skip to main content
10.1145/3529836.3529905acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicmlcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

An Improved Calibration Method for the Structured Light System Based on Self-correction of Reprojection Error

Authors Info & Claims
Published:21 June 2022Publication History

ABSTRACT

Structured light 3D reconstruction is widely applied in various fields. During the calibration process of structured light 3D reconstruction, it is very important to raise the calibration accuracy on the parameters of the structured light system. In this paper, we propose a method based on re-projection error self-correction to obtain more accurate corner positions by screening the re-projection error values of DMD images. Experimental results show that this method can improve the calibration accuracy by 64.17%. We also propose an effective standard for the placement of calibration plate, which is of great significance to reduce the number of iterations of the program. According to a series of experiments based on the above standard, the number of iterations of the proposed re-projection error self-correction method is no more than 5 times. It proves that the proposed self-correction method and placement standard are feasible, the calibration process of structured light 3D reconstruction is optimized, and its calibration efficiency is improved.  

References

  1. Song Z .Recent progresses on real-time 3D shape measurement using digital fringe projection techniques[J].Optics & Lasers in Engineering, 2010, 48(2):149-158.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Karpinsky N , Hoke M , Chen V , High-resolution, real-time three-dimensional shape measurement on graphics processing unit[J].Optical Engineering, 2014, 53(2):024105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Legarda-Sa′enz, Ricardo.Accurate procedure for the calibration of a structured light system[J].Optical Engineering, 2004, 43(2):464.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Song Z , Huang P S .Novel method for structured light system calibration[J].Optical Engineering, 2006, 45(8):083601.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. D Moreno, Taubin G .Simple, Accurate, and Robust Projector-Camera Calibration[C]// Second International Conference on 3d Imaging.IEEE, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Guo H , Xing S .Iterative calibration method for measurement system having lens distortions in fringe projection profilometry[J].Optics Express, 2019, 28(2).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Takeda M , Mutoh K .Fourier transform profilometry for the automatic measurement of 3-D object shapes[J].Appl Opt, 1983, 22(24):3977.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Srinivasan V , Liu H C , Halioua M .Automated phase-measuring profilometry of 3-D diffuse objects[J].Applied Optics, 1984, 23(18):3105.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Zuo C , Huang L , Zhang M , Temporal phase unwrapping algorithms for fringe projection profilometry: A comparative review[J].Optics & Lasers in Engineering, 2016, 85(oct.):84-103.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Jiang C , Song Z .Absolute three-dimensional shape measurement with two-frequency square binary patterns[J].Applied Optics, 2017, 56(31):8710.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Song Z , Huang P S .Phase error compensation for a 3-D shape measurement system based on the phase-shifting method[J].Optical Engineering, 2005, 46(6).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Song, Zhang, Shing-Tung, Generic nonsinusoidal phase error correction for three-dimensional shape measurement using a digital video projector.[J].Applied Optics, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Hu H , Gao J , Zhou H , A combined binary defocusing technique with multi-frequency phase error compensation in 3D shape measurement[J].Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 2020, 124(Jan.):105806.1-105806.10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Song Z , Jiang H , Lin H , A high dynamic range structured light means for the 3D measurement of specular surface[J].Optics and Lasers in Engineering, 2017, 95(AUG.):8-16.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Guo, Hongwei.Least-squares calibration method for fringe projection profilometry[J].Optical Engineering, 2005, 44(3):033603-033603-9.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Huang L , Chua P S , Asundi A .Least-squares calibration method for fringe projection profilometry considering camera lens distortion[J].Applied Optics, 2010, 49(9):1539.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. An improved projector calibration method for structured-light 3D measurement systems[J].Measurement Science and Technology, 2021, 32(7):075011 (9pp).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Li Z , Shi Y , Wang C , Accurate calibration method for a structured light system[J].Optical Engineering, 2008, 47(5):525-534.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Zhang Z .A Flexible New Technique for Camera Calibration[J].IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2000, 22(11):1330-1334.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Lourakis M I A .A Brief Description of the Levenberg-Marquardt Algorithm Implemened by levmar[J].foundation of research & technology, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Jun Y Z, Peng H, Jian Q, Head Pose Estimation Algorithm Based On Structured Light Three-Dimensional Reconstruction[J].Laser & Optoelectronics Progress,2020.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICMLC '22: Proceedings of the 2022 14th International Conference on Machine Learning and Computing
    February 2022
    570 pages
    ISBN:9781450395700
    DOI:10.1145/3529836

    Copyright © 2022 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 21 June 2022

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • research-article
    • Research
    • Refereed limited
  • Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)24
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

    Other Metrics

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format .

View HTML Format