skip to main content
10.1145/3544549.3573826acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

The Second Workshop on Intelligent and Interactive Writing Assistants

Published:19 April 2023Publication History

ABSTRACT

In recent years, writing assistants have become increasingly sophisticated and ubiquitous, fueled by advances in artificial intelligence, particularly large language models. As new use cases and models emerge, we expect the adoption rate to accelerate. In this interdisciplinary workshop, we, as a diverse group of researchers and practitioners interested in intelligent and interactive writing assistants, will create a taxonomy of writing assistants and discuss their desirable features and potential consequences. We invite writers, educators, researchers, industry practitioners, students, and anyone interested in creating, using, and testing future writing assistant technologies to join the conversation.

Footnotes

  1. 1 Examples of autocomplete systems: Apple iOS’s predictive text , Microsoft Word’s text predictions , Google Gmail’s smart compose

    Footnote
  2. 2 Examples of commercial tools for copywriting: Copy.ai , Copysmith , Jarvis ; for creative writing: AI Dungeon , Sudowrite Rytr , QuillBot , Writesonic

    Footnote
  3. 3 Examples of texts co-authored with AI: Ghosts (Best American 2022 Selection) , Nothing Breaks Like A.I. Heart (An essay about artificial intelligence, emotional intelligence, and finding an ending)

    Footnote
  4. 4 https://hai-gen2021.github.io/

    Footnote
  5. 5 https://ctrlgenworkshop.github.io/

    Footnote
  6. 6 Please refer to the https://chi2023.acm.org/for-attendees/chi2023-accessibility-faq/ for general accessibility questions.

    Footnote
  7. 7 https://sigchi.org/conferences/author-resources/accessibility-guide/

    Footnote
  8. 8 https://chi2023.acm.org/submission-guides/chi-publication-formats/

    Footnote

References

  1. Karen A Baikie and Kay Wilhelm. 2005. Emotional and physical health benefits of expressive writing. Advances in psychiatric treatment 11, 5 (2005), 338–346.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Robert L Bangert-Drowns, Marlene M Hurley, and Barbara Wilkinson. 2004. The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Review of educational research 74, 1 (2004), 29–58.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Rishi Bommasani, Drew A. Hudson, Ehsan Adeli, Russ Altman, Simran Arora, Sydney von Arx, Michael S. Bernstein, Jeannette Bohg, Antoine Bosselut, Emma Brunskill, Erik Brynjolfsson, Shyamal Buch, Dallas Card, Rodrigo Castellon, Niladri Chatterji, Annie Chen, Kathleen Creel, Jared Quincy Davis, Dorottya Demszky, Chris Donahue, Moussa Doumbouya, Esin Durmus, Stefano Ermon, John Etchemendy, Kawin Ethayarajh, Li Fei-Fei, Chelsea Finn, Trevor Gale, Lauren Gillespie, Karan Goel, Noah Goodman, Shelby Grossman, Neel Guha, Tatsunori Hashimoto, Peter Henderson, John Hewitt, Daniel E. Ho, Jenny Hong, Kyle Hsu, Jing Huang, Thomas Icard, Saahil Jain, Dan Jurafsky, Pratyusha Kalluri, Siddharth Karamcheti, Geoff Keeling, Fereshte Khani, Omar Khattab, Pang Wei Koh, Mark Krass, Ranjay Krishna, Rohith Kuditipudi, Ananya Kumar, Faisal Ladhak, Mina Lee, Tony Lee, Jure Leskovec, Isabelle Levent, Xiang Lisa Li, Xuechen Li, Tengyu Ma, Ali Malik, Christopher D. Manning, Suvir Mirchandani, Eric Mitchell, Zanele Munyikwa, Suraj Nair, Avanika Narayan, Deepak Narayanan, Ben Newman, Allen Nie, Juan Carlos Niebles, Hamed Nilforoshan, Julian Nyarko, Giray Ogut, Laurel Orr, Isabel Papadimitriou, Joon Sung Park, Chris Piech, Eva Portelance, Christopher Potts, Aditi Raghunathan, Rob Reich, Hongyu Ren, Frieda Rong, Yusuf Roohani, Camilo Ruiz, Jack Ryan, Christopher Ré, Dorsa Sadigh, Shiori Sagawa, Keshav Santhanam, Andy Shih, Krishnan Srinivasan, Alex Tamkin, Rohan Taori, Armin W. Thomas, Florian Tramèr, Rose E. Wang, William Wang, Bohan Wu, Jiajun Wu, Yuhuai Wu, Sang Michael Xie, Michihiro Yasunaga, Jiaxuan You, Matei Zaharia, Michael Zhang, Tianyi Zhang, Xikun Zhang, Yuhui Zhang, Lucia Zheng, Kaitlyn Zhou, and Percy Liang. 2021. On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07258(2021).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel M. Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter, Christopher Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, and Dario Amodei. 2020. Language Models are Few-Shot Learners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.14165(2020).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Steve Graham, Amy Gillespie, and Debra McKeown. 2013. Writing: Importance, development, and instruction. Reading and writing 26, 1 (2013), 1–15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Laura A King. 2001. The health benefits of writing about life goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27, 7 (2001), 798–807.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Mina Lee, Percy Liang, and Qian Yang. 2022. CoAuthor: Designing a Human-AI Collaborative Writing Dataset for Exploring Language Model Capabilities. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 388, 19 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502030Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Opher Lieber, Or Sharir, Barak Lenz, and Yoav Shoham. 2021. Jurassic-1: Technical details and evaluation. White Paper, AI21 Labs(2021). https://uploads-ssl.webflow.com/60fd4503684b466578c0d307/61138924626a6981ee09caf6_jurassic_tech_paper.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Thiemo Wambsganss, Christina Niklaus, Matthias Cetto, Matthias Söllner, Siegfried Handschuh, and Jan Marco Leimeister. 2020. AL: An Adaptive Learning Support System for Argumentation Skills. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376732Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The Second Workshop on Intelligent and Interactive Writing Assistants

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Article Metrics

        • Downloads (Last 12 months)194
        • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)16

        Other Metrics

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Full Text

      View this article in Full Text.

      View Full Text

      HTML Format

      View this article in HTML Format .

      View HTML Format