subcomponents, Evolutionary Computation, 8:1--29 (2000).Google ScholarDigital Library
J. K. Pugh, L. B. Soros, and K. O. Stanley, Quality diversity: A new frontier for evolutionary computation, Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 3 (2016).Google Scholar
A. Rawal, P. Rajagopalan, and R. Miikkulainen, Constructing competitive and cooperative agent behavior using coevolution, in: IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG 2010), Copenhagen, Denmark (2010).Google ScholarCross Ref
E. Real, A. Aggarwal, Y. Huang, and Q. V. Le, Regularized evolution for image classifier architecture search, in: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI (2019).Google ScholarDigital Library
E. Real, C. Liang, D. So, and Q. Le, AutoML-zero: Evolving machine learning algorithms from scratch, in: Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning, H. D. III and A. Singh, eds., volume 119, 8007--8019 (2020).Google Scholar
J. Reisinger and R. Miikkulainen, Acquiring evolvability through adaptive representations, in: Proceeedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, 1045--1052 (2007).Google ScholarDigital Library
J. Reisinger, K. O. Stanley, and R. Miikkulainen, Evolving reusable neural modules, in: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (2004).Google ScholarCross Ref
T. P. Runarsson and M. T. Jonsson, Evolution and design of distributed learning rules, in: Proceedings of The First IEEE Symposium on Combinations of Evolutionary Computation and Neural Networks, 59--63, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ (2000).Google ScholarCross Ref
T. Salimans, J. Ho, X. Chen, and I. Sutskever, Evolution strategies as a scalable alternative to reinforcement learning, arXiv:1703.03864 (2017).Google Scholar
J. D. Schaffer, D. Whitley, and L. J. Eshelman, Combinations of genetic algorithms and neural networks: A survey of the state of the art, in: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Combinations of Genetic Algorithms and Neural Networks, D. Whitley and J. Schaffer, eds., 1--37, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA (1992).Google ScholarCross Ref
M. Schmidt and H. Lipson, Distilling free-form natural laws from experimental data, Science, 324(5923):81--85 (2009).Google ScholarCross Ref
J. Schrum, I. Karpov, and R. Miikkulainen, Humanlike combat behavior via multiobjective neuroevolution, in: Believable Bots, P. Hingston, ed., Springer, New York (2012).Google Scholar
J. Schrum and R. Miikkulainen, Evolving agent behavior in multiobjective domains using fitness-based shaping, in: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (2010).Google ScholarDigital Library
J. Secretan, N. Beato, D. B. D'Ambrosio, A. Rodriguez, A. Campbell, J. T. Folsom-Kovarik, and K. O. Stanley, Picbreeder: A case study in collaborative evolutionary exploration of design space, Evolutionary Computation, 19:345--371 (2011).Google ScholarDigital Library
H. Shahrzad, B. Hodjat, C. Dolle, A. Denissov, S. Lau, D. Goodhew, J. Dyer, and R. Miikkulainen, Enhanced optimization with composite objectives and novelty pulsation, in: Genetic Programming Theory and Practice XVII, W. Banzhaf, E. Goodman, L. Sheneman, L. Trujillo, and B. Worzel, eds., 275--293, Springer, New York (2020).Google ScholarCross Ref
A. A. Siddiqi and S. M. Lucas, A comparison of matrix rewriting versus direct encoding for evolving neural networks, in: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation, 392--397, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ (1998).Google ScholarCross Ref
D. Silver, J. Schrittwieser, K. Simonyan, I. Antonoglou, A. Huang, A. Guez, T. Hubert, L. Baker, M. Lai, A. Bolton, Y. Chen, T. Lillicrap, F. Hui, L. Sifre, G. van den Driessche, T. Graepel, and D. Hassabis, Mastering the game of go without human knowledge, Nature, 550:354--359 (2017).Google ScholarCross Ref
K. Sims, Evolving 3D morphology and behavior by competition, in: Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on the Synthesis and Simulation of Living Systems (Artificial Life IV), R. A. Brooks and P. Maes, eds., 28--39, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA (1994).Google Scholar
K. O. Stanley, Efficient Evolution of Neural Networks Through Complexification, Ph.D. thesis, Department of Computer Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX (2003).Google ScholarDigital Library
K. O. Stanley, B. D. Bryant, and R. Miikkulainen, Evolving adaptive neural networks with and without adaptive synapses, in: Proceedings of the 2003 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ (2003).Google ScholarCross Ref
K. O. Stanley, J. Clune, J. Lehman, and R. Miikkulainen, Designing neural networks through evolutionary algorithms, Nature Machine Intelligence, 1:24--35 (2019).Google ScholarCross Ref
K. O. Stanley and J. Lehman, Why Greatness Cannot Be Planned: The Myth of the Objective, Springer, Berlin (2015).Google ScholarCross Ref
K. O. Stanley and R. Miikkulainen, Evolving Neural Networks Through Augmenting Topologies, Evolutionary Computation, 10:99--127 (2002).Google ScholarDigital Library
K. O. Stanley and R. Miikkulainen, A taxonomy for artificial embryogeny, Artificial Life, 9(2):93--130 (2003).Google ScholarDigital Library
D. G. Stork, S. Walker, M. Burns, and B. Jackson, Preadaptation in neural circuits, in: International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (Washington, DC), 202--205, IEEE, Piscataway, NJ (1990).Google Scholar
F. P. Such, V. Madhavan, E. Conti, J. Lehman, K. O. Stanley, and J. Clune, Deep neuroevolution: Genetic algorithms are a competitive alternative for training deep neural networks for reinforcement learning, arXiv:1712.06567 (2017).Google Scholar
C. Szegedy, W. Liu, Y. Jia, P. Sermanet, S. Reed, D. Anguelov, D. Erhan, V. Vanhoucke, and A. Rabinovich, Going deeper with convolutions, in: 2015 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 1--9 (2015).Google ScholarCross Ref
W. Tansey, E. Feasley, and R. Miikkulainen, Accelerating evolution via egalitarian social learning, in: Proceedings of the 14th Annual Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2012), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA (July 2012).Google ScholarDigital Library
D. S. Touretzky, J. L. Elman, T. J. Sejnowski, and G. E. Hinton, eds., Proceedings of the 1990 Connectionist Models Summer School, San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann (1990).Google Scholar
C. C. Tutum, S. Abdulquddos, and R. Miikkulainen, Generalization of agent behavior through explicit representation of context, in: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE Conference on Games (COG-2021) (2021).Google ScholarDigital Library
J. Urzelai, D. Floreano, M. Dorigo, and M. Colombetti, Incremental robot shaping, Connection Science, 10:341--360 (1998).Google ScholarCross Ref
V. K. Valsalam and R. Miikkulainen, Evolving symmetric and modular neural networks for distributed control, in: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO) 2009, 731--738, ACM, New York, NY, USA (2009).Google ScholarDigital Library
O. Vinyals, A. Toshev, S. Bengio, and D. Erhan, Show and tell: A neural image caption generator, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 3156--3164 (2015).Google ScholarCross Ref
R. Wang, J. Lehman, J. Clune, and K. O. Stanley, POET: open-ended coevolution of environments and their optimized solutions, in: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO 2019, Prague, Czech Republic, July 13--17, 2019, 142--151 (2019).Google ScholarDigital Library
S. Whiteson, N. Kohl, R. Miikkulainen, and P. Stone, Evolving keepaway soccer players through task decomposition, Machine Learning, 59:5--30 (2005).Google ScholarDigital Library
S. Whiteson and P. Stone, Evolutionary function approximation for reinforcement learning, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7:877--917 (2006).Google ScholarDigital Library
D. Whitley, S. Dominic, R. Das, and C. W. Anderson, Genetic reinforcement learning for neurocontrol problems, Machine Learning, 13:259--284 (1993).Google ScholarDigital Library
A. P. Wieland, Evolving controls for unstable systems, in: Touretzky et al.⁸⁸, 91--102.Google Scholar
X. Yao, Evolving artificial neural networks, Proceedings of the IEEE, 87(9):1423--1447 (1999).Google ScholarCross Ref
C. Ying, A. Klein, E. Christiansen, E. Real, K. Murphy, and F. Hutter, NAS-bench-101: Towards reproducible neural architecture search, in: Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, K. Chaudhuri and R. Salakhutdinov, eds., volume 97, 7105--7114 (2019).Google Scholar
A. Zela, J. N. Siems, L. Zimmer, J. Lukasik, M. Keuper, and F. Hutter, Surrogate NAS benchmarks: Going beyond the limited search spaces of tabular NAS benchmarks, in: International Conference on Learning Representations (2022).Google Scholar

Index Terms

Evolution of neural networks

Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

Recommendations

Efficient evolution of neural networks through complexification
Read More
Towards the evolution of multi-layered neural networks: a dynamic structured grammatical evolution approach
GECCO '17: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference

Current grammar-based NeuroEvolution approaches have several shortcomings. On the one hand, they do not allow the generation of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) composed of more than one hidden-layer. On the other, there is no way to evolve networks ...
Read More
The Training of Pi-Sigma Artificial Neural Networks with Differential Evolution Algorithm for Forecasting
Abstract
Looking at the artificial neural networks’ literature, most of the studies started with feedforward artificial neural networks and the training of many feedforward artificial neural networks models are performed with derivative-based algorithms ...
Read More

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Published in
GECCO '22: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion
July 2022
2395 pages
ISBN:9781450392686
DOI:10.1145/3520304
Editor:
Jonathan E. Fieldsend
University of Exeter
,
General Chair:
Markus Wagner
The University of Adelaide
Copyright © 2022 ACM
Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]
Sponsors
In-Cooperation
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
- Published: 19 July 2022
Permissions
Request permissions about this article.
Request Permissions

Check for updates
Qualifiers
- tutorial
Conference

Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate1,669of4,410submissions,38%
Upcoming Conference
GECCO '24

Sponsor:

sigevo

Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference

July 14 - 18, 2024

Melbourne , VIC , Australia
Funding Sources
Other Metrics
View Article Metrics

Article Metrics
- 0
  Total Citations
  View Citations
- 98
  Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)26
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1
Other Metrics
View Author Metrics
Cited By
This publication has not been cited yet

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Evolution of neural networks

GECCO '22: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion

References

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Efficient evolution of neural networks through complexification

Towards the evolution of multi-layered neural networks: a dynamic structured grammatical evolution approach

The Training of Pi-Sigma Artificial Neural Networks with Differential Evolution Algorithm for Forecasting

Comments

Login options

Full Access

Published in

Sponsors

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Publication History

Permissions

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Conference

Acceptance Rates

Upcoming Conference

Funding Sources

Other Metrics

Article Metrics

Other Metrics

Cited By

PDF Format

eReader

Digital Edition

Caption

Evolution of neural networks

GECCO '22: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion

References

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Efficient evolution of neural networks through complexification

Towards the evolution of multi-layered neural networks: a dynamic structured grammatical evolution approach

The Training of Pi-Sigma Artificial Neural Networks with Differential Evolution Algorithm for Forecasting

Comments

Login options

Full Access

Published in

Sponsors

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Publication History

Permissions

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Conference

Acceptance Rates

Upcoming Conference

Funding Sources

Article Metrics

Other Metrics

PDF Format

eReader

Digital Edition

Share this Publication link

Share on Social Media